logo
How the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Got a 400% Pay Raise

How the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders Got a 400% Pay Raise

Yahoo6 hours ago

Jada McLean, who helped fight for a pay raise for the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, is pictured in Netflix's America's Sweethearts. Credit - Courtesy of Netflix
The second season of America's Sweethearts ends on a triumphant note for the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders.
In the final 15 minutes of the Netflix documentary series' new season, which airs June 18, Megan, a four-year veteran, excitedly shares the news about a 'life-changing' 400% pay increase that the cheerleaders will be getting. We learn they will also be paid more for their appearances outside of cheering for the Dallas Cowboys.
It's a happy ending to a grueling season and a key milestone in the dancers' long fight for fair pay. Over seven episodes, the series tackles how choreographers put together a 36-person cheerleading team for Dallas Cowboys football games. Just because someone has previously been on the team—those dancers are called 'veterans'—doesn't mean they'll make the team the following season. They have to audition again, alongside 'rookies,' people trying out for the first time, during an intense boot camp.
So advocating for a pay raise added pressure to the situation. Jada McLean, a five-year veteran who helped lead pay negotiations after being almost evicted from her home, tells TIME that the series' existence played a big role in them getting the increases. In both seasons of America's Sweethearts, dancers talk about how they have to work multiple jobs to pay their bills, even though the Cowboys are valued at more than $10 billion.
'Having people watch the television show and speak up honestly on behalf of us and say, 'Hey, this is not right. We weren't aware that these girls are making so little'—that motivated us to speak up more for ourselves,' McLean says.
Tad Carper, senior vice president of communications for the Cowboys, tells TIME via email: 'We're pleased, as you'll see in the series, that the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders were happy with the outcome.'
Here's how the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders made their case for a pay raise in Season 2 and got to the end zone.
Exact pay rates are not discussed in the show, and the Cowboys would not confirm the pay rates to TIME. But NBC Boston reported in 2022 that Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders made between $15 and $20 an hour, $500 per match, and about $75,000 a year.
There is also a history of dissatisfaction with Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader wages. In 2018, former Cowboys cheerleader Erica Wilkins sued, and a 2019 settlement resulted in an increase in the hourly wage from $8 an hour to $12 an hour, and an increase in game day wages from $200 to $400.
While the contents of the cheerleaders' contracts are not revealed in America's Sweethearts, the disappointed reactions are well-documented in several off-hand comments throughout the latest season of the show. Some cheerleaders like Armani, a fifth-year veteran, have a job outside of cheerleading that primarily pays their bills, but many do not. Kleine, a 4-year veteran, is working four different jobs while the Cowboys are in season.
In the series, Megan points out that the cheerleaders get some services like hair styling and spray tans, as part of the job. 'But at the end of the day, that doesn't pay my rent. I've got student loans, I've got car payments,' she says.
The first group meeting in which cheerleaders vent about their pay happens about halfway through Season 2, in Episode 4.
'For us to all be struggling financially, I'm kind of over it,' Jada says over breakfast at a diner with other cheerleaders.
'I would love to leave this place better than it was when we started,' Armani adds.
'Our legacy will be the money,' Jada says.
At the beginning of last summer, McLean tells TIME, the cheerleaders started consulting family members of alumni who were in the legal field about what their options were, and then had several meetings with the Cowboys' HR and legal teams. Viewers will see the cheerleaders talking to one another about the need for a pay increase, but their meetings are not on camera.
During a Zoom call with the team featured in America's Sweethearts, a group of veterans updated their teammates on the slow progress of negotiations.
'We sat in this meeting and I was almost in tears,' Amanda says on the call. 'It was just breaking my heart the way they were speaking about us.'
But she says she's not going to back down on the cause, arguing that the Netflix show has given them a huge platform to leverage: 'If there's any time to do it, it's now that we are relevant and the world is on our side.'
She even encourages her teammates to consider not showing up to a practice and stage a walkout. Some members talk about potentially leaving the team for good.
While staging a walkout and going on strike may have been talked about, McLean tells TIME they didn't follow through because the dancers were too worried about disappointing fans: 'We didn't want to let people down who were so excited to see the cheerleaders after supporting us through the first season of our television show.'
Judy Trammell, a choreographer for the cheerleaders, says in the show, 'A walkout would really make me nervous, but I know people have to fight for certain things to make changes, and I understand that.'
The cheerleaders continued to hold meetings to discuss the issue of pay. Amanda does bring up pay during a progress check-in she has with Trammell and the director of the team, Kelli Finglass. 'I do hope that one day we can get the cheerleaders paid more,' Amanda tells them. 'We work extremely hard, and I think all of these girls would quit their full-time jobs in order to be Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders.'
Trammell replies: 'But why do we want people to quit their full-time jobs when that's what's so impressive about ya'll?'
Speaking with TIME, McLean responded to that comment: 'The reality of having to balance two or three or four jobs isn't easy, and it's hard to be the best at something when you feel like you're having to spread yourself thin in other areas instead of fully committing to that one thing.'
Though she fought for the pay raise for her teammates, McLean will not be returning to the Dallas Cowboys, citing the workload and a general desire for a more flexible schedule.
When asked what valuable life lessons she's learned as a Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader, she brought the conversation back to fair pay.
She hopes their fight for fair pay inspires other women to speak up in their own jobs, arguing, 'at the end of the day, you don't know what's going to come from it, and it may be something that benefits you or the people who come after you.'
And she hopes the Netflix series will give people a greater appreciation for the hard work that goes into cheerleading. 'We're not just pretty faces out there shaking pom poms," she says. "We're true athletes. We're women who are successful outside of the uniforms.'
Write to Olivia B. Waxman at olivia.waxman@time.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jimmy Kimmel Socks Trump Below The Belt With A Stinging Joke About His 'Poles'
Jimmy Kimmel Socks Trump Below The Belt With A Stinging Joke About His 'Poles'

