
China's residents' needs given priority in urbanisation
SHANGHAIAND, BEIJING – Just a 10-minute walk from the tourist throngs of Shanghai's Bund, and hidden behind the glitzy skyline of pedestrian malls and luxury hotels, lies a residential community that has undergone a quiet transformation over the past three years.
Once a crumbling cluster of 1980s-era walk-ups plagued by leaking roofs, tangled power lines and cluttered alleyways, the Ruyili residential community has reemerged as a model for a concept long championed by China's top leadership: a city built 'by the people and for the people'.
'I never imagined I'd live to see this place become what it is now,' said Luo Jianshe, 72, a longtime resident of Ruyili. 'Before, you had to step over puddles and duck under pipes just to get home. Now it's like walking through a garden.'
Between August 2022 and April 2023, the community — named after the ruyi, a traditional scepter symbolizing good fortune — underwent a sweeping renovation and is now quite livable again.
Today, Ruyili is a 'car-free community', the first of its kind in its subdistrict. Mopeds and bikes are neatly stored in an underground garage. Inside, families stroll along clean walkways lined with planters, elderly residents chat beneath shade canopies, and children play where trash bins once stood.
The urban renewal project reflects a broader vision, laid out by President Xi Jinping, that cities must be built by the people and for the people.
Xi, who is also general secretary of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, introduced the concept during a 2019 fact-finding trip to Shanghai.
Whether it involves urban planning or construction, developing new districts or upgrading old ones, cities must adopt a people-centered approach, one that prioritizes the public's needs and carefully balances spaces for work, life and nature, Xi emphasized.
The vision, which was also included in the report to the 20th National Congress of the CPC in 2022, enshrines not only livability and public participation, but also the protection of cultural heritage and the coordination of urban space, industry and ecology. It's a vision deeply rooted in Party leadership and long-term urban planning, analysts said.
'This concept vividly embodies the principle of putting people first in urban development,' said Lin Chen, a professor at Renmin University of China's School of Applied Economics.
'It stresses that cities should prioritize making life more convenient, comfortable and fulfilling for their residents, while reserving the best resources for the people,' Lin said.
China's rapid urbanization in the past decade has made such a vision increasingly relevant. By the end of 2024, around 67 percent of the country's 1.4 billion people — over 943.5 million — were living in urban areas. Cities now generate more than 60 percent of national GDP.
Yet with megacities like Beijing and Shanghai grappling with the challenges of scale, the government is pivoting toward more sustainable and inclusive growth.
That includes renewed attention to cultural preservation, echoing Xi's earlier calls to avoid 'shortsighted demolitions and hasty construction'.
In Beijing, for instance, the Central Axis — a cultural and architectural spine running through the city — was added to UNESCO's World Heritage List last year. In Shanghai, architectural preservation and neighborhood revitalization go hand in hand.
Zou Xun, deputy chief architect at the Shanghai Institute of Architectural Design and Research, said the vision that cities must be built by the people and for the people is now leading a new era of thoughtful, community-driven urban transformation.
'It means starting from the goal of improving residents' quality of life, aligning with the fast pace of urban development, and ensuring that the broadest segments of the public benefit from progress,' he said.
One notable aspect of Shanghai's approach, he added, is its focus on an aging population. According to municipal authorities, 37.6 percent of the city's population with permanent household registration, or hukou, was age 60 or above by the end of 2024.
Many older neighborhoods undergoing renovation are also being adapted for senior living, with features such as barrier-free access and shared community dining halls offering nutritious meals at affordable prices.
Zhang Ming, a professor at Tongji University's College of Architecture and Urban Planning, noted that many of Shanghai's mass housing projects from the 1980s were built quickly to improve living conditions for the general public. Today's upgrades must consider long-term needs, he said.
'At the same time, we should be careful to preserve the historic charm of these communities,' Zhang said. 'Many of them reflect the unique cultural fusion of East and West that emerged after Shanghai became a port city.'
Lin Weimin, Party secretary of the Shanbei residential area, which includes Ruyili, attributed the success of the renewal to embracing 'whole-process people's democracy', ensuring that residents were actively involved in every step.
