Trump pushes through another name change as Fort Moore becomes Fort Benning again
This marks the second such reversal, reflecting the Pentagon's ongoing effort to overturn the Biden administration's 2023 decision to remove Confederate leaders' names from nine Army bases. The move necessitates finding alternative namesakes, often with shared surnames.
Fort Benning was originally named for Brig. Gen. Henry L. Benning, a Confederate officer and staunch opponent of abolition. Now, it will honour Cpl. Fred G. Benning, a World War I Distinguished Service Cross recipient. The Pentagon cites Benning's heroism in October 1918, leading troops through intense enemy fire after his platoon leader was killed.
These reversals are sparking controversy, effectively undermining the 2023 renaming process that sought to honour figures like Lt. Gen. Harold Gregory Moore Jr. and his wife, Julia. The decision to replace their names with those of individuals sharing surnames with Confederate figures adds another layer of complexity to the debate..
Moore is a revered military leader who earned the Distinguished Service Cross for valor and fought in the Battle of Ia Drang in the Vietnam War. And Julia Moore was key to the creation of teams that do in-person notifications of military casualties.
Hegseth last month signed an order restoring the name of a North Carolina base back to Fort Bragg, and warned that more changes were coming.
The North Carolina base had been renamed Fort Liberty in 2023. Its original namesake, Gen. Braxton Bragg, was a Confederate general from Warrenton, North Carolina, who was known for owning slaves and losing key Civil War battles, contributing to the Confederacy's downfall.
Now, Bragg is named to honor Pfc. Roland L. Bragg, who the Army said was a World War II hero who earned a Silver Star and Purple Heart for exceptional courage during the Battle of the Bulge.
It's not clear how much the renaming will cost, but the expense comes as the Trump administration is trying to find savings through Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency.
The Naming Commission in its August 2022 report estimated it would cost $4.9 million to rename Fort Benning as Fort Moore, but said there could be additional costs. It put the cost to rename Bragg at around $8 million. Updated costs were not available.
Hegseth said the original Bragg name is a legacy for troops who lived and served there and that it was a shame to change it. And he said he deliberately referred to Bragg and Fort Benning by those names as he entered the Pentagon on his first day in office.
'There's a reason I said Bragg and Benning when I walked into the Pentagon on day one. But it's not just Bragg and Benning," he said. "There are a lot of other service members that have connections. And we're going to do our best to restore it.'
The lower ranks of the new namesakes indicate the exhaustive research being done by Army and defense leaders to find service members with the same names who have also earned some type of award for their military action and bravery.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
National Guard from GOP states heading to DC: What you need to know
Republican governors have opted to bolster Trump's forces by sending their own guardsmen to Washington beginning with Ohio, South Carolina and West Virginia. "South Carolina is proud to stand with President Trump as he works to restore law and order to our nation's capital and ensure safety for all who live, work, and visit there," said South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster on Aug. 16 in a statement about sending 200 guardsmen to D.C. The mobilization of troops from Republican-led states will bring the total number of guardsmen in the capital to over 1,000. Here's what else to know about the growing force on the ground in Washington. How many soldiers are Republican governors sending? The three Republican states sending members of the National Guard to Washington, D.C. have mobilized around 750 troops: 150 from Ohio, 200 from South Carolina and between 300 and 400 from West Virginia. Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio called sending troops from the Buckeye State the "right thing to do." He said the deployment comes in response to an Aug. 15 request from Secretary of the Army Daniel P. Driscoll. "The initial decision to deploy D.C. National Guard was not my decision. That was the president of the United States' decision," DeWine told the statehouse bureau. "But when the secretary of the Army asks for backup support to our troops that are already deployed, yes, we will back up our troops." West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrissey said on Aug. 16 the state's deployment of troops also came at Trump's request. Morrissey said their deployment reflects our "commitment to a strong and secure America." Troops are expected to arrive on 30-day deployments that the secretary of the Army could ask to extend. South Carolina Gov. McMaster said he would recall guardsmen in the event of a hurricane or other natural disaster. How big of a force will be in D.C.? The troops from Republican-led states deploying to the District will nearly double the size of the force Trump has already deployed, from 800 to 1,550 in total. Federal troops will work alongside the city's already 3,100-officer-strong police force. Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said last week that the city's police department was understaffed and was supposed to have 3,800 officers. But she says understaffing hasn't stopped the city from achieving its lowest levels of violent crime in 30 years. "Crime levels are not only down from 2023, but from before the pandemic," Bowser said at a televised community meeting on August 12. "Our tactics are working, and we aren't taking our foot off the gas." Trump 'has the authority to do what he did,' Ohio gov says DeWine shot back at Bowser and others questioning Trump's deployment of the guardsmen. "The people who don't like it in D.C. don't have the authority. The president of the United States has that authority," DeWine said. "Anybody can argue whether or not he should or shouldn't have the authority, but it's very clear. There is no debate he has the authority to do what he did." Trump was able to deploy about a third of the 2,400 National Guard troops in Washington, D.C. because of the city's unique status as a federal district. In the rest of the country, the president cannot deploy troops in a policing capacity without the consent of the state's governor though he deployed thousands of troops to Los Angeles over objections from California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Vermont 'politely' declines Trump request: Reports Not all who have heard the call have responded by sending in troops. Gov. Phil Scott, the Republican leader of Vermont, "politely declined" to send a request to send guardsmen to Washington, D.C., according to reporting by Vermont Public, a National Public Radio affiliate. Jason Gibbs, the governor's chief of staff, told Vermont Public on Aug. 15 that sending Green Mountain State troops to Washington was too far outside the scope of what the soldiers typically do. "In the absence of an immediate emergency or disaster that local and regional first responders are unable to handle, the governor just does not support utilizing the guard for this purpose, and does not view the enforcement of domestic law as a proper use of the National Guard," Gibbs said, according to Vermont Public. Scott's office did not immediately respond to USA TODAY requests for comment. Contributing by Cybele Mayes-Osterman, a National Security & World Affairs Reporter with USA TODAY; and USA TODAY Network reporters Jessie Balmert of The Columbus Dispatch and Bella Carpentier of The Greenville News.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Deal to save jobs at Stanhope tank parts factory announced
A new contract will lead to £5m investment in an Army parts factory helping to secure 125 jobs, bosses have for the Armed Forces, Luke Pollard MP, announced the three-year contract for Cook Defence Systems in Stanhope, County Durham, to make parts for the British Army's new Challenger 3 of the William Cook Group, the factory has been manufacturing tracks and armour for tanks since World War said the contract with the Ministry of Defence (MoD) would not only strengthen the Army's "warfighting capability" but also "sustain hundreds of skilled jobs in the North East". The Ministry of Defence (MoD) said the factory was already playing a "vital role" in the UK's commitment to Ukraine by supplying spare tracks for the Soviet-era vehicles used by the Ukrainian Army. It also said the new deal was part of a wider defence investment, with the UK ramping up procurement of artillery ammunition, drones and combat spares "in response to lessons learned from Ukraine". William Cook, Director of Cook Defence Systems, said the firm was "critical to the operational independence of the British Army and allied forces"."This latest contract directly supports 125 jobs and underpins £5m of investment in new plant and machinery over the next 12 months," he added. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
South Sudanese exiles face uncertain future after release from prison in neighboring Sudan
