X's ‘Creator Revenue Sharing Program' gets ‘totally pwned' by Vietnamese click farm, lawsuit reveals
A Vietnamese click farm is accused of duping Elon Musk's X out of a small fortune by exploiting apparently lax controls surrounding its 'Creator Revenue Sharing Program' – an initiative touted by the world's richest person as a purported way for premium users to 'earn a living' through their activity on the site.
The eight-man crew operated out of a dingy office space in downtown Hanoi, where they 'programmatically post[ed] computer-generated content' to a network of 'inauthentic' X profiles set up using stolen identities 'to engage in coordinated platform manipulation,' according to a federal lawsuit filed Thursday and obtained by The Independent.
It says these automated profiles would subsequently ''like,' 'repost,' and otherwise artificially engage with each other's content, all for the purpose of deceiving X into paying out funds' based on what the company – which just last year enthusiastically touted a new 'improved authentic engagements algorithm' – now claims were bogus clicks.
The 'fraudulent scheme,' X's complaint contends, extracted payouts from the Creator Revenue Sharing Program 'by manufacturing the appearance of content engagement where none really exists.'
X is now seeking 'disgorgement' of the group's haul, suing them and 25 as-yet unidentified 'John Does' for what its complaint calls 'a pattern of racketeering activity, including… thousands of predicate racketeering acts of wire fraud since at least 2023.'
Although the company's complaint does not specify the exact amount of the outfit's total take, it says the payments were funneled into at least 125 U.S. bank accounts, set up using stolen identities, and transferred to accounts in their real names at nine banks in Vietnam, across more than 1,700 individual transactions. The complaint was filed in Texas, where X is headquartered.
According to the complaint, private investigators working for X eventually learned the names and addresses of the eight named defendants after external payment processing sites PingPong and Payoneer, where Stripe, X's payment processor, sent the Hanoi team's 'ill-gotten gains,' turned over the identity documents used to set up their accounts.
The five attorneys representing X in the case did not respond on Friday to requests for comment. Defendants Do Minh Thang, Phan Ngoc Tuan, Nguyen Ngoc Thanh, Le Dinh Chung, Nguyen Nhu Duc, Nguyen Viet Kieu, Do Viet Khanh, and Do Xuan Long were unable to be reached.
X's revenue sharing program was launched in 2022, shortly after Musk bought the platform for $44 billion. In the beginning, premium users, who pay $8 a month for a blue 'verified' checkmark next to their names and preferred algorithm placement, received a portion of the revenue generated by ads served to other premium users in their replies.
But when hate speech on X proliferated under Musk's stewardship, and major advertisers began to flee the site, the company rejiggered the program to instead reward accounts for how many interactions they generated with other premium users. Payouts vary based on a variety of factors, but one estimate pegs it at around $8 for every 1 million impressions.
'The more engagement an account generates, the more the account holder is financially rewarded,' X's complaint states.
However, according to the complaint, the alleged fraudsters in Hanoi 'deceive[d] X into concluding that the accounts they control are the accounts of legitimate content creators deserving of payment.'
'Just as a broker in the financial industry may 'churn' profits by engaging in excessive and unnecessary trades in a client's investment account to generate artificially high commissions or fees, Defendants have employed software to create extensive, artificial engagement within a network of commonly-owned and controlled accounts,' the complaint continues.
The group also sold their automation tools and techniques, generating a separate stream of income by teaching others how to help themselves to a slice of X's money, the complaint contends. One script, called the 'XGPT Tool,' was advertised to tens of thousands of users on YouTube, TikTok, Telegram, Discord, Facebook, Instagram and X itself, the complaint goes on.
On top of the fraud allegations central to X's complaint, the filing also accuses the Hanoi hackers of trademark infringement, asserting they specifically 'misuse[d] and misappropriate[d] the Twitter and X Trademarks' in thumbnails for instructional videos posted to YouTube.
Broadly speaking, X's complaint claims the alleged scam 'has harmed [its] reputation and customer relationships by introducing low-quality content to the platform.'
