Trump says U.S. will double steel tariffs to 50%
President Donald Trump told U.S. steelworkers on Friday that he will double tariffs on steel imports to 50%.
'We're going to bring it from 25% to 50%, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America,' Trump said during remarks at U.S. Steel's Irvin Works in West Mifflin, Pennsylvania.
Trump is visiting U.S. Steel after indicating last week that he will clear a controversial merger with Japan's Nippon. Investors and union members are listening for answers from the president on what shape the deal he announced between U.S. Steel and Nippon will take.
Trump described the deal as a 'partnership' in a May 23 post on his social media platform Truth Social. The president said U.S. Steel's headquarters would remain in Pittsburgh and Nippon would invest $14 billion over 14 months in the more than 120-year-old American industrial icon.
Trump told reporters on Sunday that the deal is an 'investment, it's a partial ownership, but it will be controlled by the USA.' But the White House and the companies have provided little detail to the public on how the deal is structured since Trump's announcement.
U.S. Steel has described the deal as a 'merger' in which it will become a 'wholly owned subsidiary' of Nippon Steel North America but continue to operate as separate company, according to an April 8 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sources familiar with the matter told CNBC's David Faber that Nippon is expected to close its acquisition of U.S. Steel at $55 per share, the original offer the Japanese steelmaker made before President Joe Biden rejected the deal in January. Biden blocked Nippon's proposed acquisition on national security grounds, arguing that it would jeopardize critical supply chains.
But Trump ordered a new review of the deal in April, softening his previous opposition to Nippon buying U.S. Steel. The president announced the 'partnership' one day after the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) was supposed to conclude its review and make a recommendation on whether the companies had found ways to 'mitigate any national security risks.'
'National security agreement'
Pennsylvania Sen. Dave McCormick told CNBC on Tuesday that the U.S. government will have a 'golden share' that will allow it to decide on a number of board seats. U.S. Steel will have an American CEO and a majority of the board will come from the U.S. McCormick said.
'It's a national security agreement that will be signed with the U.S. government,' McCormick told CNBC's ' Squawk Box.' 'There'll be a golden share that will essentially require U.S. government approval of a number of the board members and that will allow the United States to ensure production levels aren't cut.'
The 'golden share' likely wouldn't take the form of an equity stake by the U.S. government, said James Brower, a partner at law firm Morrison Forrester's litigation department. The committee that reviewed the deal, CFIUS, does not negotiate equity interests, Brower said.
It would likely take the form of contractual right for the U.S. government to veto certain actions, said Brower, who has represented clients on issues related to CFIUS.
Nippon will 'have certainly members of the board and this will be part of their overall corporate structure,' McCormick told CNBC. White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro told reporters Thursday that 'Nippon Steel is going to have some involvement, but no control of the company.'
'U.S. Steel owns the company,' Navarro said. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CNBC on Friday that the details of the Nippon Steel deal 'remain confidential, relatively.'
'The underlying principle is that the United States should have control over key critical sectors, whether it's basic manufacturing or high tech,' Greer told 'Squawk Box.' 'In the event that foreign countries or foreign individuals or firms want to acquire these companies or have large investments, the U.S. has to maintain control of things that matter.'
The United Steelworkers, which originally opposed the deal, has said the union 'cannot speculate about the impact' of Trump's announcement 'without more information.'
