
Chicago says it hopes to open city-owned market instead of city-owned grocery store
A year and a half ago, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson first floated the idea of opening a city-owned grocery store. Now, city officials say they have scrapped their public grocery store plans in favor of opening a public market.
A year-round public market, city officials said, would sell staple grocery items, such as milk and bread. The market would also contain retail spaces for local farmers and food retailers to sell their products, which the city said it would rent out at low cost.
Still, details are scarce about when such a market would open, how it would be funded and operated and where it would be located.
The announcement of the change in plans comes weeks after the Tribune reported the city did not apply for state funding for a public supermarket despite previously saying it would do so.
'This market will have almost like a multiplier effect in that we could support local entrepreneurs and food producers in our own neighborhoods that will essentially now have a place to sell their goods,' Deputy Mayor Kenya Merritt said in an interview. 'This model, I think, came out of a desire to be more impactful than just a public grocery store.'
Johnson's original proposal for a municipally owned grocery store was a bold one: No major U.S. city had opened a publicly owned supermarket, although the concept had found mixed success in several smaller municipalities and has since attracted interest in other big American cities, including in New York.
Proponents of the concept, including the mayor, said a city-owned store could help address the dearth of supermarkets in some neighborhoods on the city's South and West sides, where big grocery companies have shuttered store after store, leaving many residents with limited access to fresh groceries.
As recently as late August, the city planned to apply for state funding to help pay for a public grocery store in Chicago, after a feasibility study created for the city by private consultants found that such a store was 'necessary, feasible and implementable.' The city has not released the study to the public despite previously committing to doing so.
But in January, the Tribune reported city officials had not applied for state funding after filing a Freedom of Information Act request that revealed Chicago had not filed any applications for a grant under the $20 million Illinois Grocery Initiative.
The city could have secured up to $2.4 million for the project if it had applied — nowhere near enough to fund a new supermarket but a place to start.
In an interview last month, the city's chief operating officer, John Roberson, said the city 'really did not have anything to apply that money to in terms of a project, a shovel-ready project that was ready to go.'
The idea for the public market, Merritt said, came out of conversations with the Food Equity Council, a group of food system professionals who advise the city on food access issues.
In addition to the public market, the city plans to develop an 'incubator' program that will help provide training and apprenticeship opportunities for hopeful future grocery operators. The city said it also hopes to launch a program that will provide support in the form of funding and training to local food retailers.
Erika Allen, a co-chair of the Food Equity Council, said members of the group are aware of the challenges of the grocery business, which often operates on thin profit margins dependent on highly perishable inventory.
'For a city to sponsor that or run it didn't make sense to most of us,' said Allen, who is CEO of the Urban Growers Collective, an urban farming nonprofit based in Chicago. But it did make sense, she said, for the city to invest in infrastructure to support food access — like a public market.
'Our goal here is to stabilize food access,' Allen said.
'We're really looking at food security and food access as a basic human need,' she added.
Merritt said the city could not yet specify where a public market would be located, though she said the city was focused on the South and West sides.
The project could involve one market or multiple spots across different neighborhoods, Merritt said.
Merritt would not specify how much the city expects the market to cost or what specific funding sources the city, which is still projected to face a large budget deficit next year, would tap to bankroll it. Broadly, she said, the city expects to use a combination of city dollars, philanthropy and perhaps corporate partnerships to support the project financially. She said the city could not yet provide a specific timeline for when a market might open.
Merritt said the city is not sure whether it would operate the public market or contract with a third-party operator to manage the day-to-day running of the market.
In a presentation city staff shared with members of the Food Equity Council in November, they referenced public markets in three other cities — the North Market in Columbus, Ohio, Reading Terminal Market in Philadelphia and the Milwaukee Public Market.
Successful public markets are typically located in high-density, downtown areas of a city because they need lots of foot traffic to sustain themselves, said Andrew Lamas, a professor of urban studies at the University of Pennsylvania.
That raises questions, Lamas said, about whether a public market in Chicago will address the issue the city said it wanted to tackle when it floated the idea of a public supermarket: food deserts on the city's South and West sides.
