![[UPDATED] Najib walks free but not cleared in RM27mil SRC case](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Fphoto_2025-06-20_10-27-02_1750386519.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[UPDATED] Najib walks free but not cleared in RM27mil SRC case
High Court Judge K. Muniandy issued the ruling today after the prosecution failed to furnish the defence with hundreds of documents related to the trial, despite the charges being filed as early as 2019.
DNAA is when a court releases a person from charges without fully clearing them, meaning they can still be prosecuted for the same offense later.
Muniandy, when reading his judgment, said the prosecution failed to show that they can proceed with the trial in the near future as documents necessary to support the charges have yet to be procured, gathered, and served on the defence.
The court said the deputy public prosecutor also confirmed that the prosecution would not be prejudiced if a DNAA were granted, as they can pursue the case once they are ready.
"This case against the accused person has been pending in this court for a period of six years since the year 2019 and not an iota of witness testimony has been pursued with but only a plethora of postponements indicating that the prosecution is not ready with the prosecution of the case.
"Once the accused is charged in court, the charge cannot be hanging over his head for an indeterminate or indefinite period. That would be harsh and illegal.
"There is nothing to show that the prosecution able to proceed with the case for the time being or proceed within a reasonable time.
"Thus, it is unlikely that the case could be prosecuted expeditiously in the short future.," he said.
Muniandy said once the accused is charged in court, he is entitled to due process of the law and must be accorded access to swift justice.
"The process of the court is abused by the myriads of postponements and the case is still in the court system waiting to be disposed since 2019 when the court is ever ready to hear and determine the case in its entirely.
"This court is also mindful of the prevailing fact that the preferred charges against the accused dates to offences alleged to have been committed in 2014, now it is 2025, and the case has not taken off for trial.
"By virtue of those factors, the most appropriate order is for this court to discharge the accused person without acquitting him, so that he is not saddled with the charges preferred against him.
"There is no prejudice to the prosecution with the discharge which in common parlance is referred to as DNAA, as it could still pursue with the case once it is ready to do," he added.
On Feb 3, 2019, Najib claimed trial to three charges of money laundering involving RM27 million, allegedly received through his three AmPrivate Banking accounts at AmIslamic Bank Berhad, AmBank Group Building, Jalan Raja Chulan, on July 8, 2014.
He was charged under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001, which carries a maximum fine of RM5 million, up to five years' imprisonment, or both upon conviction.
The former Umno president is currently serving a jail term in Kajang Prison for misappropriating RM42 million in SRC International funds.
On Sept 2, 2022, he filed a petition for a royal pardon. On Jan 29 this year, the Pardons Board halved his jail sentence from 12 to six years and reduced his fine from RM210 million to RM50 million.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Star
32 minutes ago
- The Star
Adam Radlan acquitted of graft charges
Settled: Adam Radlan (centre) at the Kuala Lumpur Courts Complex. — Bernama KUALA LUMPUR: The Segambut Bersatu deputy chief was let off with a RM4.1mil compound by the anti-graft agency this week before the court acquitted him from 12 charges linked to the Jana Wibawa project. Adam Radlan Adam Muhammad is now free from the charges of corruption and money laundering following the payment of the compound issued by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) on Monday. Sessions Court judge Suzana Hussin made the order of acquittal yesterday after the court was informed that the MACC has agreed to accept Adam Radlan's representation and payment has been made. Deputy public prosecutor Farah Yasmin Salleh said the MACC agreed to offer the compound under Section 92(1) the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities (Amla) Act 2001 based on the representation sent by him to the MACC. Following this, the prosecution sought a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) in line with Section 254(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code to be granted to the accused. Adam Radlan's lawyer Datuk Seri Rajan Navaratnam, however, argued that his client should be given an acquittal on grounds that the compound has been paid. On Feb 21, 2023, Adam Radlan was charged with one count of soliciting a cash bribe of between 3.5% and 7% of a RM47.8mil road construction project from Mat Jusoh Mamat, the managing director of MIE Infrastructure & Energy Sdn Bhd. He was also charged with another count of accepting a bribe of RM500,000 from the same individual as an inducement to help the company secure the same project, which spanned from Jalan Sungai Adam to Kampung Banat in Perlis, from the government through direct negotiations. In February 2024, Adam Radlan was charged with two counts of receiving RM4.1mil in bribes from Lian Tan Chuan and Mat Jusoh for helping Nepturis Sdn Bhd and MIE Infrastructure & Energy obtain two similar Jana Wibawa projects and one count of soliciting RM2mil from Lian as an inducement to help Nepturis secure another project related to Jana Wibawa. The charges were framed under Section 16(a)(A) of the MACC Act 2009 and punishable by up to 20 years in prison and a fine of not less than five times the amount of the bribe or RM10,000, whichever is higher, upon conviction. Adam Radlan also faces seven money laundering charges amounting to more than RM3mil under Section 4(1)(b) Amla.


The Star
33 minutes ago
- The Star
Companies raided over smuggling activities
KUALA LUMPUR: The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) raided several companies suspected of being involved in large-scale tobacco, cigarette and cigar smuggling activities. The smuggling is believed to have cost the government an estimated RM250mil in tax revenue over the past five years. The operation, codenamed Ops Sikaro, was carried out by MACC's special operations division in collaboration with the Inland Revenue Board, Bank Negara and Customs Department. MACC senior director of special operations, Datuk Mohamad Zamri Zainul Abidin, said 14 locations across the Klang Valley and Johor were targeted. Investigations are being conducted under Section 16 of the MACC Act 2009 as well as Section 4(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, he added. 'MACC will not compromise with any party attempting to profit from corruption, money laundering and smuggling that cause significant losses to the nation,' he said in a statement yesterday.

The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Bullying tribunal on Cabinet agenda tomorrow
PUTRAJAYA: The proposal to set up a tribunal to address bullying cases involving minors will be tabled at the Cabinet meeting tomorrow, says Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. The Prime Minister said that Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said will present the proposal to the Cabinet. 'The Cabinet will discuss this when we meet on Friday,' he told reporters after attending the Finance Ministry's monthly assembly. Azalina was previously reported as saying that the government is studying the need to enact an Anti-Bullying Act, with emphasis on setting up a tribunal to hear cases involving minors. At another function, Azalina said discussions at the policy level are crucial as relevant ministries such as Women, Family and Community Development; Education; Higher Education, and National Unity may have their own views regarding enforcement aspects of the law. 'After each ministry submits its feedback, the Legal Affairs Division will conduct a detailed study (based on the information) and hold engagement sessions. 'The matter will then be brought to the policy level and subsequently to Parliament,' she said at an event, Bernama reported. Azalina said the main issue is the absence of a specific definition of bullying or penalties for such offences under existing legal provisions. Currently, bullying-related cases are dealt with under various laws including the Online Safety Act and the Anti-Sexual Harassment Act, she said. There are also provisions under labour laws and the Penal Code to deal with such cases, Azalina added. The minister said the division will issue a list of Frequently Asked Questions to clarify the differences between the Penal Code and the Child Act to avoid confusion among the public. 'Many misunderstand ... children can still be charged under criminal laws. 'However, the procedure is different. For one, they cannot be tried in an open court. 'I want to give assurance that wrong is still wrong. The law applies to everyone, whether children or adults,' she said.