Senate referee appears open to revised GOP proposal to cut federal food assistance spending
The Senate Republican plan would require states for the first time to pay a sizeable share of food benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) unless they reduce the error rate for delivering benefits to below 6 percent.
Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said earlier Tuesday that MacDonough had accepted the revised language, but a committee spokesperson clarified that she has been 'responsive to the revised language' but hasn't made a ruling.
Republican staff reworked the proposal to give states more 'flexibility' and 'information' about implementing the program.
He said the revised language would achieve roughly the same level of savings as the proposal the parliamentarian ruled against over the weekend.
'It's intact. It's very little change. Just gives the states more information to work with, but as far as affecting the program or how the program works, it's the same. Again, it just gives [states] a little bit more flexibility and a little bit more information,' Boozman told The Hill.
'It's all done and it's intact. The savings are almost identical. So we're pleased by the outcome,' he added.
It's a welcome piece of news for Republicans who have watched the parliamentarian reject a variety of proposals in the bill for violating the Senate's Byrd Rule, which governs what legislation is eligible to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote on the budget reconciliation fast track.
MacDonough had dealt Republicans a setback by ruling that the section of the GOP megabill mandating that states cover a portion of SNAP benefits depending on their error rates in delivering assistance would violate the Byrd Rule.
Boozman told The Hill on Monday that the parliamentarian was primarily concerned that the legislation did not provide enough time and flexibility for states to adapt to the proposed changes.
'They were concerned that [states] wouldn't have enough time with the data that they received in order to adjust for the payment errors. Our answer to that is to come up with a fix to provide them the data sooner,' he said. 'That was the parliamentarian's concern.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
British Bank Standard Chartered's (STAN) Stock Falls 9% on Reports of U.S. Probe
Shares of British bank Standard Chartered (STAN) are down 9% after a U.S. Republican lawmaker wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi asking for action to be taken against the bank for alleged 'sanctions evasion.' Elevate Your Investing Strategy: Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican, wrote in a letter posted to social media that a special attorney should be appointed to look into Standard Chartered's alleged failings. The London-based bank has been investigated over sanctions in the past. Standard Chartered was fined $1.1 billion in 2019 by U.S. and U.K. authorities for evading sanctions and lacking proper money-laundering controls. The lender is currently facing a $1.9 billion lawsuit in the United Kingdom by investors over Iran sanctions violations. Bank's Response Standard Chartered was quick to respond to the allegations made by Representative Stefanik. In a statement, the bank said that 'the underlying allegations — including the claim that there are $9.6 billion in unlawful transactions — are entirely false and have been rejected by the U.S. courts multiple times.' Standard Chartered added that it will 'fully cooperate' with any relevant authority. Stefanik also alleged that the New York Attorney General's Office, which helps oversee most foreign banks operating in the U.S., did not take action on allegations against Standard Chartered in the past. Stefanik is requesting that the acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey be in charge of a new probe into the British bank. Is STAN Stock a Buy? The stock of Standard Chartered has a consensus Moderate Buy rating among nine Wall Street analysts. That rating is based on three Buy and six Hold recommendations issued in the last three months. The average STAN price target of 1,356.22p implies 3.89% upside from current levels.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
New Yorkers fighting against massive battery storage plants find new ally in EPA chief Lee Zeldin
