Isle of Man wind farm would boost economy by £2bn, firm claims
Concerns raised included the visual impact, effects on wildlife and implications for shipping and navigation, leading to the firm reducing the number of planned turbines.A public meeting is set to be held later this month as Garff Commissioners gathers more views from residents about the potential visual and environmental impacts to "inform" its discussions with the firm and the government.The Isle of Man Government has declined to comment while the plans remain under consideration.Plans were submitted in March but withdrawn while the government made changes to its Marine Infrastructure Management Act, and resubmitted last month.
The project will now go through a six-month examination period, which will involve an island-wide consultation, followed by a three-month period for a recommendation report to be written. The Council of Ministers would then have three months to consider the proposals, and if approved the firm hopes the project would be operational between 2031 and 2033. Project director Jamie Baldwin said the firm could install a cable to connect the wind farm to the island.The other option being considered was to solely connect the wind farm to the UK grid, which would then be bought by the island.The £4.5bn project, which spans 81 sq miles (211 sq km), would generate "far in exceedance" of what the island would require, he said, so the majority of the energy would go back to the UK. The project would also create 30 jobs, he said.
Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Funding secured for deep water quay at Lerwick
Plans to create what has been described as an ultra deep water quay at Dales Voe in Shetland has secured more than £1.1m from Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE).The funding will support preparatory works, dredging and deepening areas at the site in Lerwick is a part of wider investment by the Scottish government of up to £500m over five years to develop Scotland's ports and offshore wind supply Port Authority's contractor, Boskalis Westminster Ltd, is using a large dredger called Magnor for phases of the work.
The Guardian
14 hours ago
- The Guardian
Which way will the wind blow? Decision day looms for planned windfarm on Tasmania's Robbins Island
More people have heard of Robbins Island than have seen it. Separated from Tasmania's north-western tip by a stretch of water that can be navigated only at low tide, the island is nearly 10,000 hectares of heathland and woodlands, paddocks, unusual geology and wetlands, all ringed by pristine beaches. The island has been owned by the Hammond family, who use it to run Wagyu cattle, since the 1960s. Further back it was home to the Pirilyunya people for tens of thousands of years. Its future is contested. After repeated delays, it is expected to be decided by the federal environment minister, Murray Watt, this month. For eight years, the renewable energy company Acen Australia has been planning to make the island home to what would be one of Australia's largest windfarms. If approved, it says, it would spend more than $3bn as it builds up to 100 turbines (maximum height: 212 metres), a 500-metre wharf and a 1.2km bridge. A 120km transmission line through forest and farms across the state's north-west will require a separate approval. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter Acen says it is one of the best wind energy sites in the country, with the capacity to generate at least a third more electricity than an average windfarm the same size. The turbines would be powered by what the Hammonds have described as the world's cleanest air – the roaring forties, which blow unimpeded across the southern Indian Ocean to the Tasmanian west coast. The proposal is backed by the state's Liberal and Labor parties, and the business community. The head of the Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Wayne Davy, says it is 'absolutely essential' to meet growing power demand, and has urged the federal government to approve it to 'create jobs, investment and huge benefits for the Tasmanian economy'. But it is opposed by environmental organisations and some scientists. They agree that the country needs more renewable energy in a hurry to replace ageing coal plants and cut greenhouse gas emissions, but argue the site is wrong. The intertidal mudflats at Robbins Island and in the surrounding area are considered internationally important feeding habitat for migratory and residential shorebirds, including more than 15 species that travel from the northern hemisphere each year via the east Asian-Australasian flyway. Some of these species, including the curlew sandpiper, far-eastern curlew and red knot, are listed as threatened. Some shorebird populations are estimated to have fallen by more than 70% since late last century. Environmentalists say the 720-megawatt farm could also threaten endangered Tasmanian wedge-tailed eagles, the vulnerable blue-winged parrot and the critically endangered orange-bellied parrot, which flies from the Australian mainland to Melaleuca, in the Tasmanian wilderness world heritage area, each summer to breed. The orange-bellied parrot has been the focus of an intensive government-funded recovery effort. Its wild population remains tiny. It fell to just 17 before increasing to nearly 100 last winter. A flock of red knots, a threatened species The question