'Our concern remains that Nippon, a foreign corporation with a long and proven track record of violating our trade laws, will further erode domestic steelmaking capacity and jeopardize thousands of good, union jobs,' USW President David McCall said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Donald Trump torpedoes Elon Musk's friend's hopes of running NASA over worrying 'prior associations'
Donald Trump has dashed Elon Musk 's hope that one of his close allies would run NASA by reneging on his nomination days before he was due to face the confirmation vote. The president maintains he backflipped on billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman's appointment after learning of his past donations to the Democrats. But MAGA loyalists suspect Trump may have been set up to make the call by insiders who have it out for Elon Musk and are looking to hurt him by punishing his friend. Trump ally Laura Loomer wrote: 'There is reason to believe that Isaacman may be facing retaliation because of his friendship with Elon Musk. 'If so, this would suggest there is a coordinated hit job on Isaacman in an effort to damage ties between President Trump and Elon Musk before the 2026 midterms. 'Is President Trump aware of the ulterior motives by some individuals in the administration who have an interest in seeing Isaacman's nomination pulled?' The New York Times revealed on Sunday that Trump reportedly knew about Isaacman's donations from the moment he chose to nominate him to run NASA. Isaacman had reportedly disclosed that over the years he had donated to prominent Democrats, including in the past two campaign cycles. Musk has also donated to Democrats in the past, before going on to become the single largest benefactor to the MAGA movement during the last campaign in his push to see Trump return to the White House. Isaacman was selected by Trump at the height of his bromance with Musk, who has a long and storied connection with the fellow billionaire. It is understood that Musk lobbied for Isaacman's appointment and that Trump deferred to the SpaceX founder for the final decision. At the time, Trump described Isaacman as 'an accomplished business leader, philanthropist, pilot and astronaut.' He had been approved by a Senate committee and was headed to a confirmation vote this week when Trump suddenly pulled his nomination. The president gave Musk a heads up on Friday - his last day at the White House - that he intended to do so. Musk's time in the White House was fraught with tension and pushback from some of Trump's closest advisors, some of whom didn't like the access Musk had to the president and the power he wielded over departments with his Department of Government Efficiency. This has sparked rampant speculation that in the wake of his official departure as a Special Government Employee, that some of his foes are exacting revenge by getting in Trump's ear about Isaacman's nomination. Republican Senator and Trump ally Tim Sheehy wrote on X: 'Astronaut and successful businessman @RookIsaacman was a strong choice by President Trump to lead NASA. 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination.' It is understood that some of Trump's allies had been pressing him about Isaacman's donations to the Democrats in recent days, prompting Trump to renege on his offer. Loomer said despite his liberal ties, Isaacman was an ideal candidate to lead NASA, with 'unmatched credentials.' 'Isaacman was on track to get over 70 Senate votes. So why the sudden reversal and talks to pull his nomination?' she asked. 'Because the Deep State doesn't want President Trump to have allies like this in his administration.' White House assistant press secretary Liz Huston pushed back against any suggestion that the decision was not Trump's. 'The Administrator of NASA will help lead humanity into space and execute President Trump's bold mission of planting the American flag on the planet Mars,' she said. 'It's essential that the next leader of NASA is in complete alignment with President Trump's America First agenda and a replacement will be announced directly by President Trump soon.' And Trump himself appeared to quell concerns that he and Musk were on the outs on Sunday night, sharing a new picture to Truth Social of him with the former First Buddy and one of Musk's sons. Musk left his role less than a week ago and just days ahead of schedule, signing off with a warm X post praising Trump. But days earlier, he had openly criticized Trump's landmark 'big, beautiful bill' and lamented the treatment of his baby-faced DOGE henchmen during his time in the White House. He said: 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit, not just decreases it.' And in the days since his departure, a laundry list of allegations have surfaced about the simmering tensions between Musk and a handful of Trump's other allies. Former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon told that Musk's turbulent time in the White House was marred when he physically 'shoved' 62-year-old Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent after he was confronted over wild promises to save the administration 'a trillion dollars'. 'Scott Bessent called him out and said, 'You promised us a trillion dollars (in cuts), and now you're at like $100 billion, and nobody can find anything, what are you doing?'' the prominent MAGA figure revealed. 'And that's when Elon got physical. It's a sore subject with him. 'It wasn't an argument, it was a physical confrontation. Elon basically shoved him.' Bannon said the physical altercation came as the two billionaires moved from the Oval Office to outside Chief of Staff Susie Wiles' office, and then outside the office of the then National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz. 'Trump 100%' sided with Bessent after the clash, he added. 'I don't think Bessent has any bad blood, but he's got a job to do and he's going to do it.' The revelations of the Musk-Bessant clash follow an explosive New York Times report that alleged Musk was using a cocktail of drugs on the campaig n trail including ketamine, ecstasy and psychedelic mushrooms. Bannon added that Musk also lost status in Trump's orbit when it was leaked to the New York Times in March that the billionaire was preparing to receive top-secret military briefings on China, which Trump abruptly stopped. 'People in the administration and the White House realized he didn't have any idea what he's doing,' Bannon said. 'They cauterized the damage.' clashed with Transport Secretary Sean Duffy for not firing enough air traffic controllers.