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jimmy Kimmel Socks Trump Below The Belt With A Stinging Joke About His 'Poles'

Jimmy Kimmel mocked President Donald Trump over a bizarre White House ceremony held for the raising of two new flagpoles on the lawn. 'I think what happened was someone told Trump his poll numbers were bad and he was like, 'Well, then, let's add two more poles,'' Kimmel said. Trump bragged that the poles are 'magnificent' and 'the largest you'll ever see' as he and others gathered to watch them erected. Except he wouldn't use that word. 'I'm not gonna use that word,' Trump said. 'Do you know what that is? The word? It starts with an 'E.' You know what the word is?' Kimmel wondered aloud if the word might be 'Eric,' then hit the president with a joke that landed below the belt. 'We do know what the word that starts with an 'E' is, and I'm guessing you haven't been able to achieve one in many years. Hence, the poles,' Kimmel fired back. 'Now he's an erection denier, too!' See more in his Wednesday night monologue:

Vibe Coding: It's Four Months Old. What's Up?
Vibe Coding: It's Four Months Old. What's Up?

Forbes

time20 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Vibe Coding: It's Four Months Old. What's Up?

Female freelance developer coding and programming. Coding on two with screens with code language and ... More application. What is vibe coding, anyway? The term, coined by Andrej Karpathy a few months ago, is now shorthand for an entire shift in the way that we view software engineering. It's the idea that AI is 'hands-off' in terms of code generation: the machine just takes the human's inputs, and comes up with source code on its own. Although LLMs are not 100% autonomous with this yet, and there's often a need for some debugging, vibe coding essentially asks the programmer to back off and let the AI do its thing. In contemporary coverage of the phenomenon, Forbes Council member Shubham Nigam quotes Rhiannon Williams of the MIT Technology Review: 'Not all AI-assisted coding is vibe coding. To truly vibe-code, you have to be prepared to let the AI fully take control and refrain from checking and directly tweaking the code it generates as you go along—surrendering to the vibes.' So while it's a colloquial term (good vibes, man!) it's also a request for the human in the loop to take distance – not to stand over the LLM's shoulder as it creates. Here's more from a recent panel at Imagination in Action in April. Nikolay Vyahhi of Hyperskill interviews Artem Lukoianov, Heena Purohit, and Aldo Pareja about this trend. 'I guess the whole beauty of this term is because it so accurately presents what's actually happening,' Lukoianov said. 'You don't even have to read the code that it produces. You … just basically teleprompt to the system, it generates a part of the code for you, and then, quite often, because developers are notorious for being lazy, you don't even read the codes.' 'You don't even try to understand what the code is doing,' added Pareja, theorizing about what will happen when IDEs and other tools start to incorporate unit testing. 'You don't even read the code. You're just feeling it.' Panelist Zach Lloyd talked about the realities of source code management. '(Developers will) get into trouble, and get and they'll try to vibe their way out of it, or they'll get into trouble with their production system and try to vibe their way out of it,' he said. 'So in the terminal, we see it goes beyond producing code, to this whole feeling of: 'let me see if the AI can just fix this thing for me, and maybe I won't have to understand exactly what it's doing.' Lloyd described this power as a kind of double-edged sword: on the one hand, it's, as he said, a 'magical' thing for a developer who feels stuck. On the other hand, he suggested, it can be dangerous for the human coder not to know what the system is doing at all. Panelist Heena Purohit pointed to some challenges with letting the AI have its own project. She argued the systems are not typically good at 'distance thinking,' or how various components of a system interact. 'Sure, you can have millions of lines of code be generated in minutes or seconds, but you still need to understand what the code is actually doing, so that you can troubleshoot it and debug it when you need to,' she said, suggesting that in many cases, scaling might be a problem. By contrast, Lukoianov gave a sort of qualified opinion that we are mostly there, and will get there soon. '(Vibe coding capability) is already good enough for us to stop coding anything,' he said. 'To me, it's more the question of how we engineer the system around this… how do we … provide the correct information to the LLM, how do we summarize our code base, and how do we provide the right tools to the LLM to actually perform … better? in my personal opinion, I feel that like the LLM is already there. It's all about, how do we properly provide this information about your code base, about what you want, about any regulations, security issues that are around there. So it's all just about the correct information, correct inputs, correct tools, to the LLMs, and eventually we'll get there.' In the 1980s, he pointed out, we had to be very close to the hardware – now, it's different. 'You don't think that much about operating systems,' he said. 'You don't think that much about hardware, unless you're working in something very specialized.' Regardless of the change, Pareja argued that full stack developers are still valuable. 'If you're using (tools) to synchronize different processes, and you have a million processes, your system is going to break,' he said. 'You need to understand these constraints.' If I was going to boil down some of the biggest ideas in this panel, I think most of them would be around the need for coding knowledge to manage the detail and periphery of systems development. In other words, the AI can do everything, but it might not do it 100% the way that you need it to be done. And there's that old adage: if you want it done right, you have to do it yourself. Maybe LLMs get us 80% of the way there without any oversight, but skipping the context and being completely ignorant of what the machine is doing is typically not a good idea, partly for the reasons that the panelists laid out. So the human in the loop is still relevant for now. But the bottom line is that vibe coding is something so new and fundamental that we'll probably be spending a lot of time figuring out how to do it best.