facing Watt is whether the windfarm can be designed in a way that shields these and other threatened species – notably, a disease-free population of Tasmanian devils – that he is required to protect under national environment law. He will be making the decision before a long-promised overhaul of the law, which has few defenders and is widely agreed to be failing. The timing places Robbins Island at the centre of an argument about how to balance the need to preserve Australia's wild places and wildlife, including a ballooning list of species at risk of extinction, while allowing a rapid rollout of renewable energy. Curlew sandpipers and a hooded plover Conservationists argue there are some places development should just not be allowed, and they include Robbins Island. Sean Dooley, a senior adviser at BirdLife Australia, says: 'To us, it is a no-go site.' 'It is such a vital staging post and feeding site for shorebirds – certainly, the most important site in Tasmania,' Dooley says. 'Birdlife Australia sees climate change as one of the two major things that are going to impact and reduce bird populations, and we need to get on top of it as soon as we can. But it's essential, in trying to deal with that, we don't exacerbate the other major threat, which is destroying habitat.' Eric Woehler, an ecologist and former convener of BirdLife Tasmania, describes the proposed site as 'completely inappropriate'. He says the company's bird surveys have been 'fundamentally inadequate', but that the best available orange-bellied parrot data – from radio-tracking of its 2024 northern migration – suggested half the birds that showed up on monitoring had visited Robbins Island. A white-bellied sea eagle 'If this is approved there is a very real and very frightening prospect of the loss of orange-bellied parrots in the wild from collision risk,' he says. 'There is a very great risk to the wedge-tailed eagle population in the area. There is a very great risk to the migratory shorebirds that fly from Siberia to Tasmania to feed in the Robbins passage area every year for six months.' The windfarm has had a difficult path to final decision stage. It has had to clear local and state hurdles, and a federal decision has been delayed seven times. In 2021 Guardian Australia revealed that federal officials had raised concern about the impact on about 150 devils that have been geographically protected from a contagious facial tumour disease that has devastated other populations, had advised the company the impact on the species could be difficult to offset. In 2022 the Tasmanian Environment Protection Authority notionally approved the development, but said it must shut down for five months each year during orange-bellied parrots' migration season. This was widely seen as a decision that would block the development, given the shutdown would make it financially unviable. But the EPA ruling was overturned on appeal. A counter-appeal against the project by the community group Circular Head Coastal Awareness Network lost in the supreme court. Acen says it is confident the risk to birds and devils can be managed and has changed its plans to address concerns that have been raised, including reducing the number of turbines by 20%, carving out part of the northern end of the island from development and promising a 500-metre buffer around sites that shorebirds gather. It says there is no evidence from surveys that shorebirds fly across the island – a point that is strongly disputed by campaigners – and, despite radio-tracking surveys last and this year, that little is known about orange-bellied parrots' flight path or the height at which they travel. Michael Connarty, Acen's head of operations and trading, acknowledges that the length of the development process has been frustrating and says the project has probably been scrutinised as much as any in Tasmania's history. He argues that the development will benefit the local community, including creating up to to 400 jobs in construction and 60 during operation, help power clean industry in the state and send any excess electricity across Bass Strait. Acen hopes Watt approves it with conditions that outline the risks it needs to navigate. 'We believe the risks can be mitigated,' Connarty says. 'It's not like this is like a rubber stamp process over eight years. There has been high-level scrutiny of the project in terms of the risk and mitigations and we're hopeful that it'll be a positive outcome with conditions, and we'll work through whatever those conditions look like.' Dooley says he has some sympathy for Acen's position as it was trying to develop the windfarm 'within the rulebook they have been given'. Birdlife Australia believes the primary issue is nature laws that 'don't give a clear vision of how the renewables rollout should go'. Another environment group, the Bob Brown Foundation, says it is preparing for action. Its founder, the former Greens leader Bob Brown, this week predicted Watt would approve the development, and vowed it would help 'bring on the biggest public confrontation with environmental defenders here since the Franklin dam'. A spokesperson for Watt declined to comment on the project while a decision was being made. They said the government had made clear it intended to reform environmental laws to 'better protect our environment, while delivering more efficient approvals'. A decision is due by 29 August.