'By involving residents in decision-making, from how the community should be improved to what changes should be made, the community handed over the power to the people.
'This project not only facilitated the upgrade of the residential compound's infrastructure, but also ignited a sense of agency among the residents,' she added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
How scared should you be of ‘the China squeeze'?
'CHINA beats you with trade, Russia beats you with war,' mused US President Donald Trump on Aug 11. His reflection came mere hours before he extended a fragile trade truce with China for another 90 days. After months of tit-for-tat tariffs, the Sino-American trade war has settled into uneasy stasis. But China is using the time to hone a sophisticated arsenal of devastating economic weaponry. Even as the sides contemplate a broader deal to stabilise the planet's most important trading relationship – worth US$659 billion (S$843.7 billion) each year – China knows that its power is not in what it buys, but in what it sells. That is a far cry from the last time Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump went head-to-head on trade in 2019. Xi agreed to buy more American goods in a deal much criticised in China. It fitted a clumsy pattern. Back then, China tended to punish transgressions by cutting access to its consumer market, such as for Australian wine or Lithuanian beef. No longer. Now Xi's economic weaponry squeezes supply chains and the foreign industries which depend on them. Victories piling up Chinese victories have piled up in recent months. First came Xi's masterstroke in April: retaliating against US tariffs by choking off supplies of Chinese-refined rare earth minerals and magnets critical to American industry. Within weeks, the US' US$1.5 trillion carmaking industry, among others, panicked and Trump sought peace. In July, the European Union squealed in the lead-up to an EU-Chinese summit after flows of rare earth minerals and battery technology to Europe slowed without explanation. Speeding them up then became a subject of negotiation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up It all appears in line with Xi's very careful plan. In 2020, he called for China to create asymmetric dependencies, by ridding its own supply chains of foreign inputs, while seeking to 'tighten international production chains' dependence on China'. At a meeting held in secret in April that year, Xi told a powerful Communist Party body that such dependencies are 'a powerful countermeasure and deterrent capability against foreigners who would artificially cut off supply (to China).' It wants other countries to depend on it without it depending on them. China's use of economic sanctions of all sorts has reached an all-time high in 2025, according to data collected by Viking Bohman of Tufts University and co-authors. Like US export controls on which China's new regime is modelled, Xi's weapons are hard to resist using, even at the risk of blowback. 'Beijing was not surprised to find it has leverage, but it must be used discreetly,' says Xiang Lanxin of the National University of Singapore. So how does China's economic weaponry work? In recent years, Xi's officials have been drawing up a list of goods that China makes and the world needs. After Trump's election last year, China's government steeled itself. It implemented a long-expected export-licensing scheme for more than 700 products, many of which are relied upon by Western armed forces, including advanced manufacturing machines, battery inputs, biotechnology, sensors and critical minerals. The listed items are not limited to inputs for weaponry, however. Many are also critical to industries that officials view as strategic, such as electric vehicles and solar technology. For some of the items, such as minerals and chemical precursors for medicines, Chinese producers hold a near-monopoly over global supply. That is partly a result of market forces concentrating production in China, where it is cheap, scalable and often subsidised, and partly a deliberate strategy to control industrial inputs. Crucially, the rules formalise officials' ability to switch off exports by revoking licences. Chinese producers applying for them must know who is the end user of their goods and report as much. This has allowed China to continue choking supplies of rare earths to specific Western defence firms, even as it has resumed the flow into America as part of the trade truce. A shortage of heat-resistant magnets, for example, is pushing up costs for such things as jet-fighter engines. The legislation also includes so-called long-arm jurisdiction. It gives officials the ability to mandate that goods manufactured in third countries using Chinese-made inputs cannot be sold to specific end users. When China's policymakers consider which industries to target through such rules, they do not appear to focus on what will cause the most pain, but rather on what will be good for their own firms. Export controls follow a pattern of keeping high-value-added supply chains inside China, says Rebecca Arcesati of Merics, a Berlin-based think tank. If officials were to ban exports of finished goods, such as batteries or drones, it could hurt