logo
Muslim advocacy group to preference Greens above Labor in some seats despite disagreement on religious freedom

Muslim advocacy group to preference Greens above Labor in some seats despite disagreement on religious freedom

The Guardian15-04-2025

A potentially influential Muslim advocacy group is planning to tell voters to preference the Greens above Labor on how-to-vote cards in several key seats, despite objecting to the minor party's position on religious freedom in schools.
Muslim Votes Matter has expressed concern about the party's plan to ensure religious schools cannot discriminate against teachers or students on the basis of their sexuality, but has welcomed a commitment to ensure 'all rights are acknowledged and taken into account'.
The group, which is campaigning for candidates in 32 seats has endorsed Greens in the Victorian seats of Wills and Bruce, where Labor MPs are preparing for a backlash over the party's response to the war in Gaza. Most of the 32 seats are held by Labor and have significant Muslim populations.
Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter
Muslim Votes Matter has also endorsed the Greens in the Queensland seat of Moreton, the South Australian seat of Sturt, and independents in the western-Sydney seats of Blaxland and Watson, held by Labor ministers Jason Clare and Tony Burke.
Guardian Australia has also confirmed the political party launched by the former Labor senator Fatima Payman, who has a strong personal brand in suburbs with high Muslim populations, Australia's Voice, will also encourage voters to preference the Greens above her former party and the Liberals on Senate ballot papers.
Ghaith Krayem, the national spokesperson for Muslim Votes Matter, said the group's how-to-vote cards were being finalised after discussion with endorsed candidates. He said they would be similar to, but perhaps not exactly the same as those handed out by endorsed candidates.
'We as a rule, will put parties like One Nation or The Trumpet of Patriots at the bottom of our how to vote card,' Krayem said. 'If a candidate moves them up, we will not do that.'
In a letter to Muslim Votes Matter last month, the Greens leader, Adam Bandt, sought to address the group's concerns about religious freedom, accepting a request to attend further consultation meetings to ensure 'that all rights are acknowledged and taken into account'.
'Schools could continue to require that a teacher hired by the school teaches the school's values and doctrines. A staff member could not be discriminated against on the basis of their sexuality or gender identity, just as it would be unlawful under Australian law to discriminate against someone based on protected attributes in other workplaces.'
Muslim Votes Matter said it did not agree with the Greens' position, but was satisfied with their engagement.
'We know that on that particular issue, we were never going to be 100% aligned,' Krayem said. 'We put forward a pathway of consultation, not just with us, but with other interested minority groups on this issue.
Labor declined to engage with Muslim Votes Matter and accused the group of being a 'self-appointed organisation that seeks to support Peter Dutton' in a manner that was 'contrary to the interests of Australian Muslim communities'.
Sign up to Afternoon Update: Election 2025
Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Krayem denied this and said the criticism was 'very inappropriate from a major party in the middle of a campaign' and 'full of disdain for our community'. The group has previously suggested Labor wants 'a quiet, loyal Muslim voter'.
Before the 2022 election, Labor committed to introducing laws that would protect all students from discrimination on any grounds, and to protect teachers from discrimination while maintaining the right of schools to preference people of their faith while hiring.
In August, Anthony Albanese said his government was unwilling to act on these issues in the absence of bipartisan support, citing concerns about 'the need for greater social cohesion'.
'And the last thing that Australia needs is any divisive debate relating to religion and people's faith … I don't intend to engage in a partisan debate when it comes to religious discrimination,' Albanese said.
Equality Australia's chief executive, Anna Brown, accused Labor of breaking an election commitment by 'failing to pursue the available pathway through parliament for a government bill that would have finally protected LGBTQ+ students and staff in religious schools'.
'More children will now be refused enrolment or miss out on school leadership roles and more teachers will continue to lose their jobs or be denied promotions because of the gaps in our laws that allow religious schools to play by their own rules,' Brown said.
A Labor spokesperson said if re-elected, the party would continue to consult on religious freedom but only introduce legislation once bipartisan support was clear.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport
Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Conor McGregor's BKFC faces ban as Australian leader slams 'brutal' sport

