logo
A feeling of calm before the storm descends on Tasmanian politics following motion of no-confidence in Jeremy Rockliff

A feeling of calm before the storm descends on Tasmanian politics following motion of no-confidence in Jeremy Rockliff

After a wild few days in the crazy world that is Tasmanian politics, Friday felt eerily quiet.
For some, it was a reprieve, a day to breathe and reflect on what had just happened and what might happen next.
For others, it was more like the kind of silence before a jump scare.
If the past few days were a horror movie with the final act being the toppling of the state's leader, then the weekend is a thriller.
An uncomfortable wait in suspense with the knowledge that something unknown is just around the corner.
But there are so many scenarios that can play out.
What Tasmanians know is that by the end of next week something will have changed in the state's political landscape.
The Liberals will still be in charge but with a different leader at the helm — someone like Eric Abetz or Michael Ferguson.
Or the world will have turned upside down and Labor Leader Dean Winter would have figured out a way to govern with just 10 MPs, leaning on the support of the crossbench and the Greens.
The last option is we're in election mode for the second time within 18 months.
Tuesday is D-Day. If things are still at status quo and the supply bills — necessary for public servants to continue to be paid — pass, then Jeremy Rockliff will take a trip to see the Governor.
The Governor will consider all of the above options. At this stage, it appears most politicians are resigned to an election being called.
But three days is a long time in Tasmanian politics, and a lot can happen.
For example, the Liberals — whose war chests are no doubt unprepared for an election or who are worried about losing their seats — could roll Mr Rockliff.
Labor, and some members of the crossbench, say that should happen, or Mr Rockliff should fall on his sword and resign. Even fellow Liberal Senator Jonathon Duniam suggested as much on Friday morning.
But how likely is that to happen?
It is understood some, like Mr Abetz, have already done the numbers and come up short.
There's also an understanding in the party that while Mr Abetz certainly has his supporters, he's not everyone's cup of tea.
Some worry he'll struggle to get support from the crossbench needed to continue governing, and fear he's too polarising to lead the party to a state election.
The other two real contenders are Treasurer Guy Barnett, the architect of last week's budget paper which inspired the motion of no-confidence, and Michael Ferguson who was already banished to the backbench over the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco.
There doesn't seem to be a stand-out candidate amongst them.
And there's something Jeremy Rockliff's opponents may have underestimated: people really like him.
Because if there was one thing everyone could agree on during the motion of no-confidence, Mr Rockliff is a nice guy.
Of course. the motion wasn't about his personality — after all nice is great, but it's not enough to lead a state.
Nice doesn't pay off the almost $11 billion in debt that Tasmania is expected to rack up in four years' time and it hasn't helped build the berth for the new Spirit of Tasmania ships on time.
Then there's the stadium cap.
It is unlikely that the average Tasmanian heard "$375 million" — on capital when it was mentioned — "and not a red cent more" and realised it included hundreds of millions of dollars in borrowings.
It might not technically be able to be called a broken promise yet, but, for the general public it's the vibe of the thing and the vibe is off.
Not to mention Mr Rockliff's plans to cut the public service and sell off public assets were decidedly controversial.
There are many valid reasons that Labor and the crossbench had when they spoke about why they were supporting the motion of no-confidence in Mr Rockliff. And that should not be forgotten.
But that niceness, and loyalty, means fellow Liberals have decided that they'll back Mr Rockliff's leadership to the hilt. Even if it means an early election.
The other aspect is that the party seems to believe that Mr Rockliff leaving won't be the fix.
There is a view that Labor and the crossbench will eventually come after whoever is next.
If Tasmanians do head to the polls, some of it is because Labor won't explore the third option: forming a minority government.
Greens Leader Rosalie Woodruff was out on Friday, once again offering Mr Winter a quick path to the premiership, or at the very least a conversation.
But Mr Winter can't say it enough (apparently) that there is no world in which he leans on the Greens for any kind of support.
While Dr Woodruff may argue that the parties' values are more aligned, Mr Winter sees the Greens as toxic for Labor.
So if Labor doesn't want to govern, why did it raise the no-confidence motion?
Some have suggested (tablespoon of salt because it's mostly Liberals) that Mr Winter simply wanted to knock off a more popular opponent.
Whatever the motivation, it's done now and there is a very real chance Mr Winter will be heading to his first election as leader. It's unlikely to be an easy one.
While Labor is blaming the Liberals for the election and the Liberals are blaming Labor, the public is blaming all politicians, in particular the major parties.
Labor's copping blame for starting the whole mess in the first place. It was playing with fire when it challenged the crossbench MPs, who swiftly rose to the occasion.
Mr Winter may have been hoping the premier would backdown and resign, but he would've known that an election was a serious possibility.
They went through something similar back in November, when the Greens raised a no-confidence motion and Mr Rockliff declared that he'd ask for an election to be called if it passed.
Turns out he wasn't bluffing.
Labor's also going to have to face up to the stadium issue.
The anti-stadium crowd knows Labor is pro-stadium and team, and won't trust it. While the pro-stadium crowd is enraged that Labor is putting it all in jeopardy — the Liberals are somehow escaping this criticism.
Meanwhile, the Liberals are getting the blame because yes — as Labor has pointed out — they are choosing to seek an election instead of a new leader, backed into a corner or not.
The fact is, the blood was in the water. People were getting frustrated with the Liberal government.
But as angry as people were with a government that's been in power for 11 years, the general sentiment seems to be that it is just too soon for another election
Mr Winter's got five weeks to convince Tasmanians he made the right move in toppling the premier, rather than letting the government bleed out a little longer.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leader's wild act weeks after election
Leader's wild act weeks after election