The Reading Terminal Market, for instance, is located in downtown Philadelphia, near hotels, transportation arteries and a five-minute walk to City Hall. The publicly owned market is managed by a nonprofit that oversees its day-to-day operations, Lamas said. People who shop at the market are diverse, both in terms of race and class, Lamas said, even though many other public spaces in the city, such as public schools and transportation, are more segregated.
'That's valuable,' Lamas said. 'But it doesn't respond specifically to the food desert issue.'
Merritt emphasized that Chicago plans to open a market in a location where it would address a gap in food access. The market or markets would be located in public transit-accessible areas where there is community support for the project, she said. 'We envision these markets to become destinations that drive economic vitality in the community where they are located,' she said.
Lamas agreed that a public market is a more feasible model for the city to tackle than a supermarket. The benefit of a public market, he said, is that the risk inherent in a supermarket operation is spread across many different businesses.
'I think this is a better model,' for the city to attempt, he said. 'The problem is that it may not address the interests of low-income people.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
IonQ, Inc. (IONQ): NVIDIA CEO Is Giving A Green Light, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discusses. IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ) is one of the few pure-play American quantum computing hardware companies. The firm was a regular feature of Cramer's appearances earlier this year in January. Back then, the quantum computing sector was basking in the glory of Google's announcement that its quantum computer had significantly outperformed a supercomputer. Investors started piling into quantum computing stocks, but Cramer remained a skeptic. Back then, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang knocked the wind out of the quantum computing bubble after he remarked that the technology wasn't mature. Yet, in a turn of events in late May, IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ)'s shares surged by 22% after its CEO commented in an interview that his firm could be the 'NVIDIA' of quantum computing. Cramer's comments revolved around NVIDIA's CEO changing tack on quantum computing: 'There are four quantum stocks that we have to follow. Some of my people that I work with were very, I think that they were, probably concerned that I went out and said, look we ought to be looking at . . .we ought to be looking at, you know the ones that people talk about. But they're gonna fly!' A quantum computer on a countertop in an engineering laboratory with a technician at work. Recently, Cramer commented on IonQ, Inc. (NYSE:IONQ)'s valuation: 'Oh my god, it's so high and it's losing so much money, but it's quantum. If I offer you a considered explanation of why I think that stock's too expensive, most people ignore it, so all I'm going to say is it's too speculative for me. I don't know what else to say.' While we acknowledge the potential of IONQ as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Is it possible to boost the US birth rate? Here's what other countries have tried
(NEXSTAR) – The Trump administration is reportedly seeking ways to raise the American birth rate, considering incentives ranging from a $5,000 cash 'baby bonus' to a 'National Medal of Motherhood' awarded to women with more than six children. Would a trophy or tax break be enough to convince Americans to have more children? Countries around the world with plummeting birth rates have test driven all sorts of strategies to promote procreating, and it turns out it's a tough task. People and policymakers may want to boost the birth rate for a variety of reasons, from cultural to economic. The primary economic concern is that if a country's birth rate drops too low, and there isn't enough immigration to bring in younger workers, the country will be left with an aging population that needs support but a smaller tax base of workers to support them. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports the U.S. birth rate dropped to 1.6 children per woman in 2023 – a new historic low. To be at replacement levels, the birth rate would have to be a bit higher at 2.1. That's generally accepted as the level at which each generation ensures it replaces itself. While the U.S. birth rate is lower than it has ever been before, it's still higher than our North American neighbors to the north and dozens of other countries around the world. Canada's fertility rate is at 1.3, according to World Bank Data. Any countries around Europe and Asia have rates that are even lower, including Italy (1.2), Spain (1.1), Japan (1.2) and Korea (0.7). Australia and New Zealand also have fertility rates lower than the United States'. The U.S. is far from the first country to show concern over a shrinking population. Singapore, which has one of the lowest birth rates in the world, has tried doling out sizable cash incentives. Couples get the equivalent of about $8,500 for their first and second children, CNBC reports, and $10,000 for their third child and beyond. Those bonuses don't go very far, however, with Singapore's ultra-high cost of living. The cost of raising a child isn't cheap here either. LendingTree recently estimated it costs about $29,000 a year. 