logo
The man behind Javier Milei's chainsaw

The man behind Javier Milei's chainsaw

Yahoo06-04-2025

Penetrating the bureaucracy of one of the world's most bloated states is like finding a way inside the fortress city of Minas Tirith, as imagined in The Lord of the Rings.
So spare a thought for the man whose job it is to slash and burn such a sclerotic civil service from the inside: Argentina's deregulation minister.
'It's insanity, it's like Lord of the Rings,' Federico Sturzenegger said, in reference to JRR Tolkien's capital city of Gondor, adding: 'It's like seven walls, you deregulate one and you find another.'
Mr Sturzenegger is in charge of carrying out the wishes of Javier Milei, Argentina's eccentric president, who has promised to shock the country back to life by shutting entire government departments and dragging the country out of years of Left-wing misrule.
Such is Mr Sturzenegger's eagerness he is said to have become an inspiration to Elon Musk, who has been tasked by Donald Trump to cut trillions of dollars in government waste under the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). Other leaders are also starting to pay attention.
Argentina's oversized state has over the years become a regulatory labyrinth: supermarkets were told what to stock and at what prices, while radical rent controls caused prices to surge and demand to fall off a cliff.
To tackle these laws, Mr Sturzenegger, who calls Margaret Thatcher his 'inspiration', was brought into the government in July 2024 to head up the new ministry of deregulation and state transformation, which has been moving at a phenomenal pace.
Some 672 regulatory reforms took place in the first year of Mr Milei's presidency, amounting to 1.84 deregulations per day, including weekends, according to analysis by the Cato Institute.
Mr Sturzenegger's fundamental argument for such a level of state transformation lies in the economy: inflation had soared to a staggering 300 per cent annually, while government spending and debt spiralled out of control.
The results of Mr Milei's and Mr Sturzenegger's 'shock therapy' – dubbed 'Chainsaw 1.0' – speak for themselves. Inflation and public spending are down, as is Argentina's debt burden, while confidence in the peso is rising. The country also exited recession towards the end of 2024 – a major milestone for Mr Milei's government.
Such is the perceived success of Argentina's deregulatory mission that it is being credited with inspiring Mr Musk's bureaucracy-slashing drive in the much-hyped Doge.
In fact, Mr Musk was acting directly on Mr Milei's advice, a diplomatic source told The Telegraph.
Asked whether Mr Milei and Mr Musk spoke frequently, Mr Sturzenegger, one of the president's most trusted lieutenants, was coy.
'Milei had several conversations with Musk and he told him what we were doing and how we were approaching this job. I speculate – just my speculation – those conversations made Musk understand how to use the state to reduce the state.'
Yet the relationship between the two bureaucracy slashers is hardly a secret: Mr Milei gifted Mr Musk a chainsaw on stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington in March.
'This is the chainsaw for bureaucracy,' Mr Musk declared.
As the former president of Argentina's Central Bank and a Harvard professor, Mr Sturzenegger, seems on the surface to be an establishment figure, the kind Mr Milei and Mr Musk are accustomed to rail against.
But he speaks about cutting the size of the state and deregulating Argentina's bureaucracy as a moral mission, claiming, much like Mr Musk, that government intervention makes people's lives worse, not better.
Even beyond their cost-cutting drive, the similarities are uncanny: both share a love of fantasy, with Mr Sturzenegger frequently comparing his mission to Lord of the Rings, while Mr Musk speaks about how The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy informs his world-view.
On a technical level, Mr Sturzenegger's ministry and Mr Musk's Doge also share similarities. The Argentine frequently refers to his 'chainsaw guys', who operate almost like a government black ops unit, identifying targets and slashing through decades of red tape.
Mr Musk, on the other hand, gave a band of tech protégés an extraordinary level of access to the government, including A-suite clearance to the General Services Administration, to slash spending.
