Palestine Action activist to give Glastonbury talk
A Palestine Action activist is set to appear as a speaker at Glastonbury Festival.
Francesca Nadin, who described herself as a former 'political prisoner' and contributes to the Revolutionary Communist Party website, is listed as a speaker at the festival.
Nadin said she was arrested for 'conspiracy to commit criminal damage' against two Leeds banks, Barclays and JP Morgan, that activists claim have financial ties to Israel.
Details of her presence at the festival emerged on the day that Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, confirmed that the group will be banned as a terror group following a break in at the RAF base at Brize Norton.
A video shared by the group showed an individual on an electric shooter spray red paint into the engines of Airbus Voyager aircraft, which they claimed would be used to support British military operations in Cyprus and the Middle East.
As of Monday, official listings for Glastonbury Speakers Forum events state that Palestine Action's Nadin is set to appear. The same event listing states that other speakers will include Baroness Jones, a Green Party peer.
Also listed is Sam Holland, the leader of Youth Demand, the activist group that claimed credit for vandalising Vincent Van Gogh's Sunflowers in the National Gallery.
Lady Jones told the Telegraph that she was only aware that she would be joined by Youth Demand, and not Palestine Action.
'Shocking overreaction'
She said: 'Yes, I'll debate with them. I do know that belonging to or expressing support for a proscribed organisation is a criminal offence carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
'This is a shocking overreaction by the Government to a couple of protesters using paint.
'Such a move would be completely non-proportional and a hugely worrying restriction on the right to peaceful protest which is a cornerstone of democracy.
'But PA isn't proscribed yet. Plus 239,900 people follow it. Perhaps you can ask Mark Rowley and Yvette Cooper if there is a plan to arrest them all?'
Glastonbury has been approached for comment on the event, and whether it will go ahead.
Both MPs and peers will need to vote for the intended ban if it is to come into force.
If proscribed, the group's assets and money could be seized, and support for the group could become an offence.
Islamist group Hizb ut-Tahrir was the last organisation to be proscribed, in 2024, after its members were accused of praising and celebrating Hamas's terrorist attack on Israel on Oct 7 2023.
Proscription will make it illegal to be a member of Palestine Action, to invite support for it or to wear clothing or carry flags and placards backing it. Anyone caught doing so will face up to 14 years in jail.
It comes as Glastonbury has refused to bow to pressure to remove Kneecap from its listings.
Last week, Liam O'Hanna, one of the band members, appeared in court after being charged for allegedly displaying a flag in support of proscribed terrorist organisation Hezbollah while saying 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah' at a gig in November last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Ludgate Hill phone snatcher caught with DNA from lost shoe
A phone snatcher has been convicted after DNA from a shoe he lost during a theft in the City of London linked him to the Duarte, 28, was tackled off his e-bike by members of the public after he stole a handset from a victim's hand in Ludgate Hill on 7 August last year - losing a trainer in the struggle. He was captured on CCTV wearing one shoe after he managed to get sent the trainer for DNA analysis and found the thief's profile on the national of Saffron Walden, Essex, appeared at Inner London Crown on Monday where he admitted one count of theft. He is due to be sentenced in September. 'The slipper fitted our Cinderella' Physical forensics manager Andrew Walker, of the City of London Police, said: "We were able to get sufficient levels of DNA from the shoe to obtain a single, major profile that was suitable for searching against the national DNA search generated a "hit" to a man whose profile had previously been uploaded, Mr Walker explained."The slipper fitted our Cinderella and we were able to bring him before the courts."