'The one-time bonuses are definitely not very effective, and that's pretty widely shown,' Karen Benjamin Guzzo, director of UNC's Carolina Population Center, told PBS. For what it's worth, Singapore has also tried some less conventional routes. They once got desperate enough to make a PSA (complete with a song) encouraging couples to do their 'civic duty' by getting busy in the bedroom and 'letting their patriotism explode.' In Japan, where the fertility rate is dropping faster than projected, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has described the situation as 'a silent emergency.' The government has promised to promote more flexible working environments and other measures that would help married couples to balance work and parenting, especially in rural areas where family values tend to be more conservative and harder on women. The younger generation isn't just reluctant to have kids, but also to get married due to bleak job prospects, a high cost of living and a gender-biased corporate culture that adds extra burdens for women and working mothers, experts say. While cash incentives and catchy songs haven't proven very effective at convincing people around the world to have children, one thing experts believe might work is cheap or free childcare. In a report last year, the U.S. Department of Labor described childcare as 'an almost prohibitive expense.' Even in affordable states, child care costs thousands of dollars a year. In pricier coastal communities, the median cost of infant care tops $30,000 a year. Though it's hard to predict if it would be a silver bullet, easing the child care cost burden – or completely eliminating it – is 'probably the thing that is most likely to have the impact on birth rates,' Guzzo said. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are Haverty Furniture Companies, Inc.'s (NYSE:HVT) Mixed Financials The Reason For Its Gloomy Performance on The Stock Market?
With its stock down 10% over the past three months, it is easy to disregard Haverty Furniture Companies (NYSE:HVT). We, however decided to study the company's financials to determine if they have got anything to do with the price decline. Long-term fundamentals are usually what drive market outcomes, so it's worth paying close attention. Specifically, we decided to study Haverty Furniture Companies' ROE in this article. Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula: Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Haverty Furniture Companies is: 7.0% = US$21m ÷ US$305m (Based on the trailing twelve months to March 2025). The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.07 in profit. See our latest analysis for Haverty Furniture Companies So far, we've learned that ROE is a measure of a company's profitability. We now need to evaluate how much profit the company reinvests or "retains" for future growth which then gives us an idea about the growth potential of the company. Generally speaking, other things being equal, firms with a high return on equity and profit retention, have a higher growth rate than firms that don't share these attributes. At first glance, Haverty Furniture Companies' ROE doesn't look very promising. A quick further study shows that the company's ROE doesn't compare favorably to the industry average of 18% either. For this reason, Haverty Furniture Companies' five year net income decline of 6.9% is not surprising given its lower ROE. We believe that there also might be other aspects that are negatively influencing the company's earnings prospects. Such as - low earnings retention or poor allocation of capital. However, when we compared Haverty Furniture Companies' growth with the industry we found that while the company's earnings have been shrinking, the industry has seen an earnings growth of 11% in the same period. This is quite worrisome. Earnings growth is a huge factor in stock valuation. What investors need to determine next is if the expected earnings growth, or the lack of it, is already built into the share price. By doing so, they will have an idea if the stock is headed into clear blue waters or if swampy waters await. Is HVT fairly valued? This infographic on the company's intrinsic value has everything you need to know. Looking at its three-year median payout ratio of 29% (or a retention ratio of 71%) which is pretty normal, Haverty Furniture Companies' declining earnings is rather baffling as one would expect to see a fair bit of growth when a company is retaining a good portion of its profits. So there could be some other explanations in that regard. For instance, the company's business may be deteriorating. In addition, Haverty Furniture Companies has been paying dividends over a period of at least ten years suggesting that keeping up dividend payments is way more important to the management even if it comes at the cost of business growth. In total, we're a bit ambivalent about Haverty Furniture Companies' performance. Even though it appears to be retaining most of its profits, given the low ROE, investors may not be benefitting from all that reinvestment after all. The low earnings growth suggests our theory correct. With that said, we studied the latest analyst forecasts and found that while the company has shrunk its earnings in the past, analysts expect its earnings to grow in the future. To know more about the company's future earnings growth forecasts take a look at this free report on analyst forecasts for the company to find out more. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data