
The New ‘I Know What You Did Last Summer' Betrays Itself From the Very Start
The sequel, which opens in theaters this weekend, doesn't even get that right. It thinks it does, crafting a scenario that is similar to the one in the original film, but when you break it down, the lack of clearly defined right and wrong undercuts the whole rest of the movie. You never feel like what they 'did last summer' is bad enough to warrant that level of revenge, and as a result, the whole movie falls flat. So what happens? Here it is, with spoilers for only the first 15 minutes of the movie.A group of friends leaves a party to go to a secret spot to watch fireworks. Most of them are drinking and smoking weed, but Danica (Madelyn Cline) is not. She's sober, so she makes it a point that she'll be driving. Safety first!
On the way, her friends, but especially her fiancé, Teddy (Tyriq Withers) are pretty messed up. He tries to jokingly distract her (and distracted driving is what caused the accident in the first movie), but eventually, they make it to the fireworks spot no problem. Once they get there, Teddy is feeling so good, he starts dancing in the street. While in the middle of the street, a car starts to approach, and Teddy decides to play chicken with it. It gets close enough that Milo (Jonah Hauer-King) has to save him, and everyone gets mad at Teddy's recklessness. This is important because it establishes there's a good amount of road between the turn and where Teddy is standing.
Soon after this, everything goes down. Teddy is still in the road, and a car comes by that's going so incredibly fast its driver somehow doesn't see him. As the car swerves to avoid Teddy, it ends up crashing into a guardrail and almost goes over a cliff. With the car teetering on the ledge, the group all rush over to save the driver, but the doors are jammed. They do everything they can, but five kids can't pull a pickup truck back from over a cliff, and it eventually goes over. But not before the driver gains consciousness, smashes the window, and rips Teddy's shirt off. This never comes back, by the way, but it's a thing that happens.
Now, should Teddy have been in the road? Of course not. But should this person have been driving at a reasonable enough speed to see him, especially when the film establishes there's plenty of road there? For sure. So, basically, the movie misses the mark a few times here. First, the movie makes it clear that a sober person is driving, and they arrive at the location unscathed. Second, Teddy is partially, but not wholly, at fault for the accident, and everyone makes a clearly valiant attempt to save the driver. Next, Teddy calls the police to report the accident, but then they all leave as if they weren't there.
Now, not everyone is happy about this. They feel they should stay there and own up to it, but the idea is floated that, as a compromise, they'll go to the police station on the way home. Which doesn't happen and further pisses off the group. It's an awkward ride home, but eventually, they all agree never to speak of this again.
To reiterate, Teddy reports the accident to the police. This is after he and others tried to save the person. They don't handle the situation perfectly by any means, but the movie makes them much more forgivable than the group in the original. Oh, and the car doesn't explode or anything when it falls over the cliff. It's just there. (Later, we learn the person did die.) Either way, the characters don't do everything right, but they do enough things right that you at least feel like they are partially not responsible. So, by the next year, when Danica gets that titular note (only she gets the note, by the way, so it's not really even a thing), instead of 'I Know What You Did Last Summer,' it's really more like 'I Know You Made a Guy Swerve Off a Cliff by Accident Last Summer.'
Later in the film, we learn some spoilers about who the victim was and how they relate to the killer, which I won't ruin here. It does make the plausibility of why this person goes on a murderous rampage maybe 5% more believable, but even so, after 90 minutes of movie where we're left wondering why this killer is so mad, it's too little too late. And that's the new I Know What You Did Last Summer in a nutshell. A legacy sequel to a movie that was already pretty bad on its own but somehow doesn't even understand why that movie worked in the first place.
Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CC Sabathia's car breaks down on way to Cooperstown for Baseball Hall of Fame induction
CC Sabathia's 19-year Major League ride toward baseball's Hall of Fame appears to have been a smoother one than the actual drive he made to Cooperstown for this weekend's induction. Heading to Cooperstown with his family for Sunday's festivities, Sabathia's car apparently broke down on the side of the highway, leaving the New York Yankees great and his family temporarily stranded. Sabathia posted a photo (with laughing emojis) on X, formerly Twitter, of himself, his wife Amber and their children on July 24 at 8:22 p.m. Sabathia posted the words: 'Car broke down on the way to Cooperstown. Anyone headed that way?' The road sign in the photo showed Route 17 West in upstate New York. Sabathia later posted at 11:02 p.m. that he and his family made it to Cooperstown: And on Friday, July 25 at 10:47 a.m., Sabathia posted a photo of the Cooperstown grounds where he will be speaking Sunday: This article originally appeared on CC Sabathia car breaks down on way to Cooperstown for Hall of Fame induction
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire film mogul David Geffen sued by estranged husband Donovan Michaels
David Geffen is being sued by his estranged husband. The 82-year-old film producer is accused of treating Donovan Michaels, 32, like a "living social experiment" during the couple's two-year marriage in a lawsuit filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Michaels has accused Geffen of breach of contract and alleges that the record executive kicked him out of their New York while he attended Amazon tycoon Jeff Bezos's wedding to Lauren Sanchez in Venice last month and went back on a promise to give him lifelong financial support. The lawsuit alleges that Geffen – who has an estimated net worth of $8.8 billion – used a "toxic mix of seduction, control, promises of love and lavish displays of wealth to entrap" Michaels in a loop of "dependency, submission and humiliation". Patty Glaser, a partner at the law firm representing the film mogul, said: "There was no contract – express, written, oral or implied – that has ever existed. We will be vigorously and righteously defending against this false, pathetic lawsuit." The complaint says that Geffen met Michaels on the dating site in 2016 and paid him $10,000 for sex. The couple married in a private Beverly Hills ceremony in 2023 and the complaint claims that Geffen did not seek a prenuptial agreement. The DreamWorks co-founder filed for divorce in May, citing irreconcilable differences, and the pair had kept details of their separation private until Michaels filed his lawsuit. The dancer – whose real name is David Armstrong – described himself in the lawsuit as a vulnerable young gay black man who had been exploited by a "wealthy, powerful white gay billionaire who believed himself untouchable". Geffen is alleged to have criticised "every aspect of Michaels's appearance" and body hygiene that required him to get "painful" laser and dental treatments. Michaels claims that he was frequently subjected to "back-handed insults and put-downs" about his "past and lack of sophistication". He likened the pair's relationship to the plot of the movie Trading Places and alleges that Geffen treated him like "a living social experiment – a trophy to show off to his wealthy friends, under the guise of benevolence". The lawsuit states: "Geffen told Michaels he loved him, and the two agreed to treat each other as life partners, share all assets equally and that Geffen would support Michaels financially for life. "Michaels gave up his dreams – his modelling career, his independence – to dedicate himself fully to this promise." The suit also alleges that Geffen ordered Michaels to "immediately vacate" the couple's New York home as he partied aboard his $400 million Rising Sun superyacht in the lead-up to the Bezos wedding. It states that Michaels was left homeless as Geffen was "decadently and extravagantly partying and dancing the night away in Venice, Italy with the other 0.0001 per cent of the wealthiest people on the planet". The complaint says: "While Geffen holds himself out to the public as an extraordinarily charitable man whose foundation gives millions and millions of dollars to advocacy and support groups for the homeless and disadvantaged populations, he is simultaneously endeavouring to render Michaels impoverished and homeless."


Geek Tyrant
20 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
ALIEN: EARTH Aims to Be the Next Big Prestige TV Phenomenon and It May Have Cost Over $250 Million — GeekTyrant
FX is going all-in with its upcoming series Alien: Earth , the first Alien project to bring those nightmare-fueled Xenomorphs to planet Earth. The ambitious new show isn't just another genre experiment as FX and showrunner Noah Hawley are reportedly positioning it as the next prestige-level hit on the scale of Game of Thrones or The Last of Us . According to Variety, FX wants Alien: Earth to be a sweeping, character-driven drama that expands the beloved franchise into new storytelling territory. And they're paying big for it. The series is rumored to have a budget that could exceed Shōgun , FX's recent historical epic that cost around $250 million. That makes Alien: Earth one of the most expensive shows ever produced for the network. This massive investment makes sense considering what the show promises. Not only is this the first time the franchise takes place on Earth, but the series introduces bold new ideas while honoring classic Alien themes. At the center of the story is Sydney Chandler as Wendy, a human child whose consciousness is transferred into a synthetic body. And yes, the Xenomorph threat is coming to Earth — along with some new, terrifying creatures. The earthbound setting also lets the show dive deep into a theme that has always been at the heart of Alien : corporate greed. As Hawley puts it, the series explores what the planet actually looks like in this future. "All I tried to do is think one or two steps ahead. Is it realistic to think that billionaires are going to be trillionaires? The planet is heating up, and the seas are going to rise - it's going to be a hot, wet planet that we live on." Hawley also acknowledges the freedom that comes with building something new instead of being weighed down by decades of rigid lore: "There's surprisingly little mythology across seven movies," he explains. "It was great to not have to jerry-rig a mythology into what's existing, but to just start again." That flexibility is key for Hawley and FX. Gina Balian, FX Entertainment president, added: "Everything doesn't have to fit together the way you expect from Marvel. Fans don't expect that in this universe. It doesn't have the same pressure." This means Alien: Earth isn't trying to create a Marvel-style shared universe, something Hawley has been clear about from the start. Alien has always thrived as an anthology-like series, with each film offering a unique tone and setting. Personally, I'm thrilled that the series seems to be sidestepping some of the lore from Prometheus and Alien: Covenant . Those films redefined the Xenomorph as a product of engineered design rather than an unknowable terror, and that never sat right with a lot of us. A clean slate opens the door for the mystery and dread that made Alien iconic. Alien: Earth is set to premiere on August 12, and if Hawley delivers what he's promising, we might be looking at the next big genre-defining series.