On Gaza's killing fields, journalism faces its darkest hour – but that won't stop us reporting
The Israeli war machine, accelerating its stated goal of occupying Gaza, showed no restraint in targeting journalists, in violation of international conventions. So far in this war it has killed 238 of us. The war on Gaza has become the deadliest conflict for journalists and media workers in living memory, with 2024 recording the highest number of journalists killed, the vast majority at the hands of Israeli forces. The systematic targeting and elimination of journalists is not merely a local or regional tragedy; it is a catastrophic breach of international norms regarding the protection of journalists in conflict zones, signalling a global collapse of the moral responsibility in safeguarding those who risk everything to shed light on the realities of war.
Gaza is not the only place where journalists are under siege. Threats, intimidation and murderous violence against journalists are on the rise in countries including Sudan, Pakistan and Myanmar. However, what differentiates Israeli crimes is the impunity with which the occupation forces murder journalists and the indifference shown by leaders of the so-called free world. What is especially shocking is when some media organisations repeat the Israeli regime's false allegations against targeted journalists without verification.
By any measure, it is the most dangerous time to be a journalist in recent history. Reporters are threatened, harassed and killed merely for fulfilling their public duty of bearing witness and reporting the truth. Worldwide, the dangers faced by journalists in conflict zones have intensified. In 2023, a journalist or media worker was killed, on average, every four days. In 2024, this grim statistic worsened to once every three days, most of those by Israeli forces. The journalists in Gaza are not parachuted-in international correspondents but local journalists – those who know the land, the people and the stories best. These journalists are not just reporting on Gaza's tragedy; they are living it.
This surge in violence against journalists is neither accidental nor isolated. It is part of a broader, deeply worrying trend: the systematic silencing of the media, often orchestrated by autocrats and regimes who seek to conceal their crimes in darkness. This should horrify us all. It is an assault not only on individual reporters but on the entire global public's right to know, to understand the depth of human suffering, and to hold the powerful to account.
Beyond the killings of more than 230 journalists, Israel now employs starvation as a tool, with journalists pushed to the brink, collapsing from hunger while reporting. At Al Jazeera, we have lost colleagues and their family members in Gaza, with the latest killing of Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues bringing the total number of the network's journalists killed to nine. Our colleagues have been forced to report not just on the atrocities happening to civilians, but on the direct attacks against those whose only weapon is a microphone or a camera.
Despite this, we insist on continuing in our professional duty. We remain committed to reporting unfolding genocide, despite Israeli efforts to blind us and the world. We will tirelessly work to strengthen the teams and to remain faithful to our global audience, who have a right to be informed. But this requires international solidarity, and the exertion of full pressure on Israel to stop targeting and killing journalists and to allow international media access and freedom of operation in the Gaza Strip.
The international community must act, urgently and decisively, to safeguard journalists and to protect those who risk everything to inform the world about the continuing humanitarian catastrophe and genocide in Gaza. Journalists must be allowed to perform their duties without fear of violence. Anything less is a betrayal of the most fundamental principles of free expression.
We owe it to the courageous journalists in Gaza to amplify their voices. Their work is not merely documentation; it is the first draft of history, whereby future historians will study the horrors of the 21st century's most televised genocide. Access to reliable information about wars and conflicts is not a luxury; it is essential for the wellbeing of global populations, the protection of human rights and the global effort to hold perpetrators of war crimes accountable. When journalists are silenced, we all become more vulnerable to disinformation, propaganda and the unchecked abuse of power.
We are at a crossroads. If the world continues to tolerate the murder, starvation and persecution of journalists, it is not only journalism that will suffer, but also accountability, democracy and the possibility of a more just future. The international legal framework for the protection of journalists in war must be urgently strengthened and enforced, and governments must be held to account for violations.
The international journalistic community, and indeed the world, bears an immense responsibility. The courage, commitment and sacrifice of journalists in Gaza demand nothing less than our full support and unrelenting advocacy. Our inaction will be recorded by history as a monumental failure to protect those who stood at the frontlines of truth.