'Anytime there's a monetary value added to clicks, there's going to be people going to the dark side,' an Illinois social media marketing CEO told the Associated Press in 2014.
X is seeking 'injunctive relief to disrupt the [Hanoi crew's] ongoing criminal scheme,' and is asking for compensatory, treble, and punitive damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why.
Trump's early-term momentum has hit a wall. Here's why. From Gaza to Ukraine and from federal judges to the Federal Reserve, President Donald Trump has seen his early White House successes take a back seat to emerging struggles. Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk slams Trump's big tax bill on X Days after leaving the White House, Elon Musk slammed President Trump's big tax bill on X. WASHINGTON − Governing? Harder than it looked. Just as Donald Trump is pushing to pass the centerpiece of his domestic agenda, former BFF Elon Musk is trashing his "big, beautiful bill" as "a disgusting abomination." The president's prediction that Vladimir Putin would heed his entreaties to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours is stretching into Month Five. Judges he appointed to the bench are daring to rule against him. From cutting federal spending to deporting illegal immigrants, from reaching a nuclear deal with Iran to negotiating a ceasefire in Gaza, Team Trump is running into roadblocks that are making it difficult to deliver on promises he confidently made before moving into the White House. More: Trump erupts when asked about 'TACO trade' ― a new nickname mocking his tariff approach There are some skid marks where the rubber has met the road. To be sure, some of Trump's problems come from a surplus of early successes and from the breadth of his ambitions. Through a flood of executive orders and actions, he has launched a transformation of the USA's approach to the world and the federal government's role in Americans' lives. Congressional Democrats are still struggling to craft a consistent and coherent strategy against him. But the pushback from other forces has become increasingly problematic for the White House − pushback from skeptical judges, foreign leaders with their own priorities, a steady-as-she-goes Federal Reserve and the reality of budget arithmetic. If Trump's first 100 days were a rollercoaster, the second 100 days, a span that ends on Aug. 8, are proving to be a bit of a slog. Ukraine: 'It'll be done within 24 hours' The question for Trump − as it was for many of his predecessors in the White House − is how he chooses to respond, whether he doubles down or adjusts his goals and tactics when obstacles loom. Consider Ukraine. In dozens of campaign speeches, candidate Trump said he would settle the war in Ukraine within a day of taking office, and perhaps even before he moved in. More: Russia's 'Pearl Harbor': What to know about Ukraine's audacious drone strike "I know Zelenskyy, I know Putin," he said at one Pennsylvania rally, referring to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his Russian counterpart "It'll be done within 24 hours, you watch. They all say, 'That's such a boast.' It will be done very quickly.'" But Putin has swatted away Trump's demands for a quick ceasefire, and Ukrainian forces have engineered a stunning drone assault on Russian military forces. An end to the war seems nowhere in sight. "I'm very disappointed," Trump said on May 28. What does he do next? More: Russia demands harsh terms at Ukraine peace talks Trump has threatened sanctions on Russia but is clearly loath to impose them. He has also suggested the United States may just walk away, leaving the conflict to the two warring parties and the Europeans to figure out. He faces similar calculations on tariffs, where he has delayed or reduced his most far-reaching threats to China and elsewhere when they seemed to rattle the stock markets. Does he follow through on his July 8 deadline for trading partners to make deals or be hit with the most stringent tariffs in close to a century? And on Gaza, where Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a longtime ally, has resisted the administration's efforts to negotiate a ceasefire. "Get it over with and let's get back to peace and stop killing people," Trump had vowed during the 2024 campaign. But the region is still wracked by chaos and violence, in recent days over the distribution of food aid. For presidents, a familiar problem Trump is hardly the first president to find himself stymied by the realities of governing and the frustrations of the balance of power. Franklin D. Roosevelt was so enraged by Supreme Court decisions undercutting his New Deal that in 1937 he proposed packing the court with additional, and presumably friendlier, justices. That idea went nowhere, though the high court started to be more welcoming to his initiatives. More than a half-century later, Bill Clinton adopted a strategy of cooperation with the new Republican House speaker, Newt Gingrich, when Democrats lost control of Congress in the 1994 midterm elections. The