
What's it like to use this new strong and light inflatable bike helmet
A new inflatable bike helmet, the Ventete aH-1, was designed to help tackle that problem. When the helmet's not in use, it flattens so it can more easily fit in a bag. When you need to use it, it comes with a tiny battery-powered pump that fully inflates it in 30 seconds.
After a decade of development by a London-based startup, the helmet came out in the U.K. last year and immediately sold out. It's not yet available in the U.S., but I had the chance to try it out. (The design was one of the winners of Fast Company 's 2025 World Changing Ideas Awards.)
It looks nothing like any helmet I've ever seen. Instead of foam, it's made from a series of ribs covered in strong, triple-laminated nylon. The flattened version isn't small—it's roughly as long as a laptop. Even when it's not inflated, it's still somewhat thick. But unlike a typical helmet, it did easily squeeze into my backpack.
It took me a couple of attempts to figure out how to inflate it, although the company has now tweaked the design so that the pump can be operated hands-free. In the version I tested, I had to hold the pump at a particular angle on the helmet's Presta valve to work correctly. (When it did work, the buzz of the pump was also very loud: I was slightly embarrassed to use it in public.) But it was fast. A tiny level on the side shows when it's correctly inflated. A strap at the back helps customize the fit.
The design actually outperforms typical helmets on safety. When Imperial College London ran a study testing 30 different bike helmets, the aH-1 scored 44.1% better than the others in linear impact tests.
'It's incredibly strong,' says Colin Herperger, cofounder and CEO of Ventete, the startup that designed the helmet. 'One of the founders drove his car on it. If you think about any other helmet, it would be in pieces. When people think about an inflatable structural system, they think it's probably soft or squishy, and in fact, it's the opposite. It's actually super stiff.'
The design is also comfortable to wear. When I tried riding with it on a hot day, my head stayed cool. Herperger points out that EPS foam, the material used in conventional bike helmets, is the same material used to insulate coolers to keep ice from melting.
In a standard foam helmet, 'heat is trying to leave your head, and it's reflecting it back down and causing you to further overheat,' Herperger says. In the new design, 'because of the chamber system, it's actually lifted off the head, and you get a conductive airflow between the head and the helmet. So the hot air is just drawn away from your head.'
I liked the way the origami-like design looked, too. It's something I'd definitely be willing to wear—though at £350 (around $475) for the helmet and pump, it isn't cheap. And because it's still waiting for regulatory approval in the U.S., I can't keep using it now. While the timeline for approval isn't clear, it may roll out here later this year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Fewer crashes, longer trips under 20mph 'the roads are definitely safer'
Journey times on Welsh roads are increasing as drivers slow down under the country's 20mph speed limit law, according to new data. Vehicle speeds on key 20mph routes have dropped by an average of 3.8mph, and compliance with the new limit has improved significantly. Wales Online readers remain to be convinced of the benefits of the law. Figures show more than 130,000 drivers have now been caught exceeding the 20mph default speed limit. The data, covering November 2023 (two months after the law was introduced) to May 2025, shows a gradual rise in the number of drivers breaking the limit again. A report by Transport for Wales, released this month, evaluates how the new default speed limit is performing. It notes that while speeds have fluctuated, there has been a 'significant and sustained' increase in drivers travelling at or below 24mph — the benchmark for compliance. READ MORE: Welsh rock legend fights for his life in hospital READ MORE: Horrifying footage shows street brawl in Newport involving multiple people armed with long poles The report found that vehicle speeds on main 20mph roads have dropped by an average of 3.8mph. Around 54% of drivers now travel at or below 24mph, up from just 20.8% before the change — a shift that is expected to reduce both the likelihood of collisions and the severity of injuries. Average speeds have increased slightly between winter 2023/24 and winter 2024/25. Average journey times on 15 routes — measured during both morning and evening in both directions — rose in 57 out of 60 cases. However, in 44 of those, the increase was no more than two minutes. At the same time, journey time variability has reduced in 45 cases, offering more consistent travel durations. Monitoring of vehicle and pedestrian interactions at crossings has so far produced inconclusive results. Similarly, air quality data shows no significant difference in nitrogen dioxide levels between areas with and without the 20mph limit. While it is too early to draw firm conclusions about trends in pedestrian and cyclist casualties, there has been an 11.8% drop in overall road casualties in the four quarters since the law came into effect. Commenter Rodgerthedodger says: 'I know that many don't like the 20 limit, but I do. I see far more courtesy towards pedestrians since its introduction. It has brought a valuable reduction in the estrangement between pedestrians and drivers, so I'm all for it. I realise that when you drive north through the valleys with their ribbon development it's tiresome, but doesn't that just show that the WG should have built bypasses for these towns decades ago?' Seaphin thinks: 'The speed limit means prices rise as trucks take longer to deliver. it also means an increase in the amount of fuel used, so much for clean air!' Goatman writes: 'I met loads of tourists down Pembrokeshire this year that said as much as they love Pembrokeshire they will not be coming back to Wales. This government in Cardiff is either destroying the tourism industry on purpose or they are just incompetent.' 