Thailand moves to recriminalize cannabis, disrupting $1 billion marijuana industry
Thailand is moving to recriminalize cannabis, reversing its 2022 decriminalization and impacting a marijuana industry valued at over $1 billion. New regulations will ban recreational cannabis use and require prescriptions for medical sales. The policy shift affects thousands of cannabis businesses, sparking uncertainty among retailers, investors, and international tourists
Thailand's cannabis industry faces disruption as the government moves to recriminalize marijuana, banning recreational cannabis use and restricting sales to medical purposes, impacting dispensaries in tourism hubs like Bangkok's Khao San Road REUTERS/Chalinee Thirasupa TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Thailand's government is moving to recriminalize cannabis, initiating new restrictions on the marijuana industry that has grown rapidly since decriminalization in 2022. The Ministry of Public Health has issued a directive banning the sale of cannabis for recreational use and mandating that any retail purchase require a prescription from a licensed medical professional.Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin confirmed on Tuesday, June 24, that, 'Cannabis will be classified as a narcotic in the future.' The new rules will become law once they are published in the Royal Gazette, which is expected in the coming days.Also read: Thailand to tighten control on cannabis after smuggling ... This policy reversal follows political instability in the ruling coalition. The Bhumjaithai Party, which had advocated for cannabis legalization, withdrew from the government last week after tensions involving Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's handling of a border dispute with Cambodia.The move comes three years after Thailand became the first Asian nation to decriminalize recreational cannabis. However, the 2022 policy shift lacked a regulatory framework, resulting in rapid expansion of cannabis-related businesses across the country. Tens of thousands of dispensaries opened, especially in tourism-heavy regions such as Bangkok, Pattaya, and Chiang Mai.The Thai Chamber of Commerce previously estimated that the marijuana industry, including both recreational and medical cannabis, could reach a valuation of $1.2 billion by 2025.Government officials now say that unregulated access has created serious social issues, particularly affecting minors. 'The policy must return to its original goal of controlling cannabis for medical use only,' said government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub in a statement.Also read: Thailand tightens border controls for tourists after Cambodia clash Cannabis industry workers and business owners expressed concern about the abrupt shift. 'This is my main source of income,' said Punnathat Phutthisawong, 25, an employee at Green House Thailand in Bangkok. 'Many shops are probably just as shocked because a lot of them invested heavily.'Chokwan 'Kitty' Chopaka, a longtime cannabis advocate, said the industry has been stifled by political interference. 'The cannabis industry has become a hostage to politics,' she said.Despite the pending regulation, cannabis dispensaries in key tourism areas remain open. On Khao San Road in Bangkok, tourists were still visiting local shops. 'There are shops everywhere, so how do they reverse this? I don't think they can,' said Daniel Wolf, a visitor from Australia. 'It's absolutely insane.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
16 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Zelenskyy's clothes have become talking point again... this time at Nato Summit
At the just-concluded Nato Summit, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy appeared more formally dressed than usual since the war with Russia began in early 2022. He swapped his typical military-style outfit for a blazer with a military touch, dress trousers, and a shirt. Back in February, the Ukrainian leader's decision not to wear a suit during a meeting with Donald Trump created a furore read more Zelenskyy set aside his usual military-style clothing for a blazer with a military feel, dress trousers and a shirt, though he skipped the tie. Reuters 'Why don't you wear a suit?' That was the question Volodymyr Zelenskyy faced at the White House a few months ago. This time, at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Ukrainian president appeared in a solid black jacket and shirt, similar to a suit. Notably, Zelenskyy was not part of the main Nato discussions but did have a separate meeting with Trump , where they discussed a list of weapons Ukraine hopes to buy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier, the attention on Zelenskyy's choice of clothes at the White House drew sharp criticism from Ukrainians, most of whom have supported him since Russia's invasion in February 2022. But why were his clothes such a big talking point both before