Ohio lawmakers revive Statehouse bill to restrict drag queen shows
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — Ohio legislators have introduced another 'adult cabaret performances' ban that LGBTQ+ advocates say will outlaw drag queen shows in public.
House Bill 249 was introduced at the Statehouse on Tuesday to ban 'adult cabaret performances,' defined as a show 'harmful to juveniles' that features 'entertainers who exhibit a gender identity that is different from the performers' or entertainers' biological sex.' The bill would prohibit these shows in all locations other than 'adult cabarets,' meaning 'a nightclub, bar, juice bar, restaurant, bottle club or similar establishment.'
Dwayne Steward, Equality Ohio executive director, condemned the legislation as 'censorship' that would restrict any gender nonconforming performance in public. Steward argued the bill is 'a blatant attempt by politicians to suppress cultural expression under the guise of protecting children.'
Ohio marijuana festival wants to pay five random people $1,000 each to judge products
'Across generations from immigrant families, Black communities to LGBTQ+ Ohioans, art has been more than expression; it has been a declaration of existence, resilience, and pride,' Steward said. 'Drag is a powerful embodiment of that spirit. It is vibrant, unapologetic, and deeply rooted in our cultural fabric. … Drag isn't just performance, it's power. And it's here to stay.'
Coined the 'Indecent Exposure Modernization Act,' the bill is being proposed by Reps. Josh Williams (R-Sylvania) and Angela King (R-Celina) with the support of 42 out of 65 Ohio House Republican representatives. The legislation, which also prohibits nudity and sexual conduct in public, is meant to 'protect children and families from sexualized performances taking place in public spaces,' the lawmakers said.
'As a mother and as a legislator, I believe Ohio families should feel safe taking their children to a city park without the risk of coming across an event or person performing in a way that incorporates themes, imagery, and acts intended for mature audiences,' said King in a release.
H.B. 249 is identical to a previous bill introduced by Williams and King also banning 'adult cabaret performances.' Williams has long argued the bill's intention is to modernize revised code regarding obscenity viewed by minors, not to ban drag. He previously stressed that the proposal only means to ban shows 'harmful to juveniles,' with events like drag story time readings and plays like 'Mrs. Doubtfire' covered under the First Amendment.
Franklinton residents seek modernization, but fear gentrification
'We are seeing trends of indecent exposure and oversexualized performances taking place in public in the presence of children,' Williams said in Tuesday's release. 'King and I and many other Ohioans don't agree with these acts taking place in the open. This legislation is simply updating already existing law to the times that we are living in.'
Like Williams and King's previous proposal, H.B. 249 outlines the following penalties if entertainers are found violating the legislation:
A misdemeanor of the first degree if a performance occurs in the presence of a juvenile under the age of 18.
A felony of the fifth degree if the performance is 'obscene.'
A felony of the fourth degree if the performance is 'obscene' and occurs in the presence of a juvenile under the age of 13.
The bill's language is modeled after a Tennessee law that also bans 'adult cabaret performances.' The contested measure was ruled 'unconstitutionally vague and substantially overbroad' by a district judge in 2023, but then reinstated by an appeals court last year. In February, the Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to the law.
A conservative Lancaster group advocated for city council to adopt a measure with the same language last year after they argued a performance during a LGBTQ+ Pride event with a drag queen was 'pornographic.' Small business owners in Lancaster said they experienced an influx of customers after their shops were included on a social media post tying them to the debated event.
Bellefontaine, a rural Ohio city, was originally supposed to be the first in the state to vote on whether to ban such performances in public. However, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled last October that the proposed ordinance, which also used the 'adult cabaret performance' wording, would not appear on the ballot given it was submitted fraudulently.
House Bill 6's repeal, Delta-8 THC among bills moving through Ohio Statehouse
'I know a lot of queens who are scared to do certain things now because we are being put under such a microscope,' said Blonde Vanity, the Columbus-based drag queen who sparked Bellefontaine's proposal.
