Iran Hangs Three More Accused of Spying for Israel
Iran on Wednesday hanged three men convicted of spying for Israel after what activists decried as an unfair trial, bringing to six the number of people executed on such charges since the start of the war between the Islamic republic and Israel.
The hangings have also amplified fears for the life of Swedish-Iranian dual national Ahmadreza Djalali who has been on death row for seven-and-a-half years after being convicted of spying for Israel which his family vehemently denies.
The executions also bring to nine the number of people executed by Iran on espionage charges since the start of 2025, with activists accusing Tehran of using capital punishment as a means to instil fear in society.
Idris Ali, Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul and Azad Shojai were executed earlier Wednesday in the northwestern city of Urmia, the judiciary said, the day after a truce between the Islamic republic and Israel came into effect, AFP reported.
They had "attempted to import equipment into the country to carry out assassinations," it added.
Iran had executed three other men accused of spying for Israel since the start of the conflict on June 13, in separate hangings on June 16, June 22 and June 23.
"The Islamic Republic sentenced Idris Ali, Rasoul Ahmad Rasoul, and Azad Shojai to death without a fair trial and based on confessions obtained under torture, accusing them of espionage," Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, director of Norway-based NGO Iran Human Rights (IHR), told AFP.
He said Ali and Shojai were two border porters -- known locally as kolbar -- who carry goods over the border.
"They were arrested on charges of smuggling alcoholic beverages but were forced to confess to espionage for Israel," he said. Ali and Shojai were members of Iran's Kurdish minority while Rasoul, while also Kurdish, was an Iraqi national.
- 'Imminent risk' -
He warned that in the coming weeks the lives of "hundreds" more prisoners sentenced to death were at risk. "After the ceasefire with Israel, the Islamic republic needs more repression to cover up military failures, prevent protests, and ensure its continued survival."
Djalali was arrested in 2016 and sentenced to death in October 2017 on charges of spying following what Amnesty International has termed "a grossly unfair trial" based on "'forced confessions' made under torture and other ill-treatment."
Long held in Tehran's Evin prison, which was hit by an Israeli strike on Monday before the truce, he has now been transferred to an unknown location, raising fears that his execution could be imminent, his family and government said.
"He called me and said, 'They're going to transfer me.' I asked where, and he said, 'I don't know,'" his wife Vida Mehrannia told AFP.
"Is it because they want to carry out the sentence? Or for some other reason? I don't know," she said, adding that she was "very worried" following the latest executions.
The Swedish foreign ministry said it had received information that he has been moved to an "unknown location" and warned there would be "serious consequences" for Sweden's relationship with Iran were he to be executed.
Amnesty International said Tuesday it was "gravely concerned" that he "is at imminent risk of execution".
- 'Grossly unfair trials' -
Rights groups say defendants in espionage cases are often convicted under vaguely-worded charges which are capital crimes under Iran's sharia law including "enmity against god" and "corruption on earth".
Analysts say that Israel's intelligence service Mossad has deeply penetrated Iran, as shown by its ability to locate and kill key members of the Iranian security forces in the conflict. But rights groups say that those executed are used as scapegoats to make up for Iran's failure to catch the actual spies.
Iran's judiciary chief, Gholamhossein Mohseni Ejei had ordered swift trials against people suspected of collaborating with Israel with rights groups saying dozens of people have been arrested since the conflict started.
"A rush to execute people after torture-tainted 'confessions' and grossly unfair trials would be a horrifying abuse of power and a blatant assault on the right to life," said Hussein Baoumi, deputy regional director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.
According to IHR, Iran has executed 594 people on all charges this year alone.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
29 minutes ago
- Arab News
Can US-Iran nuclear diplomacy still work after strikes?
LONDON: Speaking at the NATO summit in The Hague on Wednesday, US President Donald Trump indicated that the door is open to diplomacy with Iran, just days after he ordered B-2 bombers to attack Iranian nuclear facilities. Trump once more hailed what he calls the 'massive, precision strike' on three of Iran's nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, on June 22, adding that 'no other military on Earth could have done it.' His comments followed claims in a leaked assessment by the US Defense Intelligence Agency suggesting the US strikes had failed to destroy Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium or its centrifuges — succeeding only in setting back the program mere months. In response to the leaked report, Trump doubled down on earlier statements that Tehran's nuclear program had been 'obliterated.' He went on to say 'we're going to talk' with Iran next week, adding they may sign an agreement. Asked if Washington is planning to lift sanctions on Iran, Trump said the Iranians 'just had a war' and they 'fought it bravely,' adding that China can buy oil from Iran if it wants, as the country will 'need money to get back into shape.' Whether Trump's comments are a sign that the US intends to draft a new nuclear deal with Iran remains to be seen. What such a deal might look like in the wake of the past fortnight's events is also anyone's guess. One thing that is clear is that diplomacy seems the only viable option. It was almost 10 years ago, on July 14, 2015, that representatives of the US, China, France, Germany, Russia, the UK, EU and Iran gathered in Vienna to finalize the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, better known simply as the Iran nuclear deal. In exchange for sanctions relief, among other things, Iran agreed to limit enrichment of a reduced stockpile of 300 kg of uranium to 3.7 percent — insufficient to produce a bomb but aligned with its claims that its nuclear program was designed solely for generating electricity. The architect of the deal, which was several years in the making, was US President Barack Obama, who said 'principled diplomacy and … America's willingness to engage directly with Iran opened the door to talks.' Within three years, the deal was in ruins, undone by Obama's successor, Donald Trump. According to inspectors from the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency, the IAEA, Iran had been sticking to its side of the bargain. But on May 8, 2018, during his first term as president, Trump unilaterally terminated America's participation in the JCPOA and reimposed sanctions. Iran, he said, had 'negotiated the JCPOA in bad faith, and the deal gave the Iranian regime too much in exchange for too little.' This week, in the wake of Israel's surprise attack targeting the heart of Iran's nuclear program — and Trump's equally surprise decision to join in — the prospect of reviving any kind of deal with Tehran might seem distant, at best. But some analysts believe that a new nuclear rapprochement between the US and Iran could be closer than ever — and not only despite the clashes of the past two weeks, but perhaps because of them. Ibrahim Al-Marashi, associate professor in the Department of History at California State University San Marcos, said there was no doubt that 'among the Iranian public, previously ambivalent about the nuclear issue, the optics of being bombed for programs still under IAEA inspection may rally new domestic support for pursuing a deterrent.' Furthermore, the attacks by Israel and the US have also 'degraded the credibility of international institutions such as the IAEA. 'When countries that comply with inspections and international law are attacked anyway, it undermines the incentive structure that sustains the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons regime, NPT, which Iran ratified in 1970, and the Islamic Republic of Iran endorsed in 1996. 'Why sign treaties or allow inspectors in if they do not shield you from military coercion? This is a dangerous message.' But, he added, 'diplomatic alternatives were, and still are, available' and, for all its flaws, the JCPOA model is not a bad one to consider. 'The 2015 deal, although imperfect, successfully rolled back large portions of Iran's nuclear program and subjected it to the most intrusive inspection regime in the world,' he said. 'Its collapse was not inevitable; it was a political choice, dismantled by unilateral US withdrawal. Efforts to revive the deal have sputtered, and with the bombs falling the path back to diplomacy looked more distant than ever. 'But it is the only path that has worked before — and the only one likely to work again.' But only with key adjustments. As Saudi Arabia and other members of the GCC argued at the time, the JCPOA — put together in great secrecy and without consulting the Gulf states — was insufficiently tough and always doomed to fail. Now experts argue that a return to diplomacy is not only vital for the stability of the region but that any new nuclear deal must be framed with the direct input of those states most exposed to the consequences of diplomatic failure: the Arab Gulf states. 'All that is true,' said Sir John Jenkins, former UK ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Syria. 'The core point is that the JCPOA bought us between 10 and 15 years, depending on the issue and the associated sunset clause. That was designed to provide time for a new regime to be put in place to contain and deter Iran after the JCPOA expired — which would now only be five years away. 'But the Obama administration, followed by the E3 (the security coalition of the UK, Germany and France), seemed to think that once it had been signed it was such a wonderful achievement that they could turn to other things entirely. That was a mistake. 'This time it needs to be different. And there is an opportunity to start constructing a new security order in the region which involves regional states from the moment of creation rather than as some afterthought.' Jim Walsh, senior researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Security Studies Program, is adamant that when Trump pulled the plug in 2018, 'the JCPOA was already working. 'Every intelligence agency said that Iran was in compliance with the agreement and I defy you to find one serious entity that was charging that Iran was in violation of the JCPOA in the three years from 2015 to 2018. 'They even hung on to their end of the bargain after Trump pulled out, for a solid year, until it was politically untenable.' The IAEA had large teams of inspectors on the ground, Iran had agreed to requirements that no country had ever agreed to before, 'and this was consistent with what people in my trade would call a capability or latency decision.' This meant 'you have the option so that you can move in that direction if you need to, but you do not cross the line because the costs of crossing it are higher than the benefits.' And, he says, despite all that has happened since, especially in the past fortnight, Iran is fundamentally in the same place today — ready to deal. 