Mr Sturzenegger and Mr Milei's project may even have wider global ramifications beyond just influencing the Trump administration.
Even Sir Keir Starmer has had a crack at tackling Britain's bloated state, abolishing NHS England, slashing foreign aid spending and planning 15 per cent cuts to the Civil Service.
But it is perhaps in Britain where Mr Musk and Mr Sturzenegger diverge: while the Tesla billionaire spent the summer attacking the UK's handling of the grooming gangs scandal and supposed lack of free speech, Mr Sturzenegger speaks of Thatcher as an 'inspiration'.
The former British prime minister is, to say the least, a contentious figure for Argentine politicians, given her role in the Falklands War. Mr Sturzenegger dismisses that, instead revering her economic reforms and referring to her biography as if it were the Bible.
He even compares his mission to Thatcher's: slashing regulation, promoting entrepreneurship and reshaping society in the name of freedom.
'She was an inspiration... in her quest for the free man and woman, in making society freer, but also in her style of government,' he said.
'You have leaders like Nelson Mandela, they're soft-spoken, they rally the masses on peace, then you have the joking guys, like Ronald Reagan, and the fighters, who are responsible for implementing a cultural change.
'I would put Lenin, Roosevelt, Thatcher in that category – and Milei.'
And unlike Mr Musk, who is reported to be on his way out of the Trump administration, Mr Sturzenegger is here to stay, explaining that drastic cuts were just part of phase one and that 'Chainsaw 2.0' was now under way.
'We used one cabinet meeting to decide what a libertarian should do and should not do, and what I have is my chainsaw guys go around the government and they say, 'Are you in the yes or the nos?' If you're in the nos, it goes,' he explained.
Around 20 per cent of Argentina's laws have been scrapped or changed, far below Mr Sturzenegger's target of 70 per cent, while 42,000 civil servants have been sacked.
'It's like air in a balloon that you're releasing. We're cleaning up on the basis of a framework that we've decided,' he said.
While the first phase undoubtedly brought some economic stability back to Argentina, it did not come without its challenges.
Tens of thousands of Argentine citizens have taken to the streets in recent weeks to protest against cuts to pensions. In March, pensioners were joined by football diehards to decry the changes, with police using water cannons and rubber bullets to disperse the protesters.
Critics argue the poor have paid the price for Mr Milei's policies as subsidies, benefits, pensions and social programmes have been cut.
The poverty rate remains high, although it fell from 53 to 38 per cent in the second half of 2024 – an enormous drop. Still, 11.3 million Argentinians live in poverty, including millions of children.
Mr Sturzenegger acknowledges that some cuts require state intervention to compensate those affected. But, he argues, most people don't need such protection and deregulation will ultimately lead to a stronger economy.
Yet, as the government embarks on its second wave of chainsaw-wielding reforms, the risk of deepening economic hardship remains.
The administration may have stabilised inflation and strengthened the peso, but it still faces pressing challenges, including securing an IMF loan to replenish foreign exchange reserves, needed to keep the peso stable and pay off debt.
Uncertainty around the IMF deal has weakened the peso by around 8 per cent in recent weeks.
The administration is in a race against time.
In 2024, Argentina's congress approved the sweeping ley bases bill, giving the government power to issue further deregulatory decrees for at least another year.
To accelerate the process, Mr Sturzenegger launched Report the Bureaucracy, a platform where citizens can highlight restrictive regulations, showing he remains resolute despite a public backlash.
'Argentina was a failed state being led by a dark administration,' he said.
'The people are the victims of this. The quest of the free man or woman is to get over the obstacles of the state. The state imposes more obstacles than the free world.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Uncle Elon's final report card
Uncle Elon's final report card

