The partners who can't live together, or apart
Who are the Liberals?
So the federal Liberal Party, not to mention the state Liberal Party in Victoria, is now facing the prospect of its irrelevance as if it was not already apparent before the recent federal election.
Party spokespeople repeatedly say they must define and return to their fundamental values. What are they? Small government and respect for personal freedom. Is that it? Could someone flesh this out? What does this mean for state education, for aged care, for workers' rights, for small and middle sized business and so on?
The problem is that there is no one among the Liberals with the vision of a Menzies let alone his oratorical ability to sell his vision. There is no one who can move on from this moribund bunch of lightweights and rejuvenate, let alone start another party, as Menzies did in similar circumstances. Yes, that is what he did and this is where they are now.
John Whelen, Box Hill Sth
Power failure
Net zero now describes the chances the Liberals and Nationals have of regaining power until they shed their ideological aversion to renewables.
Craig Jory, Albury, NSW
Hiding the truth
The article ″ Australia rebukes Israel ″ (21/5) is notable for two revelations. One, the timidity of our response to Israel's weaponisation of starvation in Gaza in withholding backing for the direct warning of sanctions by our closest allies. We've been similarly exposed before, and there's not even an election now, as an excuse.
The second is even more interesting: as Benjamin Netanyahu pushes on with the plan to take full control of a mostly empty Gaza, in which 'just enough aid to prevent hunger' will flow, the Israeli PM is disarmingly frank about the calculation behind this policy tweak.
Dependent on international finance and materiel to further his campaign, he confesses the (limited) renewal of aid is to placate supporters who 'cannot handle images of starvation'.
This is surely a new cynical twist to the old maxim: ″the first victim of war is truth″. Hide it if you can – just don't scare the horses.
Ken Blackman, Inverloch
It's not working for me
Premier Jacinta Allan, would you please define 'working people' for us Victorians? I get confused because I forever see you and your colleagues in Hi-Vis vests and hard hats on those major infrastructure projects that have blown budgets and our state's debt levels.
Charles Griss, Balwyn
No boastful patriots
Tim Soutphommasane (Comment, 21/5), rightly invokes ″an ethos of fairness, equality and humanity″ as central to an intelligent framing of patriotism for Australia. For too long, the lazy, reflexive boofheaded values of advertising copywriters embodied in the ″Come on Aussie, come on″ tradition have defined a love of this nation. A humbler Scandinavian-style pride in a society that treats its citizens as deserving of well-funded educational, health and aged resources should be our focus.
Decency should be celebrated. If the Anzac martial tradition at Gallipoli is to be acknowledged, it should be in the context of recognising the common values shared in 1915 by young Ottoman Turk country boys with their prayer mats and Korans; and Anglo-Celtic bush lads from a Christian tradition acknowledging each other's courage, as attested in historical accounts of their encounters. Patriotism need not be boastful.
Jon McMillan, Mount Eliza
Applaud those protesters
Well done to the farmers, firefighters and everyone else who protested in Melbourne on Tuesday. They managed to do what so many of us would love to but haven't, and that is to mobilise against the increasing cash grab by this state government to prop up its gross mismanagement.
Jan Grutzner, Richmond
The wasted years
Correspondents to the Letters pages seem divided between the need for major infrastructure and the cost. The current problem is that developments like the Suburban Rail Loop and the North East Link are necessary components for a fast-growing Melbourne, but are seen as unaffordable in the eyes of many due to the state's parlous budget situation.
Federal funding, which is really essential, is limited and in recent years has tended to favour the north-eastern states at Victoria's expense. On an Australia-wide basis infrastructure development has been too late, having regard to the speed of growth of the nation this century.
It is regrettable that at the height of the mining boom, when federal funds were more than adequate, the financial benefits were dispersed in the Howard years as tax advantages instead of being invested in infrastructure development, which would have been far less costly then, and beneficial to the nation as a whole.
Brian Kidd, Mt Waverley
Change investment
In relation to comments that the proposed changes to superannuation will hinder investment, I ask, why does this investment need to be within the superannuation framework? What's to stop the wealthy from investing outside of superannuation?
Since superannuation is intended to provide a reasonable income during retirement, can't we simply stick to that vision, rather than turning self-managed funds into huge investment facilities, with incomes far beyond what most people have in retirement.
Eileen Ray, Ascot Vale
School parking jam
I live opposite a state primary school and can say that the daily 'parking stoush' is not restricted to so-called 'privileged' schools. While I am unable to park outside my house during the 'drop-off' and 'pick-up' times, these restrictions do not seem to apply to some parents. They not only park illegally, but consider it OK to straddle private home crossovers and/or nature strips.
