Paris court to rule on Sulu claim annulment on Dec 9
Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said ( pic ), in a statement, said the decision followed a hearing on July 7, during which the court concluded its hearing on the merits for the annulment of the final award in the case.
Azalina said during the hearing that the claimants had attempted to postpone the proceedings to enable them to respond to the written opinion of the Public Prosecutor of France.
However, the court dismissed the request and proceeded with the hearing.
"In this context, Malaysia places its confidence in the Paris Court of Appeal's process and decision in bringing a definitive end to the so-called Sulu Claimants' illegal global enforcement efforts, similar to the positions adopted by the Spanish and Dutch courts,' Azalina said.
The government has also reiterated its stance on the need for transparency in third-party litigation funding mechanisms to prevent their misuse against sovereign nations.
"Malaysia at the same time continues to advance its efforts to promote a global framework that places transparency at the centre of third-party litigation funding, ensuring that a mechanism intended to promote access to justice is not misused as an instrument of lawfare against sovereign states.
"International arbitration must be protected from attempts to extort sovereign states under the guise of arbitration claims,' Azalina said.
She emphasised that the Madani Government remained steadfast in defending Malaysia's sovereignty and the integrity of international arbitration.
Previously, eight Filipino nationals claiming to be heirs of the now-defunct Sulu Sultanate filed arbitration proceedings in Spain to demand billions of US dollars from Malaysia over issues involving Sabah. In March 2019, a court in Madrid appointed Stampa as the arbitrator for the case.
On Feb 28, 2022, Stampa ruled in favour of the group and issued a final award of US$14.9bil through an unlawful arbitration process, despite his appointment having already been annulled by a Spanish court.
Malaysia has since secured a series of legal victories in the case, including in November last year, when the French Supreme Court fully rejected the group's legal challenge.
That historic win for Malaysia meant the original basis for the final award, which required Malaysia to pay US$14.9bil in compensation, was not recognised under French law. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
South Africa eyes new markets after US tariffs
South Africa's President Cyril Ramaphosa emphasised that safeguarding export industries is the government's primary concern. (AP pic) JOHANNESBURG : South Africa is seeking new markets in Africa and Asia as it negotiates with the United States over looming 30% trade tariffs, which could cost around 30,000 jobs, officials said Monday. Government ministers expressed frustration with the US over the tariff – among those due to take effect against several countries later this week – saying South African exports do not compete with US industry and were only a fraction of that country's total imports. The 30% tariff is the highest in sub-Saharan Africa and comes as diplomatic relations between South Africa and the US are in tatters over a range of domestic and international policies. 'Our foremost priority is protecting our export industries,' president Cyril Ramaphosa said in his weekly newsletter. 'We will continue to engage the US in an attempt to preserve market access for our products. We must also accelerate the diversification of our export markets, particularly by deepening intra-African trade,' he said. The US is South Africa's second-largest trading partner by country after China. The tariffs will in particular hit South Africa's agriculture, automotive and textiles sectors, officials said, although 35% of exports are exempted, including copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles and certain critical minerals. The impact on growth depends on various factors, including the sourcing of alternative markets, foreign minister Ronald Lamola said in a statement. He cited forecasts that the impact may shave 0.2% off growth, which was only around 0.1% in the first quarter of this year. The South African Reserve Bank last week warned that the US levy could cost 100,000 jobs, with unemployment already at more than 30%. But trade department director general Simphiwe Hamilton told reporters Monday their estimate was that approximately 30,000 jobs could be affected. South Africa 'no threat' In a bid to avert the high tariff, South Africa has offered to import US liquefied natural gas and some US agricultural products, as well as invest in its mining and metals-recycling industries. Pretoria is focused on negotiations for a new deal despite the 'very extreme provocation' on the part of the US, Lamola told reporters. The 30% tariff was 'inscrutable' considering that imports from South Africa only represented 0.25% of total US imports, the minister said. 'Moreover, South Africa poses no trade threat to the US economy or its national security,' he said, arguing the imports supported US industry and did not compete with it. An example was that South African agriculture exports were 'counter-seasonal' and so filled gaps in the US market without replacing domestic produce, he said. Pretoria's plummeting ties with Washington and failure to reach a new trade deal have been heavily criticised at home, including by some of the parties in the coalition government who have accused Ramaphosa and his team of diplomatic missteps. On top of disagreements over a range of issues, including South Africa's case accusing Israel of genocide in Gaza at the International Court of Justice, Washington in March expelled Pretoria's ambassador after he criticised Trump's Make America Great Again (MAGA) movement. In his newsletter, Ramaphosa said the government has established a support desk that will help exporters and producers explore alternative markets in the rest of Africa, Asia and the Middle East. It will also push forward with plans for a free-trade area for the African continent, he said. The US announced last week 15% tariffs on exports from several sub-Saharan countries, including the export-reliant small mountain kingdom of Lesotho, which had initially been threatened with 50% tariffs.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
South Korea, US prepare for summit with details of trade deal unresolved
