Who leaked Iran's nuclear program strike assessment? Karoline Leavitt issues grave warning
The White House is looking for a person who allegedly leaked a confidential Pentagon intelligence assessment questioning the damage caused by US airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. The leaked report, which seemed to downplay what the US government thought was a huge military success, infuriated various top officials, including President Donald Trump. Who leaked Iran's nuclear program strike assessment? Karoline Leavitt issues grave warning (REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque)(REUTERS)
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt has now blasted the leaker in a statement, saying, "They should go to jail.' What we know about the leak
The report was written by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) and circulated on Sunday, hours after B-2 bombers dropped bombs on three key Iranian nuclear locations, including the Fordow enrichment site. The DIA document reportedly claimed that Iran's nuclear program may have been delayed by only a few months.
The DIA report, however, was only dependent on initial information and was not a complete assessment. It was compiled without contributions from the CIA, the National Security Agency (NSA), or other intelligence groups.
"It was based on intel from one day, and it was the day after the strike, so clearly it wasn't anywhere near a complete assessment," one official said, according to the New York Post. "The actual assessment admits that it was not coordinated with the intelligence community."
The DIA report was marked "top secret' even though it lacked full input from agencies. The leak happened before Iran and Israel's ceasefire deal on Monday.
The investigation is now being led by the FBI. The Justice Department is expected to take appropriate actions once the individual is found.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe recently released a statement saying the strikes caused serious long-term damage to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. This contradicted a previous Pentagon assessment that affirmed the success of the strikes.
"A body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes," Ratcliffe said. "This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
32 minutes ago
- India.com
China in BIG trouble due to Israel-Iran war; Xi Jinping now depends on Putin for..., good news for Russia due to...
(File) China's support for Iran in the recent Israel-Iran war may prove costly for Beijing as the South Asian power is likely to bear the brunt of a potential oil crisis if the conflict reignites. Beijing issued a harsh condemnation of Israel and the United States, after the two allies bombed Iranian nuclear sites last week. But experts believe that China's support for Iran will likely decrease in the future due its emerging role as a mediator in the Middle East and the damage caused by Tehran's threats to block the Strait of Hormuz. On the other hand, Russia is expected to benefit more from the Israel-Iran war, which is why Moscow largely distanced itself from the conflict, barring a few strong statements, even though Tehran is a major ally. China now more dependent on Russia for energy needs As per media reports, China, which purchases a large chunk of Iran's oil and gas produce, is worried because Tehran will likely blockade the Strait of Hormuz in case of another attack by Israel and/or the US, which will negatively impact Beijing's energy needs. The situation has forced China to once again consider Russia's proposed Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, according to a report by the Wall Street Journal. Citing anonymous sources close to Beijing, the WSJ report said China has begun showing interest in the Power of Siberia 2 project, after Beijing had earlier disagreed with Moscow's proposals regarding the ownership and cost of the proposed pipeline. The report also noted that China does not want to be overly dependent on any single source for its energy needs, and is considering to purchase more oil and gas from other oil-producing countries apart from allies like Iran and Russia. Notably, about a third of China's gas imports come as LNG from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the WSJ report said, citing data from Rystad Energy. Additionally, Russia is China's third-largest LNG supplier after Australia and Qatar, and according to S&P Global, Russia is also China's largest pipeline supplier, via Siberia 1, whose throughput is set to reach 38 billion cubic meters this year.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
How Much NATO Countries Spend On Defence: A Breakdown After 5% Hike
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has announced an increase in its defence spending target, with member countries now expected to allocate 5 per cent of their GDP to defence by 2035. The agreement, reached at a summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, is nearly double the alliance's long-standing 2 per cent benchmark and comes amid renewed pressure from US President Donald Trump for allies to boost their military contributions, The Washington Post reported. NATO is a military alliance of 32 member countries across North America and Europe. They include the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Turkey, and most European Union nations. How Much Do NATO Countries Currently Spend On Defence? As of 2024, NATO countries spent an average of 2.61 per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. But this average masks wide disparities in individual national contributions. According to NATO's estimates: Poland spent the highest proportion of its GDP on defence, over 4 per cent, making it the only country to exceed that threshold. Estonia and Latvia each spent about 3.4 per cent. The US, with the largest GDP among NATO members, spent approximately 