636396 points out: 'I travel from Newport to every weekend. Virtually none of the route is 20mph, a couple of miles at most. The only bits that are 20mph in rural areas are the towns and villages, they are so small, the speed restrictions make no difference to overall travel times.' Pontybear states: 'But the roads are definitely safer and that cannot be argued.' Blackhand18 replies: 'Roads are not safer as drivers are watching the speed dial instead of the road. That definitely cannot be argued. Plus the frustration of crawling at 20mph is damaging to mental health and wellbeing.' wizard until i die says: 'Huge sections of roads in the west of England have been 20mph for years, nobody's moaning over there. Drive to the speed limit and we'll all be ok.' PJ372 thinks: 'Wales needs a common sense, targeted approach to appropriate speed limits, not the ludicrous mess we have now.' Jeff2509 believes: '20mph works in that it saves lives, injury and money in return for a few extra minutes on journeys. 'Sorry about your child's death, Mrs Jones, but the driver wanted to save a minute on his journey.'' Simoncorkswill retorts: 'It's suitable at certain points, but entirely unnecessary in others. All those who witter on about saving lives, may I suggest learning and teaching how to cross roads? I've noticed pedestrians being even more careless since it's introduction thinking they no longer really have to bother looking at all.' Has the 20mph speed limit in Wales significantly affected travel times and road safety? Share your views in our comments section.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication of M&A scrutiny
A surprising figure is celebrating Figma's successful IPO: Lina Khan, former chair of the Federal Trade Commission. In a Friday afternoon post on X, Khan linked to an article about Figma's impressive first day of trading and argued the IPO is 'a great reminder that letting startups grow into independently successful businesses, rather than be bought up by existing giants, can generate enormous value.' Khan was alluding to a $20 billion deal for Adobe to acquire Figma that fell through back in 2023. While Adobe cited the lack of a 'clear path' to approval from the European Commission and the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority, the acquisition also faced regulatory scrutiny in the United States over concerns that it could prevent Figma from being an 'effective competitor' to Adobe. Khan was FTC chair at the time, leading the agency to challenge Big Tech on fronts including startup acquisitions — to the point that companies tried to avoid this scrutiny with 'reverse acqui-hires' in which they hired key team members and licensed technology rather than acquiring startups outright. (The practice seems to be continuing despite Khan's departure from the FTC.) While her aggressive stance led to intense criticism from corners of the tech industry, she defended her approach by saying that only a tiny percentage of deals received 'a second look' and arguing that founders would ultimately benefit from 'a world in which you have six or seven or eight potential suitors' rather than 'just one or two.' And although Khan — who'd been appointed by President Joe Biden — resigned at the start of the second Trump administration, her comments Friday paint the Figma IPO as a vindication for her approach, calling the IPO 'a win for employees, investors, innovation, and the public.' Of course, Khan's critics are more likely to see Figma's success as coming despite regulatory scrutiny, not because of it. For example, Wedbush Security analyst Dan Ives told Business Insider, 'Figma is a massive success, but it's because of the company's innovative growth and not due to the FTC and Kahn.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


TechCrunch
3 hours ago
- TechCrunch
Lina Khan points to Figma IPO as vindication for M&A scrutiny
A surprising figure is celebrating Figma's successful IPO: Lina Khan, former chair of the Federal Trade Commission. In a Friday afternoon post on X, Khan linked to an article about Figma's impressive first day of trading and argued the IPO is 'a great reminder that letting startups grow into independently successful businesses, rather than be bought up by existing giants, can generate enormous value.' Khan was alluding to a $20 billion deal for Adobe to acquire Figma that fell through back in 2023. While Adobe cited the lack of a 'clear path' to approval from the European Commission and the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority, the acquisition also faced regulatory scrutiny in the United States over concerns that it could prevent Figma from being an 'effective competitor' to Adobe. Khan was FTC chair at the time, leading the agency to challenge Big Tech on fronts including startup acquisitions — to the point that companies tried to avoid this scrutiny with 'reverse acqui-hires' in which they hired key team members and licensed technology rather than acquiring startups outright. (The practice seems to be continuing despite Khan's departure from the FTC.) While her aggressive stance led to intense criticism from corners of the tech industry, she defended her approach by saying that only a tiny percentage of deals received 'a second look' and arguing that founders would ultimately benefit from 'a world in which you have six or seven or eight potential suitors' rather than 'just one or two.' And although Khan — who'd been appointed by President Joe Biden — resigned at the start of the second Trump administration, her comments Friday paint the Figma IPO as a vindication for her approach, calling the IPO 'a win for employees, investors, innovation, and the public.' Of course, Khan's critics are more likely to see Figma's success as coming despite regulatory scrutiny, not because of it. For example, Wedbush Security analyst Dan Ives told Business Insider, 'Figma is a massive success, but it's because of the company's innovative growth and not due to the FTC and Kahn.'