This is not done just to drop off or pick up their children as they lock their cars, carry their child's bag and cross the supervised crossing to 'deliver/collect' their offspring at the school gate.
Parking restrictions may be a nuisance to residents, but they exist to make it safer for the school's students.
It is a pity that some parents do not seem to realise, or care, that their illegal parking eliminates this safety feature and causes traffic congestion.
Tony Wheeler, Templestowe Lower
Stop the heritage loss
In ref to ' Melbourne's character and liveability is being bulldozed – we should be alarmed' (20/5) I am alarmed. I was alarmed in 2016 when the first planning zone laws came in. I kicked and screamed, wrote letters to the government and talked with locals about how the state was bulldozing us by rushed decisions to change the zoning on our streets.
With no answers to my questions our neighbourhoods were starting to change – 12 apartments here, a high-rise there, a sign of things to come. Not content with this, the state government is coming back determined to take every piece of grass we have left, the air we breath and the safety we had as we walked, biked, and shopped in our local communities.
This heritage we have in our very young country should be placed with pride. The pride in our single-fronted cottages, weatherboards, cream brick veneers, Housing Commission flats, and our grand Victorian, Edwardian, and Federation homes. All part of a history that if demolished can never be replaced again. I come again, kicking and screaming, asking the same questions. How do we stop this from happening?
Sharon Hendon, Glen Iris
Energy alternatives
Australia started large-scale mining uranium at Rum Jungle in the Northern Territory in 1954, but has only ever used tiny amounts for medical purposes, exporting the rest. Who knows how much ends up in nuclear weapons?
France started building nuclear power plants in 1956, now has 18 supplying much of the country's electric power. In Australia, the conservative parties have had long periods of government, but only now have decided nuclear is the thing. Can anyone believe they are real?
Meanwhile, China has become the largest generator of electricity by both hydro and wind in the world. It has also built at least one heliostat mirror array using sun to heat molten salt, which retains heat overnight enough to make the steam to turn the turbines to make electricity just like burning coal and gas, but without adding to rapidly increasing planet overheating.
Why does Australia not pay for these facilities by charging those who extract fossil fuels a whole lot more?
Loch Wilson, Northcote
Some are lucky
Yes, some might enjoy seeing white fields covered in frost, but as I turn on our heater with the temperature hovering around 0 degrees, I can't help but feel for those people less fortunate, with no warm place to sleep, through no fault of their own. I feel so privileged living in my cosy and warm house.
Pam Christensen, Leongatha North
Gift of gratitude
The article ″ My resurrection (thank you) cost $7 ″ (21/5) made my heart sing – along with the music the author Fotis Kapetopoulos describes. Gratitude is a wonderful asset and this writer has it in spades alongside his gift for describing eras, lifestyles and our public health system, which is so often criticised.
Kay Cole, Hawthorn East
AND ANOTHER THING
Politics
The Nationals remind me of my childhood. When I threatened to run away from home, my mother offered to help pack my bags.
Peter Thomas, Pascoe Vale
Sussan Ley has made her mark by stating that all policies will be reviewed given the election result. The Nationals, with no review of failed policies, served up a foolish ultimatum and failed.
Mike Fajdiga, Beaumaris
Backers of the previous coalition will now need to pick which independent party to finance. The Liberals or the Country Nationals. Interesting times ahead.
Meg Paul, Camberwell
The Nationals couldn't split the atom so they split the opposition.
Geoff Allen, Parkdale
Nuclear power brought the Coalition partners together on climate policy. But now it seems to have contributed to their split. Nuclear fusion has given way to nuclear fission.
Anthea Hyslop, Eltham
Forget about the doors being open for a reconciliation between the Liberals and Nationals because the knife drawers will always remain open. Rob Prowd, Box Hill South
Have the Nationals finally signed their own death warrant?
Chris Burgess, Port Melbourne
Bridget McKenzie (″Stupid move: Howard slams Coalition bust-up″, 21/5) doesn't know the difference between reasonable requests and unreasonable demands.
Les Aisen, Elsternwick
It has taken a woman to stop the tail wagging the dog.