The Irishman was confirmed as a part owner of Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship last year, but not everyone seems to be onboard with the promotion Conor McGregor has been dealt a huge blow after an Australian politician revealed he is leading calls for bare knuckle fighting to be permanently banned in the country. The Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship, co-owned by McGregor, was set to make its Australian debut in Perth this July. However, the WA Combat Sports Commission has rejected the application. In response to this development, Australian Opposition Leader Basil Zempilas is urging the State Government to completely outlaw the sport, asserting it has no place in Western Australia. ‌ "It was very clear that a significant majority of Western Australians did not want this brutal sport to be coming to Perth," He continued: "It should not have taken this long, and there are still lots of questions," said Zempilas. He further added: "We don't know what criteria was not met, or how the decision was reached. We don't know whether there were discussions between the Minister and the Commission, and it would appear the door is still open." ‌ Zempilas is convinced that a ban is the only appropriate measure to prevent future applications. "That's what we want. Clearly that's what the people of Western Australia want," the 53-year-old said. "It sets a bad example, there is very little demand. And it took the long way and a confusing way to get there, but I'm pleased that the common sense decision was ultimately reached." Last year, the former dual-weight UFC champion and his company "McGregor Sports and Entertainment" became part-owners of BKFC, which has since seen a stunning growth, staging events worldwide with McGregor often in attendance. However, not everyone is thrilled about the bare-knuckle fighting promotion. However, not everyone appears to be onboard with the promotion. Zempilas' comments were echoed by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. Speaking to Triple M, Albanese said: "A bit of common sense - you've got to look after people's health a bit and maybe save people from themselves. I just think we've got to be much more conscious about health issues." When asked directly about bare knuckle fighting, the Prime Minister replied: "It's a bit crazy!" BKFC President David Feldman had previously insisted that the event would still go ahead. The lineup was set to feature ex-UFC heavyweight Ben Rothwell against Aussie powerhouse Alex 'Godly Strong' Simon, and 'Rowdy' Bec Rawlings slated to face Jade event was set to take place at RAC Arena on July 19, but with calls for a ban heating up, it seems very likely that the BKFC will struggle to host an event in Australia. Recently, McGregor vowed to compete in BKFC despite the controversy. "Yes. Yes. The warrior spirit burns strong inside me," he said at a BKFC press conference in Italy earlier this year. "For sure. If you think I'm up here giving these speeches and leading these men into battle and I won't step in there myself, think again. For sure. Conor McGregor will fight in Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship – mark my words." "I would wish to be the Bare Knuckle world champion. That is a significant belt to hold in your career. Nobody from boxing to mixed martial arts can speak nothing bad on a Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship world champion. So for sure, I'd be coming in looking for the world title. "There are many bouts, showcase bouts you could say. Michael Perry, Mike Perry. You could say Jeremy Stephens. You could say a rematch against Eddie Alvarez. You could say many matches. But the lightweight title, who is the champion right now, lightweight or welterweight? Let's see. I'm open. We'll see when it comes."

Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future
Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future