and during the recent Nato summit? And why doesn't he wear a suit? Let's take a look: Why Zelenskyy's outfit became the talking point at Nato summit At the recent Nato summit, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy appeared more formally dressed than he has been since the war with Russia began in early 2022. He set aside his usual military-style clothing for a blazer with a military feel, dress trousers and a shirt, though he skipped the tie. This subtle change caused buzz online and was picked up by the Ukrainian edition of ELLE Magazine, which on Wednesday called it 'visual diplomacy of a new kind'. This was Zelenskyy's first time wearing a suit at a Nato summit. Reuters But caused him to change? One reason could be the weight given to this year's Nato summit. Many media outlets described it as one of the most meaningful meetings in the alliance's 76-year history. Key topics included defence budgets, Russia, and how committed Donald Trump remains to Europe's security, issues that, according to Euronews, made some delegates cautious about displeasing the unpredictable US president. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This was Zelenskyy's first time wearing a suit at a Nato summit, though not the first time since the war began. Earlier in the week, he wore a suit jacket during his meeting in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, where they discussed defence ties and plans for joint drone production. What happened at White House months ago? Back in February, during a meeting with Donald Trump, the Ukrainian leader was questioned by a reporter about his choice of clothing. 'Why don't you wear a suit?' asked Brian Glenn from Real America's Voice. 'You're at the highest level in this country's office, and you refuse to wear a suit.' He didn't stop there. 'Do you own a suit?' Glenn went on, adding, 'A lot of Americans have problems with you not respecting the dignity of this office.' Zelenskyy responded briefly: 'I will wear costume after this war will finish.' The word 'costume' translates from kostyum, the Ukrainian term for a suit. He then made a light jab at the reporter. 'Maybe something like yours, yes. Maybe something better, I don't know,' he said, drawing laughter from those present. 'Maybe something cheaper.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD After the exchange in the Oval Office, Glenn posted online, saying he had 'extreme empathy for the people of Ukraine' but claimed Zelenskyy's lack of formal dress showed 'his inner disrespect' towards the US. The reporter who asked Zelensky if he owned a suit, Brian Glenn, is from the pro-Trump network Real America's Voice and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's boyfriend. He got one of the rare Oval Office interviewer spots after the White House blocked the Associated Press — Drew Harwell (@drewharwell) February 28, 2025 Supporters of the Ukrainian leader soon responded by sharing wartime photos of Winston Churchill in casual attire. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Not long after the clash, Zelenskyy was asked to leave the White House, as ties between the two countries hit a rough patch. However, this week's meeting between the two leaders appeared far more positive. Zelenskyy also thanked Trump and the US, and spoke of his hopes for 'real peace' between Ukraine and Russia. US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a meeting in The Hague, Netherlands. Ukrainian Presidential Press Service/Reuters 'I had a long and substantive meeting with President Trump. We covered all the truly important issues,' Zelenskyy wrote on social media. 'I thank Mr President, I thank the United States. We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people.' Why Zelenskyy doesn't wear a suit Zelenskyy's clothing choice is meant to reflect his role as Ukraine's commander-in-chief and a visible gesture of unity with the country's armed forces. Elvira Gasanova, the designer behind the Damirli brand, often seen on Zelenskyy, told Politico, 'When world leaders see Zelenskyy in military style, it is a signal — 'Ukraine is at war and I am part of this fight'.' She said that his look is a commitment, even when meeting someone like Trump. It shows support for both civilians and soldiers caught in the war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In times of peace, suits are usually a symbol of diplomacy, routine meetings, and political normalcy. But Ukraine, Gasanova said, is still in crisis. 'The president shows that the war is still going on, that the country is still in a struggle,' she said. His decision to stick with his wartime outfit during the White House visit received strong backing at home, according to The Kyiv Independent. Military attire also carries a deeper meaning. As Euronews reported, uniforms are often linked to strength and leadership. Worn by generals, war veterans and statesmen, they can convey a sense of credibility and authority.
