logo
Reddit Sues Anthropic, Accusing It of Illegally Using Data From Its Site

Reddit Sues Anthropic, Accusing It of Illegally Using Data From Its Site

New York Times2 days ago

Reddit on Wednesday sued Anthropic, accusing the artificial intelligence start-up of unlawfully using the data of Reddit's more than 100 million daily users to train its A.I. systems.
The lawsuit, which was filed in the Superior Court of California in San Francisco, claimed that Anthropic had accessed or tried to access Reddit data more than 100,000 times, in a breach of the online platform's content policies. Anthropic had also declined to enter into a licensing agreement for the data, the lawsuit said, and had unjustly enriched itself at Reddit's expense.
'We will not tolerate profit-seeking entities like Anthropic commercially exploiting Reddit content for billions of dollars without any return for redditors or respect for their privacy,' Ben Lee, Reddit's chief legal officer, said in a statement. 'A.I. companies should not be allowed to scrape information and content from people without clear limitations on how they can use that data.'
A spokeswoman for Anthropic did not immediately provide a comment.
The lawsuit was the latest clash over the use of digital data by A.I. companies amid a heated race to develop the technology. For years, A.I. companies have gobbled up as much data across the internet as possible to fine tune their systems, which rely on information to improve the responses they generate. But those data sources are quickly drying up, as companies have begun to lock down more of their data to keep it from being used without permission.
Reddit, which is 20 years old and went public last year, is among a generation of social media companies with a wealth of user-generated conversational data. The site is a kind of social message board, where people can hold discussions on any number of topics, from dogs to television shows to cryptocurrency.
In recent years, Reddit executives began realizing just how valuable the company's data was to the rest of the industry. Steve Huffman, Reddit's chief executive, began talking to companies like Google and OpenAI to potentially strike licensing deals. Reddit eventually reached deals with Google and OpenAI to allow them to access Reddit public conversation data to train their A.I. systems for a fee.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines  - Your Money Briefing
How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines  - Your Money Briefing

Wall Street Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • Wall Street Journal

How to Get Off the Investing Sidelines - Your Money Briefing

A turbulent spring in the stock market spooked some investors — and now, they're struggling to get back in . Host Julia Carpenter talks with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist Jason Zweig about how these same folks can reshape their investing strategy with some much-needed historical perspective. Full Transcript This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated. Julia Carpenter: Here's Your Money Briefing for Friday, June 6th. I'm Julia Carpenter for The Wall Street Journal. What do you think the opposite of FOMO or the fear of missing out is? FOGI. The fear of getting in, and FOGI is all too common among investors these days. Jason Zweig: When people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines nonstop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: After such an up and down few months in the stock market, spooked investors know they're probably playing it a little too safe, but what's the first step to jumping back in the fray? We'll talk with WSJ's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, about how to conquer FOGI and maybe even how to use it to your advantage. That's after the break. Investors haven't had a quiet 2025. After the Trump Administration's tariff plan sent the market into a tailspin earlier this spring, some investors decided to pull out rather than play ball, and others had taken a step back even earlier. But now the market seas have calmed. So how do you get back in? Wall Street Journal's The Intelligent Investor columnist, Jason Zweig, joins me to talk more. Jason, one of your readers, Michael McCowin, wrote to you and coined this new term: FOGI. Or fear of getting in. How did he arrive at this FOGI place? Jason Zweig: Well, he would say a couple of things. First of all, he got old, and he became a FOGI, an old FOGI. And secondly, he has pretty strong views. He's fortunate. He's a former professional investor. He has plenty of assets to see him through. He's 86, and he feels that the potential upside from staying in the market at this point is not as great as the potential downside of staying in and perhaps losing a lot of his money without time to recover. Julia Carpenter: And after such a turbulent period in markets, you talk to some investors who say they think they should be more fully invested, but they still are in that place that Michael is in, that sort of FOGI place. Why do you think so many investors feel this way? Jason Zweig: Uncertainty is always high except at total market turning points, like say, 2020 or in 1987. And when people sense a high level of uncertainty in the market, it makes these kinds of decisions more complicated, because often, people are making these judgments partly based on what their peers are doing. And if all your peers are doing is expressing confusion and watching the headlines non-stop, it can be hard to figure out what to do. Julia Carpenter: FOGI is contagious. Jason Zweig: Yeah, it absolutely is. Julia Carpenter: And your column, which is linked in our show notes, does such a great job of giving us some much-needed historical perspective. How do the last few market cycles fit into the big picture of the last 80 years in markets? Jason Zweig: The key thing to put in perspective as an investor is that, the long run, tells us unambiguously that you should be rewarded for sticking with U.S. stocks if you can stick with them long enough. We've had over 60 instances of stocks losing 5% or more. We've had a couple dozen corrections where they went down 10 or 20%. And, just in the past few years, we've had two severe bear markets where stocks lost 20% or more. And, over time, the markets have always overcome that and delivered ample returns for people who could stick with it. However, it's not a guarantee. And, ultimately, if you try to force yourself to be the kind of investor you're not, you might end up worse off. People who really feel they need to sleep well at night should listen to that intuition, because if you compel yourself against your own gut to stick with the market during times that look tough, when times that actually feel tough come along, you may get shaken out. So, having a little bit higher allocation to cash or bonds might not be a bad thing for someone who is inclined to get spooked out of the market. Julia Carpenter: I wanted to ask you about a hindsight bias. What is it, and how should we be thinking about it as investors? Jason Zweig: Hindsight bias is a fallacy of human reasoning. It essentially trains us to think, after the fact, that what did happen is what we predicted would happen. And just think about presidential elections, for example. People say things like, "Oh, I knew all along it would be a landslide," or, "I knew all along it would be close." But if you go back and look at what they actually were saying before the election, they weren't saying that. And the advantage of what's just happened, particularly in April and the rebound in May, is that it's so fresh in all of our minds, that it's kind of hard to lie to ourselves. And it gives us a great opportunity to look back and say, "What was I actually saying and thinking? Oh, I was actually saying and thinking this was almost the end of the world, and it's turned out not to be, at least so far. So maybe the lesson I should learn is not to be so certain about my forecasts." Julia Carpenter: So thinking about investors like Michael, what would you tell them to consider as they weigh their options and try to conquer this fear of getting in? Jason Zweig: I like to say, if you must panic, panic slowly, panic gradually. Maybe take one percentage point of your allocation to stocks and reduce that each month. And, within a retirement account, where you don't have immediate tax consequences, you can do that quite easily. And making gradual change, first of all, will make you feel better, because you'll feel you're responding to the thing you're afraid of. But more importantly, it prevents you from overreacting to a fear you feel that ultimately doesn't turn out to be actual. Julia Carpenter: And just to emphasize to those who are still sort of spooked, Jason, managing investments is just one part of an overall financial plan, but it's an important one nonetheless. I wonder what would you say to someone about using the market to build wealth and this sense of security? Jason Zweig: So, the thing to keep in mind is that, while there are no guarantees, and it is not actually true that if you hold stocks long enough you're guaranteed to outperform all other assets, it's a bet about probabilities. It's highly likely that you will do extremely well if you hold stocks for the long term. And the fact that the probability isn't a hundred percent, I don't think should really discourage you from doing it. Just as it can rain on a day when the forecast is 100% sunshine, stocks can disappoint people who hold them for decades at a time, but in the long run, it is a very high probability bet. And putting most of your money in stocks, particularly when you're young and your labor income gives you a hedge against fluctuations in the value of your stock portfolio, is a good idea. It's the best bet for long-term investing, even if it's not quite a certain bet. Julia Carpenter: That's Jason Zweig, columnist for WSJ's: The Intelligent Investor. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. Tomorrow we'll have our weekly markets wrap up, What's News and markets, and then we'll be back on Monday. This episode was produced by Ariana Aspuru. I'm your host, Julia Carpenter. Jessica Fenton and Michael LaValle wrote our theme music. Our supervising producer is Melony Roy. Aisha Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott Saloway and Chris Zinsli are our deputy editors. And Philana Patterson is The Wall Street Journal's head of news audio. Thanks for listening.

