PM sidesteps future of two-child benefit cap amid ‘chaos, chaos, chaos' claims
The Prime Minister said he is 'absolutely determined' to 'drive down' child poverty, although he declined to give further details ahead of the publication of the Government's strategy on the issue.
His remarks came as Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch pressed Sir Keir to say how many pensioners would have their winter fuel payments restored and asked about the future of the two-child benefit cap amid 'U-turn after U-turn' from the Prime Minister.
The cap was introduced in 2015 by then-Conservative chancellor George Osborne and restricts child welfare payments to the first two children born to most families.
Speaking at Prime Minister's Questions, Mrs Badenoch said Sir Keir has 'not stabilised the economy' before adding: 'He has no clear answers on what he's doing, it's just chaos, chaos, chaos. He's making announcements with no detail.
'So let's move to another area of confusion. Can we get a simple answer: will the Government keep the two-child benefit cap?'
Sir Keir replied: 'I am absolutely determined that we will drive down child poverty, that's one of the proudest things of the last Labour government, that's why we've got a taskforce, that's why we've got a strategy, and we'll set out that strategy in due course.
'But we drive child poverty down. Under them, poverty always goes up.'
Mrs Badenoch countered: 'I didn't ask him about a taskforce, I asked him if he'll keep the two-child benefit cap, and he doesn't know.
'It's just chaos and uncertainty. He has no details, he is briefing something and causing a lot of confusion to the people out there.
'But on that two-child benefit cap I'll tell him this: I believe in family, but I also believe in fairness. On this side of the House, we believe that people on benefits should have to make the same choices on having children as everyone else.
'What does the Prime Minister believe?'
Sir Keir replied: 'I believe profoundly in driving down poverty and child poverty, that's why we'll put a strategy in place.'
The Prime Minister then noted Mrs Badenoch has been 'praised this week by the Russian embassy', adding: 'If she carries on echoing Kremlin talking points like this, Reform is going to be sending her an application form for membership.'
Mrs Badenoch said she asked Sir Keir what he believes in, adding: 'He had to look in his folder to find the answer. His MPs behind him know what they believe in, he doesn't know.'
The Tory leader went on to claim 'it's only going to get harder' for Sir Keir in Government, adding: 'He has to ask (Downing Street chief of staff) Morgan McSweeney what it is that he believes in, but the fact is the chaos is being felt in the economy.'
Mrs Badenoch said Chancellor Rachel Reeves claims she 'would not be coming back with new tax rises but she will have to pay for all of these U-turns' announced by the Prime Minister.
Sir Keir opted to read out Mrs Badenoch's suggestion that Ukraine is fighting a 'proxy war' on behalf of western Europe against Russia.
He said: 'That was certainly noticed in the Russian embassy because they put out a statement saying the Leader of the Opposition has 'finally called a spade a spade, Ukraine is indeed fighting a proxy war against Russia on behalf of Western interests'.
'They went on to say: 'The illegitimate Kiev regime, created, financed and armed by the West, has been at it since 2014.''
Sir Keir added: 'She asked me what I believe in; I believe in standing by Ukraine and calling out Russia as the aggressor.'
Mrs Badenoch's spokesman later told reporters that 'for the Prime Minister to read out tweets written in the Kremlin as some sort of political 'gotcha' is quite despicable and we are calling on him to apologise'.
Mrs Badenoch defended the Conservative Party's record in government in supporting Ukraine, adding Sir Keir 'doesn't have any answers' and is 'saying everything he can to distract from the mess he is making of our economy'.
She said: 'Two weeks ago he was crowing about his historic trade deal and how he got 0% tariffs on steel, now the steel industry will face 25% tariffs unless he does exactly what President Trump tells him to.
'It's chaos, chaos, chaos, and isn't the root of the chaos that it is about this Prime Minister, his decisions and his judgment?'
Sir Keir replied: 'She gets up on a Wednesday morning, scrolls through social media, never does any of the detail.