policy, dubbed "triangulation," dismayed liberal Democrats but led to welfare reform and a balanced budget. More: Elon Musk slams President Trump's big tax and policy bill as a 'disgusting abomination' After Democratic setbacks in the 2014 midterms, Barack Obama said he still had the ability to deploy "the pen and the phone" − that is, to sign executive actions and to activate outside allies. Trump enjoys considerable political assets, including the discombobulation of Democratic leaders and the loyalty of congressional Republicans. More: Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill That is being tested by the battle over the bill known as reconciliation. The sprawling measure would extend and expand tax cuts from Trump's first term, add billions of dollars for border security, and trim billions from Medicaid and clean-energy tax credits. It would also increase the national debt by a budget-busting $2.4 trillion over 10 years, according to the updated estimate by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. In previous showdowns, Trump has prevailed in Congress, in part because GOP members see their reelections at risk if an unhappy president backs primary challengers against them. He is lobbying for the bill as "arguably the most significant piece of Legislation that will ever be signed in the History of our Country." But Musk, who until May 27 led Trump's DOGE budget-cutting initiative, has weighed in on the other side, warning the legislation would create a "crushingly unsustainable debt." His warnings are being cited by Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and a handful of other GOP senators alarmed by the bill's impact on the federal budget deficit. The tech billionaire posted an electoral threat of his own on X. The social-media platform is a political asset, too, not to mention the hundreds of millions of dollars that the world's richest man has been willing to spend in the past on political campaigns. "In November next year," he proposed, "we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people."
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk calls for killing House's ‘big, beautiful bill'
Elon Musk on Wednesday called for killing the House's 'big, beautiful bill' and for a new spending bill to be drafted after he threw a wrench into GOP leadership's plans to pass President Trump's bill of legislative priorities by July 4. 'A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS,' Musk said on his social platform X. He later added on X, 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' Musk, who was at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), called the legislation passed by the House 'pork-filled' and a 'disgusting abomination' on Tuesday. His stinging criticism doubled down on his previous comments that the bill undermines the cost-cutting efforts of DOGE. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters Wednesday that there isn't time for a new bill in response to Musk's comments. 'I want Elon and all my friends to recognize the complexity of what we've accomplished here. This extraordinary piece of legislation, record number of savings, record tax cuts for the American people and all the other benefits in it. We worked on the bill for almost 14 months. You can't go back to the drawing board, and we shouldn't,' Johnson said. 'We have a great product to deliver here. So I know it doesn't … it's not perfect by some peoples' estimations. But you cannot make perfect the enemy of the very, very, very good. …So I'll continue to try to reach Elon and tell him, extol the merits of our work here. I hope he'll understand it.' Musk's criticism gave political cover to the fiscal hawks in the Senate who were already critical of the legislation, including GOP Sens. Ron Johnson (Wis.), Mike Lee (Utah) and Rand Paul (Ky.). Paul said Tuesday on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' that if four conservatives band together, they could force Senate GOP leaders to agree to bigger spending cuts and possibly 'separate out' language to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. Similarly, Lee called for the Senate to 'make this bill better.' The group wants to see deeper spending cuts while other Republicans, like Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Josh Hawley (Mo.) and Jerry Moran (Kan.), are worried that House language to cut Medicaid spending will hurt their constituents. Meanwhile, the White House has brushed off Musk bashing the bill and said his criticism 'doesn't change the president's opinion.' Speaker Johnson earlier Wednesday said Trump is 'not delighted' with Musk's position on the bill and that 'Elon did a 180 on that.' Trump is 'deeply involved' with 'personally advocating' for the bill, and there will be additional meetings going forward between the administration and lawmakers to get it passed, a White House official told The Hill. Trump held a press conference with Musk in the Oval Office on Friday to mark his exit from the White House team and to thank the Tesla CEO for his work to overhaul the federal government. Mychael Schnell contributed. Updated at 4:26 p.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump is brushing off Musk's megabill attacks — for now