WhatsApp 都可以自己寫 AI 機器人?官方確認正在測試
WhatsApp 都可以自己寫 AI 機器人?官方確認正在測試

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

WhatsApp 都可以自己寫 AI 機器人?官方確認正在測試

ChatGPT、DeepSeek 的使用介面都有一個共通之處,就是以對話方式呈現,而本來就是通訊軟件的 WhatsApp 也相當有潛質可以成為一個 AI 平台。WABetaInfo 就發現 WhatsApp 正向小部分 beta 測試者開放試用 AI Studio 的新功能,讓用戶可以自行創作 AI 對話機器人。 母公司 Meta 旗下的 Messenger 和 Instagram 其實都已經在海外加入了 AI Studio,也有專屬的網頁版本,不過這次就是給 WhatsApp 這個不一樣的用戶群體也可以使用。在 AI Studio 裡面,用戶可以設計對話機器人的性格、角色,包括是熱情、直接的旅遊顧問;具自信、有魄力的教練,當然背後會是由 Meta AI 模型驅動。 相對於 OpenAI 的 GPTs 和 Google Gemini Gem 服務,WhatsApp 的版本更著重於私人使用,因為使用者需要自行把 AI 機器人的連結分享出去,而不像其他服務會有個市集般的地方讓其他人發掘使用。 目前未知 AI Studio 什麼時候才會正式推出,更未知會否開放到我們本地用戶,但反正 Meta 是在密密加強 WhatsApp 的能力。 更多內容: Introducing GPTs Build custom experts with Gems WhatsApp beta for iOS 25.17.10.75: what's new? WhatsApp to let users build their own AI chatbots to use in the app Perplexity AI 加入 WhatsApp,香港可用、免登入、免 VPN!吉卜力風格、中文對答都可以! 遲到好過冇到!iPad 版 WhatsApp 終於登陸 App Store 緊貼最新科技資訊、網購優惠,追隨 Yahoo Tech 各大社交平台! 🎉📱 Tech Facebook: 🎉📱 Tech Instagram: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 社群: 🎉📱 Tech WhatsApp 頻道: 🎉📱 Tech Telegram 頻道:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store