RioCan REIT sees profit rise in second quarter despite Hudson's Bay strife
TORONTO — RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust says it's cutting financial ties to five properties held in its joint venture with the now-defunct Hudson's Bay as it works to move past the debacle as quickly as possible.
'We can report that RioCan has elected not to participate financially in 5 of 12 assets,' said chief financial officer Dennis Blasutti on an earnings call Friday.
'What it means is that we will not put any more money into the assets, in any form.'
RioCan was in a joint venture with Hudson's Bay that held the properties of 12 Hudson's Bay locations, but all stores closed at the start of June after liquidation sales.
Blasutti said that given the amount of debt associated with the five properties, and their future prospects, RioCan decided there wasn't enough potential for financial returns to dedicate any more money to them.
Debt on the properties, which one analyst noted runs past $100 million, is no longer RioCan's problem, said chief executive Jonathan Gitlin.
'We're no longer liable for that debt,' he said on the call.
RioCan said its net investment in the joint venture was $40.2 million or 0.5 per cent of RioCan's total equity as of the end of June.
The company is cutting ties with the HBC leases while reporting that it's own overall portfolio of properties continues to see strong gains in lease rates, despite tepid economic growth.
RioCan said its blend of new leases and renewals shows a 20.6 per cent increase in new lease rates compared with old ones, including spreads on new leases of 51.5 per cent.
'Demand continues to be strong from top tier necessity-based retailers that thrive in any economic backdrop. Their margins are well protected, allowing them to absorb market rents,' said Gitlin.
Its retail occupancy rate was 98.2 per cent, compared with 98.3 per cent last year.
The company reported a net income of $145.6 million for the quarter that ran to June 30, up from $122.3 million in the quarter last year.
It said net income was 49 cents per unit for the period, compared with a profit of 41 cents per unit for the same quarter last year.
Revenue totalled $361.7 million, up from $292.2 million last year.
---
Ian Bickis, The Canadian Press
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 8, 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
17 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Pembina Pipeline Reports Q2 2025 Results and Strategic Expansions
Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. An update from Pembina Pipeline ( (TSE:PPL)) is now available. Pembina Pipeline Corporation reported its second quarter 2025 financial results, highlighting earnings of $417 million and an adjusted EBITDA of $1,013 million. The company has updated its 2025 adjusted EBITDA guidance and announced several strategic initiatives, including enhanced propane exports, acquisitions in gas infrastructure, and pipeline expansions. These developments are aimed at improving market access, reducing costs, and meeting growing transportation demands. Pembina's capital investment program for 2025 has been revised to $1.3 billion, reflecting its commitment to expanding infrastructure and securing long-term agreements. The most recent analyst rating on (TSE:PPL) stock is a Buy with a C$56.00 price target. To see the full list of analyst forecasts on Pembina Pipeline stock, see the TSE:PPL Stock Forecast page. Spark's Take on TSE:PPL Stock According to Spark, TipRanks' AI Analyst, TSE:PPL is a Outperform. Pembina Pipeline's overall score reflects strong financial performance and positive corporate events. While technical analysis shows mixed signals, the company's valuation is attractive, and the earnings call indicates confidence in future growth despite some challenges. To see Spark's full report on TSE:PPL stock, click here. More about Pembina Pipeline Pembina Pipeline Corporation is a leading energy infrastructure company in North America, primarily engaged in the transportation and storage of hydrocarbons. The company focuses on providing integrated solutions for the oil and gas industry, with a significant presence in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin. Average Trading Volume: 3,588,461 Technical Sentiment Signal: Buy Current Market Cap: C$29.86B For detailed information about PPL stock, go to TipRanks' Stock Analysis page. Disclaimer & Disclosure Report an Issue
Globe and Mail
17 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Don't be fooled by the ‘yield on cost' fallacy