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
The Rangers realisation that astounded Andrew Cavenagh as Dave King hopes board mood swings are now thing of the past
King reckons that now the grownups in charge, the boardroom moodswings that have plagued the club will become a thing of the past Say what you want about the men who've run Rangers for the past decade but you can't fault the devotion to a club most have supported since they were wearing short trousers. Around the boardroom, tens of millions have been poured into a passion first developed as children. The trouble is that much of those huge sums have been squandered by a series of blunders verging on the schoolboy. The job now for the new American regime in control at Ibrox is to return the Light Blues to the top of the class in Scotland. And if there's one thing offering re-assurance to Dave King, it's that the grown ups are now in charge. The former chairman was one of those boyhood supporters who gave his all - and most certainly his fortunes - in the pursuit of making Rangers great again. But having been born and raised in Glasgow, the Castlemilk native was as susceptible as any of the men he shared the director's table with of getting caught up amidst the reactionary mindset of the larger Ibrox faithful. He saw how a bad night in Perth or Paisley could lead to dire consequences for the manager in the dugout. But with the mature heads of Andrew Cavenagh and his partners from 49ers Enterprises now in charge, King hopes the days of boardroom mood swings are over. King - who handed over his 14 percent stake in the club last week as the US consortium concluded their £75million takeover - said: 'I remember speaking to Andrew and he was astounded by the extent to which we won a game, we lost a game, and there was doom and gloom at board level. 'As supporters you can do that, but as a board you can't be making decisions around transfer business because you lost on Wednesday night in Paisley. 'You need a proper football plan, a proper financial plan. I think sometimes when you've got too many supporters on the board, immediate results start to introduce knee-jerk thinking - 'Get him out, get him in, fire the manager'. 'You've got to be careful that you don't get caught up in that because it's dangerous. I think the new owners are going to come in with a plan and they'll stick to it. 'When things don't go well, it'll be fine. They won't throw the plan aside. I'm expecting that level of maturity because these are very mature investor business people who are looking at Rangers in a very mature way. "These are not some supporter that's coming in because the jacket, tie and brown brogues are important to them. 'They see Rangers as a great business opportunity and quite frankly, it is. 'But it was never going to be one as long as it remained a parochial cap-in-hand set-up. It can't be, 'Oh we need a couple of million quid so let's go around the directors and get a loan'. 'We had to break away from that. It's something I thought we had with 55, keeping Steven Gerrard on board and defending the title. 'I really thought we'd turned the corner, but unfortunately, it was decided to take Steven out of the picture. 'I regret that, but it is what it is. We are where we are. 'I'm definitely excited, genuinely excited about the progress the club will make now this transaction has gone through.' Cavenagh and Co have kicked-off the new era at Ibrox with a promise to inject an initial £20million into the club's transfer kitty. That will do for starters but more, a lot more, will be needed to make Rangers a serious contender for prizes. Taking on a Celtic side that have lifted 13 of the last 14 league crowns will not be easy but King is confident that new owners grasp the appetite for success which is now their job to feed. 'I do think that's an exact understanding,' he said. 'The ambition most certainly must be to win a trophy next season. 'My understanding is the expectation is to be competitive next season. 'I think the squad that we've got at the moment is way short of what we need to have a sustained run at the title while simultaneously participating in Europe. 'It's no surprise this year that the guys were up for it in Europe because that's just almost a mentality aspect of Europe. 'I don't know if some of them regarded that as being a shopping window - but the fact is they weren't quite up for going to Perth or Paisley or places like that. 'We need people that understand it the way Barry Ferguson did. 'Barry and guys like Allan McGregor understand what it takes to win league titles. 'It's not about the glamour games. It's about going away in a wet, windy, cold night to Aberdeen, to St Johnstone and grinding out an ugly 1-0 result. 'When I looked at the team, when we were down with 40 minutes to go, I wasn't seeing the leadership on the pitch. 'I wasn't seeing the characters on the pitch that were saying, come on, and grabbing them. 'If that was Richard Gough, he'd have been tackling the guys himself. 'I think we're way short on players. That's why I'm trying to moderate expectations to say as much as the 49ers are coming in to make an impact as quickly as they can and as sensibly as they can, I'm just concerned it might take a wee bit longer than we as supporters would like. 'But it doesn't mean we won't be going forward all the time.' A fresh pile of American's dollars will certainly help Rangers close the gap on Celtic. But just as valuable will be the business and sporting expertise being brought to the table by the Stateside consortium with their NFL experience. King added: 'They're not guys that are just going to throw money at the club. 'There's going to be a football plan and there's going to be a financial plan behind that. 'Andrew and the investors coming in understand there's going to have to be a substantial net investment. 'It's really how much is going in total because we have to get some guys out as well. 'We've been paying a lot of money for players, some that virtually never started and others that give us very little time on the pitch. 'If they can get them out and free up the wages and add the new money, then it could be a very, very substantial new investment.'