Business Insider

time28 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

Uncle Elon's final report card

All good buddy comedies come to an end. For President Donald Trump and first friend "Uncle Elon" Musk, theirs wrapped up with the same explosive fanfare upon which it started. But now their shared enthusiasm for cutting government waste has morphed into animosity for each other so deep and personal that it's become a textbook case study in management gone wrong. In November, just after Trump's reelection, I asked management experts if Musk could mimic his track record of juicing everything he could out of his lean companies to make the government run more efficiently. They were reluctant to doubt Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency, but just as reluctant to think his efficiency tactics at Tesla and X meant he could single-handedly transform the government. I checked back in with some of them in March, six weeks into DOGE's chaotic tenure, after it dismantled USAID and axed tens of thousands of federal workers. They described his management as "clumsy," "wrongheaded," and full of "political recklessness." Now, the breakup of the bromance between two of the world's biggest, boldest personalities is surprising only in that it took so long to unfold and, once it did, moved with the speed that only two social media savvy, chronically online posters could propel. (Musk posted on X more than a dozen times lambasting Trump and his " Big Beautiful Bill" late last week, since deleting some of the most disparaging claims, and Trump suggested Musk might be suffering from "Trump derangement syndrome.") If DOGE is a cautionary tale in how not to manage, it's one from the furthest extreme, marked by a clash between the egos of two of the world's most powerful men that made politics extremely personal. Still there are business lessons to be gleaned even for those of us who run fewer than six companies and have fewer than 220 million social media followers. DOGE has proved "unsuccessful" up to this point, and is so far a "failed venture" for Musk and for the government, says Subodha Kumar, a professor at Temple University's Fox School of Business. It brought "disruption, a lot of delays, a lot of mistrust, and a lot of good people have left the organization," he says. "This kind of damage takes a long time to repair." To date, DOGE has claimed it found $180 billion in savings (Musk in May called DOGE "effective," but "not as effective as I'd like," as the original goal was to save $2 trillion). An analysis in April from nonpartisan research group Partnership for Public Service found that the department's actions could cost as much as $135 billion, an estimate of the costs of the firings, re-hirings, and lost productivity. Meanwhile, the four months Musk spent working taking a chainsaw to the federal government are wrapping up doused in drama that has spilled over to his other companies. After his 130-day post as a special government employee ends, Musk is pointing the blame for government waste back on Trump, skewering the spending bill for being too big and ugly, and endorsing a call to impeach Trump and replace him with Vice President JD Vance (that post has since been deleted). The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss. Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor The escalating tension is just the beginning of a fight that could get worse for Musk, and likely has little benefit for Trump, Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, a Yale School of Management leadership professor who has studied Trump for decades and advised presidents, tells me in an email. DOGE, he notes, overpromised savings and may actually cost US taxpayers more when it comes to rehiring costs, repairing systems, and weakened cybersecurity. As WIRED reported last week, DOGE is hiring, and even has reached out to technologists who formerly worked for the government. Musk's involvement with the DOGE proved tumultuous for his businesses from the start. His personal wealth ballooned by some $200 billion in 2024, surpassing $400 billion after Election Day. Once he got to work in the White House, his absenteeism from his companies — paired with a growing distaste for DOGE's actions among the electorate and protests targeting Tesla — led his net worth to drop alongside Tesla's market cap. Last Thursday, Musk's open beef with Trump further hampered his wealth, leading the Tesla CEO to lose $34 billion personally in a single day. Tesla stock, which has taken a beating as people turn on the company to protest Musk's government work, took its biggest tumble since March, closing 14% lower and wiping out $152 billion from the company's market cap. Musk is still the richest person in the world. For Musk, there's damage to the Tesla brand in need of repair. His next step could be "to portray himself as a purist who came in to offer his technical help and didn't realize how deep the corruption runs," says Michael Morris, a professor at Columbia Business School. "Musk could potentially portray himself as a wayward son of the tech industry." This might only work if the Trump administration continues to stumble, and if Musk also sees more success, like winning big with his robotaxi push. As Taylor Lorenz reported in User Mag Friday, some high-profile Democrats are already signaling that they would welcome Musk back into the fold. Trump over the weekend told NBC News Musk would face "serious consequences" if he donated to Democratic candidates (he did not specify what they would be). It's yet to be seen where Musk will find his next political alliances: On Friday, he ran a poll on X asking if a third political party should emerge to include the 80% of Americans in the middle of Republicans and Democrats, as he sees it. The president has threatened to go after Musk's government contracts — which total in tens of billions of dollars for SpaceX and Tesla. "The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!" Trump himself bought a Tesla just three months ago, and is now considering selling it. (Best of luck to him, the cars' resale values have tanked). As Trump and Musk part ways, it's clear that Musk's brazen, fully autonomous leadership style didn't work in the government world, as it eschewed transparency and collaboration in favor of a top-down approach. "The one-size-fits-all policy does not work everywhere," says Kumar. "You have to understand the culture of the organization and you have to work from inside rather than from outside." Back in November, experts told me it wasn't clear what authority Musk would actually wield in the newly-created position to implement massive spending cuts. Trying to employ tech-world leadership tactics from the White House created a rivalry between Musk and Trump for power and control, undercutting the alliance between the two and leaving DOGE far short of its savings goals. "The lesson here is akin to that of two mob bosses of the gangster world who both crave the superior distinction of being the number one boss — with surging parallel drives for grandiosity," Sonnenfeld says. "Musk's tragic mistake was that he forgot his role — as a staffer and advisor to Trump, not the primary character he foolishly believed himself to be, and even now, continues to overestimate his own importance and indispensability."