Perth Now

time41 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

Leader's wild act weeks after election

Tasmania is again gripped by parliamentary theatre as Labor leader Dean Winter moved a fresh no-confidence motion against the Rockliff government, echoing the political chaos of just 10 weeks ago. Mr Winter opened the motion by congratulating Premier Jeremy Rockliff for holding onto government before launching into a blistering attack on the Liberals' handling of key issues, including Maritime Tasmania's 'Spirits' fiasco and the state's finances. 'We are here because the 51st parliament had no confidence in the Rockliff government. This parliament should have no more confidence,' Mr Winter told the House of Assembly. Labor leader Dean Winter moved a fresh no-confidence motion against the Rockliff government. NewsWire/ Simon Sturzaker Credit: News Corp Australia The motion, expected to be defeated, calls on MPs to formally declare they have no confidence in Mr Rockliff nor his government, and they instead express ongoing confidence in Mr Winter as an alternative leader. Only 14 of the 35 members will be allowed to speak to the motion, with debate capped at 15 minutes each. Three government MPs, three Labor MPs, two Greens and all six independents will speak, paving the way for a potential vote by about 7.30pm. More to come

Liberal backbencher Garth Hamilton says Australia should pay jobless migrants to leave Australia
Liberal backbencher Garth Hamilton says Australia should pay jobless migrants to leave Australia

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Liberal backbencher Garth Hamilton says Australia should pay jobless migrants to leave Australia

Queensland MP Garth Hamilton says Australia should consider paying jobless migrants up to $9000 to leave the country as a way of curtailing rising immigration levels. The Liberal backbencher said the policy was not politically divisive, and said similar approached had worked in 'left-wing governments in the EU' like France, Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Quoting figures between $6000 to $9000, he said the payment would 'give people a pathway home' and labelled the move as a 'reasonably compassionate and fair approach'. 'The reality is, a lot of migrants who are coming over here aren't finding work, they aren't finding their housing,' he told 2GB on Tuesday. 'They aren't finding that things were as rosy as they'd hoped because of the high immigration policies that we've employed, things haven't quite been working out.' He said high immigration was impacting housing availability, rent, lines at hospitals and schools and warned Australia needed to 'address it now'. Speaking directly on the housing crisis, he said: 'We're not going to build our way out of this problem'. Mr Hamilton said an urgent response was warranted, given that any cuts to immigration would not 'solve the immediate problem now and today'. 'If all we do … is just cut the rate of immigration, that'll help a bit down the track, but it won't solve the immediate problem now and today,' he said. 'And I want to point out, this isn't some right wing solution. All of the governments that deploy this are pretty much left wing, France, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium. 'So this is about left or right. This is about putting the citizens of the country first'. Net overseas migration decreased by 16.7 per cent in 2023-24 to 446,000, however figures remain significantly above pre-Covid rates of 247,620 recorded in December 2019. While a Dutton-Coalition government went to the May polls pledging to slash net overseas migration by 100,000, Labor has forecast a decline to 225,000 in 2026-27. As it stands the Coalition are yet to cement their policy position on immigration amid a review into the area.