Martin Crowe, Fitzroy North
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
37 minutes ago
- The Advertiser
Gaza aid distribution halts, Eid marked by violence
With severe food shortages plaguing the coastal enclave, fighting continued in many areas of the Gaza Strip. Local health authorities said 16 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes, mostly in northern Gaza, while the Israeli army said four of its soldiers were killed and five were wounded by an explosion in a building in Khan Younis to the south. In a day of confusing messaging, the GHF first announced its distribution sites in southern Gaza were closed, then it revealed that it had actually handed out food, before saying that it had had to close its gates as a precautionary measure. "The distribution was conducted peacefully and without incident; however, it was paused due to excessive crowding that made it unsafe to proceed," it said in a statement. As Palestinians across the war-ravaged Gaza Strip marked the start of one of Islam's most important holidays, Eid al-Adha, Israeli forces continued military operations that they say are needed to root out and destroy Hamas militants. The Israeli military was rocked by the deaths of four soldiers in a booby-trapped building, which brought the army death toll to eight since the start of June. "It is a sad and difficult day," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. The army earlier issued new evacuation orders for areas in and around Gaza City, warning of an imminent attack. With many residential areas of Gaza reduced to rubble by months of fighting, locals held Eid al-Adha prayer services in the open, next to bombed-out mosques and homes. "As you can see, we are holding Eid prayers, while the bombing, shelling and planes are ongoing," said one woman, Umm Mahmoud, in Khan Younis. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli blockade of the enclave, with the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition nearly tripling. The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of aid distribution which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. It suspended operations on Wednesday and asked the Israeli military to review security protocols after hospital officials said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points between June 1-3. Eyewitness blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" who were advancing towards their positions. The army said on Friday that Gazans should only move to and from the GHF distribution centres from 6am to 6pm local time. Outside daylight hours these access routes should be considered a closed military zone. "Entering it poses a significant risk to your life," military spokesman Avichay Adraee wrote on X. However, many Gazans say they have to walk for hours to reach the sites, meaning they have to start traveling well before dawn if they are to stand any chance of receiving food. Palestinians have described the distribution process as chaotic and poorly organised, and say limited supplies have led to early morning crushes on access routes. On Friday, the GHF said it had delivered 8160 boxes of food, providing approximately 471,240 individual meals. Since launching its operations, the GHF has opened three sites, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. With severe food shortages plaguing the coastal enclave, fighting continued in many areas of the Gaza Strip. Local health authorities said 16 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes, mostly in northern Gaza, while the Israeli army said four of its soldiers were killed and five were wounded by an explosion in a building in Khan Younis to the south. In a day of confusing messaging, the GHF first announced its distribution sites in southern Gaza were closed, then it revealed that it had actually handed out food, before saying that it had had to close its gates as a precautionary measure. "The distribution was conducted peacefully and without incident; however, it was paused due to excessive crowding that made it unsafe to proceed," it said in a statement. As Palestinians across the war-ravaged Gaza Strip marked the start of one of Islam's most important holidays, Eid al-Adha, Israeli forces continued military operations that they say are needed to root out and destroy Hamas militants. The Israeli military was rocked by the deaths of four soldiers in a booby-trapped building, which brought the army death toll to eight since the start of June. "It is a sad and difficult day," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. The army earlier issued new evacuation orders for areas in and around Gaza City, warning of an imminent attack. With many residential areas of Gaza reduced to rubble by months of fighting, locals held Eid al-Adha prayer services in the open, next to bombed-out mosques and homes. "As you can see, we are holding Eid prayers, while the bombing, shelling and planes are ongoing," said one woman, Umm Mahmoud, in Khan Younis. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli blockade of the enclave, with the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition nearly tripling. The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of aid distribution which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. It suspended operations on Wednesday and asked the Israeli military to review security protocols after hospital officials said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points between June 1-3. Eyewitness blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" who were advancing towards their positions. The army said on Friday that Gazans should only move to and from the GHF distribution centres from 6am to 6pm local time. Outside daylight hours these access routes should be considered a closed military zone. "Entering it poses a significant risk to your life," military spokesman Avichay Adraee wrote on X. However, many Gazans say they have to walk for hours to reach the sites, meaning they have to start traveling well before dawn if they are to stand any chance of receiving food. Palestinians have described the distribution process as chaotic and poorly organised, and say limited supplies have led to early morning crushes on access routes. On Friday, the GHF said it had delivered 8160 boxes of food, providing approximately 471,240 individual meals. Since launching its operations, the GHF has opened three sites, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. With severe food shortages plaguing the coastal enclave, fighting