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse
Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Readers sound off on the Trump/Musk rift, anti-ICE protests and Diddy's abuse

Dartmouth, Mass.: Being the richest man in the world does not appear sufficiently ego-gratifying for Elon Musk. Observing his recent involvement with the Trump administration, with his destructive actions leading the DOGE crusade to disrupt or destroy American governance, one wonders what his motivation is. Is it financial gain, media attention or a quest for power? Or is it a grand plan conceived by a man with a deep psychological disorder? Musk's recent severe criticism of President Trump's legislative agenda is perhaps the first salvo in his plan to save America from the conflagration he ignited and helped enlarge. Is the grand scheme to now be the white knight who comes to the rescue and douses the flames, thereby becoming the hero who saved America? The legislative and judicial branches of government have either enabled, been enriched by or ignored the destruction occurring to American democracy. Musk can now assume the role of hero by utilizing his enormous resources to defeat Trump's agenda by threatening to 'out-primary' any Republican legislators who continue to support the president. Trump has certainly provided a roadmap by imposing or threatening tariffs, or defunding and then dowsing the flames with a change of course, thus appearing as though he's coming to the rescue of America. Musk has far more personal resources and grasp of political strategy than Trump, and may have greater aspirations as he interjects himself into the politics of Brazil, Germany and the United States. Betty Ussach Glendale: From the ancient text 'The Art of War' by Sun Tzu, it is said, 'All war is based on deception.' The same applies to the accusations of division now viewed as front-page news regarding Trump versus Musk. Such antics create a storyline that hurts people. Also stated in the book: 'There's no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare.' Our country is experiencing a period of adjustment whereby deception has been made to separate us. The lesson from the book stipulates, 'There are times when you have to forgive your enemies and love them as your own.' Hatred never ends if people embrace only what makes them comfortable. Jonathan Kiddrane Brooklyn: Let me get this straight. TACO man sits on his hands when his criminal cultists storm the Capitol, but he unleashes the National Guard on peaceful protesters? When is this madness going to end? Don't tell me America is not in the midst of a constitutional crisis. June Lowe Staatsburg, N.Y.: Trump deploys the National Guard for individuals who are protesting in Los Angeles. Rioters attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6 and the National Guard was not deployed, then the rioters were pardoned. What's wrong with this picture? I really hope no one tries to explain this to me, because it's obvious that this so-called president has no idea how to run this joke of a country that the United States has become. Glenn Marowitz Manhattan: Joe Biden thought he needed woke approval to be reelected. Woke devotees created sanctuary cities and no immigrants could be deported. That and no bail for repeat criminals was the end for Biden and the Dems. They would not allow the bad apples to be vetted and deported. Trump had a royal straight flush in this game of hold 'em. An inexperienced Vice President Kamala Harris only added to the pot. Trump got elected and decided to deport everyone. All those righteous people are now thrown in with the criminals. These uprisings in California are just the beginning. We will soon see violent terrorist operations carried out secretly. People like AOC and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams are responsible. Fascist Trump is smiling and licking his lips as if he just had a jelly donut. There are no strong Dems to counteract him. We are in big trouble. Michael Malewich Avon-by-the-Sea, N.J.: There were a few letters in yesterday's edition questioning why ICE agents cover their faces. Simple answer: Same reason the protesters do — to avoid discovery. Protesters want to evade arrest and prosecution. ICE agents want to protect their families and selves from retaliation. The liberal justice system would most likely free the criminals while ICE agents face physical retaliation. Robert Stiloski Bronx: Where is the outcry from the left demanding that protesters remove their masks? More importantly, where is their condemnation of the violence and destruction taking place? Those who take part in destructive mobs should be held accountable and required to pay for any damages caused. Even a simple act of assault or resistance against a federal officer can carry up to a year in jail. Enforcing the law consistently is essential to stopping this wave of violence. Al D'Angelo Smithtown, L.I.: Voicer Katherine Raymond agrees with democratic-socialist ideas such as taxing the rich but, like almost all liberals, 'the rich' are anyone making more than her. She shows her hand by questioning how anyone can think a household income of $1 million qualifies as rich. Is she kidding or is this a misprint? Andrew Ross Bronx: As a 48-year Belmont/Little Italy resident, community advocate and 37-year NYC Board of Education/Department of Education educator and parent, it has become abundantly clear that neither Rafael Moure-Punnett, the rest of Bronx Community Board 6, The Belmont BID or, as of yet, any of our local politicians have shown a genuine or active interest in the safety and wellbeing of the children, teenagers or families in our neighborhood in regard to the completely unchecked speeding that has been going on for more than a decade one block from our local elementary, middle and high schools. Despite the Department of Transportation claiming to have done a study in this area, one of their representatives would not provide the time or date they did so, yet insisted that their conclusion had been there was no need for a traffic light on the corner of this highly dangerous intersection. Jeff Vargon Peekskill, N.Y.: To Voicer John Weiss: Wrong you are! On page 24 in Friday's Daily News, there was an article on the 81st anniversary of that momentous day ('WWII vets are still toast of Normandy even 81 years later,' June 6)! I guess it appeared in my paper and no one else's. Steven Bevacqua Pleasantville, N.Y.: To Voicer Nick Smith: My letter wasn't saying that criticism of Israel is always antisemitic, it was more about why Israel is the only country heavily criticized for fighting terrorism. Every year, when Yom Haatzmaut, which is known as Israeli Independence Day, and the Salute to Israel Parade come up, I always hear a bunch of anti-Israel fanatics calling it Nakba Day as an insult. Had the Arabs just accepted the UN Partition Plan back in 1947 rather than attack the Jews that day, there wouldn't be such issues now. As for me living where I do, it was because my father had a major job transfer when I was an infant that brought my family here. If you really believe in giving land back to indigenous groups, then give your property to the Native American tribe that originally lived there. Tal Barzilai Staten Island: So far, everything I have read or seen about Sean 'Diddy' Combs shows that he is rich, controlling and a bully. No matter what, people's lives have been ruined. I hope he can't buy his way out of this. Thomas Bell Bronx: To Voicer Stephanie Revander: You do not disagree with what I said, but how I said it. I could have made my point and saved four words by leaving out 'run-of-the-mill.' In retrospect, I should have stated that while some rapists can be reformed, that does not include those who brutally beat and/or choke their victims unconscious. They should serve life. Richard Warren