3.2 per cent. Spain spent 1.2 per cent of its GDP on defence, the smallest share in the alliance. Canada, Portugal, and Italy each spent around 1.5 per cent. Slovenia, Belgium, and Luxembourg fell slightly below those levels. Who Met The 2% Target? At least 22 of NATO's 32 members met or exceeded the original 2 per cent spending target set in 2014. The remaining nine countries did not. Iceland is excluded from these estimates, as it does not maintain a standing military. This target, while influential, has never been legally binding. Even so, average defence spending among NATO members has risen significantly, from 1.4 per cent of GDP in 2014 to over 2 per cent in 2024. A New 5% Benchmark While the new 5 per cent goal is intended to signal stronger collective defence, its implementation is far from guaranteed. At the summit, Donald Trump singled out Spain, accusing it of " wanting a free ride" and threatening to penalise the country in future trade negotiations if it did not increase its defence budget. In response, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said Spain had no plans to meet the 5 per cent goal. He called the previous 2 per cent target "sufficient" and "realistic" for Spain's economy. Rachel Rizzo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center, said that the wording of the agreement may offer flexibility. "The language of the 5 per cent agreement may leave just enough wiggle room for some allies, such as Spain, to opt-out," she said as per CBS News. What Counts As NATO's Defence Spending? NATO calculates defence spending to include weapons and equipment, personnel costs, operational readiness, infrastructure, and other military capabilities.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
After Kaitlan Collins, CNN's Natasha Bertrand, gets on Trump's nerves - he says thrown her out like a dog
Donald Trump is fighting CNN again , and this time it's reporter Natasha Bertrand who is in the line of fire. Trump went off on social media after she shared information about a leaked intelligence report about Iran. The president did not hold back, resulting in yet another confrontation between the White House and CNN. What did Trump say about Natasha Bertrand? Donald Trump has unleashed a nasty attack against CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand, calling for her to be 'thrown out like a dog' over leaked intelligence on Iran The president also disclosed that he has been watching CNN reporter Natasha Bertrand for days, in his most recent outburst since the leak made headlines, as per a report by the Daily Beast. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ontdek je slimheid met 22 vragen en zie je IQ. WW IQ Test BEGIN NU Undo ALSO READ: Fito captured: The shocking crimes and net worth of Ecuador's most wanted man, José Adolfo Macias 'Natasha Bertrand should be FIRED from CNN! I watched her for three days doing Fake News.' He wrote on his Truth Social platform that she should be chastised IMMEDIATELY and then discarded "like a dog." Live Events The meltdown was Donald Trump's most recent attack on the media, which he has used frequently since it started to wonder if the US strikes on Iran's three main nuclear enrichment facilities had been "obliterated." 'She should not be allowed to work at Fake News CNN. It's people like her who destroyed the reputation of a once great Network. Her slant was so obviously negative, besides, she doesn't have what it takes to be an on camera correspondent, not even close. FIRE NATASHA!', Trump stated in yet another post. The president personally attacked Bertrand, calling for her dismissal and accusing her of "trying to ruin our Patriot Pilots by harming their reputation when, in reality, they performed a GREAT job and hit "pay dirt" — TOTAL OBLITERATION!" Did CNN defend Bertrand? On Wednesday, CNN responded by asserting in a statement that the organization fully supports Bertrand's journalism and that of her colleagues. CNN backed up Bertrand's reporting, saying it was true and good for the public, as tensions rose between Trump and the media. CNN admitted that the results were preliminary. 'We do not believe it reasonable to criticize CNN reporters for accurately reporting the existence of the assessment and accurately characterizing its findings, which are in the public interest,' stated CNN's communications section, reported the Daily Beast. — CNN Communications (@CNNPR) June 25, 2025 In recent years, President Donald Trump has compared other perceived adversaries to dogs, including former FBI Director James B. Comey, former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, and even his own Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was formerly a competitor for the GOP's 2016 presidential candidacy. What leaked report angered Donald Trump? The Pentagon's intelligence branch, the Defense Intelligence Agency, provided the preliminary analysis, which also purportedly discovered that while the attack did not destroy Iran's underground structures, it did block access to two of its three primary nuclear sites. The news was first rejected by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who said it was leaked by a "low level loser" to discredit the president. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has opened a probe into the leak, claimed it denigrated the efforts of US military combatants, while Rubio also voiced his opinion, calling it the work of "professional stabbers." Meanwhile, Trump claimed that the report's conclusions were "not complete" and that additional data will provide a more accurate picture of the battle damage sustained over the weekend. FAQs Why did Donald Trump criticize CNN's Natasha Bertrand ? He was outraged by her coverage of a leaked intelligence assessment about Iran and demanded her dismissal. What did CNN say? CNN defended Bertrand, stating that her reporting was accurate and in the public interest.
