Fire-hit retirement flats rebuild may start in 2026
Work to replace a retirement complex which was gutted in a blaze more than five years ago could begin next year, a council report says.
The Beechmere complex in Crewe, Cheshire, was destroyed in August 2019 when fire tore through the timber-framed building.
The site, which had 132 apartments, was one of five extra care housing schemes commissioned through a PFI (private finance initiative) arrangement in 2007.
In 2023, charges were brought against six companies, all of which denied offences of failing to comply with the Fire Safety (Regulatory Reform) Order 2005. The firms are due to face trial in May.
About 150 elderly and disabled residents were evacuated but lost their homes when the fire broke out. No-one was injured in the blaze.
The report to Cheshire East Council's finance sub-committee has recommended councillors allow officers to continue and conclude renegotiation of the PFI contract.
If an agreement is reached between the various parties, building work on the replacement Beechmere complex could start in the spring or summer next year, with a possible opening date of late 2027 or early 2028, the report said.
Housing provider Avantage, which delivered the extra care housing schemes including Beechmere, could get planning permission for the new building this summer, the document states.
The sub-committee is set to discuss the report's recommendation during a meeting on Monday.
The trial of the six accused firms has been scheduled to begin at Chester Crown Court on 5 May and is set to last 10 weeks.
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Questions remain five years after retirement home fire
Beechmere: Lawyers apply for court case dismissal
Charges brought over retirement complex blaze
Retirement homes destroyed in fire to be replaced
'I just keep thinking, why has this happened?'
Cheshire East Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Works to replace unsafe 'high fire risk' cladding on Thamesmead blocks
A housing developer will replace the unsafe 'high fire risk' cladding of eight Thamesmead tower blocks but residents remain frustrated, feeling the job is only half-finished. Residents of Royal Artillery Quays (RAQ) have campaigned for over half a decade to make their home safe after several investigations identified building defects in the residential complex that posed a serious fire risk. As previously reported by the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), chartered engineering and advisory firm Urban Change gave all eight buildings a high fire risk rating in 2022 primarily due to the 'poor workmanship' it identified in the installation of the external wall insulation (EWI) system. Urban Change found that fire break fixings were missing, not regularly spaced and made of plastic and not steel, making them more susceptible to failure if exposed to fire. The investigation also discovered that the expanded polystyrene (EPS) render system in the EWI wasn't thick enough, with the report stating: 'This could lead to early exposure of the combustible insulation to fire.' Barratt Developments, the original developer of the eight block complex that was built in 2002, has announced that work to remediate the problems found within RAQ's external walls will begin this month, at no cost to leaseholders. These works are based on the recommendations of the Urban Change report and have recently been approved by the Building Safety Regulator (BSR). A Barratt spokesperson said: 'As the original developer for Royal Artillery Quays, we remain committed to remediating any fire safety issues identified in the original construction of the buildings, at no cost to leaseholders, in line with our obligations under the Developer Remediation Contract we signed in March 2023. 'Now that the external wall remediation designs have been approved by the Building Safety Regulator, we look forward to starting works in mid-late June.' The Local Democracy Reporting Service understands that the work will involve the removal and replacement of the EPS render system contained within RAQ's EWI that covers approximately 90 per cent of the overall development building façade, as well as any other items identified as requiring remediation. Although pleased that this work will begin soon, RAQ residents still fear the job is not done as no plan to remedy problems found in the complex's internal walls has been offered. RAQ's property manager Rendall & Rittner commissioned fire safety inspectors to conduct a fire stopping survey at three of the eight tower blocks in 2019. The purpose of the survey was to test whether the internal sections and rooms within the tower blocks had sufficient structural integrity to prevent fires spreading from one part of the building to another. In a report seen by the LDRS, the inspectors stated: 'Our survey establishes that the areas, as surveyed, currently do not meet the minimum statutory requirements, and without remedial attention it is conceivable that any fire incident could result in significant loss and possible prosecution of The Responsible Person(s) and their individual Duty Holders.' RAQ resident George Boyd said: 'Crucially, the internal remediation work has not yet been approved. "We are aware of the potential for extensive costs, as evidenced by the £432 million spent to rectify similar internal defects at Olympic Village. 'Disturbingly, fire safety reports for RAQ, including the Gresham IMS report, highlight the serious nature of these internal defects, even suggesting the possibility of prosecutions in the event of a fire.' Mr Boyd also fears that the external wall remediation work won't go far enough either, as Urban Change stated that only the first two storeys of aluminium corner panels on RAQ's fire escape staircases would need to be replaced, despite the insulation of these panels having a Euroclass rating of E, the second most combustible rating in the fire class system. Urban Change said: 'The other corner panels higher up the stair core are not being replaced as there are no ignition sources externally or internally.' Mr Boyd was critical of this, claiming that this decision will condemn RAQ residents to permanently higher insurance. He said: 'While the external wall remediation is approved, we are deeply concerned that combustible materials, now prohibited in new constructions, will remain within our fire escape stairwells. 'Insurers have indicated that this will lead to permanently high insurance premiums, likely further increasing our already substantial monthly service charges. Furthermore, real estate experts have advised that this partial remediation, sanctioned by the BSR, is likely to have a significant negative impact on the value of our properties. 