Odisha HC questions DPR vetting in Cuttack drain project
A division bench comprising Justice SK Sahoo and Justice V Narasingh has sought clarifications from the principal secretary of Housing and Urban Development (H&UD) department over glaring irregularities in the preparation and review process of DPRs for five major branch storm water drains.
The court questioned why the private project management consultancy (PMC) firm submitted hydraulic designs to VSSUT, Burla, for vetting instead of IIT-Bhubaneswar, despite a clear government directive issued via letter on May 30, 2025. This directive followed a technical review meeting chaired by the chief engineer-cum-additional secretary, H&UD department, on April 30.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Vice-Presidential Polls: Oppn fields former SC judge Sudarshan Reddy
New Delhi: The Opposition on Tuesday named former Supreme Court judge Justice B Sudarshan Reddy as its 'joint candidate' for the September 9 Vice-Presidential elections, which it termed an 'ideological battle' against the BJP-led NDA which has nominated Maharashtra Governor CP Radhakrishnan. If the BJP intended to put the DMK in a spot by choosing a Tamil as the NDA candidate, a section in the Opposition believes they have returned fire by choosing a Telugu that could create a political dilemma for N Chandrababu Naidu-led TDP and K Chandrasekhar Rao-led BRS. AAP, which has left the INDIA bloc, has also pledged its support to Justice Reddy, as the INDIA leaders maintained he is a 'joint Opposition candidate and not just the bloc's'. Sources said Arvind Kejriwal was briefed by Trinamool Congress' Derek O'Brien about the consensus reached over the candidate following which the AAP chief gave his party's green signal. The name was given the final stamp at a meeting of INDIA bloc leaders at Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge's official residence here, which was preceded by a meeting on Monday evening and late night consultations among top leaders. Sources said they were pitching the battle as 'Constitution and Idea of India versus RSS-BJP'. The announcement also caps two days of intense consultations during which names of former ISRO scientist Mylswamy Annadurai, Mahatma Gandhi's great grandson Tushar Gandhi and former Rajya Sabha MP Bhalchandra Mungekar among others also cropped up. Flanked by INDIA leaders, Kharge told a press conference, 'This Vice-Presidential contest is an ideological battle. All Opposition parties have nominated Justice B Sudarshan Reddy as their joint Reddy is one of India's most distinguished and progressive jurists.' 'He has been a consistent and courageous champion of social, economic and political justice. He reflects, fully, the values that shaped our country's freedom movement so profoundly, and the values on which our country's Constitution and democracy have been anchored. All these values are under assault and therefore, our collective and determined resolve to fight this election,' Kharge said.
United News of India
4 hours ago
- United News of India
SC passes no final order, asks AG how to handle Bills kept pending by Governor
New Delhi, Aug 19 (UNI) The Constitution Bench of Supreme Court, hearing the Presidential Reference on assent to Bills, did not pass any final or interim order today. The Bench instead asked the Attorney General for India, R Venkataramani, to assist on the lawful options available when a Governor keeps Bills pending for years. A Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai, and comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar, is hearing the Presidential Reference on questions relating to grant of assent to Bills. The Bench noted that the two-judge verdict had invoked Article 142 to declare assent to 10 Tamil Nadu Bills that had been pending since 2020, citing the Governor's prolonged inaction. Justice Surya Kant pointed to paragraphs 431–433 of the judgment, where the earlier Bench recorded the Governor's repeated delays and failure to follow constitutional procedure. Admitting the factual correctness of the delays, Attorney General Venkataramani maintained that even in such undesirable circumstances, the Court could not step into the Governor's shoes. 'Can the Court invoke Article 142 to declare deemed assent? That has to be tested,' he said, cautioning that the ruling had created 'disquieting features' and could set a precedent extending beyond the Tamil Nadu case. Justice Narasimha noted that the earlier judgment appeared to be tailored to an 'extraordinary fact situation' rather than laying down a general principle. 