Next, H.B. 249 will be assigned to a House Committee, where it will receive hearings open for public testimony.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation
Vice President JD Vance told comedian and podcast host Theo Von on Saturday that Elon Musk made a "huge mistake" by accusing President Donald Trump of being implicated in the Jeffrey Epstein files. Vance warned that Trump and Musk being embroiled in a "blood feud" with one another will be bad for the country and will likely not end well for the Tesla CEO either. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that. And I think that if he and the president are in some blood feud — most importantly — it's going to be bad for the country, but I think it's going to be, I don't think it'll be good for Elon either," Vance argued. 'Gone Too Far': Gop Lawmakers Rally Around Trump After Musk Raises Epstein Allegations Musk referenced Jeffrey Epstein in relation to Trump on Thursday as part of a larger attack against the president and Republican leaders over their budget reconciliation bill. "Time to drop the really big bomb. [Trump] is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" Musk wrote on X. "Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out." Read On The Fox News App Vance told the comedian Trump "didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein" and that his loyalties will always be with the president. He noted that he hopes Musk will eventually "come back into the fold," but doubted the possibility of that coming true after his tweet accusing Trump of being involved with Epstein. Click Here For The Latest Media And Culture News When asked by Von why he believed Musk's "feelings were hurt," Vance speculated that the culmination of the violent threats against him and his company, paired with Congress' budget reconciliation bill, may have pushed him over the edge. "His businesses are being attacked nonstop. They're literally like firebombing some of his cars," he pointed out. "So I think part of it is this guy got into politics and has suffered a lot for it. But I mean, and I get the frustration there… Congress, you got this spending bill. But the main purpose of the bill is not actually spending or cutting spending, though it does cut a lot of spending." The vice president acknowledged Musk's concerns over the spending bill that allegedly started the feud between the two and noted that disagreements over its contents likely caused some "frustrations." "The main purpose of the bill is to prevent the biggest tax increase, but I understand — it's a good bill — it's not a perfect bill," Vance said. "The process in D.C., if you're a business leader, you probably get frustrated with that process because it's more, you know, bureaucratic. It's more slow-moving. So I think there's just some frustrations there." Fox News' Elizabeth Elkind, Deirdre Heavey and Alex Miller contributed to this article source: JD Vance says it was a 'huge mistake' for Musk to go after Trump with Epstein accusation
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff's praise
Elon Musk appeared to jokingly reconsider his stance on the Big Beautiful Bill after a California Democrat came to his defense. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote on X that "I can't believe I'm saying this – but [Elon Musk] is right." However, that seems to be the last point on which the two agree. They both object to the Big Beautiful Bill, viewing it as full of pork. Musk opposes the bill because he believes it raises government spending too much, while Schiff objects to what he calls its "far-right" content, which he describes as "dangerous." Republican Lawmakers Stand Firm Against Musk's 'Kill The Bill' Assault On Trump's Agenda Musk fired off a response rejecting Schiff's alleged praise of the tech billionaire's position on the bill. "Hmm, few things could convince me to reconsider my position more than Adam Schiff agreeing with me!" On May 30, Musk's time with the administration came to an end, and he seemed to leave things on good terms. President Donald Trump thanked Musk for his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and gave him a symbolic "key to the White House" as a parting gift. Read On The Fox News App Following his departure from the White House, Musk said he was looking forward "to continuing to be a friend and adviser to the president." However, things took a sharp turn as a feud between Trump and Musk quickly heated up after the Tesla founder began publicly criticizing the Big Beautiful Bill. Inside The Musk-trump Fallout After the legislation passed the House, Musk said that the "massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Musk's criticisms received mixed reactions from Republicans, with some — such as Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. — agreeing with him. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was "surprised" by Musk's reaction and claimed the two of them had a good discussion about the bill. Trump and Musk then began slugging it out on their respective social media platforms — X and Truth Social — as well as TV. The president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was "very disappointed" with Musk and claimed that the former DOGE head knew what was in the bill, something that Musk denied. Trump Not Interested In Talking To Musk: 'Elon's Totally Lost It' The heated exchange led to two explosive tweets, both of which were later deleted. In one post, Musk claimed Trump was mentioned in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender and disgraced financier. In his other post, Musk endorsed a message that called for Trump's impeachment and said that Vice President J.D. Vance should take over. While it's unclear whether Trump and Musk will reconcile, for now it seems unlikely. Trump told Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier that he was not interested in talking to Musk and that "Elon's totally lost it."Original article source: Musk jokes about reconsidering stance on Big Beautiful Bill after Schiff's praise
