
‘No crime' in Scotland claims Donald Trump despite 300,000 crimes last year
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
DONALD Trump has bizarrely claimed Scotland has 'no crime' - despite cops recording 300,000 incidents in the last year.
The US President even insisted no one is mugged in Scotland - and labelled streets as 'crime-free'.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
Trump bizarrely claimed Scotland has 'no crime', despite cops recording 300,000 incidents
Credit: Alamy
Speaking on the podcast Pod Force One - filmed while visiting his golf course at Turnberry, Ayrshire over the weekend - he also claimed nobody was pushed onto subway tracks here, despite several incidents in recent years.
Mr Trump said of Scotland: 'You don't have crime. You don't have muggings. You don't have people getting hit over the head when they're not looking with a baseball bat. They're not pushed into a subway, if they had them.
'Yes, it's not New York. You wouldn't have them pushed into a subway. No, it's a different kind of a place.'
Unfortunately for Mr Trump, evidence does not back up his claims.
Scottish Government figures show there were 299,111 crimes recorded in 2024/25.
There were 16,476 robberies - a category in including muggings - in the last decade, with 1,782 in the last year alone.
And in recent years, several victims have suffered violent assaults on Scotland's only subway network in Glasgow - including people being pushed onto the tracks in 2021 and 2017.
Mr Trump went on to claim Scotland does 'not have big crime, they'll have a different form of crime' - despite an upsurge in gang violence in Glasgow and Edinburgh since March which saw police launch a major operation to crackdown on machete and firebombing attacks.
Talking about Scots, the tycoon-turned-politician claimed: 'They'll get into an argument on something and it'll be very minor compared to the kind of things that you witness every day but it's a very good way of life, actually.'
Later, when asked whether he'd ever consider coming to Scotland and run the country as First Minister, the US President said: 'Yeah, well, Scotland though, I think you probably have a very good first minister right now.'
Five moments you missed from a weekend with Donald Trump in Scotland
Mr Trump - whose mum was famously born on Lewis - added: 'I could do it. I think I might be eligible, I could be within six months or something but it is a special place.'
The President also repeated his love of the movie Braveheart which stars Mel Gibson as Scottish hero William Wallace.
Mr Trump added: 'The Scottish people are really amazing. And they're great fighters too. But England had a hard time with Scotland. They just, they couldn't quite tame them.'
Scottish Tory justice spokesman Liam Kerr said: 'Despite the President's best PR efforts for John Swinney, Scots know that surging crime rates are down to a host of SNP failures, including a drop in police numbers, soft-touch sentencing and dangerous criminals being released early because the new prisons promised haven't been built.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Scotland continues to be a safe place to live with reported crime falling by more than half since 1991.
"This is backed up by the recently published Recorded Crime in Scotland 2024-25, which shows reported crime falling by more than half since 1991 and the flagship Scottish Crime and Justice Survey which also showed people feel safer in their communities.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
21 minutes ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes showed real bravery
There is a certain worldly cynicism aroused by the announcement that a politician is stepping down to spend more time with their family. It was for a long time the refuge of MPs who had earned themselves an entry in the News of the World, the Who's Who of romeos, rogues and reprobates, for their activities with ladies – or young gentlemen – of the night. Less commonly, it was regarded as an admission that someone could not hack it or was frustrated by their slow progress up the greasy pole. After all, no one wants to quit politics. Contra the cynics, Kate Forbes. Scotland's deputy first minister will stand down from Holyrood at next May's elections, having somehow crammed a whole political life into ten tempestuous years. In that time, she has been a backbencher, public finance minister, finance secretary, leadership candidate, backbencher again, and finally deputy first minister and economy secretary. In her letter to first minister John Swinney, she acknowledges that 'quite rightly this job entails long days far from home' but 'I do not wish to seek re-election and miss any more of the precious early years of family life'. Forbes married her husband Alasdair, a widower, in 2021 and became stepmum to his three daughters. The following year the couple had a daughter, who is turning three. (Some men go to war, others jump out of planes, but living with five women is true bravery.) Forbes was never meant to get where she did. Upon her election to the Scottish parliament in 2016, her religious views were known and they marked her as an apostate in an era of secular progressivism. A member of the Free Presbyterian Church, Forbes's religion is not an identity category but a living faith. She believes in it all: birth, death, resurrection and salvation. The happy-clappy bits and the fire and brimstone alike. There was little chance of her progressing beyond the outer ministry in the modern, uber-liberal SNP, and she had to settle for a junior ministerial post in the Scottish