Is the honours system still relevant for New Zealand?
Photo:
Supplied/ Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
This long weekend, a new list of Kiwis will be crowned with titles under the New Zealand Honour's System, when a list is unveiled on Monday to celebrate the King's Birthday.
Up to 400 Honours are granted annually across lists announced for the
New Year
and the King's Birthday holiday, with Special Lists occasionally released at other times too.
The titles bestow a smorgasbord of letters after names, like CNZM, Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit; or ONZM, Officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit, all recognising service to the Crown and to the nation. Some become dames and knights.
But is the honours system still relevant? Are the right number given out to the right people? And are the right people making decisions about who should be recognised?
Anyone can nominate a person they think is worthy of a New Zealand royal honour, though at least two other people must submit letters in support of the nomination.
The
form
is
online
.
About 800 to 1000 nominations are considered each year, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet says.
While those nominated are usually New Zealand citizens, people who are not citizens can also be nominated if they have benefited New Zealand or helped New Zealanders overseas.
The applications are considered by the Cabinet Appointments and Honours Committee; which is a group of government ministers and chaired by the prime minister.
The prime minister then makes the final recommendation to the King.
Reporter Victor Waters took to the streets of Auckland to get people's views.
"I guess it is kind of less valid of a title than it used to be," one man said. "It is good to recognise people's achievements, ... but I couldn't say whether we're giving them out for the right or wrong reasons."
While, a woman said: "I don't really care, they're just titles - as long as it's not like a grant of a million dollars of the taxpayers money, I don't really mind. It really depends on who's nominated and if they deserve it or not. I think people deserve recognition for their work, as long as it's deserved."
Another woman said: "I still think it's cool to like give knighthoods and stuff, but to those deserving and that have really earned it."
While another man said: "In terms of New Zealand's indigenous perspective - whether Māoridom or Pasifika, they have [honours], and I think we can investigate that too, or perhaps weigh those up. The knighthoods and such, they are honours, but I think they have lost some of their relevance in the times that we live in.
"At the same time, do we throw them out? And I'm not convinced throwing [them] out is the answer." However, he said it may be helpful for a process to be undertaken examining what the honours mean now, the values and ideas behind them, and how New Zealanders want them to evolve: "[That] is something I think might be a valuable or worthwhile offering".
Twenty five years ago, then- Prime Minister Helen Clark got rid of 'sir' and 'dame' titles,
in 2000
. At that time, those receiving a titular honour were appointed Principal and Distinguished Companions of the New Zealand Order of Merit.
Helen Clark was prime minister of New Zealand from 1999 to 2008.
Photo:
AFP
In 2009, the National government led by John Key
brought them back
.
In 2010, Clark was appointed a Member of the Order of New Zealand, Aotearoa's most senior honour, and says she was "honoured" to accept it.
She believes the honours should be purely New Zealand focused, and not royal honours, though recognises that many people may feel the knighthoods sound posher.
"In this day and age, in New Zealand, 12,000 miles from the United Kingdom, why are we parading the titles like that - I just don't really get it.. We've inherited them from an aristocratic English system, and I just don't think that's consistent with a more egalitarian outlook in New Zealand.
"The ONZ shows the bipartisanship of the system at its best. That came to me as an offer from the Key government."
Former All Blacks coach Sir Steve Hansen, receiving his KNZM for services to rugby from The Governor-General, the Rt Hon Dame Patsy Reddy. He was named in the 2020 New Year's Honours list.
Photo:
PHOTOSPORT
She also believes people being honoured should have lived a life of service, and done exemplary work, beyond their paid role.
"It is good to recognise people who have given good service to New Zealand," she says.
During her time as prime minister, Clark chaired the committee who considered who would be put forward for the honours. The process to decide who to recommend for honours was seriously considered, and was hard work, she says, partly because there were so many deserving people nominated.
"Your numbers: 400 a year, it sounds a lot, but believe me, when you're sitting at the Cabinet Honours and Appointments Committee and you've got 200 slots for New Year, and six months later 200 for the King's Birthday weekend - Queen's as it was in my time - it's actually quite hard getting the numbers of good applicants down into those 200 slots.
"And sometimes you have to postpone recognising someone, because there's just not the room - but you say we'll come back to that in six months time'.
"I'd like to think that we were fair, we looked to have honours which were broadly representative of New Zealand: geographically, across our different ethnic communities, across men and women, and then across the kinds of service that you would recognise.