continued in many areas of the Gaza Strip. Local health authorities said 16 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes, mostly in northern Gaza, while the Israeli army said four of its soldiers were killed and five were wounded by an explosion in a building in Khan Younis to the south. In a day of confusing messaging, the GHF first announced its distribution sites in southern Gaza were closed, then it revealed that it had actually handed out food, before saying that it had had to close its gates as a precautionary measure. "The distribution was conducted peacefully and without incident; however, it was paused due to excessive crowding that made it unsafe to proceed," it said in a statement. As Palestinians across the war-ravaged Gaza Strip marked the start of one of Islam's most important holidays, Eid al-Adha, Israeli forces continued military operations that they say are needed to root out and destroy Hamas militants. The Israeli military was rocked by the deaths of four soldiers in a booby-trapped building, which brought the army death toll to eight since the start of June. "It is a sad and difficult day," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. The army earlier issued new evacuation orders for areas in and around Gaza City, warning of an imminent attack. With many residential areas of Gaza reduced to rubble by months of fighting, locals held Eid al-Adha prayer services in the open, next to bombed-out mosques and homes. "As you can see, we are holding Eid prayers, while the bombing, shelling and planes are ongoing," said one woman, Umm Mahmoud, in Khan Younis. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli blockade of the enclave, with the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition nearly tripling. The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of aid distribution which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. It suspended operations on Wednesday and asked the Israeli military to review security protocols after hospital officials said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points between June 1-3. Eyewitness blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" who were advancing towards their positions. The army said on Friday that Gazans should only move to and from the GHF distribution centres from 6am to 6pm local time. Outside daylight hours these access routes should be considered a closed military zone. "Entering it poses a significant risk to your life," military spokesman Avichay Adraee wrote on X. However, many Gazans say they have to walk for hours to reach the sites, meaning they have to start traveling well before dawn if they are to stand any chance of receiving food. Palestinians have described the distribution process as chaotic and poorly organised, and say limited supplies have led to early morning crushes on access routes. On Friday, the GHF said it had delivered 8160 boxes of food, providing approximately 471,240 individual meals. Since launching its operations, the GHF has opened three sites, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning. With severe food shortages plaguing the coastal enclave, fighting continued in many areas of the Gaza Strip. Local health authorities said 16 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes, mostly in northern Gaza, while the Israeli army said four of its soldiers were killed and five were wounded by an explosion in a building in Khan Younis to the south. In a day of confusing messaging, the GHF first announced its distribution sites in southern Gaza were closed, then it revealed that it had actually handed out food, before saying that it had had to close its gates as a precautionary measure. "The distribution was conducted peacefully and without incident; however, it was paused due to excessive crowding that made it unsafe to proceed," it said in a statement. As Palestinians across the war-ravaged Gaza Strip marked the start of one of Islam's most important holidays, Eid al-Adha, Israeli forces continued military operations that they say are needed to root out and destroy Hamas militants. The Israeli military was rocked by the deaths of four soldiers in a booby-trapped building, which brought the army death toll to eight since the start of June. "It is a sad and difficult day," Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement. The army earlier issued new evacuation orders for areas in and around Gaza City, warning of an imminent attack. With many residential areas of Gaza reduced to rubble by months of fighting, locals held Eid al-Adha prayer services in the open, next to bombed-out mosques and homes. "As you can see, we are holding Eid prayers, while the bombing, shelling and planes are ongoing," said one woman, Umm Mahmoud, in Khan Younis. The United Nations has warned that most of Gaza's 2.3 million population is at risk of famine after an 11-week Israeli blockade of the enclave, with the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition nearly tripling. The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza at the end of May, overseeing a new model of aid distribution which the United Nations says is neither impartial nor neutral. It suspended operations on Wednesday and asked the Israeli military to review security protocols after hospital officials said more than 80 people had been shot dead and hundreds wounded near distribution points between June 1-3. Eyewitness blamed Israeli soldiers for the killings. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots on two days, while on Tuesday it said soldiers had fired at Palestinian "suspects" who were advancing towards their positions. The army said on Friday that Gazans should only move to and from the GHF distribution centres from 6am to 6pm local time. Outside daylight hours these access routes should be considered a closed military zone. "Entering it poses a significant risk to your life," military spokesman Avichay Adraee wrote on X. However, many Gazans say they have to walk for hours to reach the sites, meaning they have to start traveling well before dawn if they are to stand any chance of receiving food. Palestinians have described the distribution process as chaotic and poorly organised, and say limited supplies have led to early morning crushes on access routes. On Friday, the GHF said it had delivered 8160 boxes of food, providing approximately 471,240 individual meals. Since launching its operations, the GHF has opened three sites, but over the past two days, only two of them have been functioning.