Asef Hamidi is the director of news, Al Jazeera Channel
Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Israel ambassador Mike Huckabee says Hamas 'could use some Ozempic'
The comments came as international outrage over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza has reached a fever pitch in recent weeks. The United Nations' World Food Programme has warned that a third of Gaza's population isn't eating for days at a time. (Starvation of a civilian population as a method of war is a crime under international laws.) Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to deny that civilians are starving, saying as he announced a new offensive into the Gaza Strip that assessments of the situation have been exaggerated. Read more: One meal a day. $20 for an egg. Choosing which kid gets fed. Starvation stalks Gaza In the interview on Aug. 11, Huckabee defended the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an aid distribution system supported by the U.S. and Israel that has been criticized by other foreign leaders and international organizations for generating violence near distribution sites. Huckabee said Hamas, the Palestinian militant group designated by the U.S. government as a terrorist organization, "hates" the GHF because its aid distribution methods have hurt Hamas' capacity to "control the food market." "Yeah, there's some real deprivation in that country," he said. "But it's not because GHF is killing people."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Wednesday briefing: How Trump and Putin might make peace in Ukraine without Zelenskyy at the table
Good morning. All eyes will be on Alaska this Friday for a peace summit aimed at ending the war in Ukraine. The meeting will be between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. Even more striking: Ukraine, the country under invasion and with parts of its territory occupied, has not been invited. But behind the buzz of diplomacy lies the fog of war. Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned that Russia is not preparing to end the conflict, but 'making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations'. What exactly this new offensive will entail remains uncertain. But just days before the Trump-Putin summit, Zelenskyy admitted in a press briefing that groups of Russians advanced about 10km in several places, as part of their bid to seize full control of the Donetsk region. To understand how the upcoming summit and reports of fresh Russian incursions might shape the course of the war and any potential peace settlement, I spoke to Dan Sabbagh, the Guardian's defence editor, who is reporting from the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. That's after the headlines. Immigration | More than 50,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats since Keir Starmer became prime minister, official figures have confirmed. Gaza | Gaza is facing a new threat as diseases resistant to antibiotics spread across the devastated territory. Medical supplies are scarce and tens of thousands of people have been injured or weakened by malnutrition in the 22-month war. UK news | The Treasury is looking at ways to raise more money from inheritance tax amid growing pressure on the country's finances ahead of the autumn budget, sources have told the Guardian. Wildfires | Almost 6,000 people have been evacuated from their homes in northern, central and southern Spain as wildfires continue to burn amid a heatwave that could bring temperatures of 44C to some parts of the country. US news | National guard troops arrived at their headquarters in Washington DC on Tuesday as Democratic mayors warned Donald Trump against expanding his law and order power grab in other major cities. During the presidential campaign last year, Donald Trump repeatedly vowed to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of taking office. But eight months into his presidency, the war rages on into its fourth year. In that time, Russia has been building up its industrial capability. It is now manufacturing about 100 Shahed drones a day, while ramping up missile production, especially Iskander ballistic missiles, which are very hard for Ukraine to intercept, Dan tells me. 'They've started using these in combination and in greater numbers,' Dan says. 'In spring, we saw more regular missile attacks on Kyiv, which included all-night drone raids. In one attack, dozens of people were killed. The biggest was in the western city of Lutsk, near a Ukrainian airbase, when about 700 drones came in one night. We're seeing the Russian military-industrial complex grinding along, trying to win through attrition.' Russia started to slightly dial down its attacks on Ukrainian urban centres after complaints by the US, but that changed this week. And there's more movement on the frontlines, with reports that raiding parties have broken through a few kilometres from Donetsk. 'These are small, about 30 to 50 troops, but the point is psychological: to make Americans and negotiators think Ukraine is in trouble,' Dan says. 'Ahead of this much-hyped Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, the Russians are trying to create 'facts on the ground'.' What about Ukraine's offensive into Russia? Last year, Ukrainian forces crossed the border into Russia's Kursk region in a surprise incursion that caught Russia off guard. 