
Inside Trump's supercharged version of Bush's "War on Terror"
Why it matters: Donald Trump became president in part by running against the legacy of George W. Bush, the last Republican in the White House before him. But now Trump is supercharging many of the post-9/11 legal, tactical and political strategies Bush used.
Driving the news: Trump's push to deport "millions" of unauthorized immigrants and his strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities in particular have many parallels to Bush's "War on Terror."
Trump's sending unauthorized immigrants to high-security prisons in the U.S. and abroad — sometimes denying them due process.
Bush sent alleged terrorists — including undocumented people in the U.S. — to prisons around the world and the U.S. military facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The Trump administration is now using "Gitmo" for detainees it says have criminal histories.
Trump preemptively, and unilaterally, attacked Iran with 14 bunker-buster bombs and launched missiles at an Iranian-backed proxy group in Yemen, killing dozens.
He said he ordered the first attack out of concern Iran was close to gaining a nuclear weapon. Bush used a similar rationale for invading Iraq, though unlike Trump he got Congress' approval beforehand.
The similarities don't stop there:
Surveillance: Trump has enlisted tech company and defense contractor Palantir to help surveil and track unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. Bush enlisted telecom companies such as AT&T and Sprint for most of his domestic surveillance in the name of stopping terrorists. Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" provides billions to expand such programs. (Palantir told Axios that its software doesn't proactively collect data, and said its work is in accordance with the law.)
Executive orders: Trump's administration has invoked some of Bush's executive orders made after 9/11 to justify his immigration actions, as Semafor pointed out.
Rhetoric: Trump has labeled alleged members of Latin American gangs as "terrorists" and "alien enemies" to justify expedited deportations. He has said his administration is focused mostly on "the worst of the worst" — the same phrase Bush's administration used in its anti-terror campaign.
Courts: Trump and Bush's administrations both concealed information from judges and court hearings using the "state secrets privilege," claiming there would be a national security risk for transparency.
Habeas corpus: Trump has floated suspending habeas corpus — suspects' right to use the courts to fight unlawful detentions. Bush tried to do that in 2006 before it was overturned by the Supreme Court.
Reality check: There are exceptions to the Trump-Bush parallels.
Trump's immigration effort is far broader than Bush's, which focused largely on men suspected of having ties to terror groups. Trump's deportation efforts are targeted at millions more noncitizens in communities nationwide.
Bush was also responding to the trauma of the 9/11 attacks and fearful of another mass attack.
So far, Trump's attacks against Iran have been far more limited than the government-toppling invasions Bush embarked on.
What they're saying: A spokesperson for Bush declined to comment.
Trump's team didn't respond to a request for comment.
"Trump is saying out loud what the Bush administration did behind closed doors," said Vince Warren, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, the first organization to represent detainees sent to Guantanamo Bay after 9/11.
Between the lines: Most Republicans have cheered Trump's aggressive immigration moves, while Democrats have been mostly muted in pushing back, recognizing that Joe Biden's handling of the border cost them politically.
Some Trump supporters such as Tucker Carlson have criticized the president's military entanglements in the Middle East, given that Trump ran on a promise to avoid getting involved in wars such as those in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Vice President Vance has said he understands such concerns and told NBC's "Meet the Press" last month that "the difference is that back then we had dumb presidents, and now we have a president who actually knows how to accomplish America's national security objectives. So this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing."
Flashback: The Bush administration made mistakes in who it detained and accused of links to terrorism in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.
The Bush administration preemptively detained hundreds of Arab and Muslim immigrants in the U.S., and some men were sent to foreign prisons.
An inspector general report in 2003 said: "Even in the hectic aftermath of the September 11 attacks, we believe the FBI should have taken more care to distinguish between aliens who it actually suspected of having a connection to terrorism," and those "who, while possibly guilty of violating federal immigration law, had no connection to terrorism."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Bessent casts some shade over Musk's new political party
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday he imagined that Elon Musk 's businesses' boards weren't so keen on the Tesla CEO's unveiling of his new "America Party." The big picture: The world's richest man — who before his explosive fallout with President Trump said he'd do a lot less political spending moving forward — became a GOP mega-donor last year. Now, the billionaire seems intent on carving a new political path. Irate over Trump's recently signed"big, beautiful bill," the former DOGE leader is turning his sights away from what he described as "the two-party (some would say uniparty) system" and plans to form his own party. Driving the news: Bessent, with whom Musk once had a heated spat in the White House, said on CNN's "State of the Union" Sunday that "the principles of DOGE were very popular" — but Musk was not. Musk's massive slashes through the federal government left a bruise on his reputation and his company. A March NBC News poll found that 46% of voters thought creating DOGE was a good idea, while 40% said it was bad — but when asked to broadly rate their feelings on DOGE, 47% had a negative view, compared to 41% who held a positive view. And 51% had a negative view of Musk himself. What he's saying:"I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone," Bessent told CNN's Dana Bash. He continued, "I imagine that those boards of directors did not like this announcement yesterday, and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities." Catch up quick: Musk announced on Saturday that he would launch "the America Party," which he claimed would "give you back your freedom." Musk said in a response that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties." Yes, but: There are steps Musk must take to formally register a political party, and recent Federal Election Commission filings don't show that has yet happened. What we're watching: The day prior, he shared a poll to his followers asking whether he should create a new political party and suggested part of his strategy would be to "laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." Musk didn't specify what those specific races would be. He added, "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people." Billionaire Mark Cuban and Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly worked in for Trump during his first term, both appeared interested.