"And certainly we didn't just discount recommendations that came from opposition members of Parliament. We felt that these needed to be genuinely nation-wide and bipartisan, so we did our best I think to get a good spread of people."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter
curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
The House: Bills this week
Debating Chamber in Parliament Photo: RNZ / Diego Opatowski After a week off, MPs are back in the capital for a two-week sitting block, in which a smorgasbord of bills are scheduled to be debated. To make up time, there is another extended sitting on Thursday morning from 9 am (earlier than the normal 2pm start). Parliament's agenda this week is a hodgepodge of bills at different stages in their legislative journey. Let's start with the new bills. The first bit of Government business up for the week is the Regulatory Systems (Internal Affairs) Amendment Bill, which the House got its first go at debating last week, before the first reading was interrupted with five speeches still remaining. Regulatory Systems Amendment Bills are omnibus bills, which means they amend a suite of relevant legislation rather than just a single Act. They are a way for government agencies (in this case, Internal Affairs) to make small technical changes to regulatory systems that those agencies oversee. For Internal Affairs, these include things like gambling; births, deaths and marriages; and censorship of objective material. The bill has the tentative support of the opposition Labour and Green parties, with Te Pāti Māori yet to speak on the bill. The Antisocial Road Use Legislation Amendment Bill aims to discourage road users from participating in, as the name of the bill suggests, 'antisocial' conduct while operating a vehicle. This could include intimidating convoys, boy-racer meet-ups, fleeing from police, or dirt-bike gatherings, which are apparently becoming more common. Tuesday's first reading is the first chance the public gets to hear what MPs have to say about it. The final first reading of the week is the Constitution Amendment Bill, which is the less contentious bill relating to elections in recent weeks. This bill follows a recommendation from both the Electoral Commission and the Justice Committee (from their inquiry into the 2023 General Election), to remove the '28 day rule' - the period in which Ministers of the Crown can continue to remain in office even after they cease to be MPs (at the close of polling day). In the unlikely event of a delayed return of the writ (the official election results), this change would allow continuity of Government. The Public Works (Critical Infrastructure) Amendment Bill is back in the House after being examined by the Transport and Infrastructure Committee for just shy of three months. It seeks to simplify the process whereby the Crown, local authorities, and network utility operators acquire land for 'critical' infrastructure projects that fall under either Schedule 2 of the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024, or the list of Roads of National Significance. During the first reading, Labour cautiously lent its support to the Bill, while the Greens and Te Pāti Māori voted against it, citing concerns about Māori and other land owners potentially having fewer rights to appeal an acquisition. The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill is an omnibus bill that intends to improve the collection of revenue from goods crossing our borders. It would replace the current fee-based regime with a levy payment system. Customs Minister Casey Costello said the change would "provide a more balanced approach that reflects the risks and costs that classes of levy payers create". Being quite an esoteric, technical change, it's relatively uncontroversial. The second reading debate of the Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill will pick up from where it left off, with nine speeches remaining. The bill addresses gaps in criminal law concerning foreign interference intended to harm New Zealand. Spy novel ideas like treason, and inciting mutiny or espionage-all on behalf of foreign actors-would be introduced as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote. The Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill is the second of the government's three-phased approach to replacing the Resource Management Act. This Bill would make changes in the areas of infrastructure and energy, housing growth, farming and the primary sector, natural hazards and emergencies, seeking to streamline consenting and investment. Wellingtonians in particular may also be interested to hear that it streamlines the listing and delisting of heritage buildings. In fact, the Minister in Charge of the Bill, Chris Bishop, said an amendment paper would be put forward during the committee stage this week that would specifically make the demolition of the Gordon Wilson Flats on The Terrace a permitted activity. While the RMA was well-intentioned, most MPs agree that over time it became unfit for purpose. Opinion diverges over what to replace it with (this being the second attempt in two Parliaments). Labour supported this bill to committee, albeit with reservations. The Greens and Te Pāti Māori reckon this isn't the right approach to RMA reform - expect opposition filibustering practitioners to try and drag this one out. The Local Government (Water Services) Amendment Bill will resume its committee stage this week. The Bill is part of the scrapping of the sixth Labour Government's Three Waters policy, and sets up a new regulatory framework for water services delivery. All three opposition parties are against the bill, with the House still yet to debate parts 4 and 5. Interestingly, the Hauraki Gulf / Tīkapa Moana Marine Protection Bill is collaborative in that it was introduced by the previous government, and continued by the current one. It aims to promote the restoration of the Hauraki Gulf, which has been facing recent ecological decline. Te Pāti Māori did not support the Bill at its second reading. The Privacy Amendment Bill reaches the end of its legislative journey on Thursday, with nine speeches to go in its third and final reading. It has unanimous support. It seeks to improve public transparency regarding the gathering of private information, notably requiring agencies to notify someone when it collects their personal information indirectly. The Leader of the House's office also intends to get to the third reading of the Resource Management (Consenting and Other System Changes) Amendment Bill this week following Tuesday evening's committee stage, which they hope will be completed before the House adjourns. RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 2
An image of Mr Ed from his younger days. Photo: supplied In part two, community sports organisations are crying out for more more volunteers after a 40% drop in people signing up since the pandemic. And finally, is this the longest standing classroom toy? Mr Ed of Piha Community Preschool has been taken around New Zealand and further afield for the last 15 years.
