
Senate Parliamentarian blocks key Medicaid cuts in Trump's tax bill, jeopardizing July 4 deadline
The Senate parliamentarian delivered a crucial setback to Republicans on Thursday, ruling that a core Medicaid provider tax overhaul in President Donald Trump's sweeping tax-and-spending bill violates Senate procedural rules.
The provision, intended to save $250 billion by slashing state taxes on hospitals and health providers, was a linchpin in offsetting the bill's trillions in tax breaks, primarily benefiting corporations and wealthy Americans. With Democrats uniformly opposed, Republican leaders must now scramble to revise or remove the provision entirely, as defying the nonpartisan parliamentarian's guidance is virtually unprecedented. The ruling intensifies pressure on GOP senators racing against Trump's July 4 deadline for passage, with the bill's fate now hanging in the balance.
The fallout extends beyond Medicaid: The parliamentarian also rejected GOP measures blocking immigrants from healthcare programs and restricting gender-affirming care under Medicaid, further eroding the bill's planned savings. Republican leaders had leaned heavily on these health cuts to fund permanent extensions of Trump's 2017 tax cuts, which expire this year. Senate Finance Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR) hailed the rulings as a victory, stating they excised 'morally bankrupt' cuts threatening vulnerable Americans. Yet for Republicans, the decisions risk ballooning the bill's deficit impact, which the Congressional Budget Office already estimated at $2.8–$3.4 trillion over a decade.
Even before the parliamentarian's ruling, the Medicaid cuts faced fierce resistance within the GOP. Senators Josh Hawley (R-MO), Susan Collins (R-ME), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) warned the provider tax reductions would cripple rural hospitals reliant on those funds—potentially triggering closures in their states. Hawley revealed Trump personally directed him late Wednesday to revert to the House's milder approach (freezing provider taxes instead of cutting them), signaling disarray in Republican strategy. Hospital associations nationwide echoed alarms, predicting the Senate's deeper cuts would 'wipe out balance sheets' and devastate healthcare access.
To placate critics, Senate GOP leaders floated a $15 billion rural hospital fund as a safety net. But Collins demanded at least $100 billion, calling the initial figure woefully inadequate, while fiscal hawks like Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) deemed even $15 billion excessive. Tillis, facing reelection in battleground North Carolina, bluntly warned colleagues the cuts could cost Republicans the 2026 midterms, comparing the political fallout to Democrats' Obamacare implosion in 2014. Meanwhile, House Republicans from New York and California threatened to sink the bill over unrelated state tax (SALT) disputes, highlighting the fragile coalition.
With the parliamentarian's decision constraining GOP options, Republican leaders now face three untenable choices: strip the Medicaid provisions, revise them to comply with rules (a complex task under time pressure), or force a floor vote requiring 60 senators to override objections, a near-impossible threshold given Democratic unity. The ruling also undermines Trump's ultimatum for passage by July 4, though Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) insisted Republicans have 'contingency plans' and are 'plowing forward.' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent added urgency by noting the U.S. is nearing its debt limit deadline in August, complicating the timeline further.
As the Senate grinds toward potential weekend votes, human stakes underscore the policy clash. In Missouri, mother Courtney Leader told CNN her 9-year-old daughter with cerebral palsy relies on Medicaid for life-sustaining care: 'Without Medicaid, we would lose everything, our home, our vehicles, and eventually, our daughter.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
35 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India
Describing each visa adjudication as a 'national security decision', the U.S. has asked applicants to share their social media usernames or handles for each platform they have used in the last five years. The U.S. Embassy in India shared the information in a brief statement issued on Thursday (June 26, 2025), which also cautioned against 'omitting' social media information, as it could lead to 'visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' The statement that was posted on X read, 'Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit it.' The communication continued, 'Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' On June 23, the U.S. Embassy asked those applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa to switch the privacy settings of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting, which it said was necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the US under law. The embassy had also said since 2019, the U.S. has required visa applicants to provide 'social media identifiers' on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. The F or M category is for student visas, and the J category is for exchange visitor visas. In Thursday's (June 26, 2025) communication, the embassy also attached two related digital posters. National security decision 'Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,' read the caption on the top of a poster, followed by a note. The note read, 'The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.' It comes against the backdrop of an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration in Los Angeles recently. On June 24, the embassy's statement said that the U.S. had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation, and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility. The U.S. further warned that those entering the country illegally would face jail time and deportation. The U.S. Embassy in India has issued a series of statements on the subject of visas and immigration this month. On June 19, the embassy said a U.S. visa was 'a privilege, not a right,' and its screening did not stop after a visa was issued, as authorities might revoke it if one broke the law. The embassy had also said that using illegal drugs or breaking any of the U.S. laws while on a student or visitor visa could make one ineligible for future U.S. visas. Earlier this month, the U.S. Embassy in India also issued statements, underlining that while people travelling legally to America were welcome, illegal entry or abuse of visas won't be tolerated by the country. The United States 'will not tolerate' those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the U.S., its embassy said on June 16, 2025. The U.S. Embassy had said the U.S. had 'established new visa restrictions' targeting foreign government officials and violators.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fed fears push dollar to lowest level in 3 years
A battered dollar is taking another beating as investors, unnerved by fresh signs of an erosion in US central bank independence, waste no time in pushing the greenback back to its lowest levels in over three years. US President Donald Trump on Wednesday called Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell "terrible" in his latest attack on the central bank chief and said he has three or four people in mind as contenders for the top Fed job. The dollar was back at multi-year lows against a basket of other major currencies on Thursday, erasing a brief respite provided by safe-haven flows related to West Asia tensions earlier in the week. Down 10% so far this year and set for its worst year since 2003, the dollar was expected to weaken further as renewed concern about Fed independence comes amid increased expectations for rate cuts and a looming July 9 deadline for trade agreements. The leading contenders for next Fed chief reportedly include former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, national economic council head Kevin Hassett, current Fed governor Christopher Waller, and treasury secretary Scott Bessent. Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management, noted that the dollar had not benefited as much as expected in the past two weeks from heightened West Asia tensions, a sign the dollar's safe-haven role had been hurt. In recent years, the currency has risen when oil rallies, but it gained just 0.7% last week. Concern about Fed independence adds to the damage, investors said. Respect for independent institutions such as central banks has long been viewed as a key attraction of major economies, helping anchor economic stability and provide policy certainty. reuters Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program during the weekend.U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defense secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything."The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the OF URANIUMThe Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the U.S. strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged and would take years to Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the U.S. Gabbard, who would normally conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, was not scheduled to participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear Senate briefing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was postponed. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran would respond to any future U.S. attack by striking American military bases in the Middle claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's 'HATRED'During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias."It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said."There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' news conferences I have ever seen!"advertisementOn X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his the press conference, Caine, the top U.S. general, largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the U.S. also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice."I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," he said.- EndsMust Watch