Metro

time2 hours ago

  • Metro

Why I'm scared by a report about Britain's 'minority white' future

A new study has predicted that 'white British' people are set to become a minority in Britain in the next 40 years. Cue the hysteria. I'm not surprised, it feels like this was exactly the intention behind this report. Conducted by Matt Goodwin of Buckingham University, who is also a regular voice on the right-wing TV channel GB News channel, the research claims that the proportion of white Brits will decline from 73% (where it currently stands) to 57% by 2050. It is then thought that white British people will become a minority by 2063 and that by the end of the century they will only constitute a third of the overall population. Referencing his study's findings, Goodwin said that those in favour of 'maintaining the way of life of the traditional majority population' will need their concerns 'recognised, respected and addressed.' Let's be real about what we're looking at here. This is not an impartial, apolitical study of demographic change. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. Firstly, Goodwin makes frankly insulting and arbitrary decisions about what exactly is considered 'White British'. He defines this as those without at least one immigrant parent – creating a strange conclusion in which some people seem defined only by their 'foreign' side, creating a two-tiered system in which only those untainted by immigrant blood are considered genuinely 'White British' or native. By his definition, as a Muslim with one English parent and one Libyan, I'm not as British as a white non-Muslim, despite being born and raised here. This only reinforces what I have known my entire life – or at least, since I started looking visibly foreign by first wearing the hijab at 15: That I am always defined by my foreignness and never my Englishness. Goodwin's definition is so absurdly broad that figures such as King Charles and Winston Churchill wouldn't be considered 'White British' in this instance. But it is not white people with an American mother or a Greek father who are accused of diluting the native British population when it comes to studies like these. It's people like me whose brown, Muslim lineage renders me a foreigner, despite me being ethnically just as English as I am Libyan. Why else would Goodwin focus on his headline-grabbing statistic that 1 in 5 Britons will apparently be Muslim by the end of the century. In fact, Goodwin's main report on 'religious projections' doesn't even mention any other faiths, simply categorising the UK population along the lines of Muslim or non-Muslim. This sounds chillingly like 'us versus them', 'good guy versus bad guy' or 'native versus foreigner' – all of which fuel hysteria about a Muslim takeover and label Islam and Britishness as mutual exclusives. In fact, just this week we have seen Reform – a party that many predict could soon find its way in Number 10 – raising the issue of a Burka ban. For many, being British is about more than a passport. It looks, sounds and acts a certain way – and that is not Muslim. Studies like the one released this week embolden those holding Islamophobic views, giving them a statistical basis for their bigotry. Research conducted by someone with such incendiary views should be taken with far more suspicion than we have seen with these findings – but I suppose that doesn't matter when there are some catchy fear-mongering soundbites on offer. While the survey has predictably been used as evidence for lowering immigration levels, beneath the odd (frankly racist) categorisation of British identity, it also paints a picture of the birth rates of different communities in the UK and how that will impact future demographics. Given that Britain's birth rate is at an all-time low, we have seen pronatalist policies slowly creep into the mainstream as politicians panic about what the future will look like if nobody can afford to have babies. But what this survey seems to reinforce is that calls to raise the birth rate aren't simply about providing the nation with the next generation of workers and taxpayers. It is, for many, ensuring that the future face of the west remains white and that the so-called native population reproduces quickly enough to balance out other communities like my own, who traditionally tend to have larger families. Last year a peer in the House of Lords made a speech in which he warned about radical Muslims taking over Britain 'through the power of the womb'. More Trending Every year when the name Muhammad inevitably tops the list of most popular baby names, we see another wave of media-manufactured moral panic that Britain overrun by Muslims unless the white British population has more babies. Reports like these don't just legitimise conspiracy theories like this, they help manufacture them, and attempt to make people like me feel more othered, more unsafe. Who knows what this hypothetical Britain will look like in decades time? But if the children and grandchildren of people like me aren't considered part of the future British population, but a hostile outside force, then things are only going to get worse for all of us. Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Donald Trump and Elon Musk might make peace – but it will never last MORE: What does Eid Mubarak mean and how should you reply to the greeting? MORE: Universal digital 'BritCards' on an app could soon be used to prove who you are

More than 50,000 write to minister to oppose Flamingo Land plans
More than 50,000 write to minister to oppose Flamingo Land plans

STV News

time2 hours ago

  • STV News

More than 50,000 write to minister to oppose Flamingo Land plans

More than 50,000 people have written to the Scottish Government calling for the approval of the controversial Flamingo Land development on the shores of Loch Lomond to be removed, the Greens have said. Green MSP Ross Greer said planning minister Ivan McKee must 'listen to the Scottish public' on the Lomond Banks proposals. However, ministers have so far refused requests for the plans to be 'called in'. Last month, the Government's reporter granted an appeal and approved planning permission in principle to the Lomond Banks development, but placed 49 conditions on the application. Under the £43.5 million proposals, Lomond Banks would see two hotels, more than 100 lodges, a waterpark and monorail built on the site at Balloch, West Dunbartonshire. However, the decision has incensed environmental and conservation campaigners, who have long opposed the development and say it will lead to the 'irreversible' loss of woodland. The Scottish Greens say more than 50,000 people have used a portal on their website to write to Mr McKee. Greer said: 'I have campaigned side by side with local residents in Balloch for nearly ten years now to stop Flamingo Land. At every stage we have won on the basis of the overwhelming evidence against their plans, but that has all now been overturned by the Scottish Government. 'I do not understand why the Scottish Government are determined to cosy up to greedy theme park operators rather than protect Scotland's world famous natural heritage. 'It's time for government ministers to actually listen to the people of Scotland and save Loch Lomond.' Last week John Swinney said he will always 'cherish' Scotland's natural environment as he was pressed on the issue at First Minister's Questions. The First Minister said he could not comment directly as the planning process is still live, telling MSPs: 'The reporter is required to make his decision on the planning merits of the case and to take full account of all submission of all parties involved in the case, including representatives of the local community.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store