'We're the only country in the world that isn't paying the 50% tax on steel and that will be coming down, we're working on it to bring it down to zero, that is going to happen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
15 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
MP urges Government to protect live music venues from new neighbours' complaints
Dame Caroline Dinenage has proposed letting decision-makers take into account existing properties, when they grant or refuse permission for new projects. The Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee chairwoman warned that 'live music's in crisis, the Government needs to be listening' as she proposed a new clause to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. Dame Caroline, the Conservative MP for Gosport, told the Commons: 'It isn't about venues versus developers. 'It's about making sure we have a balance right between building enough good homes and making sure the places we're building keep the things that make life worth living. 'In Westminster and our constituencies, everyone agrees that our high streets have been in decline, so it's vitally important that we protect the places that are special to us, our constituents and our communities, the places that provide a platform for our creators and our world-beating creative industries where we can make memories, celebrate and have fun.' Dame Caroline called on the Government to let town halls and ministers rule on plans 'subject to such conditions that would promote the integration of the proposed development of land with any existing use of land, including such conditions as may be necessary to mitigate the impact of noise on the proposed development'. A similar principle already exists in national planning rules, known as the National Planning Policy Framework, to ease pressure on existing businesses which 'should not have unreasonable restrictions placed on them as a result' of newer builds. But the Music Venue Trust's annual report last year warned that, in 2023, 22.4% of venues closed as a result of 'operational issues', compared with 42.1% of its members reporting 'financial issues'. The Trust identified noise abatement orders or other neighbour disputes as being among the issues which have resulted in permanent closures. 'Consistent application of the 'agent of change' principles will de-risk and speed up planning and development,' Dame Caroline told MPs, and added that her proposal was 'good for venues' and 'good for developers and new neighbours'. She said the law change could help authorities stop 'expensive and often pointless bun fights' when neighbours complain about noise. She continued: 'It'll make sure the needs of an existing cultural venue are considered from the start and it will save developers from late-stage objections and lengthy expensive legal disputes down the line.' Dame Caroline said music venues 'are the foundation of our world-beating creative industries and also very important for our local communities', and that they had been placed 'under threat, including from our disruptive planning system and our onerous licensing regime'. The Commons select committee recommended last year that the 'agent of change' principle should be put on a statutory footing, to protect grassroots music venues.
Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
MP urges Government to protect live music venues from new neighbours' complaints
Dame Caroline Dinenage has proposed letting decision-makers take into account existing properties, when they grant or refuse permission for new projects. The Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee chairwoman warned that 'live music's in crisis, the Government needs to be listening' as she proposed a new clause to the Planning and Infrastructure Bill. Dame Caroline, the Conservative MP for Gosport, told the Commons: 'It isn't about venues versus developers. 'It's about making sure we have a balance right between building enough good homes and making sure the places we're building keep the things that make life worth living. 'In Westminster and our constituencies, everyone agrees that our high streets have been in decline, so it's vitally important that we protect the places that are special to us, our constituents and our communities, the places that provide a platform for our creators and our world-beating creative industries where we can make memories, celebrate and have fun.' Dame Caroline Dinenage is urging the Government to let town halls and ministers rule on plans (PA) Dame Caroline called on the Government to let town halls and ministers rule on plans 'subject to such conditions that would promote the integration of the proposed development of land with any existing use of land, including such conditions as may be necessary to mitigate the impact of noise on the proposed development'. A similar principle already exists in national planning rules, known as the National Planning Policy Framework, to ease pressure on existing businesses which 'should not have unreasonable restrictions placed on them as a result' of newer builds. But the Music Venue Trust's annual report last year warned that, in 2023, 22.4% of venues closed as a result of 'operational issues', compared with 42.1% of its members reporting 'financial issues'. The Trust identified noise abatement orders or other neighbour disputes as being among the issues which have resulted in permanent closures. 'Consistent application of the 'agent of change' principles will de-risk and speed up planning and development,' Dame Caroline told MPs, and added that her proposal was 'good for venues' and 'good for developers and new neighbours'. She said the law change could help authorities stop 'expensive and often pointless bun fights' when neighbours complain about noise. She continued: 'It'll make sure the needs of an existing cultural venue are considered from the start and it will save developers from late-stage objections and lengthy expensive legal disputes down the line.' Dame Caroline said music venues 'are the foundation of our world-beating creative industries and also very important for our local communities', and that they had been placed 'under threat, including from our disruptive planning system and our onerous licensing regime'. The Commons select committee recommended last year that the 'agent of change' principle should be put on a statutory footing, to protect grassroots music venues.
Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Fears of damage to nature from Labour planning reforms overblown, minister says
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook hit out at criticism that the plans would allow developers to get away with damaging habitats if they contributed to a nature restoration fund, dubbed 'cash to trash'. Mr Pennycook dismissed concerns several times, including calling them 'misrepresentation', 'patently false', and saying some critics had 'flagrant misconceptions' of what the Bill would do. Campaigning groups, including the National Trust, RSPB, Wildlife Trusts and Marine Conservation Society have warned they believe the reforms will significantly weaken environmental law. They said it could allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules, and increase the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and the loss of woods and parks. It came as Labour faced a potential rebellion in the voting lobbies on Monday over the fears. One Labour MP encouraged the Government to 'rescue something positive from the wreckage of this legislation' as he tabled an amendment. However, Mr Pennycook said the current 'status quo' between the environment and development was not working. In turn, he said, proposed changes would lead to a 'win-win' for both. He said: 'The nature restoration fund will do exactly as its name suggests. It will restore, not harm nature. It is a smart planning reform designed to unlock and accelerate housing and infrastructure delivery while improving the state of nature across the country.' I have been consistently clear that building new homes and critical infrastructure should not, and need not, come at the expense of the environment Matthew Pennycook He later told MPs: 'I feel obliged to tackle a number of the most flagrant misconceptions head on. 'First, some have claimed that driven by a belief that development must come at the expense of the environment, the Government is creating a licence for developers to pay to pollute. A cash-to-trash model, as some have dubbed it. In reality, the nature and restoration fund will do the precise opposite. 'I have been consistently clear that building new homes and critical infrastructure should not, and need not, come at the expense of the environment. It is plainly nonsense to suggest the nature restoration fund would allow developers to simply pay Government and then wantonly harm nature.' Mr Pennycook said the money would be given to Natural England, which would develop plans on how to better preserve nature. In response to a question from shadow housing minister Paul Holmes about the capacity of Natural England to take on the responsibilities, Mr Pennycook said: 'We've been perfectly clear that this new approach is not a means of making unacceptable development acceptable.' He continued: 'Another claim put forward has been that the Bill strips protections from our protected sites and species, allowing for untrammelled development across the country. Again, I'm afraid this amounts to nothing less than wanton misrepresentation.' This Bill constitutes a regression on environmental protection Ellie Chowns Green Party MP Ellie Chowns (North Herefordshire) said the Office for Environmental Protection warned the Bill reduces environmental safeguards. 'This Bill constitutes a regression on environmental protection,' she said. Mr Pennycook said: 'The Government's view that the Bill is not regressive. Environmental delivery plans (EDPs) will secure improved environmental outcomes that go further than simply offsetting harm as required under current legislation.' Suggestions that the Bill would allow for the destruction of irreplaceable habitats or create irretrievable harm to them were 'patently false', he told MPs. The Conservatives accused the Government of 'greenwashing', over its plans. Mr Holmes said: 'While developers may cheer the ability to pay into a nature restoration fund instead of taking direct responsibility for mitigations, we should ask, is this really restoration, or is it greenwashing?' Mr Pennycook said the new laws were needed to 'speed up and streamline' Labour's housing target of 1.5 million homes, clean energy goals and aim to approve at least 150 'major economic infrastructure projects'. Labour MP Chris Hinchliff described the nature restoration fund as a 'kernel of a good idea', but added: 'The weight of evidence against how it has been drafted is overwhelming.' The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 69 will give 'ministers the opportunity to rescue something positive from the wreckage of this legislation, ensuring environmental delivery plans serve their purpose without allowing developers to pay cash to destroy nature'. He added: 'It would ensure conservation takes place before damage, so endangered species aren't pushed close to extinction before replacement habitats are established, and it outlines that conservation must result in improvements to the specific feature harmed, protecting irreplaceable habitats like chalk streams.'
