Trump administration redirects 20,000 anti-drone missiles meant for Ukraine, Zelensky confirms
President Volodymyr Zelensky confirmed that U.S. President Donald Trump's administration diverted 20,000 anti-drone missiles originally intended for Ukraine to American forces in the Middle East, in an interview with ABC News published on June 8.
Zelensky said Ukraine had counted on the missiles to help counter relentless Russian drone attacks, which include swarms of Iranian-designed Shahed-type drones. On June 1, Russia launched a record 472 drones in a single night.
"We have big problems with Shaheds… we will find all the tools to destroy them," Zelensky said. "We counted on this project — 20,000 missiles. Anti-Shahed missiles. It was not expensive, but it's a special technology."
Zelensky said the plan had been agreed upon with then-U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and was launched under President Joe Biden's administration.
The Wall Street Journal reported on June 4 that the Trump administration had redirected the munitions, which include special fuzes used in advanced rocket systems to intercept drones, toward U.S. forces stationed in the Middle East.
The Pentagon reportedly informed Congress in a classified message that the reallocation of the fuzes for the Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System was deemed an "urgent issue" by current Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Join our community Support independent journalism in Ukraine. Join us in this fight. Support Us
A Ukrainian military intelligence (HUR) source told the Kyiv Independent on June 4 that Russia is preparing to launch more than 500 long-range drones per night in future attacks, as Moscow rapidly scales up drone production and constructs new launch sites.
The Trump administration has halted the approval of new military aid packages to Ukraine since the start of his second term in January.
Trump has repeatedly expressed skepticism about continued assistance to Kyiv and temporarily suspended military shipments earlier this year, only resuming them after Ukraine agreed to a ceasefire framework during peace talks in Jeddah on March 11.
Hegseth, who ordered the temporary halt, did not attend the most recent Ukraine Defense Contact Group meeting on June 4 — the first such absence by a U.S. defense chief since the beginning of the full-scale invasion.
Ukraine has urgently called on Western partners to expand investments in domestic arms production and deliver more air defense systems, including U.S.-made Patriots, to counter intensifying Russian airstrikes.
Despite growing international appeals and Kyiv's offer of a 30-day ceasefire as the basis for peace talks, Moscow continues to reject the proposal.
Trump, who spoke by phone with Russian President Vladimir Putin on June 4, has refused to impose new sanctions on Russia, saying he is focused on pursuing a negotiated ceasefire.
Read also: Elon Musk's father to attend pro-Kremlin event in Russia hosted by far-right ideologue
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Deportee's Lawyers Push for Contempt Proceedings Despite His Return
Just because Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia is back on U.S. soil to face criminal charges after being wrongfully deported to a prison in El Salvador does not mean that the Trump administration's troubles in the monthslong civil case have come to an end. On Sunday, lawyers for Mr. Abrego Garcia in the civil case filed blistering court papers arguing that even though the White House had finally complied with an order to return their client, the judge overseeing the case should still pursue contempt proceedings against Trump officials. The administration, the lawyers wrote, had spent much of the past three months 'engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders.' The papers, filed in Federal District Court in Maryland, where Mr. Abrego Garcia's family first filed suit in March to force the government to bring him back, had equally fiery words for the federal criminal indictment that was filed against him in Nashville on Friday. The indictment accused Mr. Abrego Garcia of taking part in a yearslong conspiracy to smuggle thousands of undocumented immigrants across the United States as a member of the violent street gang MS-13. In their court papers on Sunday, his lawyers in the civil case said that the White House's evident ability to bring Mr. Abrego Garcia back to the United States to face criminal charges put the lie to repeated claims by administration officials that they were unable to get him out of El Salvador at all. The lawyers also framed the indictment itself as the administration's 'latest act of contempt,' accusing the Justice Department of starting to work on it only while the department was 'under threat of sanctions' for having violated orders from Judge Paula Xinis, who has been handling the civil case from the start. 'Two things are now crystal clear,' the lawyers wrote. 'First, the government has always had the ability to return Abrego Garcia, but it has simply refused to do so. Second, the government has conducted a determined stalling campaign to stave off contempt sanctions long enough to concoct a politically face-saving exit from its own predicament.' The filing came in response to a request to Judge Xinis from the Justice Department to pause all of the proceedings in the civil case as department lawyers prepared a motion to dismiss it altogether. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
The Tunnel That Leads Underneath a Hospital in Southern Gaza
Two feet wide and less than six feet tall, the tunnel led deep beneath a major hospital in southern Gaza. The underground air bore the stench of what smelled like human remains. After walking some 40 yards along the tunnel, we found the likely cause. In a tiny room that the tunnel led to, the floor was stained with blood. It was here, according to the Israeli military, that Muhammad Sinwar — one of Hamas's top militant commanders — was killed last month after a nearby barrage of Israeli strikes. What we saw in that dark and narrow tunnel is one of the war's biggest Rorschach tests, the embodiment of a broader narrative battle between Israelis and Palestinians over how the conflict should be portrayed. The military escorted a reporter from The New York Times to the tunnel on Sunday afternoon, as part of a brief and controlled visit for international journalists that the Israelis hoped would prove that Hamas uses civilian infrastructure as a shield for militant activity. To Palestinians, Israel's attack on, and subsequent capture of, the hospital compound highlighted its own disregard for civilian activity. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
NATO's New Military Realism
Welcome news last week was that the North Atlantic Treaty Organization may soon aim for members to spend 5% of their economies on defense. The details are still to come at the alliance's summit this month. But America's friends in Europe are finally waking up, or at least most of them are, from their long nap since the 1990s and taking national survival seriously. 'I will propose an overall investment plan that would total 5% of GDP in defence investment,' NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said Thursday in Brussels. Members could count up to 1.5 percentage points of GDP for peripheral defense investment such as hardening roads for military transport. But even 3.5% dedicated to military spending is a sea change in Europe, up from the current 2% minimum target. Credit Mr. Rutte for realism about the threat: The Russians have 'only a $2 trillion economy compared to a $50 trillion economy for NATO' but are 'producing four times more in terms of ammunition.' NATO's job is to 'make sure that collectively we have what we need to prevent us from taking Russian language courses.' President Trump has been pressing the 5% target in his unsubtle browbeating that the Europeans must manage more of their own defense. No question the 5% is more appropriate for the threat and could motivate defense scofflaws such as Spain (1.28% in 2024) and Canada (1.37%). Several NATO allies on the Russian front lines understand the stakes: Poland is already above 4% on defense spending, and the Baltic states are heading to 5% without NATO's institutional prodding.