'What is Iran's leverage here in negotiations with the IAEA or with the Europeans or with the Americans? It's that they can turn the dial up on enrichment and turn it down, and they can install advanced centrifuges and then take them apart. 'This is part of a political game, because they don't have a lot of ways to put leverage on their opponents.' He believes that if Iran really wanted an actual bomb, rather than the threat of one as a bargaining chip, it would have had one by now. 'Producing highly enriched uranium is the technically hardest part of the project, and moving to weaponization is more of an engineering problem.' The fact that Iran has not done so is the real clue to the way ahead. 'I've worked for 20 years to prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, but it would be hard to argue that they don't have some justification. Let's be super clear: the country that's attacking them, Israel, is a nuclear state. 'But if they wanted to build a bomb, they've had 18 years to do so, so someone has to explain to me why that hasn't happened. 'As far back as 2007 the director of US national intelligence said Iran had the technical wherewithal to build a weapon, and the only remaining obstacle was the political will to do so.' And, despite Trump's claim that the US attacks had 'obliterated' the Iranian nuclear program, political will may still be all that is preventing Iran becoming a nuclear state. Dan Sagir, an Israeli researcher and lecturer on the topic of Israel's own nuclear deterrence and its impact on the Arab-Israeli conflict in the Middle East, says that if the US and Iran do return to the talks that were already underway when Israel launched 'Operation Rising Lion' on June 12, 'any deal that emerges is not going to be as solid as the previous one.' 'So Trump bombed Fordow,' said Sagir. 'But where is the 400 kg of highly enriched uranium? The Iranians, who are very talented in this field, will say, 'You bombed it. You buried it.' But do we know that's correct? We'll never know. 'If they still have it, they can get the bomb within a year. If they don't have it, it's two-and-a-half years. In any case, the game is not over.' In fact, said Walsh of MIT, there is 'every indication' that the uranium, which the IAEA says has been enriched to a near-weapons-grade 60 percent — a claim dismissed by Iran as based on 'forged documents provided by the Zionist regime' — is not buried within the Fordow complex. 'In May, Iran's foreign minister warned the IAEA that they would take precautions. On June 13, the head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization also said they were going to take action, and on that day, according to satellite imagery, a convoy of trucks was outside Fordow, and the next day they were gone. 'So I would guess that they still have a lot of nuclear material somewhere that they could very quickly upgrade to weapons-grade material (which requires 90 percent enrichment).' Whether or not the current fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran lasts, details emerging of America's attack on Fordow and the other Iranian nuclear facilities appear only to reinforce the conclusion that a new nuclear deal with Iran is the only way forward. 'You cannot bomb the knowledge of how to build a centrifuge out of the heads of the Iranians,' said Walsh. 'You can't bomb away 18 years of experience. 'This is a big, mature program and dropping a few bombs isn't going to change that. You can blow up equipment, and kill scientists, but we're not talking about Robert Oppenheimer (the US physicist who led the team that made the first atomic bomb) in 1945. 'They've been at this for 18 years and now we're at the management phase, not at the invention stage. They're going to be able to reconstitute that program if they want to. There is no military solution to this problem.'
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
CIA says new intelligence shows Iran's nuclear program severely damaged by US strikes
CIA Director John Ratcliffe said Wednesday that a 'body of credible intelligence' indicates Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged by US strikes last weekend. 'This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years,' Ratcliffe said in a statement. Ratcliffe said the CIA continues collecting additional information to keep 'appropriate decision-makers and oversight bodies' fully informed. He added: 'When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, given the national importance of this matter and in every attempt to provide transparency.' Following last weekend's unprecedented US bombing operation against three Iranian nuclear sites, including the notorious Fordow, conflicting reports have emerged over how much impact those strikes had. One assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) leaked to US media this week suggested that Iran may still have a majority of its nuclear capabilities intact. 'This is a preliminary, low confidence assessment – not a final conclusion – and will continue to be refined as additional intel becomes available,' a senior DIA official told Al Arabiya English when asked about the assessment. US President Donald Trump and his administration have slammed the leaked DIA report and played it down. After the CIA released Ratcliffe's statement, he also posted it on X, adding: 'My statement confirming CIA intelligence which contradicts illegally sourced public reporting regarding the destruction of key Iranian nuclear facilities.'
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran partially reopens airspace after ceasefire with Israel
Iran on Wednesday reopened the airspace over the country's east, state media reported, following a ceasefire with Israel that ended 12 days of fighting. Iran had closed its skies since June 13 after Israel launched a major bombing campaign that prompted Iran to retaliate with waves of missile strikes. A ceasefire between the two came into effect on Tuesday. 'The airspace over the eastern half of the country has been reopened to international overflights as well as domestic and international flights solely with origin or destination in airports located in eastern Iran,' transport ministry spokesman Majid Akhavan said, according to the official IRNA news agency. He added that Mashhad airport, which Israel said it had struck during the war, was among the airports that reopened. Other reopened airports include Chabahar, Zahedan and Jask. Domestic and international flights in other parts of Iran, including the capital Tehran, 'are not permitted until further notice,' Akhavan noted.
