Afghanistan welcomes upgraded diplomatic ties with Pakistan
The move signals easing tensions between the neighbouring countries, as relations between the Taliban authorities and Pakistan -- already rocky -- have cooled in recent months, fuelled by security concerns and a campaign by Islamabad to expel tens of thousands of Afghans.
Pakistan's top diplomat on Friday said the charge d'affaires stationed in Kabul would be elevated to the rank of ambassador, with Kabul later announcing its representative in Islamabad would also be upgraded.
"This elevation in diplomatic representation between Afghanistan & Pakistan paves the way for enhanced bilateral cooperation in multiple domains," the Aghan foreign ministry said on X.
Kabul's Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi is due to visit Pakistan "in the coming days", ministry spokesman Zia Ahmad Takal told AFP.
Muttaqi met with Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar in May in Beijing as part of a trilateral meeting with their Chinese counterpart Wang Yi.
Wang afterwards announced Kabul and Islamabad's intention to exchange ambassadors and expressed Beijing's willingness "to continue to assist with improving Afghanistan-Pakistan ties".
Dar hailed the "positive trajectory" of Pakistan-Afghanistan relations on Friday, saying the upgrading of their representatives would "promote further exchanges between two fraternal countries".
Only a handful of countries -- including China -- have agreed to host Taliban government ambassadors since their return to power in 2021, with no country yet formally recognising the administration.
Russia last month said it would also accredit a Taliban government ambassador, days after removing the group's "terrorist" designation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Border dispute clouds Nepal PM Oli's India visit next month
Nepal's border dispute with India over Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura resurfaced on Wednesday, weeks before Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli's visit to New Delhi. The row follows an agreement between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval to reopen three trading routes, including Lipulekh. Kathmandu says the deal was struck without its consent and undermines its sovereignty. On Thursday, lawmakers across party lines raised the issue in Parliament. 'Unilaterally deciding the use of Nepali territory is not acceptable,' members declared. Kamal Thapa, Former Foreign Minister and Chairman of the Rastriya Prajatantra Party-Nepal urged Oli to raise the matter in his upcoming visits to Beijing and New Delhi. Mahesh Bartaula, Chief Whip of the ruling Communist Party of Nepal-UML called the India-China understanding 'a dilution of Nepal's sovereignty.' Nepali Congress leader Bishwa Prakash Sharma said all parties were united on the issue. Oli will attend the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation summit in China later this month and will travel to India on September 16. Nepal's Foreign Ministry said areas east of the Mahakali River, including Kalapani, Lipulekh and Limpiyadhura, are 'integral parts of Nepali territory.' It said India and China had been formally told not to carry out activities there. India, meanwhile, rejected Nepal's claims. 'Border trade through Lipulekh has existed since 1954. It was disrupted in recent years due to Covid and other developments. Both sides have now agreed to resume it.'
India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
Why Chinese Media Say India Has Now Realised The Need For Friendship With Beijing
New Delhi: China's state-run press has placed unusual focus on Foreign Minister Wang Yi's recent visit to New Delhi. For Beijing's news outlets, the trip signalled a shift in India's strategic posture at a time when U.S. tariffs are beginning to bite. During his two-day stay, Wang Yi held wide-ranging talks with Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval on the border situation. He also met External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Reports in Chinese media framed the visit as part of India's recalibration, suggesting that stronger ties with Beijing would benefit the Global South (a grouping of developing nations across Asia, Africa and Latin America). Add Zee News as a Preferred Source The Chinese foreign ministry later confirmed that the two sides agreed to restart regular dialogue mechanisms, expand cooperation, resist unilateral pressure from third countries and maintain calm along the boundary. State-run Global Times highlighted this consensus, stating that 'stability and peace' in the border areas had been reaffirmed. Some Indian media outlets claimed China had relaxed controls on rare earth exports to India. Asked about this, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said she was 'not aware of such a move' but added that Beijing sought uninterrupted supply chains and closer cooperation with partner economies. The Hindustan Times recently reported that China accounts for nearly 30 per cent of India's fertiliser imports, besides supplying rare earths for automobile components and tunnel-boring machines for infrastructure projects. Despite positive optics, official readouts from both capitals diverged on key issues. Beijing's statement claimed Jaishankar had acknowledged Taiwan as part of China. But India's foreign ministry clarified that New Delhi's position on Taiwan remained unchanged and that its economic, cultural and technological ties with Taipei would continue. On terrorism, India's official note said New Delhi strongly raised the issue with Wang Yi, recalling the SCO's founding objective of countering extremism. The Chinese release, however, made no reference to terrorism. Similarly, India flagged environmental concerns over China's planned mega dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo (Brahmaputra), stressing the need for transparency. This too was absent in Beijing's version. Chinese editorials have framed the visit as a step towards 'strategic space' for India. The China Daily wrote that New Delhi had little choice but to reassess its options after Washington doubled tariffs on Indian goods, despite India's alignment with the United States on several global issues. The paper argued that India's refusal to halt Russian oil imports further exposed its friction with American policy, pushing it to hedge by engaging China. The Global Times carried a similar theme, suggesting India's heavy dependence on the U.S. export market had become a vulnerability under rising tariffs, while Asian partnerships offered a safer alternative. Nationalist commentary platforms went further. A website, Guancha, quoted Fudan University scholar Lin Minwang as saying that closer ties with China could strengthen India's bargaining position with Washington. He also stressed that Beijing would never compromise on matters linked to core national interests. Wang Yi's visit, therefore, was more than a routine diplomatic stop. For Beijing, it was a moment to underline the potential of an India-China reset, driven as much by global economics as by shifting geopolitics.
India Today
18 minutes ago
- India Today
China's Wang Yi holds talks with Afghanistan, Pakistan: Should this worry India?
The top focus of this episode of India Today Global is on the expansion of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) following a trilateral meeting between the foreign ministers of China, Pakistan, and Afghanistan in Kabul. This development, termed CPEC 2.0, is viewed as a strategic challenge for New Delhi, running through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and potentially leading to the strategic encirclement of India via the 'String of Pearls' strategy, including the Gwadar Port. The programme examines this geopolitical shift as India and China attempt to renew ties since the 2020 Galwan standoff. Simultaneously, the discussion touches upon strained India-US relations over tariffs on Russian oil purchases. Strategic affairs expert Professor Brahma Chellaney provides his analysis, stating, "engagement with containment has been China's strategy for long."