Why would you not calculate your model dividend portfolio's yield based on its book cost instead of its current market value? I'll calculate the yield both ways in today's column. Then I'll explain why I prefer one method over the other. Let's use my model Yield Hog Dividend Growth Portfolio as an example. This is an opportune time to do so, because the portfolio just reached a key milestone: Thanks to a 6-per-cent dividend hike from Capital Power Corp. (CPX) on July 30, the portfolio's annual income has now officially doubled since inception. When I launched the portfolio with $100,000 of virtual money on Oct. 1, 2017, it was throwing off $4,094 of income annually based on dividend rates at the time. Owing to scores of dividend increases and regular reinvestments of cash over the years, it's now generating $8,199 of income – an increase of 100 per cent. These dividend ETF picks diversify your portfolio while saving on currency-conversion costs Down on dividend investing? Here's why you shouldn't be Now, to your question about yield: The traditional way to calculate the yield of a portfolio or individual stock is to divide the projected annual income by the current market value. Dividing the model portfolio's annualized income of $8,199 by its market value of $192,896 (as of July 31) produces a yield of about 4.3 per cent. In other words, for every dollar of capital in the portfolio today, about 4.3 cents of income is being generated annually, based on current dividend rates. This is what is known as the 'indicated yield,' and it is by far the most common way to calculate yield. But some investors prefer to measure yield in a different way. They calculate the 'yield on cost' by dividing current annualized income by the original cost of the stock or portfolio, not by the current market value. Using this method, the yield on cost of the model portfolio is $8,199 divided by the original value of $100,000, or about 8.2 per cent. The main benefit of using yield on cost is that it illustrates the growth of income over time. Indeed, despite the tariff-related volatility that has swept financial markets this year, dividend increases have continued to roll in from utilities, power producers, banks, real estate investment trusts and other companies in the portfolio. This is one reason I invest in dividend growth stocks: They bring some stability and predictability to an uncertain world. But here's the problem: Some investors don't always interpret yield on cost properly. They make the mistake of comparing the yield on cost with the current yields available in the marketplace. This is an apples-to-oranges comparison that can lead investors astray. Let's look at a stock in my personal portfolio to see why. Back in 2010, I bought shares of the utility, Fortis Inc. (FTS). At the time, the stock was trading at $27.58 a share and paying $1.12 of dividends annually, for a yield of about 4.1 per cent. Fortis (which I also hold in the model portfolio) has raised its dividend every year since then and is currently paying $2.46 annually. My yield on cost is therefore about 8.9 per cent (calculated as $2.46 of current income divided by my original purchase price of $27.58). Some fans of using yield on cost might argue that I could never find a dividend yield that high in the marketplace, especially from a company as solid as Fortis. I've even seen investors use a high yield on cost to justify hanging on to a stock they might otherwise want to sell. But am I actually earning 8.9 per cent on my investment in Fortis? No, absolutely not, because – this is the key part – my investment is no longer worth $27.58 a share. That price is 15 years out of date. Thanks to steady appreciation in Fortis's stock price over the years, my investment is now worth about $70 a share, as of Friday morning. So, if I currently have about $70 of capital tied up in each Fortis share, and each share is generating $2.46 of dividends, the yield of my Fortis shares is actually 3.5 per cent, not 8.9 per cent. The higher yield is misleading because it is derived by applying a current dividend rate to an old share price, which makes it useless for comparing Fortis's yield with the yields of other dividend stocks. Let's look at a more extreme example to drive the point home. Imagine you purchased a rental apartment building 50 years ago for $100,000. At the time, the building was generating rental income of $10,000, for a yield of 10 per cent. Now, let's assume the apartment building's market value and its total rental income have both increased tenfold, to $1-million and $100,000, respectively. Would you calculate the apartment's yield by dividing the current rental income of $100,000 by the wildly out-of-date market value of $100,000? Of course not. The price you paid 50 years ago is no longer relevant. What matters for the purposes of calculating the apartment's yield, and comparing it with the yield of other apartments, is the property's current market value and annual income potential today. The building's true yield is therefore 10 per cent ($100,000 divided by $1,000,000). A high yield on cost is a nice reminder that your income has grown, but it should never be used as a metric to compare with other investments. So, the next time someone tells you they don't want to sell a stock because it has a high yield on cost, show them this column. E-mail your questions to jheinzl@ I'm not able to respond personally to e-mails, but I choose certain questions to answer in my column.
CTV News
17 minutes ago
- CTV News
Updated unemployment numbers from Statistics Canada
Atlantic Watch Young workers and the private sector bore the brunt of Canadian job losses in July.