the strength of domestic producers. But by restricting the flow of industrial inputs needed to make those goods, policymakers in fact lower prices on domestic markets, and give their exporters a cost advantage against foreign competition in important sectors. This playbook appears to be in use in India today to prevent it from helping others break free of China's grip. Licences have stopped being approved for advanced manufacturing machines for India, where Apple is creating alternative supply chains. The restricted flow of machine tools and dysprosium, a rare earth element, have apparently slowed production of iPhones and AirPods respectively. And in June, Apple's in-country manufacturer, Foxconn, withdrew more than 300 Chinese engineers from India, suggesting that the recent moves were coordinated. Giving the game away China's use of its economic weapons this year has mainly been defensive – in response to American trade policies. But it all comes at a cost. Foreign officials and firms now fret about being suddenly cut off from Chinese suppliers, say, in a conflict over Taiwan. Chinese policymakers have done themselves 'enormous reputational damage', laments a foreign business leader in Beijing. Officials in Brussels, Tokyo and Washington are spooked and a flurry of deal-making is under way. That means Xi is likely to confront a drawback that America knows well: the more sanctions are used, the less effective they risk becoming. For a chokehold to be effective, a country must have a near-monopoly on supplying a particular good or service, says Matteo Maggiori of Stanford University. 'Sanctioning power is non-linear, which means that the difference between controlling 95 per cent and 85 per cent of a market is the difference between whether the targets of sanctions can find alternative suppliers or not,' says Maggiori. He notes that whereas tariffs cause firms to increase prices, export controls tend to spur them to invest in alternatives. Some Chinese officials quietly understand. Certain senior ones have even indicated to European businesses that urgent cases of rare earth shortages, such as those that would cause a plant to shutter, should be raised with the Ministry of Commerce to find informal work-arounds to keep supplies flowing. Such deft management of the controls by officials may help dull the desire of foreign firms focused on short-term profits to invest in alternatives. Wu Xinbo of the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University told CNN in June that the flow of exports could be dynamically managed. 'If the bilateral relationship is good, then I'll go a bit faster; if not, I'll slow down.' Ultimately, China finds itself in a delicate position. It is simultaneously assuring foreigners that its supply chains are reliable while warning them off seeking alternatives. And its diplomats badger trade partners not to give in to American demands that would isolate China from global trade. 'Attempting to decouple and disrupt supply chains,' Xi told foreign bosses in March, 'will only harm others and not benefit oneself.' Wise advice indeed. ©2025 The Economist Newspaper Limited. All rights reserved
Business Times
18 hours ago
- Business Times
Might a US-China mini thaw be underway?
ONE of the key elements of Donald Trump's foreign policy has been concern about China's rising power. Yet, the US president on Monday (Aug 11) extended his tariff truce with Beijing for another 90 days, raising the possibility that the two powers might potentially agree to a wider grand economic bargain in 2025 or beyond. The executive order was signed just hours before the previous tariff pause was set to expire, providing relief to financial markets around the world. Trump had previously increased tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 per cent, with Beijing reciprocating. An initial 90-day truce in May saw the US lower its levies to 30 per cent while Beijing reduced tariffs on US goods to 10 per cent and agreed to ramp up rare earth exports. The news comes soon after chip giants Nvidia and AMD agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of Chinese revenues. This is part of what has been called an ' unprecedented ' deal to secure export licences to China. The US had earlier banned the sale of powerful chips used in areas like AI to China under export controls usually related to national security. Some security experts, including a number from Trump's first term, recently expressed deep concern that Nvidia's H20 chip was 'a potent accelerator' of China's AI capabilities. Window of opportunity The new 90-day pause allows time for a potential Trump meeting with President Xi Jinping at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in South Korea this October. Depending on the mood music this autumn, it is even possible that the US president may offer a visit to China at much the same time. This provides a window of opportunity for US and Chinese officials to finalise not only a tariff deal, but possibly the framework for a wider economic bargain that could include issues such as fentanyl trafficking and Chinese purchases of sanctioned Russian and Iranian oil. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up A key question, therefore, is whether this truce presages a mini thaw in ties, as part of an effort to responsibly manage the competition between the two powers. While it is too early to tell, the answer will be decided largely by the personal chemistry of Trump and Xi. While economic and security fundamentals will mostly determine the long-term course of relations, both leaders are politically dominant in their nations and likely to remain in office until 2029 at least. With the two sides far apart on many issues, a Xi-Trump meeting would offer an opportunity for each leader to gauge the other's intent. The importance of this personal factor was shown during Trump's first term when his erratic nature accentuated the volatility in US-China ties. During Barack Obama's presidency, relations remained generally cordial, reflecting the commitment of Xi and Obama to bilateral stability. Both leaders appeared to recognise the super-priority of the relationship. Washington pursued a strategy that promoted cooperation on shared interests such as climate change, while constructively engaging on harder issues such as South China Sea tensions. It is sometimes forgotten that a key precursor for the Paris climate deal in 2015 was a US-China agreement in this area brokered by Obama and Xi. Renewing bilateral relations However, this engagement approach is perceived by Trump as having failed to shape Beijing's long-term behaviour. If and when Trump and Xi meet this autumn, the goal would be to find a framework to renew bilateral relations in the second half of the 2020s. Both appear to know that a stable relationship could have a broad, positive effect on global affairs, and potentially forestall further disruptive tensions. Yet, significant hazards in the US-China bilateral landscape remain. The future of Taiwan is a major point of uncertainty, and a tough framework of US measures against China carries over from the Trump and Joe Biden eras. These include sanctions over human rights abuses in Xinjiang and Hong Kong, and the rejection of nearly all of Beijing's maritime claims in the South China Sea. Ultimately, the new pause in the tariff war indicates that US-China relations need not inevitably be a force for greater global tension. Instead, it might yet show there is still a small, precious window of opportunity to evolve a strategic partnership to help underpin bilateral relations in the second half of the decade. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics


Independent Singapore
a day ago
- Independent Singapore
Forum on reimagining Singapore's electoral system set for Aug 23
Photo: Screengrab/ SINGAPORE: A discussion on electoral reform will be held at The Projector in Golden Mile Tower from 2:00 to 4:30 p.m. on Aug 23. The Singapore Democratic Party's Chee Soon Juan and Dr James Gomez will be giving addresses, and there will also be a standalone lecture on the state of overseas voting in Singapore. The panel discussion includes former Workers' Party Member of Parliament Leon Perera and political scientist Elvin Ong. Jeremy Tan, who contested in Mountbatten SMC as an independent candidate in the May 3 polls, and Jo Teo are also panellists at the event. Ahmad Amsyar will moderate the discussion. Tickets to the event are free. More details may be found here . 'Do we get the government we vote for? Where do we draw the line? Who wields the pen? Will smaller GRCs lead to greater minority representation? With only 47% of Gen Zs approving of the results of GE2025, should the voting age be lowered? What is a reasonable notice period for the release of electoral boundaries? Is a voter in Jalan Kayu more powerful than a voter in Bukit Panjang? Out of over 200,000 overseas Singaporeans aged 21 and above, how many actually voted?' are some of the questions to be raised during the discussion. In a Facebook post on Aug 7, Mr Perera wrote that electoral reform is an important subject worth having on a national level, given that electoral outcomes affect everyone's quality of life. He asked whether Singapore's electoral laws 'help to generate fair, representative political outcomes that make for stable, sustainable politics.' 'There are those who say that this is the wrong question to ask. Some say that it is the nature of politics that governing parties would always seek to bend the rules in their favour,' he added. The former MP also asked if 'thoughtful citizens' should not seek better rules governing elections, instead of opposition parties merely using their 'tenacity, resilience and ingenuity to work within these (often changing) rules that sometimes disadvantage them and try to win.' See also Jamus Lim backs WP chief's S$1,300 minimum wage proposal Meanwhile, in a blog post on Aug 5, Dr Gomez underlined the need to establish an independent election commission, which has been 'widely recognised as an international best practice recommended by the UN Electoral Assistance Division and the intergovernmental organisation International IDEA,' he wrote, adding, 'For Singapore, this represents a long-overdue but essential first step toward genuine electoral reform.' /TISG Read also: SDP launches petition to reform Singapore's electoral system including abolishing GRC system () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });