How Much NATO Countries Spend On Defence: A Breakdown After 5% Hike
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) has announced an increase in its defence spending target, with member countries now expected to allocate 5 per cent of their GDP to defence by 2035.
The agreement, reached at a summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, is nearly double the alliance's long-standing 2 per cent benchmark and comes amid renewed pressure from US President Donald Trump for allies to boost their military contributions, The Washington Post reported.
NATO is a military alliance of 32 member countries across North America and Europe. They include the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Turkey, and most European Union nations.
How Much Do NATO Countries Currently Spend On Defence?
As of 2024, NATO countries spent an average of 2.61 per cent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. But this average masks wide disparities in individual national contributions.
According to NATO's estimates:
Poland spent the highest proportion of its GDP on defence, over 4 per cent, making it the only country to exceed that threshold.
Estonia and Latvia each spent about 3.4 per cent.
The US, with the largest GDP among NATO members, spent approximately 3.2 per cent.
Spain spent 1.2 per cent of its GDP on defence, the smallest share in the alliance.
Canada, Portugal, and Italy each spent around 1.5 per cent.
Slovenia, Belgium, and Luxembourg fell slightly below those levels.
Who Met The 2% Target?
At least 22 of NATO's 32 members met or exceeded the original 2 per cent spending target set in 2014. The remaining nine countries did not. Iceland is excluded from these estimates, as it does not maintain a standing military.
This target, while influential, has never been legally binding. Even so, average defence spending among NATO members has risen significantly, from 1.4 per cent of GDP in 2014 to over 2 per cent in 2024.
A New 5% Benchmark
While the new 5 per cent goal is intended to signal stronger collective defence, its implementation is far from guaranteed.
At the summit, Donald Trump singled out Spain, accusing it of " wanting a free ride" and threatening to penalise the country in future trade negotiations if it did not increase its defence budget. In response, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez said Spain had no plans to meet the 5 per cent goal. He called the previous 2 per cent target "sufficient" and "realistic" for Spain's economy.
Rachel Rizzo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Europe Center, said that the wording of the agreement may offer flexibility. "The language of the 5 per cent agreement may leave just enough wiggle room for some allies, such as Spain, to opt-out," she said as per CBS News.
What Counts As NATO's Defence Spending?
NATO calculates defence spending to include weapons and equipment, personnel costs, operational readiness, infrastructure, and other military capabilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Market surges 15% from April lows, edges closer to peak levels
Defying tariff and geopolitical tensions, India's equity benchmarks, the BSE Sensex and NSE Nifty, have surged nearly 15% each from their early-April lows and are now approaching record highs. Extending gains for the third consecutive session on Thursday, the Sensex jumped 1,000.36 points (1.21%) to close at 83,755.87, while the Nifty50 rose 304.25 points (1.21%) to settle at 25,549.00. The Sensex now sits just 2,200 points shy of its all-time high of 85,978, and the Nifty is within 730 points of its peak (26,277). The market had nosedived between late March and early April after U.S. President Donald Trump announced a reciprocal tax on goods imported into the world's largest economy. The move stoked fears of an all-out global trade war, with retaliatory tariffs announced by China, the EU, and others. On April 7, the Sensex had plunged about 4,000 points intraday to hit a 52-week low of 71,725 and the Nifty 50 tumbled 1,150 points to hit a low of 21,744.
Mint
13 minutes ago
- Mint
Senate Parliamentarian blocks key Medicaid cuts in Trump's tax bill, jeopardizing July 4 deadline
The Senate parliamentarian delivered a crucial setback to Republicans on Thursday, ruling that a core Medicaid provider tax overhaul in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill violates Senate procedural rules. The provision, intended to save $250 billion by slashing state taxes on hospitals and health providers, was a linchpin in offsetting the bill's trillions in tax breaks, primarily benefiting corporations and wealthy Americans. With Democrats uniformly opposed, Republican leaders must now scramble to revise or remove the provision entirely, as defying the nonpartisan parliamentarian's guidance is virtually unprecedented. The ruling intensifies pressure on GOP senators racing against Trump's July 4 deadline for passage, with the bill's fate now hanging in the balance. The fallout extends beyond Medicaid: The parliamentarian also rejected GOP measures blocking immigrants from healthcare programs and restricting gender-affirming care under Medicaid, further eroding the bill's planned savings. Republican leaders had leaned heavily on these health cuts to fund permanent extensions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which expire this year. Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) hailed the rulings as a victory, stating they excised 'morally bankrupt' cuts threatening vulnerable Americans. Yet for Republicans, the decisions risk ballooning the bill's deficit impact, which the Congressional Budget Office already estimated at $2.8–$3.4 trillion over a decade. Even before the parliamentarian's ruling, the Medicaid cuts faced fierce resistance within the GOP. Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned the provider tax reductions would cripple rural hospitals reliant on those funds—potentially triggering closures in their states. Hawley revealed Trump personally directed him late Wednesday to revert to the House's milder approach (freezing provider taxes instead of cutting them), signaling disarray in Republican strategy. Hospital associations nationwide echoed alarms, predicting the Senate's deeper cuts would 'wipe out balance sheets' and devastate healthcare access. To placate critics, Senate GOP leaders floated a $15 billion rural hospital fund as a safety net. But Collins demanded at least $100 billion, calling the initial figure woefully inadequate, while fiscal hawks like Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) deemed even $15 billion excessive. Tillis, facing reelection in battleground North Carolina, bluntly warned colleagues the cuts could cost Republicans the 2026 midterms, comparing the political fallout to Democrats' Obamacare implosion in 2014. Meanwhile, House Republicans from New York and California threatened to sink the bill over unrelated state tax (SALT) disputes, highlighting the fragile coalition. With the parliamentarian's decision constraining GOP options, Republican leaders now face three untenable choices: strip the Medicaid provisions, revise them to comply with rules (a complex task under time pressure), or force a floor vote requiring 60 senators to override objections, a near-impossible threshold given Democratic unity. The ruling also undermines Trump's ultimatum for passage by July 4, though Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) insisted Republicans have 'contingency plans' and are 'plowing forward.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added urgency by noting the U.S. is nearing its debt limit deadline in August, complicating the timeline further. As the Senate grinds toward potential weekend votes, human stakes underscore the policy clash. In Missouri, mother Courtney Leader told CNN her 9-year-old daughter with cerebral palsy relies on Medicaid for life-sustaining care: 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything, our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter.'
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
15 minutes ago
- First Post
'China owned', 'Vsl no link Israel': Vessels near Hormuz transmit unusual messages to avoid attacks amid ceasefire uncertainty
Ships transiting near the Strait of Hormuz have begun broadcasting unusual messages about their nationality in an apparent effort to avoid being targeted, as uncertainty continues to cloud the ceasefire between Iran and Israel read more An aerial view of the Iranian shores and the island of Qeshm in the strait of Hormuz, on December 10, 2023. Reuters File Ships transiting near the Strait of Hormuz have begun broadcasting unusual messages about their nationality in an apparent effort to avoid being targeted, as uncertainty continues to cloud the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, according to a Reuters report, citing maritime risk analytics firm Windward and ship tracking data on Thursday. According to the report, citing Windward, the practice began after hostilities erupted earlier this month between Iran and Israel, prompting US airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Though a ceasefire was brokered by US President Donald Trump after 12 days of conflict, maritime security threats remain high in the region. The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) confirmed that the overall risk to vessels in the area remains elevated despite the truce. 'The perception among shipowners is that due to the convoluted nature of shipping it's hard to know or ascertain clearly a chain of ownership to nationalities which may be under higher threat in shipping, namely the UK, US and Israel,' Reuters quoted Ami Daniel, chief executive officer of Windward, as saying. Between June 12 and 24, as many as 55 vessels transmitted 101 unusual messages while sailing through the Gulf and Red Sea, according to Reuters, citing Windward. These messages included identifiers such as 'China owned' and 'Russian crude,' in an apparent effort to deter attacks by signaling affiliation with countries perceived as less likely to be targeted than Western nations. Commercial maritime traffic surged by 30% on June 24, the day after a ceasefire was announced, reported Reuters, citing the Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC). The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world's most vital energy corridors, with around 20% of global oil and fuel consumption passing through its narrow waters. Under normal circumstances, vessels in the region typically broadcast their destinations or use standard signals such as 'For Orders.' In high-risk areas, messages like 'Armed Guards on Board' are occasionally transmitted to deter piracy or potential attacks. However, according to Daniel from maritime analytics firm Windward, the appearance of unusual messages significantly increased after June 12. Prior to that date, such messages were mostly confined to the Red Sea, which had been a hotspot for attacks by Houthi rebels following the outbreak of the Israel-Gaza war. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I've never seen it in the Persian Gulf,' Reuters quoted Daniel as saying. A Panama-flagged container ship, Yuan Xiang Fa Zhan, en route to Pakistan, was broadcasting the message 'PKKHI all Chinese' on Thursday as it transited the Strait of Hormuz, according to vessel tracking data from LSEG. Meanwhile, the China-flagged supertanker Yuan Yang Hu, carrying crude oil from Saudi Arabia to China, was transmitting 'Chinese ship' while crossing the strait. Once it cleared the waterway, the signal changed to 'CN NBG,' referencing the Port of Ningbo-Zhoushan. In the Red Sea, the Singapore-flagged container ship Kota Cabar broadcast the message 'Vsl no link Israel' as it navigated the high-risk area. The Joint Maritime Information Center (JMIC) also issued a warning about electronic interference affecting the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) in the region. Disruptions to GNSS can cause ships to veer off course, heightening the risk of collisions or grounding. With inputs from agencies