Israeli politician to address Australian event virtually after visa cancelled
Israeli politician to address Australian event virtually after visa cancelled

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Israeli politician to address Australian event virtually after visa cancelled

The group that organised speaking events for Israeli far-right politician Simcha Rothman says "the show will go on" and he will appear virtually in Australia after the Knesset member's visa was cancelled days before his scheduled visit. In a social media post on Tuesday, the Australian Jewish Association declared that they would not "bow down" and Mr Rothman would address an event organised by the group via Zoom. The politician, whose party is part of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition, was due to appear in person at events in Australia within days, including one in Sydney next Thursday. But on Monday, the government confirmed his visa had been cancelled, as Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke warned he would not accept people coming to the country to spread division. Hours later, the Israeli government declared that it would revoke the visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority. Relations between the Australian and Israeli governments have soured over past months, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's announcement that Australia would recognise Palestinian statehood in September eliciting a furious response from his counterpart. Mr Rothman was originally scheduled to appear at "many Australian synagogues, schools and other Jewish organisations" as part of his speaking tour, according to the Australian Jewish Association. The group said it would now hold "one large communal event" where he would speak via video call. "The Jewish community won't bow down to Tony Burke or Penny Wong," the group said in the post, under an image labelling it the "Simcha Rothman Solidarity Tour". "The show will go on." The group's chief executive, Robert Gregory, said in a separate statement posted to social media that the purpose of Mr Rothman's original visit was to "show solidarity with Australia's Jewish community", which he said was facing a "wave of anti-Semitism". He said they had organised for the politician to meet with victims of antisemitism and visit Jewish institutions that have been targeted. "The visit was not in any way connected to current events in the Middle East," he said. "This is a viciously anti-Semitic move from a government that is obsessed with targeting the Jewish community and Israel." In a statement on Monday, Mr Burke said the government "takes a hard line on people who seek to come to our country and spread division". "If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here," he said. Mr Rothman is a member of the National Religious Party — Religious Zionism, which is led by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. Earlier this year, Australia and several other nations imposed sanctions that included travel bans on the party's leader and Israeli national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir. The government also denied a visa to former Israeli justice minister Ayelet Shaked late last year, shortly before she was due to embark on a speaking tour. The letter revoking Mr Rothman's visa, seen by the ABC, said he had the potential to use the events he would be participating in to "promote his controversial views and ideologies, which may lead to fostering division in the community". It cites examples of Mr Rothman claiming that children were not dying of hunger in Gaza, that those children were Israel's enemies, and that the idea of a two-state solution had "poisoned the minds of the entire world". The decision states that "his presence in Australia would or might be a risk to the good order of the Australian community or a segment of the Australian community, namely the Islamic population". It added that "given his inflammatory statements, that likely public knowledge that [Mr Rothman] had entered Australia with the government's permission may encourage others to feel emboldened to voice any anti-Islamic sentiments, if not to take action to give effect to that prejudice". But during an interview with the ABC, Mr Rothman insisted he was blocked from entering Australia only because he said: "Hamas is bad and Israel is good." He also denied there was a starvation crisis in Gaza, blaming Hamas for any hunger, and repeated claims published on a conservative American news website that the United Nations had changed the definition of starvation to launch political attacks against Israel. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley on Tuesday demanded Mr Burke explain why Mr Rothman's visa was cancelled, describing the move to bar an elected member of Israel's parliament from entering the country as a "very unusual thing". "And I haven't seen explanations from Tony Burke that actually explain what is going on here," she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store