Mantel takes Manhattan for Fanatics Fest
Mantel takes Manhattan for Fanatics Fest

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mantel takes Manhattan for Fanatics Fest

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - AUGUST 18: Michael Rubin (C) with Verizon "Moment of Freak Out" winner Dwight Lake and Joshua Booker, during the Fanatics Fest NYC 2024 at Jacob Javits Center on August 18, 2024 in New York City. (Photo byfor Fanatics) We're finally here, Collectors. Fanatics Fest Week. Heading to NYC for the show? Check out Yahoo Sports' primer on what to expect from Michael Rubin and team this year. And don't forget to stop by Bleecker Trading to hang with the Mantel crew. We'll be there after the show every day, with a packed schedule of events , giveaways, authentic NYC pizza… everything you'll need. We can't talk about Fanatics Fest without talking about the engine driving Fanatics' push to dominate the sports and collectible businesses: Michael Rubin. The Fanatics founder and CEO's rise offers a masterclass in strategic evolution, risk tolerance, and obsessive focus on customer value. As described in Boardroom's cover story article and video, Rubin sees Fanatics not as an empire, but a 22,000-person startup, still just getting started. Regular readers of these pages are probably pretty aware of the love we have for Bleecker Trading, an NYC hobby shop that puts culture and community at the forefront of everything they do. With Mantel hitting the Big Apple, deciding where we wanted to post up was a no-brainer, and for Yahoo Sports, we wanted to take readers behind the scenes at the shop. I also had the pleasure of joining Bleecker honcho Mark Zablow on The Hobby With Cage , so give the article a read, the video a watch , and then come hang with us at the shop this week if you're in town. At this point you've probably heard of Labubu, the cute/creepy dolls that have taken over the world over the last few weeks. (If you are unfamiliar, check out this piece from NPR , which explains the toy's origins). We also enjoyed the video below from the Wall Street Journal, which showcases how the store behind the phenomenon, Pop Mart, has made the dolls go viral, and as a result, is now minting money. Are Labubu dolls here to stay, or just this year's Furby ? In a heart-warming twist of hobby fate, a Caitlin Clark 2024 Panini Prizm WNBA Black Finite 1/1 rookie card, graded PSA 9, sold for $274,500 via Goldin Auctions just months after a collector landed it for $27 in a Whatnot stream. The card is now the most valuable non-autographed Clark card ever sold, and the second-priciest overall behind her $366K Gold Vinyl auto. Kudos to the seller, Valerie Coleman, for turning her windfall into a good cause, with her pledge to match up to $50K in donations collectors make to animal rescues. One of only four known Ceratosaurus skeletons, and the only juvenile, is hitting the auction block at Sotheby's on July 16. Measuring over 10 feet long with a complete skull and razor-sharp teeth, the fossil stands mounted in a dramatic, roaring pose. Originally unearthed in Wyoming and once housed at Utah's Museum of Ancient Life, the specimen is estimated to bring in $4-6M at the sale, a huge number, though still tiny in comparison to the Stegosaurus 'Apex' , which sold for $44.6M back in 2022. Not all are thrilled, by the way, that fossils once destined for museums and scientific research, are ending up in private collections through these auctions. Another week, another Mantel update. Yesterday we launched new features including Streaks, Polls and better image display tools (including zoom). Not on Mantel yet? Grab a (free) account and username today , and join in the excitement as we take in the sights, sounds and conversations from Fanatics Fest in NYC. Your collection deserves a community. Download Mantel today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store