Wall Street bonuses jump 32% as total surges to record, NY comptroller says
NEW YORK, March 26 (Reuters) - Wall Street banker bonuses rose 31.5% to an average $244,700 last year as dealmaking rebounded, but the boom times may wane as economic uncertainty rises, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said on Wednesday.
Deals have slowed this quarter as companies navigate changing policies from President Donald Trump's administration, including tariffs and personnel changes atop regulatory agencies.
Get a look at the day ahead in U.S. and global markets with the Morning Bid U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.
"This financial market strength is good news for New York's economy and our fiscal position, which relies on the tax revenue it generates," DiNapoli said in a statement. "However, increasing uncertainty in the economy amid significant federal policy changes may dampen the outlook."
The changes come after a bumper year in which the bonus pool for employees in New York City's securities industry surged to a record $47.5 billion for 2024, the highest in records dating back to 1987, the estimates showed.
As the world's top financial center, one in every 11 jobs in the city is either directly or indirectly associated with the securities industry, the comptroller estimated.
Wall Street's biggest banks reported rising investment banking fees last year, fueled by more deals and corporate debt issuance. After profits rose 90% in 2024, the latest bonus data reflected the first major increase since banks reaped a windfall in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Employment in the securities industry in 2024 reached its highest level in at least three decades, to 201,500 employees, up from 198,400 a year earlier.
The 2024 bonuses will generate $600 million more in state income tax revenue and $275 million more for the city compared with 2023, according to estimates from DiNapoli.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.' The DBT has been approached for comment.
South Wales Argus
2 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.' The DBT has been approached for comment.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Government ‘passive' in recovering £1.9bn of Covid loan losses, MPs warn
The Government has been 'dangerously flat-footed' in its approach to recovering nearly £2 billion in estimated taxpayer losses from the Covid bounce back loan scheme, MPs have warned. The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) – comprised of cross-party MPs – criticised the lack of incentive for lenders to recover the money. The bounce back loan scheme was set up in the early days of the Covid-19 lockdowns when businesses across the country were forced to close or faced a drop-off in demand. It provided loans of up to £50,000 per business, and were available to most UK firms without the usual credit and affordability checks in order to be issued more quickly. However, the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) estimated that total losses due to fraud on the bounce back loan scheme will be at least £1.9 billion – with the figure likely to be higher as not all fraudulent cases had been identified. The DBT also said that some £130 million worth of losses had so far been recovered from the bounce back scheme – but said it was not possible to identify how much related to borrowers contracting them fraudulently. The Government guaranteed to cover any losses incurred by lenders on loans which could not be repaid when the scheme began. It has nonetheless withdrawn its backing on £367 million worth of loans where it felt lenders have not done all it should have done – meaning banks foot the bill, rather than taxpayers. Earlier this month, Starling Bank said it had agreed to remove the Government guarantee on a group of loans that had potential issues – leading it to put aside some £28 million. But the PAC said the broader guarantee meant there was a lack of incentive for banks to recover taxpayers' money. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, criticised 'passivity' in the Government's approach. 'DBT were unable to tell us if even the tiny fraction of that sum recovered was in fact even related to fraud,' he said. 'Indeed, relying on government-backed lenders to recover losses, who thus lack any incentive to pursue lost funds, has been a dangerously flat-footed approach. 'Now that the Insolvency Service has taken over responsibility for viable cases, we look forward to hearing how it fares where others have failed.'
