NSCN faction says Assam eviction drive planned to grab Naga ancestral lands
Uriamghat is close to Assam's border with Nagaland.
The faction said the areas targeted were 'fictitiously' marked 'disturbed area belt' (DAB), citing pre-1947 demarcations by the British, who had transferred these areas for administrative convenience without consulting the Nagas.
The faction said successive Assam governments made 'illegal Bangladeshi immigrants' settle down in the DAB with the alleged long-term plan to evict them and grab the lands of the Nagas.
'In the name of evicting the encroachers, the Assam government has double-crossed the Nagaland government by violating the terms and is occupying Naga ancestral areas by permanently stationing Assam police in the DAB,' it said in a statement.
Assam and Nagaland have been locked in a bitter border dispute since the latter was carved out of the former in 1963, claiming more than 150 lives over the decades. Several rounds of talks have not helped resolve the dispute, but the two governments agreed to maintain the status quo more than a decade ago.
The NSCN faction accused the Assam government of violating the status quo. It also underlined Assam's boundary disputes with other northeastern States.
Assam has partially resolved its dispute with Arunachal Pradesh and Meghalaya.
The faction appealed to the Naga people to pressure the Nagaland government into boosting security along the borders of their ancestral lands. It said more police personnel, home guards, and village guards should be recruited and deployed along the border with Assam.
The Assam government has engaged a large number of police personnel and bulldozers to clear 11,000 bighas of land at Uriamghat. However, the eviction drive is unlikely to take place on Tuesday, as initially planned.
'The eviction drive has not been finalised yet. Land survey operations are underway,' Gunadeep Das, Golaghat's Divisional Forest Officer, said.
He said about 60% of some 15,000 settlers, mostly Muslims, have already left Uriamghat after having been served notices.
The Assam government has been carrying out a series of eviction drives across the State since June. At least 55,000 people, mostly Muslims with roots in present-day Bangladesh, have been evicted from forest land, grazing land, and government revenue land.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
PM Modi's speech on Sindoor: Tectonic shift in Indian politics
Operation Sindoor is a testament to what has happened to Bharat that is India over the past 11 years. A significantly reformed, rebuilt and indigenised Indian armed forces demonstrated what the nation is capable of once the shackles of prolonged foreign subjugation of policy idiocy end read more Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech on the floor of the Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor was an astonishing masterclass. It will go down as his finest hour and the most outstanding performance by an Indian political leader since Independence. Modi demolished all the treasonous slander and libel of India's so-called political Opposition, in the wake of Pahalgam and Operation Sindoor. Prime Minister Modi eloquently asserted the quest for India's unfinished goal of statehood in its most formative historical phase since the coronation of Chhatrapati Maharaj at Raigad Fort in 1674. No nation can be built by one solitary individual alone, but if anyone has a claim to being its driving contemporary force it's surely Narendra Damodar Modi. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In just over a decade the change he has wrought to the Indian nation is unprecedented. It is more impressive than the achievements of Otto von Bismarck and Giuseppe Garibaldi, who had force at their disposal, to create modern Germany and Italy in the nineteenth century. By contrast Prime Minister Modi has had to navigate the most intolerably vexatious political order of truculent anarchy and constitutional roadblocks to pursue the imperative goal of placing the nation on a secure footing and institutionalizing its essential multidimensional attributes. Prime Minister Modi's speech followed three superb performances by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar and Home Minister Amit Shah that laid out in exact detail and sequence the purposes and achievements of Operation Sindoor. But it was the Prime Minister who deployed a scalpel with precision, engaged in unforgiving historical analysis of Congress party history and precise chronological detail of the momentous events after the brutal murders of Pahalgam. He proceeded to unsparingly dissect the grotesque absurdity of India's political Opposition and its entitled so-called Leader of Opposition, Rahul Gandhi. One by one, he summarised the calamitous missteps of the Congress party following Independence, especially Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru, whose arrogant self-confidence despite utter incompetence have cost Indian dear. The most grievous losses to India occurred immediately after Independence because of his unctuous deference to Viceroy Lord Mountbatten and obsession with Edwina, his wife. Mountbatten presided over the colossal bloodletting of Partition despite being warned by his own officials it was going to occur, but Nehru nevertheless proceeded to retain him as Governor-General. Most egregiously he retained British Generals as India's army chiefs of staff who duly betrayed India as it was poised to retake J&K in entirety and potentially liberate the strategically vital territory of Gilgit Baltistan. A grim account of events has been provided by India's commanding officer during the war, Lionel Pratap Sen in his memoirs, Slender was the Thread. Nehru proceeded to betray Tibet by assisting its conquest by China, extending logistical support to it during the invasion. His monumental stupidity subsequently led to military defeat in 1962 when China attacked India and the loss of the Aksai Chin. Nehru ignored warnings by his most brilliant China expert, Sumol Sinha, whom he banished to Harvard in annoyance when alerted of the impending danger posed by China. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In the aftermath of the 1962 military catastrophe, he sought to ingratiate himself with Mountbatten again and supposedly secure his place in history, by ceding the Kashmir Valley to Pakistan. Thankfully, the negotiations he had sponsored in London faltered after Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto ceded the Shaksgam Valley to China and Nehru died before any resumption of talks was feasible. The other grievous error was committed by his daughter, Indira Gandhi. After India's historic military defeat of Pakistan in 1971 she mistakenly acquiesced to Soviet implorations and failed to retain vital Indian strategic gains made in the battlefield. The Soviets persuaded her not to impose a harsh peace on Pakistan at Simla because their vital SALT talks with the US were scheduled for the same year. A visionary stateswoman would have ignored Soviet requests, despite their important help during the conflict, and pursued urgent Indian national interests, facing down Soviet displeasure. The astonishing calumny and legal assault Narendra Modi has suffered for almost twenty-three years would have defeated and broken a lesser man, but he's evidently made of sterner stuff than most. But it is a cause of deep shame that his role as Prime Minister of India has not spared him the most despicable abuse from which the dignity of his office should have shielded him. But Modi was apparently intended for a higher purpose, as his former adviser the immensely learned and wise, late Bibek Debroy once prophetically pointed out. The dismal misconduct of Congress party apparatchiks is a reflection of the low mindset that has consumed the party today. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rahul Gandhi himself is beyond redemption and the people of India have by now figured him out. His constant refrain inviting Modi to publicly denounce President Donald Trump as a liar, over claims he ensured the cessation of hostilities in the context of Operation Sindoor, is oblivious to the consequence of such observations by Modi prompting a huge setback in India-US relations, at a time when sensitive negotiations are in train between the two counties. His undue sensitivity towards two of the world's most criminal regimes, with prodigious quantities of blood on their hands over many decades, has not made him reflect. The millions of famine victims of China's Great Leap Forward and the genocidal war against the Hindus of East Pakistan in 1971 are crying out plaintively to no avail. Such is the temperament of Rahul Gandhi. Operation Sindoor is a testament to what has happened to Bharat that is India over the past 11 years. A significantly reformed, rebuilt and indigenised Indian armed forces demonstrated what the nation is capable of once the shackles of prolonged foreign subjugation of policy idiocy end. The innovative genius of Indians was illustrated not just by the array of missiles designed and manufactured domestically, but how an outdated arsenal of guns was adapted with inventive new technology to return to the battlefield as highly efficient and cost-effective weaponry. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The imperative of an efficacious military is essential for deterrence and infinitely cheaper than warfighting and that's the direction in which Modi's has been headed. In fact, Operation Sindoor continued with India's security agencies eliminating the killers of Pahalgam after a relentless search operation. Let it also be registered that both Pahalgam and Pakistani responses to India's Operation Sindoor were a joint effort, with the terrorists and Pakistani terrorist army using Chinese equipment, from missiles and aircraft to machine guns and satellite phones. The transformation of India's defence sector is a metaphor for the advances in its wider economy of a massive infrastructure building surge, the absence of which earlier constrained economic progress. This key endeavour in lowering logistical costs and the implementation of unprecedented new associated dimensions, underlined by India's digitisation and startups, will be the basis of a robust and internationally competitive economy. Combined with multiple measures to reduce poverty, highlighted by India's forward leap in the recent World Bank Gini coefficient rankings, India will surely incarnate a new dharmic socio-economic order in the making. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This is the scale of Narendra Modi's achievements and it's a tragic irony that many supposedly sensible, allegedly educated Indians don't see it, missing the forest for the trees, a chronic historic propensity of Hindus. The great danger remains that the well thought out Congress party strategy of inciting bitter caste animosity and the mobilisation of India's growing jihadi constituency will upset India's progressing apple cart. There should be no doubt the entire Congress strategy, the tried and tested Karnataka model, is perfectly rational and hugely portentous. It aims to seize power electorally by organising the intransigent Muslim vote-bank alongside disaffected caste constituencies and contrived regional discontent to establish a victorious coalition. Such a political situation will threaten India's sovereignty and independence as a nation and the dreams of its historic transformation, with mutually dependent Islamic and foreign interests conjoining to successfully seizing India from within. But the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor and the spectacular performance of the Prime Minister and his team also suggest the possibility of a reprieve for India in 2029 and, hopefully, beyond too. Once the Indian economy reaches its $10 trillion GDP target it will be unstoppable and secure. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The writer taught international political economy for more than two decades at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
Hindustan Times
a few seconds ago
- Hindustan Times
Mizoram begins biometric enrolment drive for Myanmar refugees in Serchhip district
AIZAWL: The Mizoram government began its biometric enrolment drive for Myanmar refugees in Serchhip district on Wednesday, the first attempt by the state government to issue identification documents to the refugees. The District Level Committee on Displaced Persons meeting on July 11 in Serchhip had discussed Biometric Enrolment of Displaced Persons through Foreigner's Identification Portal for refugees from Myanmar and Bangladesh. Sixteen Myanmarese nationals residing in Chanmari locality of Serchhip town were enrolled during the session, said Serchhip district nodal officer for Foreigners Identification Portal & Biometric Enrolment, Vanthangpuia. 'This is the first biometric enrolment drive in the entire state, and Chanmari was chosen for its smaller refugee population to facilitate a practical, on-the-spot session for officials,' Vanthangpuia told HT, adding that a comprehensive drive would start on August 5. Serchhip currently has 647 Myanmarese and 266 Bangladeshi refugees across more than 30 villages. Similar enrolment exercises are scheduled to begin in Champhai, Saitual, and Lunglei districts from Thursday, according to a statement by the state government. Mizoram has refugees in all 11 districts, with the largest number in Champhai district, which houses 13,586 refugees. Officials in Champhai said enrolment teams using the Foreigners Identification Portal & Biometric Enrolment (FIP&BE) system will begin tagging individuals in Vengthlang, Kanan Veng, and Dinthar Veng areas of Champhai town. Mizoram's home department estimates that over 37,000 people from Myanmar are currently residing in the state. Officials, however, underline that the figures fluctuate due to cross-border movements. Additional home secretary H Vanlaldika said the enrolment was being carried out through a system developed by the National Informatics Centre and indicated that a similar process could be conducted in districts where Bangladeshi nationals live if the state receives instructions from the Centre.