'It was not in the form of a precedent, it was to handle a situation,' he observed. The Attorney General, however, warned that once recognised, the doctrine of 'deemed assent' could be applied in future cases: 'The moment the Court enters into this arena, there will be mind-boggling facts which the Court may have to confront.' The Court said, no change in law or directions issued on 'deemed assent'. The Court sought assistance from the Attorney General on the constitutionally permissible recourse in cases of prolonged delay by a Governor. The Bench noted the earlier Tamil Nadu Governor's judgment may have addressed an 'egregious situation,' but questioned whether Article 142 can be used to declare deemed assent. Justice Surya Kant referred to the earlier judgment noting Bills from 2020 were pending; the AG confirmed this was factually correct and argued that courts cannot step into the Governor's role, even in undesirable situations. The Court listed the matter for further hearing tomorrow (Wednesday, August 20). UNI SNG SS
India.com
5 hours ago
- India.com
Rising H-1B Uncertainty: 45% Of Indian Professionals In US Would Return Home, 24% Fear Pay Cuts, Deportation Risks Grow Amid Trump's Visa Shakeup
New York: Indians working in the United States on H-1B or L-1 visas are reconsidering their long-term plans in the wake of rising uncertainties. A recent Blind poll, conducted anonymously for verified professionals, found that 45% would return to India if job loss forced them to leave the United States. Another 26% said they would move to a different country, while 29% remain undecided. Pay cuts and quality-of-life concerns top the list of worries for those contemplating a return. About 25% cited lower pay as a deterrent, 24% mentioned a dip in living standards, 13% highlighted cultural or family adjustments and 10% feared fewer job opportunities. When asked if they would apply for a U.S. work visa again, only 35% said yes. The majority (65%) were either unsure (27%) or negative (38%), indicating a growing shift in perception about the benefits of American work visas. Personal experiences feed this sentiment. Over one-third of respondents (35%) said they or someone they knew had to leave the United States following a job loss, often facing deportation risks during the short grace period. Deportation Notices Before Grace Period Ends H-1B visa holders reported a rising trend of deportation notices being issued even before the 60-day grace period expires. One in six respondents said they or someone they knew had received a Notice to Appear (NTA) within weeks of losing a job. This could result in a permanent ban from the United States. 'Multiple cases where NTAs were sent in 2 weeks. Immigration lawyers now advise leaving as soon as possible after [the] job ends otherwise you risk a permanent ban from the US,' wrote one Meta user on Blind. Normally, H-1B workers get 60 days to find a new employer or switch visa status, but reports since mid-2025 suggest notices arriving as early as two weeks into the grace period. Trump's Comments Stir Debate President Donald Trump recently urged U.S. companies to 'stop hiring in India'. The Blind survey found 63% of U.S.-based professionals felt this could benefit their companies, while 69% of India-based respondents believed it would harm their firms. The survey was conducted from July 28 to August 8, 2025. Potential Visa Rule Changes On August 8, the US Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OMB) cleared a proposal to change H-1B visa rules. Titled 'Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking to File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions', it is now with US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for public comment. While the text of the proposed rule has not yet been released, the proposal could potentially replace the current random H-1B lottery system with a wage-based selection process. The measure revives Trump's first-term effort to prioritise higher salaries. In January 2021, near the end of Trump's first term, he attempted to implement a rule that tied the H-1B lottery selection to wage level. This new rule will likely resemble the 2021 version. At present, H-1B selection is a lottery. Under a wage-based system, the USCIS would rank applications by offered salaries, starting from the highest until the annual cap is reached. Luck takes a back seat. The H-1B programme allows 85,000 visas annually: 65,000 for general applicants and 20,000 for holders of US master's degrees or higher. If applications exceed the cap, a computerised lottery determines selection. Tech firms rely heavily on this programme. If the rule mirrors the 2021 attempt, cap-subject H-1B petitions for entry-level positions would have almost no chance of selection. This would significantly affect foreign graduates seeking work in the United States.