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour's benefit cuts may discriminate against disabled women, say charities
Downing Street's disability cuts will have a 'devastating' impact on women's health and dignity and could breach equality law, the government has been warned. Charities and disabled people's organisations including Scope, Spinal Injuries Association, Inclusion London, ME Association and WinVisible told the Guardian that tightening eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) would mean disabled women being discriminated against, due to their higher personal care needs compared with men. Under the new rules, to be voted on by MPs next week, a claimant must receive four points in a single daily living category to qualify for the payment. Washing below the waist will score just two – half the number given to needing assistance between the shoulders and waist. It means the new four-point rule won't take into account menstruation or some women's extra toilet requirements, such as incontinence from pregnancy, unless they have additional needs. More than 100 Labour MPs have signed a Commons bid to halt the cuts in their tracks, enough to threaten Keir Starmer's majority. Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on an amendment declining to give the welfare reform bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on 1 July. The rebellion, the prime minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. 'The proposed changes to the Pip assessment criteria ignore fundamental aspects of women's health and dignity,' said Dharshana Sridhar, campaigns manager at the Spinal Injuries Association. The decision to award fewer points for assistance with personal care below the waist overlooked the realities of menstruation, incontinence and intimate hygiene; needs that were especially complex and often more acute for women with spinal cord injuries, Sridhar said. 'By failing to recognise the distinct and disproportionate impact of these changes on disabled women, the proposals risk breaching the Equality Act 2010, both in terms of sex and disability discrimination, and the Public Sector Equality Duty. A benefits system that systematically disregards menstruation, personal care, and continence management for disabled women cannot credibly claim to meet its legal obligations to promote equality and eliminate discrimination.' Hat Porter, a spokesperson for the menstrual justice charity Irise, said: 'Already PIP applicants with conditions like endometriosis and fibroids face a much lower than average application success rate, with claimants' debilitating symptoms being dismissed as 'just a period'. 'Tightening the eligibility criteria would make it even harder to access financial support. For those who use Pip to cover the costs of carers or social care fees, having this lifeline stripped away could leave them without the support they need to manage tasks like changing period products. That would have a devastating impact on their dignity as well as health.' There are wider concerns that women will be more likely to miss out on Pip under the new rules, after the government's own impact assessment showed more women than men currently score fewer than four points on descriptors while getting a daily living award. The ME Association said that Pip's existing 'majority of the time' rule – which says a claimant must be unable to do an activity over half the time to qualify – would compound the discrimination against women. 'Menstrual symptoms, by definition, occur intermittently and may not affect a woman for over 50% of the time – meaning they are often excluded from consideration, regardless of how severely disabling they are when present,' said Ella Smith, the charity's welfare rights consultant. 'In practice, this could lead to many women losing eligibility under the proposed 4-point rule, not because their support needs are minor, but because those needs are dispersed across multiple activities or occur cyclically. With Pip being positioned to replace the work capability assessment as the sole gateway to assessing work capability, it is imperative that the new system takes account of intermittent yet profoundly disabling experiences such as menstruation.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at Scope, said the charity had heard from 'hundreds' of disabled people who rely on benefits to afford sanitary products, incontinence pads, and needing to do more laundry. 'Disabled people are extremely concerned their personal hygiene and health will be among the many devastating costs of these cuts,' she said. The Pip changes come amid strained NHS community and social care, which several DPOs told the Guardian had already led to 'basic' hygiene being treated as a 'luxury' for some disabled women. Tumu Johnson, a spokesperson for Sisters of Frida, a disabled women's group, says: 'Disabled women have been told [by local councils] to wear incontinence pads instead of being provided support to use the toilet. They have also been told to use the hormonal pill to stop their periods instead of support to manage their menstruation the way they choose. We've heard from many disabled women who are scared that the Pip changes mean they could now lose vital personal care, on top of their other needs.' A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: 'The vast majority of people who are currently getting Pip will continue to receive it. We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people while always protecting those who need it most. 'At the heart of this is our review of the Pip assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our plan for change.'
Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Spectator
Home Office probes Palestine Action over suspected Iran link
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced on Monday afternoon that the UK government had decided to proscribe activist group Palestine Action – and now it transpires that officials are investigating its funding over concerns that there may be an Iran link. As reported by the Times, Palestine Action's donations are being probed amid worries that the Iranian regime is funding the campaign group via proxies given their aims align. How curious… Palestine Action's donations are being probed amid fears that the Iranian regime is funding the campaign group via proxies Palestine Action – which states its purpose is to 'dismantle the apartheid regime in Israel through targeted campaigns against companies that profit from the occupation and genocide of the Palestinian people' – admits on its website that as it is a grassroots movement, its funding may be 'sometimes inconsistent'. Donations can be made via its site, but the group does not publish financial information – although one of its few public donors is known to be James 'Fergie' Chambers, a US communist who is also the heir to the billion-dollar Cox Enterprises empire. NGO monitor, a research organisation that holds activist groups to account, has blasted Palestine Action for not revealing its funding sources, saying this 'reflects a lack of transparency and accountability'. And now the Home Office has waded in, with concerns about exactly where the group is getting the significant sums required for its legal costs. Dear oh dear… Cooper told the Commons on Monday that her decision to proscribe the group was made in parr by considering Palestine Action long history of controversial and damaging stunt. In 2022, seven members of the group broke into the Bristol headquarters of Elbit Systems UK, a subsidiary of the Israel-based arms manufacturer, with sledgehammers. In the same year, the group attacked the Thales defence factory in Glasgow and Instro Precision in Kent. In March last year, a Palestine Action activist slashed a 1914 portrait of Lord Balfour at Trinity College, Cambridge. The following month, four activists were charged with causing some half a million pounds worth of damage at the Teledyne factory in Shipley, which supplies electronics to the defence sector. Earlier this year, Palestine Action sprayed Allianz Insurance's London offices with red paint and graffitied Donald Trump's Turnberry golf course in Scotland. They don't do things by halves, eh? The Home Secretary will lay a draft proscription order next Monday, and MPs will vote on the motion the following Wednesday. If passed, it is down to the House of Lords to have the final say before the legislation comes into force on 4 July. Stay tuned…
