
US envoy urges Syria's al-Sharaa to revise policy or risk fragmentation
US envoy to Syria Tom Barrack said he had advised Sharaa in private discussions to revisit elements of the pre-war army structure, scale back Islamist indoctrination and seek regional security assistance.
In an interview in Beirut, Barrack told Reuters that without swift change, Sharaa risks losing the momentum that once propelled him to power.
Sharaa should say: 'I'm going to adapt quickly, because if I don't adapt quickly, I'm going to lose the energy of the universe that was behind me,' Barrack said. He said Sharaa could 'grow up as a president and say, 'the right thing for me to do is not to follow my theme, which isn't working so well.''
Sharaa, leader of a former al-Qaeda offshoot, came to power in Syria after guerilla fighters he led brought down Bashar al-Assad in December last year after more than 13 years of civil war.
Sharaa has promised to protect members of Syria's many sectarian minorities. But that pledge has been challenged, first by mass killings of members of the Alawite sect in March, and now by the latest violence in the southwest.
Hundreds of people have been reported killed in clashes in the southern province of Sweida between Druze fighters, Bedouin tribes and Sharaa's own forces. Israel intervened with airstrikes to prevent what it said was mass killing of Druze by government forces.
Barrack said the new government should consider being 'more inclusive quicker' when it comes to integrating minorities into the ruling structure.
But he also pushed back against reports that Syrian security forces were responsible for violations against Druze civilians. He suggested that ISIS militants may have been disguised in government uniforms and that social media videos are easily doctored and therefore unreliable.
'The Syrian troops haven't gone into the city. These atrocities that are happening are not happening by the Syrian regime troops. They're not even in the city because they agreed with Israel that they would not go in,' he said.
'No successor' to al-Sharaa
The US helped broker a ceasefire last week that brought an end to the fighting, which erupted between Bedouin tribal fighters and Druze factions on July 13.
Barrack said the stakes in Syria are dangerously high, with no succession plan or viable alternative to the country's new government.
'With this Syrian regime, there is no plan B. If this Syrian regime fails, somebody is trying to instigate it to fail,' Barrack said. 'For what purpose? There's no successor.'
Asked if Syria could follow the dire scenarios of Libya and Afghanistan, he said: 'Yes, or even worse.'
The US has said it did not support Israel's airstrikes on Syria. Barrack said the strikes had added to the 'confusion' in Syria.
Israel says Syria's new rulers are dangerous militants and has vowed to keep government troops out of the southwest and protect Syria's Druze minority in the area, encouraged by calls from Israel's own Druze community.
Barrack said his message to Israel is to have dialogue to alleviate their concerns about Syria's new leaders and that the US could play the role of an 'honest intermediary' to help resolve any concerns.
He said al-Sharaa had signaled from the beginning of his rule that Israel was not his enemy and that he could normalize ties in due time.
He said the United States was not dictating what the political format of Syria should be, other than stability, unity, fairness and inclusion.
'If they end up with a federalist government, that's their determination. And the answer to the question is, everybody may now need to adapt.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
4 hours ago
- Arab News
Developing countries must get help to access global markets, says Saudi minister
RIYADH: Saudi Arabia's deputy foreign minister, Waleed Elkhereiji emphasized the Kingdom's support for the global economy during a speech on Wednesday in Awaza, Turkmenistan, at the Third UN Conference on Landlocked Developing Countries. He stressed the important need to provide assistance for such countries so that they can more easily access global markets, and as a result enhance their security, stability and sustainable development, the Saudi Press Agency reported. Elkhereiji also highlighted the importance of international collaborations and strategic partnerships in efforts to achieve global economic stability and sustainable development, particularly in landlocked developing countries, and reaffirmed the Kingdom's commitment to finding lasting solutions to global economic challenges and obstacles to trade and development. Saudi Arabia aims to help implement global plans for sustainable development through smart investments and projects in line with the goals of the nation's own Saudi Vision 2030 plan for national development and diversification, he added, while also supporting cooperation between countries through its membership of international organizations. Also on Wednesday, Elkhereiji held talks with Rashid Meredov, Turkmenistan's deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs, about cooperation, and regional and international developments.