New Yorkers fighting the opening of massive battery energy plants in their neighborhoods have a powerful new ally: US Environmental Protection Administrator Lee Zeldin. Zeldin, the former Long Island congressman, will be holding a press conference in Hauppauge Monday to discuss environmental safety issues posed by 'Battery Energy Storage Systems,' which are hazardous when they catch fire. While not explicitly opposing BESS, Zeldin is set to issue a new EPA guidance for communities and local governments to consider regarding the environmental risks of such facilities. Advertisement 3 EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin is set to hold a press conference on Long Island on safety issues presented by 'Battery Energy Storage Systems' on Monday. REUTERS/Raquel Cunha 'Calling a technology 'green energy' does not mean there are no environmental impacts,' Zeldin, the 2022 Republican candidate for governor, told The Post. He blasted the 'delusional' and unrealistic green energy goals advanced by Gov. Kathy Hochul and Albany Democrats amid the backlash against the proliferation of battery storage plants across New York, including Staten Island, Queens, the Hudson Valley and upstate. 'Residents are looking across the country where dangerous lithium battery fires at BESS facilities have caused widespread damage, and they are concerned with New York's partisan push to fill yet another of its delusional 'green' goals, which the state itself admits it cannot meet,' Zeldin said. Advertisement 'Many New Yorkers, especially in New York City and on Long Island, have made their voices clear – they do not want Battery Energy Storage Systems built in their neighborhoods.' The Empire State is aggressively expanding battery energy storage systems to meet ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 and achieve 100% zero-carbon emission electricity by 2040 under the the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act of 2019. Zeldin slammed what he deemed wacky state Democrat policies that move to limit or phase out more reliable energy sources such as natural gas to advance their climate protection agenda. Advertisement 3 A protest against a proposed lithium-ion battery energy storage system in Brooklyn on Aug. 6, 2025. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post 'The state that banned the safe extraction of natural gas, gas hook-ups on new construction, gas stoves, and aims to end the sale of gas-powered vehicles, continues to put the safety and well-being of New Yorkers second to their climate change agenda,' Zeldin said. He cited recent incidents in California and Hawaii to demonstrate the serious risks BESS facilities pose to host communities and first responders. Advertisement A rep for Hochul said it was bizarre to have the nation's environmental chief opposing the advancement of clean energy programs that reduce carbon emissions to tackle climate change, aiming to improve the environment while diversifying New York's power supply. 'Lee Zeldin's job is to protect the environment, but he has been doing anything but that,' said Ken Lovett, Senior Hochul's communications advisor on energy and the environment. 'His continued assault on clean energy and his push for rollbacks on environmental protections will hurt everyone in his home state of New York and across the country and fly in the face of the federal government's claim of wanting U.S. energy independence,' Lovett said of Zeldin. 'While other states are rapidly investing in storage to stabilize their grids and lower costs, Zeldin's approach risks leaving New York's economy behind and forcing New Yorkers to pay,' he said. New York recently enacted among the most stringent battery energy storage regulations in the country in 2023 pertaining to safely developing energy storage facilities, Hochul's office said. 3 Zeldin is set to issue a new EPA guidance for communities and local governments on the plants. Luiz C. Ribeiro for New York Post Six former city fire safety officials, including former FDNY Commissioner Tom Von Essen, praised the regulations. Since 2019, New York has approved more than 6,000 battery storage projects creating 440 megawatts of capacity, with 1.3 gigawatts already under contract and a state goal of six gigawatts by 2030, according to the EPA. Advertisement New York passed two laws that dramatically expanded the state government's power to override local opposition for major renewable projects, including battery storage facilities of 25 megawatts or larger. The Hauppauge facility is not subject to a state override, but residents there have expressed widespread misgivings. Concerns include potential toxic emissions released during a blaze as well as contaminated water containing hydrofluoric acid and other pollutants being discharged into the Nissequogue River and groundwater while fighting a fire at the facility.
Boston Globe
2 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Black mayors of cities Trump decries as ‘lawless' tout significant declines in violent crimes
'It gives us an opportunity to say we need to amplify our voices to confront the rhetoric that crime is just running rampant around major US cities. It's just not true,' said Van Johnson, mayor of Savannah, Ga., and president of the African American Mayors Association. 'It's not supported by any evidence or statistics whatsoever.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up After deploying the first of 800 National Guard members to Washington, the Republican president is setting his sights on other cities including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Oakland, Calif., calling them crime-ridden and 'horribly run.' One thing they all have in common: They're led by Black mayors. Advertisement 'It was not lost on any member of our organization that the mayors either were Black or perceived to be Democrats,' Johnson said. 'And that's unfortunate. For mayors, we play with whoever's on the field.' Advertisement The federal government's actions have heightened some of the mayors' desires to champion the strategies used to help make their cities safer. Trump argued that federal law enforcement had to step in after a prominent employee of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, was attacked in an attempted carjacking. He also pointed to homeless encampments, graffiti, and potholes as evidence of Washington 'getting worse.' However statistics published by Washington's Metropolitan Police contradict the president and show Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson scoffed at Trump's remarks, hailing the city's 'historic progress driving down homicides by more than 30 percent and shootings by almost 40 percent in the last year alone.' Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles, where homicides fell 14 percent between 2023 and 2024, called the federal takeover nothing but a performative 'power grab.' In Baltimore, officials say they have seen historic decreases in homicides and nonfatal shootings this year, and those have been on the decline since 2022, according to the city's public safety data dashboard. Carjackings were down 20 percent in 2023, and other major crimes fell in 2024. Only burglaries have climbed slightly. The lower crime rates are attributed to tackling violence with a 'public health' approach, city officials say. In 2021, under Mayor Brandon Scott, Baltimore created a Comprehensive Violence Prevention Plan that called for more investment in community violence intervention, more services for crime victims, and other initiatives. Scott accused Trump of exploiting crime as a 'wedge issue and dog whistle' rather than caring about curbing violence. 'He has actively undermined efforts that are making a difference saving lives in cities across the country in favor of militarized policing of Black communities,' Scott said via email. Advertisement The Democratic mayor pointed out that the Justice Department has slashed over $1 million in funding this year that would have gone toward community antiviolence measures. He vowed to keep on making headway, regardless. 'We will continue to closely work with our regional federal law enforcement agencies, who have been great partners, and will do everything in our power to continue the progress despite the roadblocks this administration attempts to implement,' Scott said. Just last week Oakland officials touted significant decreases in crime in the first half of this year compared with the same period in 2024, including a 21 percent drop in homicides and a 29 percent decrease in all violent crime, according to the midyear report by the Major Cities Chiefs Association. Officials credited collaborations with community organizations and crisis response services through the city's Department of Violence Prevention, established in 2017. 'These results show that we're on the right track,' Mayor Barbara Lee said at a news conference. 'We're going to keep building on this progress with the same comprehensive approach that got us here.' After Trump gave his assessment of Oakland last week, she rejected it as 'fearmongering.' Social justice advocates agree that crime has gone down and say Trump is perpetuating exaggerated perceptions that have long plagued Oakland. Nicole Lee, executive director of Urban Peace Movement, an Oakland-based organization that focuses on empowering communities of color and young people through initiatives such as leadership training and assistance to victims of gun violence, said much credit for the gains on lower crime rates is due to community groups. 'We really want to acknowledge all of the hard work that our network of community partners and community organizations have been doing over the past couple of years coming out of the pandemic to really create real community safety,' Lee said. 'The things we are doing are working.' Advertisement She worries that an intervention by military forces would undermine that progress. 'It creates kind of an environment of fear in our community,' Lee said. In Washington, agents from multiple federal agencies, National Guard members and even the United States Park Police have been seen Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson Savannah's Johnson said he is all for partnering with the federal government, but troops on city streets is not what he envisioned. Instead, cities need federal assistance for things like multistate investigation and fighting problems such as gun trafficking, and cybercrimes. 'I'm a former law enforcement officer. There is a different skill set that is used for municipal law enforcement agencies than the military,' Johnson said. There has also been speculation that federal intervention could entail curfews for young people. But that would do more harm, Nicole Lee said, disproportionately affecting young people of color and wrongfully assuming that youths are the main instigators of violence. 'If you're a young person, basically you can be cited, criminalized, simply for being outside after certain hours,' Lee said. 'Not only does that not solve anything in regard to violence and crime, it puts young people in the crosshairs of the criminal justice system.' Advertisement For now, Johnson said, the mayors are watching their counterpart in Washington, Muriel Bowser, closely to see how she navigates the unprecedented federal intervention. She has been Johnson praised Bowser for carrying on with dignity and grace. 'Black mayors are resilient. We are intrinsically children of struggle,' Johnson said. 'We learn to adapt quickly, and I believe that we will and we are.'