As a young man in the mid-1980s, Daud Mahmoud Abdullah left his home in Aweil in South Sudan and headed north. It was a time of war. South Sudan was still part of Sudan and was fighting for independence, in a conflict that would claim about 2 million lives. He never went back. But now, aged 60 and after 6 months in a Sudanese prison, he is closer to home than he's been in 40 years. This July, he finally crossed the border back into his native South Sudan, taking a deep breath and reminding himself, 'I am alive.' After everything that has happened to him, it feels like a miracle. Sudan — once his place of refuge — has been embroiled in a brutal civil war since April 2023 that has killed 40,000 people and displaced nearly 13 million more, according to UN agencies. Abdullah lived in the town of Wad Madani, capital of Al Jazirah State, about 135km (85 miles) south of Khartoum. There had been incursions into the area by the Rapid Support Forces, a paramilitary force once known as the Janjaweed who were notorious for mass killings, rapes and other atrocities in Darfur two decades ago. More recently, the RSF have again been accused of by the International Criminal Court of committing war crimes, including the attacks on famine-hit Zamzam and other camps in North Darfur. In January, the Sudanese Armed Forces began recapturing parts of Al Jazirah state from the RSF — and making sweeping arrests. Abdullah got caught up in the incursions on his way home from the market: he was picked up by SAF soldiers and accused of cooperating with the RSF. Abdullah says that he was 'beaten, tortured and burned with cigarettes' to make him confess. Although he never made a confession, he was thrown in prison. Held without charge and tortured in prison In a report released in March, the top U.N. human rights body detailed how both the SAF and the RSF have detained tens of thousands of people 'without charge, with limited or no contact with their families, in squalid and overcrowded facilities' in 'a widespread pattern of arbitrary detention, torture, and ill-treatment.' Abdullah can attest to this. He remembers inmates dying from starvation, beatings or illnesses like cholera on a daily basis. One morning, he discovered that 28 of his fellow inmates had died in the night. For the next three days the bodies lay inside his cell, and the soldiers refused to remove them. 'Even when you shouted to them,' said Abdullah, 'they would tell you, 'if you want to die also, you can die with them.'' The Associated Press spoke to eight men in total, some of whom were detained in other prisons in Al Jazirah State and Khartoum. All recounted nightmarish conditions during their incarceration. They described being crammed into cells alongside hundreds of other prisoners. Cells were so crowded that they were forced to sleep with their knees tucked under their chin. Beatings occurred regularly; one said he lost the use of his right eye as a result. One man, Michael Deng Dut, 29, said he had been 'tortured with electricity more than 18 times.' Simon Tong, 39, said that he was tortured with a knife during an interrogation, and rolled up his sleeve to expose the scars on his arm. Many of the men said they were given only a handful of food and a small cup of water once a day. 'This is the reason many of us passed away,' said Tong, 'because of the lack of food and water.' A place between north and south In July, 99 South Sudanese prisoners were separated from the other inmates. As the men awaited their fate, one died, reducing their number to 98. On July 28, they were bundled into a bus and driven away, not knowing where they were going. 'They did not tell us they were going to release us,' says Abdullah. He didn't realize where he was until they reached the South Sudanese border and were taken to Renk, the country's northernmost town, by South Sudanese officials. Though still far from home, Abdullah was back in his own country for the first time in 40 years. The border town of Renk has become a hub for South Sudanese nationals trying to get home. When the Sudanese civil war broke out in 2023, UN agencies and the South Sudanese government established an onward transportation program which has moved more than 250,000 people, according to the UN's International Office of Migration. On June 1, 2025, the program was suspended due to global cuts to humanitarian funding. The number of people living in and around a transit center in Renk has since swelled to 12,000, roughly six times its intended capacity. Thousands are living in makeshift shelters made of sticks and cloth. Reunited but stranded But for Abdullah, arriving in Renk was a moment of overwhelming joy after months of torture and uncertainty. He was overcome to see his wife, daughter, and younger brother waiting for him. His wife had decided to take his family south after his younger brother had been arrested and released by SAF for the third time. 'When I saw Abdullah, I thanked God,' she said. 'We did not expect to see him alive again.' Abdullah now hopes to return to Aweil, the town where he was born. He still has family in Sudan, and is trying to contact them so that they might join him in Renk. 'If they come back safely, then we plan to go to Aweil,' he said. 'All of us, together.' For more on Africa and development: The Associated Press receives financial support for global health and development coverage in Africa from the Gates Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