government's finance department. Unfortunately for the party leadership, events overtook. The night before the 2020 budget speech, finance secretary Derek Mackay was forced to quit after a newspaper learned of his text messages to a 16 year old. Forbes, who had been allowed no real input into the budget, was thrust onto the floor of Holyrood to deliver – and be interrogated on – a speech she had only been handed hours before. She did so with such confidence and composure that even the SNP's most loyal critics commended her. That performance made her promotion to the cabinet finance post inevitable, though some more glumly considered it unavoidable. By the time Nicola Sturgeon resigned in February 2023, Forbes had established herself as a moderate, pro-business Nationalist who wanted the Scottish government to focus on prosperity rather than gender ideology, an agenda she opposed. Yet the prospect of the party moving to the centre, and especially of it being led by an evangelical Christian, prompted the SNP establishment to throw its weight behind Humza Yousaf, who was well-meaning but plainly not up to running a devolved government. In a straight fight, he would have been no match for Forbes, but instead the leadership contest was shaped by her internal enemies and the media into an inquisition on her religious beliefs. Journalists well-laden with secular prejudices delighted in making her answer for those verses of Scripture which scandalise modern sensibilities. To her credit as a Christian, but disastrously for a politician, she refused to lie or be evasive about her beliefs. When they asked her views on abortion, she told the truth. When they enquired as to her thinking about gay marriage, she did the same again. When they tried to corner her on trans rights, she was honest and took the punishment that came with it. Compelled to bear witness, she did so with her head held high, fighting the good fight and keeping the faith. It is one of the most personally admirable and politically suicidal decisions I have ever seen. In the end, she lost, though only narrowly, and was vindicated when her opponent swiftly proved as unequal to the challenges of office as she had warned. He inflicted so much damage with a programme of Continuity Sturgeon progressivism that, just 14 months later, his successor was drafting in Forbes as deputy head of the government to repair relations with the business sector, steer economic policy back to growth, and serve as the symbol of a new pragmatism. Despite our fundamental disagreements, I rate Forbes as a politician and a public official and said so regularly on Coffee House and elsewhere. This did nothing for her reputation among Nationalists. In fact, I know that it was used against her, and I'm sorry for that. Some regarded with bemusement, others horror, the sight of a gay Catholic Unionist simping for a Wee Free separatist, but the simping was not for Forbes so much as for the fleeting possibility that a leader of her calibre could get her hands on the controls. In a way, I should be relieved that she was sabotaged by the liberal bigots in her own party. If she had been half the first minister I reckon she might have been, she could have broadened the SNP's electoral coalition to the point at which independence became the consensus view across the electorate. She was a very dangerous woman for a time there, and might be again if she were to return after her children have grown up. The cynics will reassert themselves in the coming days, pronouncing that Forbes has seen the writing on the wall, that the SNP is finished, that she is hinting at her lack of faith in Swinney, that she had risen as high as she would be allowed to in a party thoroughly in the grips of identity politics progressives. Or, and I will tread lightly here, perhaps she truly values motherhood above career, one of the few remaining mortal sins in a non-judgemental age. Her fellow Nationalist Gail Ross did the same in 2021, admitting that five days a week away from her son was just too much. Not coincidentally, she too was a Highlands MSP, where constituencies rival small countries for square mileage. Labour's Jenny Marra, a considerable talent, walked away after ten years darting up and down the vast North East Scotland region. Family had to come first. Anglo culture is hardly alone in associating labour with fortitude and moral uprightness, but it is noticeably unforgiving of those who opt out in favour of raising children. Try to balance work and family but say you find it impossible, and you can expect to be chastised for failing at something so many parents do. The resentment is not for admitting you cannot manage but for forcing others to reconsider how well they are managing. I have sat in many a newsroom well into the evening, hearing bedtime stories read over the phone by loving parents who were wanted at home, and wanted to be there, but who were working late to give their children the best start in life. I'm not a parent, and maybe it's not my place to comment, but I know too many people whose fathers and mothers worked those hours, provided abundantly for their offspring, but now have no relationship with them. Their material needs were more than met but at the expense of other, deeper needs. No doubt Kate Forbes has made the right decision for her family but I can't help but wonder how many more families would have benefited from her making it to Bute House. Yes, she's hopelessly wrong about the constitution, but there's more to politics than policy. There's talent and character and leadership. We will have to settle for much less.


Scotsman
21 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why Donald Trump's visit was a good thing for Police Scotland
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Well, well, despite all the scare stories, Donald Trump's four-day visit went exactly as planned. Contrary to the dire predictions of some, our policing system was not brought to its knees by a long weekend's work. If our community policing model could just survive the year of extractions caused by the 84/85 Miners Strike, it could surely withstand the extra demands of four days. It was, however, a tricky operation, with more than two venues and a lot of outside exposure for a president who has recently survived two assassination attempts, and appears to be 'catnip' for extremists. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But now that Air Force One is well away and the pointless placards put away 'til next time, we can safely reflect on the fact that the presidential visit has actually benefited our police service. Let me explain. READ MORE: Deer put down after being hit by police car in Aberdeenshire ahead of Trump visit Police Scotland officers guard the Trump Turnberry golf course ahead of Donald Trump's arrival in Scotland (Picture: Christopher Furlong) | Getty Images Ensuring match fitness Police Scotland, whether in its recent national incarceration or its old constituent forces, had a well-deserved reputation for the professional handling of major events. Next to London, Edinburgh had more major and royal events than any other city in the UK. The west of Scotland was also highly experienced. The continuous exposure to the ritual hate fest which is 'Old Firm' football ensures that police in and around Glasgow always knew how to control hostile crowds. But experience has a shelf-life and the preparedness of police forces to deal with complex and major events depends on 'match fitness'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The last truly major event in Scotland was the initial phase of the funeral of Queen Elizabeth in 2022, and, while it was logistically tricky, there was very little real threat. You have to go back to the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow the previous year to find a major event that tested all aspects of police planning and operations. But that was four years ago, and things change quickly at the top of policing. Almost all the senior officers involved in COP26 have now moved on and been replaced by officers, who though able have not actually been in the hot seat. For you can plan all you like, run exercises all day long, but there is no substitute for the real thing. Regardless of contingencies, things go wrong as soon as real people become involved. Small mistakes can turn into big problems, and before you know it you are reacting to incidents rather than driving the operation. Trump's habit of going 'off script' In the case of President Trump's visit, there were good points and bad. It was not a state visit with high-risk public processions in crowded streets. On the other hand, golf links, while remote, are vast open spaces and difficult to protect. Transport routes were also tricky, with lots of minor roads to be protected from disruption. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And the US Secret Service would have been on edge, with the recent assassination attempts and their president's habit of impromptu 'off-script' behaviour adding to the tension. But in the end, it all came good, as I was sure it would. The plan worked, and all the little things that went wrong were sorted quickly and without fuss. So congratulations to the event 'Gold Commander', Assistant Chief Emma Bond, and all her team. Another big job well done, lessons learned and valuable experience banked.


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside GOP's effort to stop Trump from pardoning Ghislaine Maxwell
Donald Trump is facing warnings from Republicans concerned he is considering a pardon for Jeffrey Epstein 's associate Ghislaine Maxwell. While the president has acknowledged his ability to pardon Maxwell for her child sexual trafficking crimes, he has not signaled he intends to do so. But after Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met for interviews with Maxwell in Florida last month, there are concerns that her bid for a pardon might be gaining traction. One senator, who requested anonymity to speak with The Hill about a potential pardon, said that Maxwell has an incentive to 'lie' to get her sentence reduced. This lawmaker warned against trusting anything Maxwell says in her effort for a pardon. 'It's ridiculous that he would consider shortening a sentence for somebody who aided and abetted sexual trafficking as she did,' said the Republican senator. The lawmaker described that argument as specious: 'She's trafficking underage children. I can't imagine anything she could say could nullify her heinous crimes.' Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus sent a letter to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee saying that if his client receives clemency for her 20-year prison sentence, she would go before Congress to testify 'openly and honestly' about Epstein. The panel's Chairman, Rep. James Comer, agreed to postpone Maxwell's testimony , which was initially scheduled for August 11 because her lawyers want to wait until after the Supreme Court considers their appeal of her 2021 conviction. Logistics for questioning could get complicated after Maxwell was last week moved to Federal Prison Camp in Bryan, Texas. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) did not publicly specify reasoning for the transfer. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota agreed that Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi would need a strong justification for pardoning Maxwell – or even commuting her sentence. He said, according to The Hill, that it would be 'difficult' to reason granting Maxwell any pardon or leniency considering the severity of her crimes. Maxwell is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for her crimes, which include sexual trafficking conspiracy and enticing and transporting minors to engage in criminal sexual activity. 'There have been no discussions or consideration of a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell, and there never will be,' a senior White House official told the Daily Mail on July 15. Asked on Monday this remains true, a White House official said the office 'will not comment on the existence or nonexistence of any clemency request.' The whole saga started on July 6 when the Justice Department and FBI released a memo saying that it found in its review of the Epstein files that the child sexual criminal died by killing himself in prison on August 10, 2019. It also concluded that there was no 'client list' and said no one else would be charged in relation to the crimes. This sent MAGA circles into immediate fury, with some claiming a cover-up was underway and others calling for AG Bondi to be removed from her position. Deputy AG Blanche was subsequently tasked with two-days of talks with Maxwell to find out what the Epstein confidante knew in an effort to quell Trump's base. It's unclear yet what has come from those interviews.