News18
9 minutes ago
- News18
What Starmers plan for UK to recognise Palestinian state means
Agency: PTI London, Jul 30 (AP) Britain has announced that it will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, stops building settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution. The UK followed France, which declared last week that it will recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in September. More than 140 countries have already taken that step, but France and Britain are significant as members of the Group of Seven and the UN Security Council. The two countries hope their bold – if largely symbolic – diplomatic moves will help add pressure on Israel to ease a catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza and breathe life into a moribund peace process. What Starmer said Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that Britain will recognise a Palestinian state in September, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." He said that included 'allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank." Starmer also said Hamas must release all the hostages it holds, agree to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza" — though he did not make that a condition for recognition. Britain says that's because Hamas has no role in a two-state solution. UK officials increasingly worry that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during 22 months of war, but because Israel's government is aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for their future state. Much of the world regards Israel's occupation of the West Bank as illegal. 'The moment to act is now," Cabinet minister Heidi Alexander told Times Radio. 'There's the effective annexation of the West Bank happening." Starmer is also under mounting domestic pressure to do something as horror spreads at the scenes of hunger in Gaza. More than 250 of the 650 lawmakers in the House of Commons signed a letter in recent days urging the British government to recognise a Palestinian state. Opinion polls suggest far more Britons support recognition than oppose it, though a large number are undecided. Reaction is polarised Israel quickly condemned the British move. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds, said Starmer's announcement 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims." The families of Israelis taken hostage by Hamas were also critical. 'Recognising a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism," said the Hostages Family Forum, which represents many hostages' relatives. Emily Damari, a British-Israeli national who was held captive for more than a year, called Starmer's stance 'a moral failure." The British statement was welcomed by the Palestinian Authority, which Britain views as a legitimate representative of Palestinians. It has limited autonomy in pockets of the occupied West Bank. Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian Authority's envoy in London, said Britain's statement 'is a corrective to over a century of dispossession, during which the Palestinian people have been deprived of our land, liberty and lives." Limited influence, historical weight In practice, Britain's influence on Israel is limited. The UK government has suspended free trade talks and halted some arms shipments to Israel over its conduct of the war, but is not a major economic or military partner. History has, however, given Britain a particular interest and role in the Middle East. Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Britain bears a 'special burden of responsibility" as the former governing power of what was then Palestine and author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland, but also pledged to protect the rights of the Palestinian population. 'This has not been upheld, and it is a historical injustice which continues to unfold," Lammy said at the UN on Tuesday. Most of Britain's main political parties support a two-state solution. But the right-of-centre opposition Conservatives said Starmer's announcement was premature. 'Recognition of a Palestinian state is only meaningful if it is part of a formal peace process and cannot happen while hostages are still being held in terrorist captivity and while Hamas' reign of terror continues," said Priti Patel, the party's foreign affairs spokeswoman. Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, welcomed Starmer's statement as a step forward but said the prime minister should not use Palestinian statehood as 'a bargaining chip." The move may spark diplomatic momentum Britain and France hope other countries will follow their move. On Tuesday, European Union member Malta said it, too, would recognise a Palestinian state in September. Germany, a major European power and strong ally of Israel, remains a holdout. Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated his country's position that recognition of a Palestinian state 'can be one of the last steps on the road to realising a two-state solution," but that Berlin has no plans for recognition 'in the short term." Real clout rests with the US, and Starmer's cautious approach may be designed to persuade President Donald Trump to take a tougher line with his ally Netanyahu. The prospects are uncertain, to say the least. Asked about Britain's stance on Tuesday, Trump said: 'We have no view on that." Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at international affairs think tank Chatham House, said there is 'no doubt" that a global majority supports Palestinian statehood, but that's not enough to make it a reality. 'British recognition or French recognition doesn't make it internationally recognised," he said. 'You need the (UN) Security Council — and that is not going to happen because of a certain person in the White House." (AP) GSP (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 30, 2025, 19:45 IST News agency-feeds What Starmers plan for UK to recognise Palestinian state means Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