The Independent
16 hours ago
- The Independent
Solar panels that fit on your balcony or deck are gaining traction in the US
When Terrence Dwyer received a knock on his door and a flyer for a solar panel system small enough to fit on his deck, he was quickly sold. Solar systems that plug into regular wall outlets have been popular in Europe for years and are gaining traction in the U.S. for their affordability and simple installation. 'We thought absolutely, let's do this right away,' said Dwyer, who lives in Oakland, California. These small-scale solar systems could become attractive to more homeowners now that President Donald Trump's sweeping budget-and-policy package will scrap residential rooftop solar tax credits and may shift interest to cheaper alternatives. Even before the GOP bill passed, manufacturers of the smaller systems known as plug-in or balcony solar were seeing increased demand and other positive signs such as a new Utah law streamlining regulations for homeowners to buy and install them. The systems about the size of a door haven't been as widely adopted in the U.S. as in Europe because of lack of awareness, patchwork utility rules and limited availability. The $2,000 plug-in solar system installed on Dwyer's backyard deck in March consists of two 400 watt panels, an inverter, a smart meter and a circuit breaker. It saves him around $35 per month on his power bill because he is consuming less energy from the grid, but he said reducing his carbon footprint was his primary motivation. 'We like the environmental benefits of solar and wanted to engage with solar in some fashion,' Dwyer said. Had Dwyer opted for rooftop solar, he would have paid $20,000 for the system and $30,000 to upgrade his roof to support the panels. Installing a plug-in solar system requires some homework. What power companies let customers do with energy-generating equipment varies, which is why prospective purchasers should check their utility's policies first. Building permits might be required depending on the municipality. Some systems can be self-installed, while others may require an electrician. For example, some kits have meters that must be wired into a home's circuit breaker. Removing hurdles for plug-in solar Dwyer bought his system from Bright Saver, a nonprofit company in California that advocates for plug-in solar. In addition to the type Dwyer bought, the company also offers a smaller model costing $399 that recently sold out in six days. 'The interest and demand have been overwhelming,' said Cora Stryker, a founder of Bright Saver. 'It is clear that we are hitting a nerve — many Americans have wanted solar for a long time but have not had an option that is feasible and affordable for them until now.' Kevin Chou, another founder of Bright Saver, said wider adoption of the systems in the U.S. has been hindered by utility policies that create uncertainty about whether they're allowed and a lack of state and local policies to make clear what rules apply. Some utilities contacted by The Associated Press say plug-in solar systems require the same interconnection applications as rooftop panels that send electricity back to the wider network. But Steven Hegedus, an electrical engineering professor at University of Delaware, said he doesn't understand why a utility would need to require an interconnection agreement for plug-in solar because, unlike rooftop systems, they are designed to prevent energy from flowing to the grid. Still, if in doubt, a customer should follow their utility's policy. During the early days of plug-in solar's growth, some opposition from utilities is likely since customers are buying less energy, said Robert Cudd, a research analyst at the California Center for Sustainable Communities at the University of California, Los Angeles. 'Utilities really prefer everyone being a predictable and generous consumer of the electricity they sell,' Cudd said. This year, Utah enacted a novel law supporting plug-in solar by exempting certain small-scale systems from interconnection agreements and establishing safety requirements such as being certified by a nationally recognized testing organization such as Underwriters Laboratories. It appears to be the only state that's passed legislation supporting plug-in solar, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Republican state Rep. Raymond Ward, who sponsored the legislation, said the smaller systems allow people to better manage where their energy comes from and what they pay. 'Europe has these things. You can go buy them and they work and people want them. There is no reason why we shouldn't have them here in the United States,' Ward said. Bright Saver says they are lobbying other states for similar legislation. Alexis Abramson, dean of the University of Columbia Climate School, also applauded Utah's move. 'We actually need more localities, more states putting in allowances for this type of equipment,' she said. Plug-in solar availability and savings potential Some questions remain about how much customers could save. Severin Borenstein, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley's Haas School of Business, said the cost of some portable solar systems in the U.S. would make it hard for customers to come out ahead on their utility bills over the time they own them. He estimates the price of a $2,000 system in the U.S. works out to paying about $0.20 a kilowatt-hour over a 25-year period, which only saves people money if they have high utility costs. By comparison, Borenstein said the cost of systems sold in Europe, typically around $600, is equivalent to paying about $0.05 or $0.06 per kilowatt-hour over 25 years. Baltimore resident Craig Keenan said saving money was only part of why he installed one of the smaller Bright Saver models on his balcony in July. 'I'm interested in renewable energy because the amount of carbon emissions that we produce as a species is very, very unsustainable for our world,' he said. He said he expects the system will save him about $40 per year on utility bills, so it would take him about 10 years to recoup the cost of the kit. Keenan, a mechanical engineer, said installation took him 10 to 15 minutes. 'I think anyone can install this,' he said. 'It's not complicated. It doesn't require a technical degree.' Other companies selling plug-in solar kits include Texas-based Craftstrom. It has sold about 2,000 systems in the U.S. since 2021, mostly in California, Texas and Florida. The company's basic kits contain a solar panel that can fit in a backyard or other sunny space, along with equipment to maintain and regulate the flow of energy including an inverter and smart meter. Kenneth Hutchings, Craftstrom's chief revenue officer, said their U.S. sales rose this year even before the passage of the GOP tax bill, and he expects demand for plug-in solar to increase further as federal rooftop solar credits expire. The company advises customers to notify their power company before installation, but it has "never had any pushback from any utility,' said Michael Scherer, one of the founders of Craftstrom. China-based EcoFlow plans to begin selling plug-in solar systems in Utah and expand to other states if supportive legislation is passed, said Ryan Oliver, a company spokesperson. 'This is an example of where technology is sort of ahead of the regulators,' Oliver said, adding: 'As this rolls out to more of a nationwide product, we expect it will become more mainstream as people understand it better." ___ Associated Press video journalist Mingson Lau in Baltimore contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
