Why the US visa interview pause has triggered another crisis for colleges
A recent directive by the Trump administration to pause new visa interviews for international students has ignited uncertainty across US college campuses. The timing, coming just months before the academic year begins, has left universities scrambling to understand the implications for enrollment, finances, and long-term academic planning.
Mount Holyoke College, a liberal arts institution in Massachusetts, is among those already seeing the effects. Of the 140 international students admitted for the upcoming academic year, only around 50 have received their visas, with the rest either stuck in limbo or uncertain if their appointments will result in approvals. As quoted by CNN, Kavita Khory, director of the college's Center for Global Initiatives, said, "This is supposed to be a celebratory time… and suddenly, all of that's been thrown up in the air.
"
Uncertainty replaces celebration for students and colleges
The visa pause has affected not only incoming international students but also current ones who need visa renewals. Universities have reported confusion due to a lack of guidance from the US State Department. Speaking to CNN, an official at a research university on the East Coast said, "Time is of the essence for these students. The uncertainty piece of it is what's making it challenging."
While the State Department, through spokesperson Tammy Bruce, has stated that the administration is prioritizing national security and that visa adjudication is a "national security decision," no clear timeline has been offered for when the suspension will end. As reported by CNN, Bruce said more guidance would be provided in the coming days.
Financial, academic, and emotional fallout expected
The University of California system, where international students make up about 9% of the 2024 undergraduate enrollees, expressed deep concern.
In a statement to CNN, spokesperson Stett Holbrook emphasized that international students are essential to the university's research and teaching mission and warned that delays in processing could have ripple effects on budgets, staffing, and services.
Smaller private colleges without large endowments are especially vulnerable. As quoted by CNN, a former university official explained that institutions face a "three-pronged" crisis: a loss of revenue, a disruption in academic talent, and a human toll on students and communities.
Fear of a lasting reputational hit and brain drain
Beyond the immediate enrollment issues, colleges worry about long-term damage to the US's reputation as a destination for global talent. CNN quoted a university official saying there is a "chilling effect" on international student recruitment. Chinese students, who make up about a quarter of international enrollees, face heightened scrutiny after President Trump announced plans to "aggressively" revoke their visas.
Fanta Aw, CEO of NAFSA, told CNN that international students are already the most vetted group of nonimmigrants and that the policy is a misuse of taxpayer resources. "It is a poor use of taxpayer dollars," she said.
Karen Edwards from Grinnell College added, "It really breaks my heart," reflecting fears that political tensions may permanently deter students from choosing the US.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
14 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump says he'll 'know exactly' within minutes if Ukraine deal is possible
US President Donald Trump said he expects Russian President Vladimir Putin to arrive at their meeting in Alaska on Friday with concrete proposals to end the war in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters on Monday at the White House, Trump said it would only take him "a couple of minutes" to determine whether a deal is possible."At the end of that meeting, probably the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made," Trump said. He added that if Putin's proposals are serious, he will pass them on to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky with a recommendation to either make peace or "keep fighting."advertisementTrump described the upcoming meeting as "really a feel-out meeting" and said it could go either way. "It'll be good, but it might be bad," he said. "I may say, lots of luck, keep fighting. Or I may say, we can make a deal."UKRAINE FEARS DEAL WITHOUT ITS CONSENT MAY FAVOR MOSCOW Putin, eager to cement Russia's territorial gains since the February 2022 invasion, is expected to press for a ceasefire on terms Kyiv and its European allies have long resisted. Trump has signalled openness to ideas -- including land swaps -- that could alarm Ukraine, where leaders fear any agreement made without them would tilt toward Moscow's sidestepped repeated questions about whether he would insist on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's participation. "He's been to a lot of meetings" without stopping the war, Trump said, contrasting the wartime leader's record with Putin's decades in the US president left the door open to involving Kyiv later. "The next meeting will be with Zelenskyy and Putin," he said. "Or Putin and Zelenskyy and me." He promised to call both Zelenskyy and European leaders after the Alaska talks to brief them — but stressed, "I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal.""President Putin invited me to get involved," Trump said, calling it "very respectful" that the Russian leader would come to US soil. "I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that can be made for both parties."Putin is expected to hold firm on keeping occupied territory and blocking Ukraine's NATO membership. Zelenskyy insists Ukraine will not surrender land. On the front lines, fighting grinds on along a 1,000-kilometre front, with little sign of an end in sight.- EndsWith inputs from Associated Press
Time of India
28 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is May Mailman, the Harvard-educated lawyer at the center of Trump's campaign against America's top universities?