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
From shortage to surplus: India pours record rice crop into ethanol
Live Events PROBLEM OF PLENTY (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India is allocating record rice volumes for ethanol production as it struggles with unprecedented inventories that are likely to swell further with the arrival of the new season crop, a reversal from earlier shortages that led to export more rice to ethanol is helping to reduce rice stocks in the world's biggest producer and exporter of the grain and keeping India's ambitious ethanol blending programme on track despite a drop in supplies of traditional feedstock sugar March, India removed the last of roughly two years of restrictions on rice exports, which had been prompted by poor rains that curtailed production. This year's ample monsoon rains are poised to deliver an abundant harvest."Our top priority is making sure we have enough food," a senior government official told Reuters, declining to be named because he was not authorised to speak with media."But since we have way more rice than we actually need for that, we've decided to use some of it for ethanol production," the official state-run Food Corporation of India (FCI) has allocated a record 5.2 million metric tons of rice for ethanol, equivalent to nearly 9% of global rice shipments in the 2024/25 marketing year ending in June. In the previous year, less than 3,000 tons of FCI rice went into buys nearly half of India's rice crop and currently has reserves, including unmilled paddy, of a record 59.5 million metric tons on June 1, far exceeding the government's target of 13.5 million tons for July availability of rice for ethanol has taken pressure off corn prices, which jumped to record high last years, forcing record imports by distilleries use corn, rice and damaged food grains as feedstock, switching between them depending on the No.3 oil importer and consumer of petroleum products, aims to increase the blending of ethanol into gasoline to 20% by 2025/26. Last month, it nearly hit that target, reaching 19.8% ethanol, thanks to plentiful 20% goal had appeared to be beyond reach when sugarcane supplies, which accounted for 80% of ethanol feedstock until three years ago, tumbled because of drought in 2023, forcing the world's biggest consumer of the sweetener to sharply reduce diversion of sugar for year, India's gasoline included 14.6% more rice will be used for ethanol if the government either lowers rice prices or increases the ethanol buying price, said Arushi Jain, joint secretary at the Grain Ethanol Manufacturers FCI is selling rice at Rs 22,500 per ton, while oil marketing companies are procuring rice-based ethanol at Rs 58.5 per litre, which doesn't provide enough margin to ramp up rice-based ethanol production even further, said Akshay Modi, managing director at Modi Naturals Ltd, an ethanol stocks could rise further as India is likely to harvest a bumper crop from October, said B.V. Krishna Rao, president of the Rice Exporters can increase exports only so much, said Rao, as it already accounts for more than 40% of global rice removing export curbs, India has been aggressively exporting rice, with shipments likely to rise nearly 25% to a record 22.5 million tons in the 2025 calendar year, denting exports of rivals including Thailand and harvested a record 146.1 million tons of rice this crop year ending in June, far surpassing local demand of 120.7 million tons, according the Food and Agriculture stockpiles will force India to allocate even more rice for ethanol production next marketing year, said Himanshu Agrawal, executive director at rice exporter Satyam Balajee."The government's going to have a hard time offloading all that rice they bought from farmers," said Agrawal.
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who leaked Iran's nuclear program strike assessment? Karoline Leavitt issues grave warning
The White House is looking for a person who allegedly leaked a confidential Pentagon intelligence assessment questioning the damage caused by US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The leaked report, which seemed to downplay what the US government thought was a huge military success, infuriated various top officials, including President Donald Trump. Who leaked Iran's nuclear program strike assessment? Karoline Leavitt issues grave warning (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)(REUTERS) White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has now blasted the leaker in a statement, saying, "They should go to jail.' What we know about the leak The report was written by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and circulated on Sunday, hours after B-2 bombers dropped bombs on three key Iranian nuclear locations, including the Fordow enrichment site. The DIA document reportedly claimed that Iran's nuclear program may have been delayed by only a few months. The DIA report, however, was only dependent on initial information and was not a complete assessment. It was compiled without contributions from the CIA, the National Security Agency (NSA), or other intelligence groups. "It was based on intel from one day, and it was the day after the strike, so clearly it wasn't anywhere near a complete assessment," one official said, according to the New York Post. "The actual assessment admits that it was not coordinated with the intelligence community." The DIA report was marked "top secret' even though it lacked full input from agencies. The leak happened before Iran and Israel's ceasefire deal on Monday. The investigation is now being led by the FBI. The Justice Department is expected to take appropriate actions once the individual is found. CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently released a statement saying the strikes caused serious long-term damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. This contradicted a previous Pentagon assessment that affirmed the success of the strikes. "A body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes," Ratcliffe said. "This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years."
