Amputee's knife was a threat, accused PC says
A police officer believed an amputee who threatened to stab care home staff had "ample opportunity" to drop his knife before he was Tasered, a court has heard.
PC Stephen Smith told Southwark Crown Court that he did not see that Donald Burgess, 92, was disabled and in a wheelchair before he used Pava spray, and then a baton before making an arrest.
The police officer, aged 51, and PC Rachel Comotto are accused of using excessive force on Mr Burgess, who had one leg, at Park Beck care home in St Leonards-on-Sea in June 2022.
PC Smith denies two charges of assault and PC Comotto, 36, denies one charge of assault by discharging her Taser at Mr Burgess.
Mr Burgess was taken to hospital after his arrest and later contracted Covid-19.
He died 22 days later aged 93, and the PCs are not accused of being responsible for his death.
Jurors were previously told the care home had called 999 after Mr Burgess reportedly grabbed a cutlery knife and said he wanted to murder the site manager with a cutlery knife.
PC Smith told jurors: "The way he had been threatening staff members - the threat was the knife, to the staff there, and also to himself."
The court heard both PC Smith and PC Comotto repeatedly asked Mr Burgess to drop the knife and PC Smith warned him he would be sprayed or Tasered if he did not.
PC Smith told the court he believed Mr Burgess "could clearly understand what we were saying to him".
In the Sussex Police "use of force form", which PC Smith filled out shortly after the incident, he wrote Mr Burgess was "given ample opportunity" to drop the knife.
Jurors heard on Monday that PC Smith allegedly emptied a canister of Pava incapacitant spray into Mr Burgess's face and struck him with a baton before PC Comotto deployed her Taser.
On Thursday, Smith denied this and said he used a "short burst" of Pava on Mr Burgess.
"I just wanted the knife out of the gent's hand", PC Smith said, adding that he tried to "knock the knife out of Mr Burgess's hand" by using the baton.
Ian Mills, a police use-of-force adviser, later testified for the defence that PC Smith's actions "though difficult to watch, was generally in accordance with his training".
Mr Mills agreed PC Smith used his baton with "minimal force" and said police officers make "split-second decisions based on their perception of the circumstances" and "without the benefit of hindsight".
The two officers made a "tactical error" in failing to "fully explore avenues of information before entering the room" such as by talking to the care home staff about Mr Burgess, Mr Mills added.
Prosecutors say the force used against Mr Burgess was excessive and unnecessary given his age and physical condition.
The trial continues.
Follow BBC Sussex on Facebook, on X, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.
PCs laughed about spray use on man, 92, jury hears
Pensioner 'possessed' before being Tasered – court
PC Tasered amputee, 92, in wheelchair, court hears
Sussex Police
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
$38,000 Fines Waived for Ontario Amish Families Convicted for Not Using ArriveCan App
Over $38,000 in fines have been waived and convictions set aside for a group of people from an Ontario Amish community who were convicted for not using the ArriveCan app during COVID-19 lockdowns. Lawyers with The Democracy Fund (TDF) won the case after seven months of negotiations and multiple court appearances on behalf of the group known to avoid modern technology due to their faith.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police officer lists four problems with restaurant applying for drinks licence
An Indian restaurant owner faced objections from police and licensing officers for the second time in a matter of months after re-applying for a drinks licence for his business. Rafiqul Islam, 47, wants to serve alcohol from 10am to 11pm at Cardamom, in St James's Street, Brighton. He has not been legally able to do so since his licence lapsed. He previously applied for a licence until midnight every day but was turned down after a Brighton and Hove City Council licensing panel hearing in February. Mr Islam has since brought in a former colleague and more experienced licence holder, Szabolcs Veres, to work as the designated premises supervisor (DPS) with responsibility for alcohol sales. But at a licensing panel hearing before three councillors, Sussex Police licensing officer Mark Thorogood listed several issues with the premises since Mr Islam took over. These included The licence lapsing in October 2023 Alcohol was listed on the menu and a beer pump was still connected in November 2023 even though the premises no longer had a licence Trading outside permitted hours and with no functioning closed-circuit television (CCTV) in December 2023 The battery-operated CCTV was not working in December 2024 The panel was told that the incident log had not been signed off and staff had not received the training that they needed, the licence was found to have lapsed and Mr Islam was given a final warning. Conservative councillor Ivan Lyons asked what measures would give the police confidence to support Mr Islam's premises having a licence. Mr Thorogood said that there were none. He said: 'We have raised our concerns around a history of non-compliance and a new proposed DPS. 'We have spent a long time already trying to assist Mr Islam in adhering to the previous premises licences he has held but with no success.' Mr Thorogood said that the business was small and 'not challenging' but the various issues, including trading without a licence, meant that the force had lost confidence in Mr Islam. Council licensing officer Donna Lynsdale also said that she had no confidence in Mr Islam's ability to comply with any licence conditions. Ms Lynsdale said that she visited the business in February to ensure that no alcohol was on sale after the previous licence application was turned down. Although no alcoholic drinks were on display, they were still included in the menus on the counter. She said that Mr Islam called her for help with his new licence application and asked her to recommend someone who could help. Ms Lynsdale said: 'Mr Islam stated he believed the reason the last application was refused was because the committee did not like his legal representative. 'This clarifies that Mr Islam is not taking any responsibility for the previous issue – the breaches – or the poor running of the premises. 'Despite providing Mr islam with all the documents and assistance to comply with the previous premises licence, he continued to breach the conditions.' Mr Islam's solicitor, Nicholas Perkins, said that the business was small, with space for only 20 to 28 customers at a time, so it was not a 'challenging' restaurant. But it was in the centre of Brighton where there were restrictions on new alcohol licences because of the 'saturation' of licensed premises and the associated risks of crime and nuisance. Mr Perkins said that the site had been a restaurant for many years and would not be adding to the volume of similar businesses in the area. Without the licence, Mr Perkins said, his client would be 'financially ruined'. He said: 'You (the panel) should look at this whole situation afresh. Mr Islam has candidly admitted his failings but that does not mean he should not be given a further opportunity. 'The proposal before you is new, different and you could have confidence in it on the basis that Mr Veres is prepared to be the DPS. 'He's prepared to take the risk. He has the confidence that going forward these premises will operate correctly.' Labour councillor Paul Nann asked if conditions could include the number of hours that Mr Veres spent at the premises but he was told that this would not be possible. The panel – which also included Labour councillor Julie Cattel – retired to make its decision which should be made public within five working days.
Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
South Dakota is on track to spend $2 billion on prisons in the next decade
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — Two years after approving a tough-on-crime sentencing law, South Dakota is scrambling to deal with the price tag for that legislation: Housing thousands of additional inmates could require up to $2 billion to build new prisons in the next decade. That's a lot of money for a state with one of the lowest populations in the U.S., but a consultant said it's needed to keep pace with an anticipated 34% surge of new inmates in the next decade as a result of South Dakota's tough criminal justice laws. And while officials are grumbling about the cost, they don't seem concerned with the laws that are driving the need even as national crime rates are dropping. 'Crime has been falling everywhere in the country, with historic drops in crime in the last year or two,' said Bob Libal, senior campaign strategist at the criminal justice nonprofit the Sentencing Project. 'It's a particularly unusual time to be investing $2 billion in prisons.' Some Democratic-led states have worked to close prisons and enact changes to lower inmate populations, but that's a tough sell in Republican-majority states such as South Dakota that believe in a tough-on-crime approach, even if that leads to more inmates. For now, state lawmakers have set aside a $600-million fund to replace the overcrowded 144-year-old South Dakota State Penitentiary in Sioux Falls, making it one of the most expensive taxpayer-funded projects in South Dakota history. But South Dakota will likely need more prisons. Phoenix-based Arrington Watkins Architects, which the state hired as a consultant, has said South Dakota will need 3,300 additional beds in coming years, bringing the cost to $2 billion. Driving up costs is the need for facilities with different security levels to accommodate the inmate population. Concerns about South Dakota's prisons first arose four years ago, when the state was flush with COVID-19 relief funds. Lawmakers wanted to replace the penitentiary, but they couldn't agree on where to put the prison and how big it should be. A task force of state lawmakers assembled by Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden is expected to decide that in a plan for prison facilities this July. Many lawmakers have questioned the proposed cost, but few have called for criminal justice changes that would make such a large prison unnecessary. 'One thing I'm trying to do as the chairman of this task force is keep us very focused on our mission,' said Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen. 'There are people who want to talk about policies in the prisons or the administration or the criminal justice system more broadly, and that would be a much larger project than the fairly narrow scope that we have.' South Dakota's incarceration rate of 370 per 100,000 people is an outlier in the Upper Midwest. Neighbors Minnesota and North Dakota have rates of under 250 per 100,000 people, according to the Sentencing Project, a criminal justice advocacy nonprofit. Nearly half of South Dakota's projected inmate population growth can be attributed to a law approved in 2023 that requires some violent offenders to serve the full-length of their sentences before parole, according to a report by Arrington Watkins. When South Dakota inmates are paroled, about 40% are ordered to return to prison, the majority of those due to technical violations such as failing a drug test or missing a meeting with a parole officer. Those returning inmates made up nearly half of prison admissions in 2024. Sioux Falls criminal justice attorney Ryan Kolbeck blamed the high number of parolees returning in part on the lack of services in prison for people with drug addictions. 'People are being sent to the penitentiary but there's no programs there for them. There's no way it's going to help them become better people,' he said. 'Essentially we're going to put them out there and house them for a little bit, leave them on parole and expect them to do well.' South Dakota also has the second-greatest disparity of Native Americans in its prisons. While Native Americans make up one-tenth of South Dakota's population, they make up 35% of those in state prisons, according to Prison Policy Initiative, a nonprofit public policy group. Though legislators in the state capital, Pierre, have been talking about prison overcrowding for years, they're reluctant to dial back on tough-on-crime laws. For example, it took repeated efforts over six years before South Dakota reduced a controlled substance ingestion law to a misdemeanor from a felony for the first offense, aligning with all other states. 'It was a huge, Herculean task to get ingestion to be a misdemeanor,' Kolbeck said. Former penitentiary warden Darin Young said the state needs to upgrade its prisons, but he also thinks it should spend up to $300 million on addiction and mental illness treatment. 'Until we fix the reasons why people come to prison and address that issue, the numbers are not going to stop,' he said. Without policy changes, the new prisons are sure to fill up, criminal justice experts agreed. 'We might be good for a few years, now that we've got more capacity, but in a couple years it'll be full again,' Kolbeck said. 'Under our policies, you're going to reach capacity again soon.' Raza writes for the Associated Press.