RNZ News
10 hours ago
- RNZ News
No votes, no problem: The early winners in local elections
Photo: New Zealand Electoral Commission More than 220 local politicians have won a spot on their council or community board without a single vote being cast. The lack of candidates in some areas means representatives are being elected unopposed. Two - Hurunui mayor Marie Black and Manawatū deputy mayor Michael Ford -have even already 'won' mayoral seats for next term. Black told Local Democracy Reporting she was thrilled to be elected for a third term to represent the North Canterbury district. Ford told the Manawatu Standard it was a real privilege to be elected to mayor for the first time without opposition. Hurunui mayor Marie Black has already 'won' mayoral seats for next term. Photo: Supplied / Hurunui District Council A total of 3466 candidates are standing in the October local elections, according to Local Government NZ, the national body for councils. This is the highest number seen in the past six local elections. Of these, 222 were elected unopposed to their seat - a similar figure to the last two elections, LGNZ figures showed. LGNZ chief executive Susan Freeman-Greene said the uptick in candidates showed people see value in being a part of their council. "People are more engaged in this year's local elections than in the past and want to be a voice for their community. "This is good for democracy as the more voting choices people have, the more say they have in who represents their interests at the council table." Freeman-Greene said she wanted this to translate into more people voting. Voter turnout has steadily dropped over the years, with a 40 percent turnout for the 2022 local elections. Elisha Milmine didn't expect to go from a complete newcomer to guaranteed councillor in just five days. Milmine was initially contesting the one vacancy for the Hastings District Council's Kahuranaki ward, but her opponent withdrew for personal reasons. "I feel it would have been justified to fight for my place," Milmine told Local Democracy Reporting. "Now it's a matter of showing my constituency I am worthy of their vote through the term by working hard for our community." Elisha Milmine was initially contesting the one vacancy for the Hastings District Council's Kahuranaki ward, but her opponent withdrew for personal reasons. Photo: Supplied/LDR Rotorua Lakes Council's rural ward councillor Karen Barker can also put her canvassing feet up after being elected unchallenged. "It can be a reflection of the kind of job you have done and how comfortable people are with what the council's been doing." Ten of Hutt City's candidates were elected unopposed: Five across four wards, and five Eastbourne Community Board positions. Auckland has two wards with unopposed councillors (Rodney and Ōrākei). Christchurch has three: Harewood, Waimari and Hornby ward councillors. The Chief Executive of the local authority must give notice of the vacancy to the electoral officer. A by-election must then be held not later than 89 days after the electoral officer receives the notice. The by-election is conducted by post and must be for all the vacancies that exist when nominations closed on August 1. These will be required to fill 13 seats across 10 elections, including community board positions in Twizel, Clifton and Rotorua Lakes. Community boards generally represent a smaller area within their council. Most members earn between 3 - 10k per year, depending on the size and responsibilities of the board, with the chair earning more. A LGNZ spokesperson said community boards play an important role in a council, but their work often flies under the radar. "For the hours required ... the pay often doesn't cover costs like travel, childcare, or lost work time. This can be a tough fit for people with full-time jobs or families." In rural or sparsely populated wards, there aren't always enough eligible or willing people to do these roles. Gore District - Mataura Community Board Gore District - Gore and Districts Health Inc - Southland Ward Hastings District - Maraekākaho Community Subdivision Hurunui District - Hanmer Springs Community Board Mackenzie District - Twizel Community Board New Plymouth District - Clifton Community Board New Plymouth District - Kaitake Community Board Rotorua Lakes District - Rotorua Lakes Community Board Wellington City - Mākara-Ōhāriu Community Board Whakatāne District Council - Tāneatua Community Board LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