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Russia and Ukraine to talk about peace but are still far apart
ISTANBUL, June 2 (Reuters) - Russian and Ukrainian officials are due to sit down on Monday in the Turkish city of Istanbul for their second round of direct peace talks since 2022, but the two sides are still far apart on how to end the war and the fighting is stepping up. U.S. President Donald Trump has demanded Russia and Ukraine make peace, but so far they have not and the White House has repeatedly warned the United States will "walk away" from the war if the two sides are too stubborn to reach a peace deal. The first round of talks on May 16 yielded the biggest prisoner swap of the war but no sign of peace - or even a ceasefire as both sides merely set out their own opening negotiating positions. After keeping the world guessing on whether Ukraine would even turn up for the second round, President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Defence Minister Rustem Umerov would meet with Russian officials in Istanbul. The Russian delegation will be headed by Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky, who after the first round invoked French general and statesman Napoleon Bonaparte to assert that war and negotiations should always be conducted at the same time. On Sunday, Ukraine launched one of its most ambitious attacks of the war, targeting Russian nuclear-capable long-range bombers in Siberia and other military bases, while the Kremlin launched 472 drones at Ukraine, Ukraine's air force said, the highest nightly total of the war. The idea of direct talks was first proposed by President Vladimir Putin after Ukraine and European powers demanded that he agree to a ceasefire which the Kremlin dismissed. Putin said Russia would draft a memorandum setting out the broad contours of a possible peace accord and only then discuss a ceasefire. Kyiv said over the weekend it was still waiting for draft memorandum from the Russian side. Medinsky, the lead Kremlin negotiator, said on Sunday that Moscow had received a Ukraine's draft memorandum and told Russia's RIA news agency the Kremlin would react to it on Monday. According to Trump envoy Keith Kellogg, the two sides will in Turkey present their respective documents outlining their ideas for peace terms, though it is clear that after three years of war Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart. Kellogg has indicated that the U.S. will be involved in the talks and that even representatives from Britain, France and Germany will be too, though it was not clear at what level the United States would be represented. Ukraine's delegation will also include its deputy foreign minister, as well as several military and intelligence officials, according to an executive order by Zelenskiy on Sunday. In June last year, Putin set out his opening terms for an immediate end to the war: Ukraine must drop its NATO ambitions and withdraw all of its troops from the entirety of the territory of four Ukrainian regions claimed and mostly controlled by Russia. Ukrainian negotiators in Istanbul will present to the Russian side a proposed roadmap for reaching a lasting peace settlement, according to a copy of the document seen by Reuters. According to the document, there will be no restrictions on Ukraine's military strength after a peace deal is struck, no international recognition of Russian sovereignty over parts of Ukraine taken by Moscow's forces, and reparations for Ukraine. The document also stated that the current location of the front line will be the starting point for negotiations about territory. Russia currently controls a little under one fifth of Ukraine, or about 113,100 square km, about the same size as the U.S. state of Ohio. Putin ordered tens of thousands of troops to invade Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian troops. The United States says over 1.2 million people have been killed and injured in the war since 2022. Trump has called Putin "crazy" and berated Zelenskiy in public in the Oval Office, but the U.S. president has also said that he thinks peace is achievable and that if Putin delays then he could impose tough sanctions on Russia.
