10-foot-long predator — with toxic flesh — is first-of-its-kind catch off Mexico
Off the coast of Veracruz, Mexico, fishermen attached hunks of bonito fish to a longline and dropped it in the water.
The nearly 400-foot line drug through the water until something heavy chomped down on the bait and was reeled to the surface.
The fishermen recorded a video of the creature on the end of the line as it approached the boat on the July day in 2024, possibly not realizing the significance of the catch.
The hook was caught in the mouth of a bluntnose sixgill shark — the first ever confirmed catch 'for Mexican waters of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea.'
The shark was brought to shore to be weighed and measured, according to a study published June 6 in the peer-reviewed journal Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria.
The nearly 10-foot-long shark has a 'robust body' and a 'large and broad head,' researchers said. The shark's 'big mouth' holds 'six rows of large, serrated comb-shaped teeth on each side of the lower jaw.'
The shark has a 'prominent tapetum lucidum,' or reflective layer in the eye, that makes their eyes appear 'fluorescent greenish' while alive.
The shark was a sexually mature male, likely at the peak of its size, researchers said.
Bluntnose sixgill sharks, or Hexanchus griseus, can be found globally, but in patches of ocean instead of widely distributed, according to the study.
The first record of the shark in the Gulf of Mexico was in 1962 when a 14-foot female was caught off the coast of Alabama, according to the study. A 10-foot male bluntnose sixgill shark was caught off the coast of Texas in 1984.
This record, however, confirms the species's distribution to the southwest region of the Gulf.
'Local fishermen have reported capturing the species on several occasions, however the specimens were released since the flesh is bland and not well appreciated due to its consistency,' according to the study. 'It also has a large amount of fat which is considered toxic. For this reason, species of the genera Hexanchus and Heptranchias have been dubbed milk sharks by local fishermen.'
The shark's flesh has an incredibly high concentration of oil, leading to the meat being considered ichthyosarcotoxic, and not safe to eat, according to the study.
This means that when the sharks are caught it is typically incidental and they are not specifically targeted in any commercial operations, researchers said.
The sharks are usually found below 300 feet, though juveniles swim closer to coastal areas, according to the study.
The shark was caught 12 miles north of the community of Salinas Roca Partida.
The Gulf of Mexico was renamed as the Gulf of America by executive order on Jan. 20 by President Donald Trump. This change is not recognized outside the United States.
The research team includes Luis Fernando Del Moral-Flores, Sergio Alejandro Lozano-Quiroz, Viridiana R. Escartín-Alpizar, Eduardo García-Mercado and Rolando Hernández-Ortiz.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump is dismantling science in America. Time to push back, Washington
For US scientists like myself, the months since President Donald Trump's inauguration have been an onslaught of chaos. Trump's executive orders and DOGE have consistently targeted scientific institutions — through multi-pronged attacks on universities, research funding and government scientists. As a result, U.S. scientists are facing an unprecedented loss of job opportunities and any semblance of career stability, not just for a few months, but for decades. Research job cuts are already widespread, with resulting impacts on state and local economies across all 50 states, in urban and rural areas. For most scientists, the personal devastation is compounded by recognition of the long-term, permanent damage to US research, innovation and technology development. As scientists and Americans, our job is to speak out and make these costs unmistakable to the public. Although science and technology are integrated into every moment of our lives, the work that goes into them is often invisible: successful medical treatments are based on decades of plodding bench research and trials, and engineering innovations get commercialized by companies after years of initial development in universities. Scientific discoveries — especially those that benefit the public — are largely nurtured in universities, supported by federal funding. The most promising eventually find their way out, through university partnerships with government, non-profits, and industry. In fewer than five months, Trump's executive orders and DOGE have attacked every aspect of science and research: revoking funding overnight, politicizing scientific peer review, attacking universities, terminating tens of thousands of active projects, mass firing of federal scientists and revoking international student visas. Many executive orders and actions impacting scientific fields have been legally challenged. However, eventual court rulings on legality will mean little for the hundreds of thousands of scientists who have lost jobs, research and student programs already cut, and projects that have had to cancel experiments and data collection. In practical terms, much long-term damage is already done. Terminations of research grants alone have resulted in widespread devastation. Across just two agencies, the number of canceled contracts is staggering: 2,100 National Institute of Health projects ($1.9B in lost funding), and 1,700 projects funded by the National Science Foundation ($1.4B in lost funding). Most people don't realize it, but scientists that get federal grants have invested years — often unpaid — gaining specialized expertise that allows them to be competitive for these grants. These canceled projects represent several generations of America's best innovation — in medicine, environment, public health and engineering. Losses of federal government scientists, who are among the most experienced in their disciplines, are another existential blow to US innovation and research. On June 14, Trump will spend $60 million in taxpayer dollars on a birthday parade for himself. As a scientist, what I see is $60 million in lost science, lost engineering, lost innovation. If you don't already have a reason to join a #NoKings protest on June 14, please get out in support of US science and scientists! We want to do great work: unraveling mysteries, making lives better and powering the future economy. Lauren Kuehne lives in Bremerton, where she has done environmental research for over 15 years, with NOAA, at the University of Washington and then as small business owner and consultant. Her work has been funded by the National Science Foundation and other federal agencies.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Future of NASA Scientific Balloon Facility in Palestine in question due to proposed budget cuts
PALESTINE, Texas (KETK) – The future of the NASA's balloon launches at the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility in Palestine is coming into question due to proposed budget cuts for 2026. PHOTOS: Inside NASA's Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility near Palestine According to a NASA 2026 budget technical supplement released on Tuesday, cuts are being made to the the NASA Astrophysics Research program to align with President Donald Trump's Budget Request for 2026. These cuts include the Balloons, Astrophysics Data Analysis Program, which would have it's 2026 budget eliminated entirely. In a statement shared with KETK by a NASA scientist at the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility in Palestine, NASA officials urged calm because they are still in the budget negotiation process. The Palestine facility launches 15 scientific balloons for NASA each year and is a NASA funded federal facility that would close without federal funding. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Greenland and Iceland saw record heat in May. What does that mean for the world?