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Calls grow for besieged Tasmanian Premier to resign after no-confidence loss, despite Jeremy Rockliff ruling out privatising state-owned assets
Tasmania's political quagmire has continued to escalate days after a no-confidence vote shockingly passed the house, with mining and business bodies joining Independent MPs in calling for Premier Jeremy Rockliff to be dumped as Liberal leader. A vote of no-confidence passed the house by the slimmest of margins on Thursday, with Labor speaker Michelle O'Byrne casting the deciding ballot after stating she could not vote in favour of a Liberal government. Tasmanians will now have to wait until next week to find out when they will return to the polls for the second time in as little as 14 months, with Mr Rockliff to visit the state Governor on Tuesday. Both houses of Parliament will also convene on Tuesday to pass emergency budget supply bills to ensure the state can sufficiently pay its debts between the end of financial year and the conclusion of the election, with the poll to then be called immediately after. However, Independent MP Craig Garland insisted for Mr Rockliff to step aside ahead of the contest and allow the Liberal Party to select a new leader. 'To do otherwise would be to drag the government down and show Tasmanians the arrogance and ignorance that led to the loss of confidence in the Premier in the first place,' he said on Friday. 'If the Liberals are unwilling to form government, I call on the Labor Party to put aside politics for the best interests of Tasmania, and work with myself, and other non-government members to make this parliament work again,' he said, despite Opposition Leader Dean Winter vehemently ruling out a Coalition with the Greens. 'If the major parties aren't willing to compromise, it shows that Tasmanians must look at Independents and minor parties who have demonstrated they can make minority government work'. Small Business Council of Tasmania CEO Robert Mallett also came out swinging against Mr Rockliff on Saturday and said that despite being a 'very good Premier', he was puzzled as to why he had not yet tendered his resignation. 'Personally, I'm very disappointed for Jeremy because I know he's put his heart and soul into trying to get it right, but at the end of the day, again, for the state, we would be better off with a new leader,' he said. 'He could have stepped down as Premier and the Parliamentary Liberal Party could have chosen another Premier'. Mr Mallet, whose body represents over 42,000 small businesses said the ongoing political instability was untenable and that there were 'some very experienced parliamentarians in the party' who could serve as Liberal leader. CEO of the Tasmanian Minerals, Manufacturing and Energy Council Ray Mostogl also reiterated that elections damaged confidence in the private sector and that the poll would further delay a crucial ruling on the Marinus Link, and several other pending business decisions. 'Jeremy is a remarkable person and I think that's a view that's held by many people of all colours in politics, so this is not personal he's a great guy,' he said. 'The point is they've been voted in, there's policies that they've had election promises that they made and we need to let that run its course." Mr Rockliff has remained defiant in his bid to lead the Liberals to the winter poll and on Saturday announced there would be no sale of state-owned companies if he won the election, of which was a key reason the no-confidence motion was advanced by Labor. "There will be no privatisation under the Tasmanian Liberal government," Mr Rockliff said in a statement, assuring the plan had been abandoned for good. 'There will be no asset sales under the Tasmanian Liberal Government,' he said. 'Labor has forced this early election on the deceitful campaign that our government intends to divest government-owned businesses – before Mr Eslake's work is even completed'. The government had commissioned independent economist Saul Eslake to determine which state owned assets could potentially be sold off, yet a number of critical enterprises including Port Arthur, Hydro Tasmania, the Spirit of Tasmania operator TT-Line and TasRacing were explicitly ruled out.