'It was a big morale-boosting operation,' Dan says. But by the spring of this year, Russia had successfully repelled the attack. Reclaiming the region occurred during a crucial time: the big row between Trump and Zelenskyy in the Oval Office that was seen around the world. Shortly after that diplomatic spat, the Americans briefly withheld intelligence sharing, which is crucial for targeting and knowing where the enemy is, and paused weapons shipments for the first time. 'The Russians gained a lot of territory in a few days. Even though both were later switched back on, a lot of momentum was lost,' Dan says. 'So, Ukraine lost what might have been a bargaining chip in future negotiations.' What will happen at the Alaska peace summit? There are reports that Ukrainians only knew about the peace summit after it had been arranged. And they have not been invited – despite pleading from European leaders that Zelenskyy be at the negotiating table. The relationship between Trump and Zelenskyy can best be described as rocky. But Dan says that Trump has seemed to lose patience with Putin. He gave the Russian leader a 50-day deadline to agree to a Ukraine ceasefire or face US sanctions on oil exports, and began to threaten secondary sanctions on China and India for buying Russian oil. Then, Trump's negotiator Steve Witkoff went to Moscow last week, and news broke that Trump would meet the Russian president this week. It will be the first US-Russia leadership summit since Joe Biden met his counterpart in Geneva in June 2021. 'Trump wants the headline 'I stopped the war', but may not care what that looks like,' cautions Dan. 'The two leaders agreed to meet in Alaska, a kind of midpoint between the two countries, though geopolitically nowhere. European leaders aren't invited. Zelenskyy isn't invited. This is purely bilateral and it's Trump and Putin's first face-to-face since Helsinki 2018. 'The Ukrainian fear is that Russia will offer a ceasefire in exchange for Ukraine giving up the rest of Donetsk oblast, which is about 9,000 sq km, including heavily fortified cities like Sloviansk and Kramatorsk.' In a press briefing attended by Dan, Zelenskyy said that Ukraine would never accept this, because it's strategically vital territory and giving it away would invite future Russian offensives. The region sought by Russia amounted to 'about 90,000 square kilometres' of the country, he said. He adds that Ukraine's counteroffer is a ceasefire on current frontlines, prisoner and child returns, and then talks on territory and security guarantees. They refuse any voluntary handover of cities Russia hasn't taken. But Putin has thus far refused to meet Zelenskyy. What do ordinary Ukrainians want? Dan has been in Kyiv every August since 2022. That year, the city was recovering after repelling Russian attempts to seize it. In 2023, the counteroffensive was under way but the future remained uncertain. By 2024, after the Kursk incursion, there was renewed optimism. 'There's now a growing weariness. People want to see what happens with this diplomatic track, but no one expects a military miracle. People get very tired when there's a run of missile and drone attacks, they lose sleep and real life becomes hard work. People are sheltering in the metro station and if you've got a family you're thinking 'what am I doing here?' But when those stop the city comes back to life. It's a resilient place,' Dan says. The Ukrainian people want the war to end – nearly everyone has lost someone or been displaced – but they won't accept peace at any price, Dan added. And while there's growing acceptance that Ukraine can't reconquer all their lost territory, there's also a hard line on not giving up more. What is on the mind of people in the country is what role Trump is going to play. 'Ukrainians, particularly the negotiators, want to be very careful here. No one wants to alienate the US leader for obvious reasons. If there is a world where Trump is going to be a mediator, the guy who can bring Putin and Zelenskyy round the table, the guy who can make this a threeway summit to end the war, or at least stop the fighting, then in Ukraine's view Trump can be a hero,' Dan says. 'But if Trump is going to try to negotiate with Putin and then try to force Ukrainians to accept that negotiated peace, if he is less of an honest broker, then that's something to fear and not something they want' The problem is no one knows which Trump will turn up in Alaska. Shocking report on how millions of lentil-sized bits of plastic (nurdles, above) are washing into the sea and clogging up the insides of fish, shrimp and seabirds that mistake them for food. Phoebe It's been a year since the Tories suffered their worst electoral defeat yet, but the news has yet to sink in, says former cabinet minister David Gauke in a fascinating interview with the Guardian's Jessica Elgot. Aamna A cautionary tale for readers at risk of becoming over-reliant on ChatGPT for medical advice - a 60-year-old man stopped eating salt after consulting with the chatbot and ended up being treated for psychosis. Phoebe Israel is running two Gaza campaigns, writes the Guardian's Emma Graham-Harrison: one to secure control of the strip, and another on shaping the narrative of events. The targeted killing of Palestinian journalists and restrictions on press access have led to conclusions this is a deliberate strategy. Aamna Ahead of Trump and Putin's meeting on Friday, this is an interesting look at the history of Alaska - why it is dotted with Russian Orthodox churches, and why it is a good backdrop for the two world leaders to meet. Phoebe Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Football | Crystal Palace have called on Uefa to scrap its 'poorly conceived' rules on multi-club ownership after their appeal against demotion from the Europa League was rejected. Cricket | Middlesex are in advanced negotiations with two international investment groups over a funding deal that would enable the club to build a permanent home away from Lord's. Football | Sky Sports is to give its viewers the opportunity to watch four Premier League games at once this season, introducing a 'multiview' feature to accompany a record number of live matches in the top flight. 