May Mailman's role in challenging elite US universities during Trump's term. (Photo courtesy: Facebook) May Mailman, a Harvard-trained lawyer, has been the key figure behind President Trump's aggressive campaign targeting America's top universities, according to reporting by The New York Times. Through executive orders, the strategic use of federal funding, and civil rights investigations, Mailman helped design a broad approach aimed at pressuring elite institutions to alter their policies on admissions, diversity, and gender. Although Mailman departed the White House in August 2025, as reported by CBS News, she continues to serve as a special government employee, overseeing ongoing negotiations with universities such as Harvard, according to The New York Times. Driving policy to reshape higher education Mailman was instrumental in drafting executive orders early in Trump's second term that redefined the federal government's stance on sex, limiting recognition to only two genders and rolling back policies that promoted diversity, equity, and inclusion, as reported by The New York Times. These changes forced universities like the University of Pennsylvania to ban transgender girls and women from participating in women's sports. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If You Find These Bugs in Bauru, Do Something Immediately Undo The New York Times further notes that Mailman was 'credited as an animating force behind a strategy that has intimidated independent institutions and undercut years of medical and scientific research.' She helped lead an effort to challenge what the administration viewed as liberal bias in admissions practices, particularly focusing on the role of race in college admissions. Using federal funding and civil rights investigations as leverage According to The New York Times, a key element of Mailman's strategy involved leveraging federal funding to pressure universities. Institutions faced the risk of losing significant research grants or student visa approvals if they did not align with the administration's demands. In addition, the administration opened civil rights investigations into admissions policies at several leading universities. The Times reports that Mailman personally closed a $221 million settlement with Columbia University—the largest settlement the administration has secured to date—after such investigations. Negotiations with elite universities While many universities chose to quietly comply, Harvard has been a rare holdout, willing to fight back in court, The New York Times reports. Mailman led the White House's negotiations with Harvard, which included contentious issues such as how race factored into admissions and disputes over patent investigations. The Times quotes Harvard officials describing these investigations as 'yet another retaliatory effort targeting Harvard for defending its rights and freedom. ' Talks with Harvard appeared to be progressing, with the university signalling openness to spending $500 million to reach a resolution, though new investigations and pressures continued, as noted by The New York Times. Impact on academic freedom and campus culture The New York Times highlights concerns from faculty and student groups that the administration's approach threatens academic freedom and free speech on campuses. Mailman's policies, which have included attempts to dictate hiring practices, admissions, and curriculum content, have been described by some as trampling on First Amendment rights. Adam Goldstein, vice president of strategic initiatives at the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, was quoted by The New York Times saying, 'If you normalize the use of federal power like this, then academic freedom is just a memory and universities become political footballs and no longer useful instruments in the search for truth.' Mailman's pragmatism amid controversy Despite her aggressive tactics, The New York Times reports that Mailman is respected within government circles for her efficiency and ability to balance competing interests. University officials who have negotiated with her privately have praised her pragmatic approach, noting her skill in navigating complex discussions between the administration and academic institutions. Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, praised Mailman as 'one of the most indispensable, gifted and dedicated staffers and lawyers in the Trump administration since Day 1,' according to The New York Times. Continuing influence after White House departure Though Mailman officially left her White House post in August 2025, The New York Times reports that she remains involved as a special government employee to 'tie up loose ends' on policy matters. CBS News also reported that Mailman plans to start a government affairs firm but will not represent clients related to her administration projects, including ongoing negotiations with Harvard. Mailman herself said, as quoted by The New York Times, 'We don't want to run these universities. We want some sweeping changes that set things in the right trajectory.' TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Signs Executive Order Extending Tariff Truce Deadline With China By 90 Days
The executive order was issued a day after President Trump urged China to significantly increase its purchases of US soybeans. US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order on Monday, extending the tariff truce deadline with China by 90 days, Reuters reported, citing a White House official. The order follows high-level talks between top officials from both countries, who met in Stockholm in July to explore the possibility of shifting the deadline to reach a negotiated agreement on tariffs. A White House official confirmed the latest decision, which came just hours before US tariffs on Chinese goods were due to revert to triple-digit rates. The previously agreed tariff truce between Beijing and Washington was scheduled to expire at 00:01 ET on Tuesday. The executive order, signed on Monday, was issued a day after President Trump urged China to significantly increase its purchases of US soybeans by as much as fourfold. At the same time, Washington has been pressuring Beijing to halt imports of Russian oil, with Trump warning of potential secondary tariffs on Chinese entities found violating the directive. When asked by reporters during a press conference on Monday whether he intended to extend the deadline, Trump responded, 'We'll see what happens. They've been dealing quite nicely. The relationship is very good with President Xi (Jinping) and myself." Without the order being passed, US tariffs on Chinese goods would have surged by 145%, while Chinese tariffs on American goods were set to rise to 125%. At present, imports from China into the US are subject to a 30% tariff, which includes a 10% base rate and an additional 20% imposed in relation to fentanyl-related policy measures. These rates were implemented by Washington earlier this year, between February and March. In response, China currently levies a 10% tariff on goods imported from the US. Both nations have made repeated efforts in recent months to reach a consensus on tariff policy, following the imposition of reciprocal triple-digit tariffs. In May, during a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, the two sides agreed on a temporary truce, initiating a 90-day period for continued negotiations. They met again in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July, although no official extension was announced at the time. However, both parties described the talks as constructive, signalling the possibility of a truce extension. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