Asharq Al-Awsat
6 hours ago
- Asharq Al-Awsat
Hezbollah Says Lebanon Cabinet Decision to Seek State Monopoly on Arms Is 'Grave Sin'
Hezbollah said on Wednesday the Lebanese government was committing a "grave sin" by tasking the army with establishing a state monopoly on arms, sharpening a national divide over calls for the Shiite group to disarm. Despite unprecedented pressure from Washington and from its domestic rivals, the Iran-backed group has refused to fully relinquish its arsenal, which it retained after Lebanon's civil war ended in 1990 even as other militias disarmed. Now, the US has demanded Lebanon's cabinet explicitly pledge to strip Hezbollah of its weapons - a move that risks reigniting tensions in Lebanon, a nation of multiple sects where Hezbollah retains significant support among Shiites. The cabinet on Tuesday tasked the Lebanese army with drawing up a plan to confine arms across the country to six official security forces by year's end. Hezbollah rejected the decision in a written statement on Wednesday, saying it was a result of US "diktats" and that it would "deal with it as if it does not exist". "The government of Prime Minister Nawaf Salam committed a grave sin by taking a decision to strip Lebanon of its weapons to resist the Israeli enemy... This decision fully serves Israel's interest," the group said. The statement said Shiite ministers walked out of the cabinet session before the decision was reached as "an expression of the resistance's (Hezbollah's) rejection of this decision". The group said it remained ready to discuss a broader national security strategy and called on its supporters to remain patient. WAR WITH ISRAEL The session at Lebanon's presidential palace was the first time the cabinet addressed Hezbollah's weapons - unimaginable when the group was at the zenith of its power before a devastating war with Israel last year. A US-brokered ceasefire between Lebanon and Israel in November ended that conflict, called on Lebanon to confiscate all "unauthorized" weapons across the country and said Israel would stop offensive operations against Lebanese targets. But Israel has kept its troops at five points in Lebanon's southern border region and has continued air strikes against what it says are Hezbollah fighters and arms depots. In June, the US submitted a roadmap to Lebanese officials that proposed Hezbollah fully disarm in exchange for Israel withdrawing its troops and halting its strikes. Hezbollah and its main ally, the Amal Movement led by parliament speaker Nabih Berri, have demanded the order be reversed, saying Israel must halt its strikes before any discussion on weapons can be held. On Wednesday, Amal said Lebanon's government should focus on consolidating the November ceasefire and said the next cabinet session on Thursday would be a chance to correct course. Ministers will meet again on Thursday to continue discussions on the US proposal. Imad Salamey, chairman of the Lebanese-American University's Department of Political and International Studies, said the country's Shiite community, hit hardest by last year's war, was now concerned that relinquishing Hezbollah's arms would leave them vulnerable to further Israeli attacks. "We are most probably going into a polarized political landscape," he told Reuters.


Leaders
6 hours ago
- Leaders
US Has Bank of Potential Military Targets in Iran: Col. Dahouk
On June 22, the US intervened in the Iran-Israel conflict, striking three nuclear facilities in Iran, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, using bunker-buster bombs and Tomahawk missiles. The US President, Donald Trump, insisted that the US strikes had set Tehran's nuclear program back 'decades,' adding that Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities were 'completely and totally obliterated.' However, there are reports suggesting the Israeli and US strikes have not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear program. In the light of this, recent US assessments suggest that Washington has up to a year before it will be forced to take action against Iran's nuclear program, Al-Hadath TV reported, citing its sources. The sources added that the US does not want to give Iran the chance to restore its nuclear power. Within this context, the Former Senior Military Advisor to US Department of State, Colonel (Ret.) Abbas Dahouk, believes that the US strikes did not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear capabilities and that Washington has a bank of targets it could strike to prevent Tehran from possessing a nuclear weapon. One-Year Deadline Commenting on Al-Hadath's report, Col. Dahouk said: 'Based on the damage assessment of the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, namely Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, it seems that these sites were not completely destroyed.' He suggested that the US thinks that a year is enough 'if the Iranian did not change their calculations or sought to rebuild these sites. If they did that, the US would repeat the strikes.' Nuclear Calculations Col. Dahouk said that the nuclear technology and knowledge are hard to destroy by military strikes. 'It is clear that Iran has the nuclear technology, even though that Israel assassinated top Iranian nuclear scientists – a major hit for Iran,' he noted. 'But in the end, no one benefits. The US favors diplomatic settlement but it doesn't seem available now. Iran is under harsh sanctions and pressure. The US wants to impose more, and the military solution seems to be the last option. And this is what the US and Israel tried to do, and pressures continue on Iran to push it toward changing its nuclear calculations,' he said. Snapback Sanctions Asked whether the snapback mechanism could influence Tehran's calculations or if Washington would need to pursue a new negotiation mechanism, Col. Dahouk said the US prefers diplomacy but Washington and Tehran have diverging red lines in negotiations. 'Washington and President Trump are ready for diplomatic settlement. They want to embrace the diplomatic path but the red lines are different between the US and Iran,' he said. 'The US doesn't want Iran to possess any enrichment capabilities, but Iran wants to keep its right to enrichment. Therefore, there are some conditions that Iran doesn't want to accept. I think here lies the problem and I think that Iran has some enriched uranium with unknown whereabouts. But the main issue is uranium enrichment. The US will not allow Iran to enrich but Iran wants to keep that right. This is the dilemma,' he explained. Iran Nuclear Facilities The Former Senior Military Advisor said that the one-year deadline is an indication that Iran's nuclear program was not completely destroyed. 'The recent US assessment suggests that the strikes have set back the program few years,' Col. Dahouk noted. 'But what lies underground is still unknown, especially the 400 kg of 60%-enriched uranium, and the condition of the centrifuges, whether they have been destroyed or not. So, the US strikes had some impact but they didn't destroy Iran's nuclear sites, particularly Natanz and Isfahan where facilities above the ground were destroyed but underground ones remained intact,' he added. Potential Targets Col. Dahouk explained that Iran has several sites, other than the three nuclear sites hit in the recent strikes, that could be on the US' target list. 'No, there are other sites that support the Iranian nuclear program. Some of these sites could be a potential target for US strikes,' he pointed out. Moreover, 'sites that were not completely destroyed could be hit again. I think that Iran's missile program could be also targeted, as well as other facilities. The US has a bank of military targets it could strike,' Col. Dahouk said. Short link : Post Views: 24