'Treasury targets inheritance tax rises to plug growing UK deficit,' is the front page on the Guardian on Wednesday. 'Families face fresh inheritance tax grab,' says the Telegraph. 'Chinese company could take over struggling Thames Water,' is the splash at the Times, while the Mirror leads with: 'DRY ALERT,' highlighting a story on the water crisis and drought. 'Taunts of the Tik Tok migrant,' is the focus at the Sun, and the Mail: It's not our fault!' 'Clampdown on stone imports after deadly lung disease linked to kitchen revamps,' says the i paper, as the FT has 'Arms factories expand at triple speed as Europe switches on to war footing.' Finally, the Daily Express leads with 'Record 8m people on universal credit,' and the Metro: 'Bungling hitwoman in niqab faces life.' The secrets of the world's richest company Nvidia is the world's first $4tn company – and it just made an astonishing deal with Trump. But who is the company's founder, Jensen Huang, and what is behind its success? Tae Kim explains A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Thousands more waterways are being used for swimming and boating in England than previously thought. The Environment Agency had listed 342 waterways in England as being used for outdoor activities like paddle boarding, rowing, sailing and surfing. In fact, the number is 10 times that, with 3,347 'water recreation locations' around the country. 'This research only confirms what we've been saying for years. England's wild waters are alive with swimmers, surfers, sailors and paddlers all year round,' says Dani Jordan, the director of campaigns and communities at Surfers Against Sewage. Only 451 are official bathing sites, and campaigners are pushing for more lakes and rivers to be cleaned up so people can enjoy them safely. Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday The Guardian's climate assembly with George Monbiot and special guests On 16 September, join George Monbiot, Emma Pinchbeck, Mikaela Loach, as they discuss the forces driving the big climate pushback, with a welcome from editor-in-chief Katharine Viner and the opportunity to meet our spotlight charities and activists. Book tickets here or at And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Inside the minds of Trump and Putin, from diplomats who've been in the room
Donald Trump says that within two minutes of meeting Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, he will know 'exactly whether or not a deal can get done' to end the war in Ukraine. For the Ukrainians and Europeans, there is more than just a whiff of Munich about this summit, with neither party receiving an invitation for the crunch talks. In 1938, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, Édouard Daladier and Neville Chamberlain agreed to carve up Czechoslovakia without representation from the Czech government. The concern is that this could happen once again with Mr Trump and his Maga acolytes busy discussing ' land swaps ' and criticising Volodymyr Zelensky for arguing that his constitution bars him from doing so. On the other end of the negotiation is Putin, an autocrat who believes Ukraine is a work of fiction and a mortal threat to his country. The Telegraph has spoken to a host of former officials and diplomats who have first-hand experience dealing with both the Russian and American presidents. Mr Trump characterised his goals for the high-stakes meeting as an opportunity to stare into his Russian counterpart's eyes to judge his plan to end the war in Ukraine. 'I'm going to see what he has in mind,' the US president told reporters. 'I may leave and say good luck, and that'll be the end,' he added. 'Probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can get done,' the US president declared in the White House briefing room on Monday. If he is prepared to walk away at the slightest demonstration that Putin isn't ready to end the war – Mr Zelensky says Russia is gearing up for more conflict – then what does Mr Trump want? It has long been thought that he is desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize and has a particular grudge against Barack Obama for being decorated only eight months into his first term. The Norwegian Nobel Committee cited Mr Obama's 'extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples', which seemed to be more about Mr Obama's promise as an international leader than his actual accomplishments. Mr Trump is the self-styled 'president of peace'. 'As president, he has brokered peace between Azerbaijan and Armenia, Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, India and Pakistan, Egypt and Ethiopia, Serbia and Kosovo, and with the Abraham Accords,' the White House said. 'Trump and certainly [JD] Vance, they don't care about the future of Ukraine particularly,' Anthony Gardener, who served as Mr Obama's US ambassador to the EU, said. 