The Hill
36 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hasset on healthcare coverage cuts: ‘Best way to get insurance is to get a job'
National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett said the best way for people to get health insurance is to get a job while discussing the massive tax cut legislation, which dramatically upends health care, signed into law by President Trump. During an appearance on CBS News's 'Face The Nation,' Hasset was asked about Americans' concerns that about 12 million Americans could lose Medicaid coverage, according to a report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). However, Hasset said that the CBO made a similar claim when the Trump administration aimed to add work requirement waivers to Obamacare in 2017, stating that the number of insured people increased instead. 'The bottom line is, the best way to get insurance is to get a job,' he said. 'And we've got a 'big, beautiful bill' that's going to create a lot of job creation and a lot of insurance, and the CBO is just not accounting for that.' The bill enacts the country's first-ever requirement for adults under the age of 65 — including low-income parents of children older than 14 — to prove they work, volunteer or attend school at least 80 hours per month. 'The idea that that's going to cause a massive hemorrhaging in availability of insurance doesn't make a lot of sense to us,' he said. Hassett also claimed that 5 million of those who are losing insurance have other insurance, which he says the CBO did not take into account 'They're people who have two types of insurance,' he added. 'And so therefore, if they lose one, they're still insured.' Hassett insisted that no one will lose their insurance. 'It's sound budgetary politics. And I think that nobody's going to lose their insurance,' he said.


New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bessent teases new Aug. 1 deadline for tariffs, says Fed chair can't cut rates like Trump wants
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed that the Trump administration is now eyeing Aug. 1 as the date to slap the 'Liberation Day' tariffs against countries that fail to cut lightning deals with the US. Back in April, Trump had given countries a 90-day extension before slapping those tariffs in place, meaning Tuesday, July 8. However, Bessent explained that Trump will warn countries of the forthcoming tariffs instead of imposing them outright. 'I'm not going to give away the playbook, because we're going to be very busy over the next 72 hours,' Bessent told CNN's 'State of the Union' on Sunday. Advertisement 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners, saying that if you don't move things along, then on Aug. 1, you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level.' Trump had previewed his plans to blast out letters to trading partners, but didn't mention the Aug. 1 deadline. On April 2, which he dubbed 'Liberation Day,' Trump unveiled customized tariff rates against virtually every country on the planet — including a 10% baseline rate on almost all imports. 3 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent explained that the Trump administration is giving time before imposing the 'Liberation Day' tariffs. CNN Advertisement 3 President Trump unfurled customized tariff rates against virtually every country back in April. Getty Images The 'Liberation Day' were later paused, though the 10% levy went into effect. 'I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly, and we're going to send out probably a hundred letters to small countries where we don't have very much trade, and most of those are already at the baseline 10%,' Bessent added. So far, Trump has announced various tariff deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam. The president's team has also reached something of a tariff truce with China while negotiations play out. Advertisement Bessent contended that the Aug. 1 date is 'not a new deadline,' and he has previously described a focus on securing deals with 18 of America's top major trading partners. 'We are saying this is when it's happening. If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice,' he added. 'We are close to several deals. As always, there's a lot of foot-dragging on the other side, and so I would expect to see several big announcements over the next couple of days,' he said. In addition to handling Trump's push to revamp US exports and reduce the trade deficit, Bessent has been in the headlines over speculation that the president may tap him to succeed Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell at the central bank. Advertisement 3 Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has been adamant that politics shouldn't influence monetary policy. Getty Images Bessent has not ruled that out. Powell's tenure as chair at the Fed ends in May 2026. Trump had first appointed him in 2018. One of Trump's chief grievances with Powell has been the Fed's decision not to lower its benchmark interest rate target — making the $9 trillion in US debt that is expected to come due over the next year that much more expensive to finance. The rate also increases borrowing costs for homebuyers and businesses. Powell has defended the Fed's decision and argued that the central bank is taking a wait-and-see approach to gauge the inflationary impacts of Trump's tariffs. Historically, the Fed has sought to insulate itself from political influence over monetary policy. Bessent said that if he was chair of the Fed, he wouldn't necessarily be able to lower rates overnight. 'I think that the Fed chair does not cut interest rates. It is a committee, so it's up to the Open Market Committee and the voting members to cut rates,' Bessent said when asked if he would cut rates as Fed boss. 'The President is probably the most economically sophisticated president we've had in 100 years, maybe ever,' the Treasury secretary added when asked about Trump's complaints about the Fed.