Human-caused climate change boosted Iceland and Greenland 's temperatures by several degrees during a record-setting May heat wave, raising concerns about the far-reaching implications melting Arctic ice has for weather around the world, scientists said in an analysis released Wednesday. The Greenland ice sheet melted many times faster than normal during the heat wave, according to the analysis by World Weather Attribution, with at least two communities seeing record temperatures for May. Parts of Iceland saw temperatures more than 10°C (18 °F) above average, and the country set a record for its warmest temperature in May when Egilsstadir Airport hit 26.6°C (79.9 F) on May 15. The findings come as global leaders put more focus on Greenland, a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark, following U.S. President Donald Trump's comments that he would like to annex the mineral-rich island. Burning fossil fuels for electricity and transportation releases pollutants such as carbon dioxide that cause the planet to warm unnaturally fast. The Arctic is one of the fastest-warming places on Earth. Even in today's climate, the occurrence of such a strong heat wave in the region is relatively rare, with a 1% chance of occurring in a year, the analysis said. But without human-caused climate change, such an event would be 'basically impossible,' said Friederike Otto, associate professor of climate science at Imperial College London, one of the report's authors. The extreme heat was 40 times more likely compared to the pre-industrial climate. Global impacts from a melting Arctic Otto said this extreme weather event affects the world. As the Greenland ice sheet melts, it releases massive amounts of fresh water into the salty oceans. Scientists say this could slow down the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation, an ocean current that circulates water from the Gulf of Mexico across the Atlantic Ocean to Europe and then the Arctic. Such a slowdown could disturb global climate and weather patterns. 'The nature of weather in the Northern Hemisphere is directly tied to what's happening in the Arctic, because that ice floor basically at the bottom of the atmosphere helps determine the weather patterns that we get,' said Waleed Abdalati, who heads an environmental sciences institute at the University of Colorado Boulder. He was not involved in the WWA analysis. The Greenland ice sheet and other ice covering the Arctic can influence where and when wind blows, how much water content the wind has and whether precipitation falls as rain or snow. Most of the melting of the Greenland ice sheet happens in June, July and August. The May heat wave means there will be a longer melting season this year. Melting ice sheets and glaciers also contribute to sea level rise that is threatening to flood coastlines globally and inundate low-lying island nations in the Pacific Ocean. Indigenous communities in Greenland are increasingly encountering dangerous travel conditions as sea ice that was once constantly frozen begins to thaw. Access to traditional hunting locations are lost, and sled dogs can no longer travel the same routes. Thawing permafrost can destabilize buildings and increases the risk of landslides and tsunamis caused by landslides. Greenland dismisses interest from U.S. Greenland was recently thrust onto the global stage with Trump's interest in annexing it. The Arctic island is rich with oil, gas and rare earth minerals, and its proximity to the U.S., Russia and Europe has geopolitical appeal. Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has said Greenland 'will never, ever be a piece of property that can be bought by just anyone.' Twila Moon, deputy lead scientist at the U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center, said it is essential that Greenlanders lead decisions about their territory. 'Certainly an important part of this conversation is about climate change and climate impacts,' she said. She was not involved in the WWA analysis. Moon said the climate impacts Greenland is experiencing, particularly the warming global temperatures, stem from well-identified sources such as highly polluting nations and industries. She said actions such as converting to solar or wind energy and switching to transportation that emits less pollution create positive climate impacts for people far away. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