Primary day in New Jersey governor's race could offer hints on how voters feel about Trump

time3 hours ago

Primary day in New Jersey governor's race could offer hints on how voters feel about Trump

TRENTON, N..J. -- New Jersey voters on Tuesday will settle the Democratic and Republican primaries for governor in a contest that could send signals about how the public is responding to President Donald Trump's agenda and how Democratic voters think their leaders should push back. New Jersey is one of just two states with a race for governor this year — the other is Virginia — and the fact two-term Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is term-limited has created fresh drama for the open seat. There's a six-way race on the Democratic side that features several seasoned political figures. Trump's endorsement of former state lawmaker Jack Ciattarelli may have given him a boost on the Republican side, where he faces four primary challengers. Polls are open from 6 a.m. until 8 p.m. Tuesday, but it's not the only day of voting. Early in-person voting was held from June 3-8. Mail-in ballots were sent to voters beginning in April. The contest hinges in part on New Jersey issues, including high property taxes and the soaring cost of living, but national politics are sure to figure in. Trump, who has long had a strong presence in New Jersey, waded into the race with his endorsement, attacking Democratic control of state government. Democrats are looking for a winning message and leadership after the sting of bitter losses in 2024. "Because these are the first major elections since Donald Trump's return to the White House, there's a tremendous amount at stake simply through public perception," said Ben Dworkin, director of the Rowan Institute for Public Policy & Citizenship. For Democrats? 'They'll just get further in a hole if they don't hold this seat,' he said. For Republicans? They could win because New Jersey tends to be purple during gubernatorial years, Dworkin said, but that would be viewed as a tremendous victory for Trump. The Democrats running are Mayors Ras Baraka of Newark and Steven Fulop of Jersey City; U.S. Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mikie Sherrill; teachers union President Sean Spiller and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney. The Democratic campaign has been hard fought and pricey, with tens of millions spent in one of the country's most expensive media markets. On the Republican side, most of the candidates declared their support for the president's agenda, pressing for a state-level version of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. They've also said they would end so-called sanctuary policies and, in a New Jersey-specific pitch, called for the end of the state's 2020 law banning single-use plastic bags. Ciattarelli has said he would sign an order on his first day in office ending New Jersey's Immigrant Trust Directive, which bars local police from cooperating with federal officials on civil immigration matters. He has also said he would direct whomever he names attorney general to end lawsuits against the Trump administration, including a case aimed at stopping the president's order ending birthright citizenship for people whose parents were in the country illegally. Murphy, who became the first Democrat to be reelected in more than four decades in 2021, is barred from running again by term limits and hasn't endorsed a successor in the primary. Both parties will look to build their general election campaigns on widespread voter frustration. For Democrats, that means focusing on the parts of Trump's aggressive second-term agenda that are unpopular. Republicans, meanwhile, are casting blame for economic hardships on Democrats who've run state government for the last eight years. New Jersey has been reliably Democratic in Senate and presidential contests for decades. But the odd-year races for governor have tended to swing back and forth, and each of the last three GOP governors has won a second term. Democrats have the largest share of registered voters in the state, followed closely by independent voters and then Republicans, who have roughly 800,000 fewer registrations than the Democratic Party. But the GOP has made gains in recent years, shaving the Democrats' lead of more than 1 million more registrations to the current level.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store