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida Libertarians, meeting in Daytona Beach, sense opportunity in Musk-Trump breakup
DAYTONA BEACH − Fallout from the week's nuclear-bomb-level blowup between President Donald Trump and his billionaire buddy Elon Musk had yet to settle when a few dozen true believers in absolute freedom and small government gathered to map out plans for the 2026 election. The Libertarian Party of Florida held its annual convention at The Daytona Hotel June 6-7, and attendees were energized by the opportunities presented by the Trump-Musk spat and skepticism about Trump's spending plan, aka the "Big, Beautiful Bill," that's being hashed out in the Senate. Steven Nekhaila, national chair of the Libertarian Party, is from Key West and was in attendance at the Daytona convention. He described a Republican-Democratic "duopoly," two boots of the same creature that continue to kick the American public that keeps electing it. "We have a saying. There's nobody more Libertarian than a Republican who's running for office until they get in power," Nekhalia said in a June 7 interview. "And we've seen that with the GOP over and over again at the federal level." Following Musk's break with Trump, the world's richest man posted to X, his own social-media platform: "Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?" Smelling an opportunity, Nekhaila pounced, posting: "We've been building this party for the 80% who are tired of being ruled by liars, spenders and tyrants. The door is open. The Libertarian Party isn't new, but it's finally impossible to ignore." While Nekhalia worked at a national level, other Libertarians at the Daytona convention were eying positions at the local and state level. Two Libertarians elected at the local level in Seminole County led a candidate training session. Altamonte Springs City Commissioner Jim Turney and Winter Springs City Commissioner Paul Diaz talked about how in Florida, most local elected positions are non-partisan, which creates an opportunity for minor-party candidates to introduce themselves to their communities and build trust without running into the major-party machinery. Turney suggested that when presenting themselves, candidates be Libertarian, authentic and themselves. Diaz said he campaigned in 2024 on a message that much of what is being proposed by government is outside of its role. "Is that really the role of government? Is that really what we should be doing? My line during my campaign was, 'Government's role is not to entertain people.'" Diaz said. "Stick to what we're supposed to be doing, and in my case I go right back to my lane, which is fiscally sound policy, only doing what you're supposed to do, and why on Earth are you even proposing a budget that's going to increase ... a tax increase ... when you still have mismanagement in your books?" As a two-time candidate, Matt Johnson, the state chairman, learned that he had a better shot when he ran for the DeLand City Commission in 2022 than the Florida Legislature in 2024. Even though the City Commission was a nonpartisan race, Johnson said the first question out of most voters' mouths was whether he was a Republican or Democrat. "I was able to take just over 30% away from an incumbent in a heavily Republican district," Johnson said. In the 2024 Florida House District 29 race, incumbent state Rep. Webster Barnaby won 55.6% of the vote over Democrat Rosemarie Latham and Johnson, who managed just 2.8%. "Our messaging and our policies and our methodologies of governing (are) popular, but when it comes down to the machine that is the Republicans and the Democrats, we just don't have the money to compete, and so I would say start small, start local, win there, where your party is not allowed to be a part of the discussion, build a resume of success and fighting for their rights," Johnson said. The Libertarian Party, founded in 1971, has hung on as a minor party because of its core beliefs, Johnson said. "Our principles are more aligned with the founders than either of the two parties as they currently exist," he said. "What keeps me going is I believe if humanity, if Americans, DeLandites, Volusia County citizens are to fully live to their full potential, they have to be as free as possible without government intervention. I think it is purely principles that keeps us going." Libertarian Joe Hannoush, an Ormond Beach resident who has run for multiple offices over the past decade, said he has previously been a member of both the Republican and Democratic parties. "I left for the same reason. They don't do what they actually believe," Hannoush said. "They tell you they're for anti-war and they keep going to war. They tell you they're for fiscal responsibility. They keep raising the debt. Both sides. ... I think we have to have hope because the only other option is another revolution, you know, and I'm not ready for that, so I'm trying to do it the peaceful way, the voting way." Hannoush said he is "hopeful" the Libertarians will soon be on an "upward swing," but he also cautioned that the parties involved in the Trump-Musk clash of titans have self-interest at heart. Musk − owner of Tesla, the electric car manufacturer − has expressed dismay that a Joe Biden-era electric vehicle mandate will be eliminated, while Trump has also threatened to cut Musk's company off from other government contracts. "Libertarians want an equal playing field under government. Not having government pick winners and losers," Hannoush said. "Most people don't want to have that spending, which is what the Big, Beautiful Bill does. The Big Beautiful Debt is what it is." This article originally appeared on The Daytona Beach News-Journal: Libertarians stand for small government. Can any win in 2026 election?