'I'm convinced Trump does want to position himself as the person who, quote, unquote, brought a sort of form of peace to get a Nobel Peace Prize,' Mr Gardener added. Ending the bloodshed in Ukraine could do that. Others say he's looking for yet another deal to sell as a demonstration of business acumen. There are significant rare earth mineral deposits in eastern Ukraine. That territory is on the table, and Mr Trump has already made a play for it by signing an agreement with Mr Zelensky to be able to mine it. 'Trump wants to bag a win… period,' Mr Gardener said. In his office in the Kremlin, where Putin will be preparing for his meeting with Mr Trump, sits a bust of Catherine the Great. The significance of the monument should not be lost. As Russia's longest-serving female monarch, Catherine dragged the country into the 18th century and during her reign, doubled the size of its empire. David Liddington, a former deputy prime minister, said Putin also compares himself to Peter the Great, 'somebody who is going to restore Russia's greatness and grow Russia's territory, at least its effective empire'. And Putin is likely to double down on his positions, in an attempt to at least cement his control over the Ukrainian territory already seized by his invasion forces. He will leave little of the planning up to his aides, who are mostly believed to be yes men there for affirmation rather than assistance. 'President Putin is secretive, well-scripted and always eager to press an argument that reaffirms his positions rather than his willingness to settle. He reflects the attitudes of someone who's familiar with power play, intelligence and security considerations, not the transactional, commercial kind of negotiation playbook,' Margaritis Schinas, a former European Commission vice president, said. According to Bobby McDonagh, a former Irish ambassador to the UK, Italy and EU, Putin is 'utterly predictable'. 'He will relentlessly and ruthlessly pursue his very narrowly defined idea of Russian interests,' Mr McDonagh added. Those who have been in the room before say the Russian president will likely try to corner his American counterpart by demanding that the structure of their meeting plays out in a specific fashion. 'He prefers meetings structured in two parts: first, with delegations and interpreters that mainly serve as an audience to listen to his position on a particular subject, usually peppered with aggressive comments on those who think otherwise; then, a more closed – usually tête à tête – discussion of principals where he may show some margin of openness,' Mr Schinas said. It is in the latter section of the meeting in which Putin will try to hammer home any wriggle room he has made for himself. 'Putin will keep his eye on the strategic prize. He will look for opportunities to lessen the economic pressure on Russia and the Russian economy,' Mr Liddington said. The UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office estimates that sanctions on Russia have deprived the Russian state of at least £333bn in war funds between February 2022 and June 2025. Any easing would give Putin a significant win. John Bolton, Mr Trump's former national security advisor, told The Telegraph that Putin will use his KGB skills to manipulate the US president. 'That's one reason why Putin really did not want Zelensky or the Europeans there. He doesn't want Trump to be distracted with all these other players,' Mr Bolton said. 'Putin will try to get Trump back into feeling that they're friends again. I think Trump has been disappointed that his friend, over the first six months of the administration, has not helped him reach this deal.' According to Mr Bolton, Putin has 'manipulated Trump on Ukraine really right from the beginning of the administration, but back before the disaster with Zelensky in the Oval Office.' The Russian president is 'going to try and get Trump back on side,' Mr Bolton said, adding: 'He's got to work fast.' 'The outcome will depend entirely on whether Trump resists Putin's known and entirely unacceptable demands,' Mr McDonagh added – referring to a stripped-back Ukrainian army, no prospect of them joining Nato and the recognition of Russian sovereignty over the Ukrainian regions of Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. The US president is much happier to consult with advisers on his positions in the meeting, but those don't bode well for Ukraine. Tulsi Gabbard, his intelligence chief, is known to not care much for Kyiv. Mr Vance and Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, have vocalised the need for Ukraine to surrender territory. 'He likes to be surrounded by his team and advisers, allowing them space for contributions, but under no circumstances margin for decision,' Mr Schinas said. This means the US president is unlikely to listen to the European leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer, who are set to hold talks with him on Wednesday. There is one hope among the European and Ukrainian onlookers ahead of Friday. Is Mr Trump prepared to let himself be embarrassed at the hands of Putin? Will he attempt to emulate Ronald Reagan, the former US president credited for the invention of 'Make America Great Again'? Sir Julian King, Britain's last-ever European Commissioner, said: 'You can get unexpected outcomes. 'Reagan at Reykjavik blindsided his allies,' he said, referring to the 1986 summit between the US president and Mikhail Gorbachev which ushered in the end of the Cold War. 'But as they meet for the first time in years, with Putin's maximalist negotiating and Trump's unpredictability, anything could happen.' 'The one potential saving grace, Trump won't want to come out looking like a chump,' he concluded.