'As a long-term resident nearing retirement, my flat represents my life investments, and this continued devaluation is a major worry.' Another RAQ resident Sue McDougall said the remediation work 'will not make me feel safe' due to the lack of internal work being carried out. She said: 'Am I and other residents celebrating? Unfortunately, the answer from many of us is not yet.' Steve Day, chair of the Royal Artillery Quays Residents association, has been campaigning to rectify the fire safety problems at RAQ for over five years. He has been critical of Greenwich Council for not backing residents' claims that Barratt breached building regulations during the development's construction over 20 years ago. He said: 'We welcome the work starting on the external wall remediation, but are concerned that the internal remediation hasn't yet been scoped and signed off. 'The undermining of all our evidence by the council of building safety breaches at the time of construction severely hampers our campaign to ensure our internal remediations are done to the standards that are required.' Mr Day referred to an email seen by the LDRS that was sent to him by Greenwich councillor Rachel Taggart-Ryan on April 22 which stated: 'There is no evidence to suggest that the works were in breach of the Building Regulations applicable at the time of construction.' In response to Barratt's announcement that the BSR had approved the EWI remediation work, a Greenwich Council spokesperson said: 'We believe strongly that everyone in Royal Greenwich should have a safe and secure home. 'Royal Artillery Quays is a private development, and its cladding is the developer's responsibility. "We will continue to engage with residents and stakeholders as appropriate to ensure necessary action is taken. 'While we remain neutral in terms of the building's original construction, we're pleased a scheme of work, proposed by the developer, has now been agreed by the Building Safety Regulator and we understand that works are due to begin by the end of June 2025 to bring all buildings to the BSR standards. 'There are no specific powers available to the council to speed up the developer's process. Our priority is ensuring a swift resolution, mediating where appropriate, to ensure the works agreed between the developer and BSR are completed.'
CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
New Placer County water treatment plant breaks ground, will serve Colfax to Applegate
COLFAX — A major investment is underway aimed at improving both water access and fire safety in Placer County. The Placer County Water Agency broke ground just north of Interstate 80 on the new Colfax water treatment plant, serving foothill communities from Colfax to Applegate. Safe drinking water is essential, and this project will greatly improve water quality for thousands of homes. It will also help keep this community safer when it comes to fighting wildfires. "When you build for communities and homes, you also build for a fire system," said Andy Fecko, general manager of the water agency. The new facility will replace one built 60 years ago that is now outdated, undersized, and nearing the end of its operational life. "We were frankly out of capacity at the old treatment plant, and it uses an old treatment process that's not as good as the one we're putting in," Fecko said. The new plant will nearly double treatment capacity from 1.2 to 2 million gallons per day, providing service to more homes, including those currently relying on groundwater wells. "The water will be cleaner, there will be more of it, and we'll be able to get that water to more people," Fecko said. It will also ensure enough supply for fire hydrants, important tools in protecting these vulnerable communities. "The River Fire that came very close to burning down the city of Colfax, that's the kind of system we're aiming to improve so the community ends up safer," Fecko said. The new Colfax facility is one of several projects supported by the California Department of Water Resources. "There's nothing more fundamental than turning on the tap and trusting the water coming out and that it will come out when you turn it on," said Laurel Firestone, board member of the state Water Resources Control Board. Officials say that the Colfax plant is a model, not just for this region but for others across California facing similar challenges. "This project is really a model for how together the entire region can be stronger, and it's exactly the kind of thing we're funding and starting to see come to fruition across the state," Firestone said. They broke ground on construction on Thursday, and they expect to have it complete within the next two years.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Major housing scheme decision delayed
A decision on plans to build 150 new homes has been deferred after councillors asked for more details around the developer's contribution towards extra school places. The planning application, from Stonebridge Homes, would have seen the development built off Hatfield Lane, in Barnby Dun, Doncaster. A report by planning officers said the developers would be asked to make financial contributions to local schools, including Hungerhill, to provide additional school places. However, councillors decided they needed answers from the council's education department on how it calculates figures regarding school places for developments. The report said a contribution of £605,000 would have funded 25 additional school places, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. It prompted questions from councillors Steve Cox and Neil Wood, with the latter referencing other developments near to Hungerhill school which would add to demand. Cox moved to defer the decision on planning permission until staff from the council's education department came to offer "clarity". Wood asked if a cumulative figure for places at schools affected by multiple developments to be put in council reports. The vote was carried and the application will come back to planning at a later date. The plans consist of 115 dwellings for "market housing" and 35 dwellings for "affordable housing". The council report stated the proposal "meets all key policy requirements in respect of affordable housing, public open space, education, and biodiversity net gain". A total of 63 objections had been lodged by residents in the area, raising concerns about the impact on services, including GPs in the area. However, officers informed councillors on the committee the GP practice locally "is still accepting new patients and there are others also nearby". Katie Purdam, who spoke on behalf of Stonebridge Homes, said: "The scheme has been subject to a number of changes since it was first submitted." She said it was an "opportunity" shaped with the local community and council "to deliver much need housing on the site". "The proposals have been designed with community in mind," she told the meeting. A decision on the application will be made at a future date. Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds or catch up with the latest episode of Look North. Doncaster Council
