Khurshid comes to PC defence amid row over INDIA future
Chidambaram made the remarks during the launch of 'Contesting democratic deficit: An inside story of the 2024 elections,' by Congress leader Salman Khurshid and Mritunjay Singh Yadav. Speaking to this paper, Khurshid said that Chidambaram is a valuable colleague and a deep thinking person. 'So I don't think that we should take something out of context about what he has said and look at his basic approach and sentiment. I think that's important,' he said.
On the future of the INDIA bloc, he said that parties have to work carefully and slowly build upon it.
'We have the experience of the past few months. Now what we need to do is to use that experience to build upon the future. But an alliance is not easy. It takes a lot of effort, and we all need to put in that effort and be willing to make the sacrifices that are necessary,' he said.
In his book, Khurshid also writes that the alliance partners must find ways to work together even in the state elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
10 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Kerala urges Supreme Court to dismiss president's reference about timelines for bills assent
The Kerala government on Monday urged the Supreme Court to return unanswered the presidential reference that seeks clarity on whether courts can impose timelines on the president and the governors to act on bills passed by legislatures, Live Law reported. In its application, the state argued that the reference was an attempt to reopen and overturn the Supreme Court's April ruling in Tamil Nadu government's case against the governor. On July 22, the court issued notice to the Union government and all states on the reference made by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143 of the Constitution. According to Article 143 of the Constitution, the president may refer any question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its opinion. The president makes such a reference based on the advice of the Union council of ministers. In May, referencing 14 questions, Murmu asked whether the actions of governors and the president could be tried in court and whether such timelines could be imposed on them in the absence of any such provision in the law. The president also said that Article 200 and Article 201 of the Constitution do not prescribe deadlines or specific procedural requirements. In light of the reference, the Supreme Court set up a Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice BR Gavai, and Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar. In its application on Monday, Kerala argued that the reference was based on an 'erroneous statement' that Article 200 does not stipulate a time frame for governors to act on bills, Live Law reported. The state said that 11 out of the 14 questions raised by the president had already been addressed in the Supreme Court's ruling in the Tamil Nadu case. It alleged that the reference was a 'serious misuse' of Article 143, the legal news outlet reported. Kerala also said that the Union government had not filed a review or curative petition against the April judgement and had therefore accepted it. SC's ruling on Tamil Nadu versus governor The ruling on April 8 had come on a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government after Governor RN Ravi did not act on several bills for more than three years before rejecting them and sending some to the president. In its judgement, the court held that governors must decide on bills within a reasonable time and cannot delay indefinitely under Article 200. Similarly, it said that the president must act within three months under Article 201, and any delay beyond that must be explained and communicated to the state government. Both sections outline the process of assent to bills by governors and the president. The judgement had also introduced the concept of ' deemed assent ' in cases of prolonged inaction by the governor or president, allowing pending bills to be considered approved.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Lok Sabha adjourned till 1 pm amid Opposition protests on Bihar's SIR
The Lok Sabha was adjourned till 1 pm on Monday amid opposition protests on revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, delaying the start of the discussion on Operation Sindoor. Opposition members were in the well of the Lok Sabha, raising slogans on the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, when the House reconvened at noon for the discussion on Operation Sindoor. "There is something called commitment. Leaders of all parties had sought a discussion on Operation Sindoor and now you are in the well of the House raising other issues," Speaker Om Birla said while addressing opposition members. "If you want a discussion on Operation Sindoor, you will have to go back to your seats. You can't demand a discussion on any issue from the Well of the House. The House runs as per rules of procedure," Birla said. Union ministers Rajnath Singh, Amit Shah and Nitin Gadkari among others were present in the House at the time. Defence Minister Singh is scheduled to initiate the special discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive Operation Sindoor in response to the terror attack in Pahalgam. As the opposition was unrelenting, Birla adjourned the proceedings till 1 pm. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hans India
10 minutes ago
- Hans India
Parliament Set For Crucial Debate On Pahalgam Terror Attack And Military Response
Following a week of parliamentary disruptions, the Monsoon Session is poised to commence substantive deliberations regarding the Pahalgam terror incident and Operation Sindoor beginning Monday. Both the ruling NDA coalition and opposition parties have prepared their senior leadership to participate in comprehensive debates scheduled across the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha chambers. The government's response will be articulated by key cabinet members including Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar. Unofficial sources suggest Prime Minister Narendra Modi might also participate in the proceedings, though no formal confirmation has been issued. Parliamentary leadership has arranged for a 16-hour debate format spanning both houses, focusing specifically on the April 22 attack that resulted in 26 civilian casualties and the subsequent military operation. The discussion framework was mutually agreed upon by government and opposition representatives on July 25. The Congress party has designated Gaurav Gogoi to initiate the opposition's arguments, with subsequent contributions planned from Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, Deependra Hooda, Praneeti Shinde, Saptagiri Ulaka, and Bijendra Ola. Opposition Leader Rahul Gandhi is scheduled to deliver his remarks during Tuesday's session. Notable among the confirmed speakers are representatives from various political parties including Rajnath Singh, Bajyant Panda, Tejaswi Surya, Sanjay Jaiswal, Anurag Thakur, and members from TDP, SP, AITC, DMK, and NCP factions. A significant development concerns Congress MP Shashi Tharoor's participation status. Internal party sources indicate Tharoor will likely abstain from the debate, having failed to submit the required speaking request to the Congress Parliamentary Party office. This absence could generate controversy given Tharoor's recent leadership of an international delegation addressing the India-Pakistan situation, which reportedly conflicted with his party's official position. Tharoor's public endorsement of government policies and the temporary cessation of hostilities has created friction within Congress ranks, particularly among members who maintain critical stances toward the administration's approach. Opposition leadership, spearheaded by Rahul Gandhi, has consistently challenged the government over alleged intelligence shortcomings and questioned India's international diplomatic support. These criticisms have intensified following claims by US President Donald Trump regarding American mediation efforts between India and Pakistan, assertions that the Indian government has categorically refuted. The parliamentary debate represents a crucial moment for both government accountability and opposition scrutiny regarding national security responses and diplomatic strategies in the region.