ABC News
5 hours ago
- ABC News
A feeling of calm before the storm descends on Tasmanian politics following motion of no-confidence in Jeremy Rockliff
After a wild few days in the crazy world that is Tasmanian politics, Friday felt eerily quiet. For some, it was a reprieve, a day to breathe and reflect on what had just happened and what might happen next. For others, it was more like the kind of silence before a jump scare. If the past few days were a horror movie with the final act being the toppling of the state's leader, then the weekend is a thriller. An uncomfortable wait in suspense with the knowledge that something unknown is just around the corner. But there are so many scenarios that can play out. What Tasmanians know is that by the end of next week something will have changed in the state's political landscape. The Liberals will still be in charge but with a different leader at the helm — someone like Eric Abetz or Michael Ferguson. Or the world will have turned upside down and Labor Leader Dean Winter would have figured out a way to govern with just 10 MPs, leaning on the support of the crossbench and the Greens. The last option is we're in election mode for the second time within 18 months. Tuesday is D-Day. If things are still at status quo and the supply bills — necessary for public servants to continue to be paid — pass, then Jeremy Rockliff will take a trip to see the Governor. The Governor will consider all of the above options. At this stage, it appears most politicians are resigned to an election being called. But three days is a long time in Tasmanian politics, and a lot can happen. For example, the Liberals — whose war chests are no doubt unprepared for an election or who are worried about losing their seats — could roll Mr Rockliff. Labor, and some members of the crossbench, say that should happen, or Mr Rockliff should fall on his sword and resign. Even fellow Liberal Senator Jonathon Duniam suggested as much on Friday morning. But how likely is that to happen? It is understood some, like Mr Abetz, have already done the numbers and come up short. There's also an understanding in the party that while Mr Abetz certainly has his supporters, he's not everyone's cup of tea. Some worry he'll struggle to get support from the crossbench needed to continue governing, and fear he's too polarising to lead the party to a state election. The other two real contenders are Treasurer Guy Barnett, the architect of last week's budget paper which inspired the motion of no-confidence, and Michael Ferguson who was already banished to the backbench over the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco. There doesn't seem to be a stand-out candidate amongst them. And there's something Jeremy Rockliff's opponents may have underestimated: people really like him. Because if there was one thing everyone could agree on during the motion of no-confidence, Mr Rockliff is a nice guy. Of course. the motion wasn't about his personality — after all nice is great, but it's not enough to lead a state. Nice doesn't pay off the almost $11 billion in debt that Tasmania is expected to rack up in four years' time and it hasn't helped build the berth for the new Spirit of Tasmania ships on time. Then there's the stadium cap. It is unlikely that the average Tasmanian heard "$375 million" — on capital when it was mentioned — "and not a red cent more" and realised it included hundreds of millions of dollars in borrowings. It might not technically be able to be called a broken promise yet, but, for the general public it's the vibe of the thing and the vibe is off. Not to mention Mr Rockliff's plans to cut the public service and sell off public assets were decidedly controversial. There are many valid reasons that Labor and the crossbench had when they spoke about why they were supporting the motion of no-confidence in Mr Rockliff. And that should not be forgotten. But that niceness, and loyalty, means fellow Liberals have decided that they'll back Mr Rockliff's leadership to the hilt. Even if it means an early election. The other aspect is that the party seems to believe that Mr Rockliff leaving won't be the fix. There is a view that Labor and the crossbench will eventually come after whoever is next. If Tasmanians do head to the polls, some of it is because Labor won't explore the third option: forming a minority government. Greens Leader Rosalie Woodruff was out on Friday, once again offering Mr Winter a quick path to the premiership, or at the very least a conversation. But Mr Winter can't say it enough (apparently) that there is no world in which he leans on the Greens for any kind of support. While Dr Woodruff may argue that the parties' values are more aligned, Mr Winter sees the Greens as toxic for Labor. So if Labor doesn't want to govern, why did it raise the no-confidence motion? Some have suggested (tablespoon of salt because it's mostly Liberals) that Mr Winter simply wanted to knock off a more popular opponent. Whatever the motivation, it's done now and there is a very real chance Mr Winter will be heading to his first election as leader. It's unlikely to be an easy one. While Labor is blaming the Liberals for the election and the Liberals are blaming Labor, the public is blaming all politicians, in particular the major parties. Labor's copping blame for starting the whole mess in the first place. It was playing with fire when it challenged the crossbench MPs, who swiftly rose to the occasion. Mr Winter may have been hoping the premier would backdown and resign, but he would've known that an election was a serious possibility. They went through something similar back in November, when the Greens raised a no-confidence motion and Mr Rockliff declared that he'd ask for an election to be called if it passed. Turns out he wasn't bluffing. Labor's also going to have to face up to the stadium issue. The anti-stadium crowd knows Labor is pro-stadium and team, and won't trust it. While the pro-stadium crowd is enraged that Labor is putting it all in jeopardy — the Liberals are somehow escaping this criticism. Meanwhile, the Liberals are getting the blame because yes — as Labor has pointed out — they are choosing to seek an election instead of a new leader, backed into a corner or not. The fact is, the blood was in the water. People were getting frustrated with the Liberal government. But as angry as people were with a government that's been in power for 11 years, the general sentiment seems to be that it is just too soon for another election Mr Winter's got five weeks to convince Tasmanians he made the right move in toppling the premier, rather than letting the government bleed out a little longer.