In addition to the US$350 billion, US President Donald Trump said South Korea agreed to invest a large sum of money in the US. (EPA Images pic) SEOUL : As South Korea and the US prepare for a summit of their leaders, topics left unresolved by a recent trade deal provide scope for more disputes between the key allies and trade partners, six former negotiators and experts said. President Donald Trump may use the summit with counterpart Lee Jae Myung to seek more concessions on defence costs and corporate investments, left out of the deal, while non-tariff barriers and currency could prove thorny issues, experts said. No official summit date has been disclosed, though Trump last week gave a timeframe of two weeks. The absence of a written agreement underpinning last week's talks could open the way for disputes, with some differences already emerging in the two sides' accounts of the deal. Key among these was yesterday's denial by a South Korean presidential adviser of US claims that it would take 90% of the profit from project investments of US$350 billion by South Korea, which also agreed to open up its domestic rice market. 'Even a binding deal like the FTA has been efficiently scrapped,' warned Choi Seok-young, a former chief negotiator for the Korea-US free trade deal, signed in 2007. 'And this is just promise,' said Choi. Last week's pact was scaled down from South Korea's previous plans for a package deal on trade, security and investment envisioned in the run-up to the summit between Trump and the newly-elected Lee. However, Japan struck a deal with the US sooner than expected, spurring South Korea into a scramble for a trade-focused pact, leaving issues of security and investment for the coming summit, presidential adviser Kim Yong-beom said. Uncertainty clouds plans for US$350 billion in funds Trump has said South Korea would invest in the US in projects 'owned and controlled by the US' and selected by him, though he gave few details of the plan's structure or timing. The allies face challenges in ironing out details of the fund at upcoming working-level talks, South Korean Finance Minister Koo Yun-cheol told reporters on Friday. 'People say the devil is in the details,' he added. In a social media post, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick gave an assurance of '90% of the profits going to the American people', while White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said part would go to the US government to help repay debt. However, Kim, the presidential adviser, said the two sides did not discuss profit distribution during talks, and South Korea expected the profit to be 'reinvested' in the US. 'Political rhetoric' The idea of the US potentially taking most of the profit is 'hard to understand in a civilised country', he added, while dismissing as 'political rhetoric' Washington's claim that it would make all decisions about the fund. South Korea had added a safety mechanism to reduce financing risk, including US commitments to buy products from the projects, under an 'offtake' clause and invest in commercially feasible projects, he said. Seoul officials have said US$150 billion would go to the shipbuilding industry, with the rest earmarked for areas such as chips, batteries, critical minerals, biotechnology, nuclear power and other strategic industries. The specifics of the structure have not been determined, said Kim, adding that loans and guarantees make up a majority of the funds, with equity investments accounting for a small part. Leavitt said South Korea would provide 'historic market access to American goods like autos and rice', echoing earlier comments by Trump. However, South Korea said repeatedly there had been no agreement on the agriculture market, including beef and rice, despite strong pressure from Washington. Trump expressed keen interest in Korea's quarantine process for fruits and vegetables, Seoul said, improvements to which will figure in planned technical talks on non-tariff barriers that will also cover vehicle safety rules, but gave no details. Other non-tariff barriers such as regulation of Big Tech could be hurdles. 'We cannot be relieved because we do not know when we will face pressure from tariffs or non-tariff measures again,' Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo said last week on returning from Washington. Defence costs are expected to emerge as a key issue during the upcoming summit, with Trump having long said South Korea needed to pay more for the US troop presence there. In addition to the US$350 billion, Trump said South Korea agreed to invest a large sum of money in the US, to be announced during the summit, which he said on July 30 would be held within two weeks. The allies are holding working level-talks on currency policy, put on the agenda at April's opening round of trade talks.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US tariff reduced without compromising ‘red lines', says Miti
Investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz had said that Malaysia's halal certification standards were among the non-negotiable issues in the country's tariff negotiations with Washington. PETALING JAYA : The investment, trade and industry ministry says Malaysia made no compromise on its 'red lines' in negotiating a lower reciprocal tariff on exports to the US. In a statement, it attributed the tariff reduction to a 'thorough and methodical negotiating process', adding that the 19% rate roughly tracked the rate of other countries in Southeast Asia. 'Most importantly, Malaysia stood firm on various 'red line' items. 'The 19% tariff rate was achieved without compromising the nation's sovereign right to implement key policies to support socio-economic stability and growth,' it said. The US previously imposed a 25% tariff on Malaysia effective Aug 1, a rate which president Donald Trump described as 'far less' than what was needed to eliminate the country's trade deficit with Malaysia. The rate was also higher than the 24% initially imposed on certain Malaysian exports to the US and placed on a 90-day pause, ending yesterday. Last month, Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said Malaysia would not compromise on its Bumiputera policy during tariff negotiations. Investment, trade and industry minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz later said that Malaysia's halal certification standards were also among the non-negotiable issues in the country's tariff negotiations with Washington. The two issues were cited by the Office of the US Trade Representative as barriers leading to the 24% tariff initially imposed on April 2. Zafrul said today that the decision by the US reflected its strong and enduring economic ties with Malaysia. 'It is also a testament to Malaysia's credibility as a reliable trade and investment partner,' he said.