President Donald Trump is frustrated with Elon Musk for slamming the administration's chief legislative priority, but isn't taking it personally — a distinction that's helped keep a lid on the White House's response so far. Yet as Musk's attacks stretch into their second day, administration officials are wondering how long the peace will hold, according to two White House aides and two outside advisers to the president granted anonymity to discuss internal thinking. 'In Trumpworld, we know that the sign things are going south fast is the president getting personal, even if it's just a half-sentence on Truth,' said one of the advisers. 'He's the one who decides.' Musk's ambush of the GOP's megabill via social media represents perhaps the stiffest test yet of a Trump-Musk relationship that has survived far longer than many in the president's orbit anticipated, even if it now appears to be ending the way most of them predicted. The Tesla CEO called the centerpiece of Trump's agenda a 'disgusting abomination' just days after a buddy-buddy press conference in the Oval Office during which Trump presented him with a golden key. And while it has irritated Trump aides who are trying to maintain fragile support for the legislation in the Senate, Musk's targeting of the bill and not the president himself has helped keep things relatively civil, according to the two administration officials and one of the advisers. Trump has kept silent on the matter despite Musk's continued broadsides on X. Within the West Wing, his aides dismissed Musk's complaints about the bill's size and deficit spending, arguing instead that Musk is upset primarily because it eliminates tax credits that stood to benefit his electric car company Tesla. The episode did renew quiet discussions over how to counter the sudden offensive from a former ally whose prominence, social media platform and deep pockets have made him massively influential within the Republican Party. Senior White House aide Stephen Miller, who worked closely with Musk in the administration, has taken the lead in defending the merits of the bill on X, seeking to remind critics in one post that the bill was designed by "President Trump, his loyal aides, and his closest allies in Congress to deliver fully and enthusiastically on the explicit promises he made the American People." Yet Trump has remained circumspect, according to aides and others who have spoken to him, avoiding a high-profile fight even as he ramps up involvement in efforts to change the bill in the Senate. If Trump were to confront Musk, it would most likely happen via Truth Social, said one of the White House officials. 'Elon running his mouth publicly about the bill is not helping the president at all,' the outside adviser said. "But those two fellows have talked a lot, Trump and Elon, and I think they know each other pretty well." The White House has publicly downplayed the rift, emphasizing that Musk is now a private citizen and that he still agrees with Trump on a host of other issues. "The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday. "It doesn't change the president's opinion." Musk's broadsides came ahead of a White House meeting on Wednesday between Trump and Senate Republicans, as lawmakers try to enact the megabill within a matter of weeks. Hill GOP leaders have largely brushed off Musk's intervention, calling the billionaire's critiques misguided and downplaying the impact he might have in moving votes. Within Trump's orbit, the timing of the criticism has bothered officials more than the substance — giving fodder to hesitant senators like Ron Johnson and Josh Hawley, according to one of the White House officials. But aides and allies largely dismissed the suggestion that Musk might derail the Senate effort, with some saying that after pouring millions of dollars into unsuccessfully influencing the Wisconsin Supreme Court race earlier this year, it's become clear his money doesn't swing votes. Other Republicans, though, have quietly urged the party's leadership to take more seriously the threat that Musk could fund primary challenges, said the second adviser. Even if the megabill makes it through the Senate, they say, a revised version will need to go back to the House, where Musk's influence and money could become a more immediate problem. Already, frontline and conservative Republicans are fretting about the potential consequences of getting crosswise with Musk and his near-unlimited financial resources. Should Musk escalate his rhetoric and issue a more explicit primary threat, it could force Republicans into the unenviable position of choosing between the president and his former aide — and raise the stakes for Trump's own decision over how to respond. 'They're stuck between Trump and Musk,' the second adviser said of rank-and-file members. 'I would characterize the level of alarm as reasonably high.'
