HIV transmission in Papua New Guinea at crisis levels
UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation estimate the Pacific nation recorded 11,000 new cases last year alone.
That's equivalent to 30 new positive tests a day including seven newborns, who can be prevented from contracting HIV through antiretroviral therapy.
PNG Health Minister Elias Kapavore said the trend was "deeply concerning".
"As such, I am declaring this a National HIV crisis," he told a press conference in Port Moresby.
The declaration is more than symbolic, activating a national emergency response plan enabling cross-sector co-ordination and investment in HIV services.
Adding to the anguish at the figures is the advancement of treatment and prevention options for HIV.
Most crucial is improving testing rates, so that more of the estimated 120,000 in Papua New Guinea with HIV can seek treatment.
Acting PNG health secretary Ken Wai said testing every pregnant woman can allow them to know their status and then access medication that prevents transmitting the virus to their child.
"We must scale-up access to HIV testing and treatment, particularly for groups most at risk. These priority initiatives should be offered at health facilities nationwide, and will require community leadership and support," he said.
Mr Kapavore called HIV "a disease of inequality".
"It is time for all of us to step up. I personally commit to raising this issue with my fellow ministers and parliamentarians and ensuring the urgent allocation of resources to protect our people - especially the next generation of Papua New Guineans," he said.
The uptick reverses a decade of progress made to 2010, when World Vision reported new infections fell by roughly half to roughly 6000 a year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The ‘unworthy' cancer with a terrible survival rate and the program seeking to change it
Lung cancer is particularly lethal because it is silent, with almost no symptoms until the disease has progressed. Forty-two per cent of diagnoses are for final-stage cancer, when it is almost too late for treatment. The screening program will use low-dose CT scanners to check all heavy smokers aged 50 to 70. By catching cancer at an earlier stage, when it can be more effectively treated, it is expected the program will save 12,000 lives over the next decade. Smoking is the major risk factor for lung cancer, responsible for 90 per cent of male and 65 per cent of female cases. When the tobacco leaf is dried, two nitrosamine molecules are produced. When the tobacco is ignited, the nitrosamines enter the lungs, where they can mutate DNA, turning healthy cells cancerous. Loading Lung cancer itself is relatively survivable if caught early, as surgeons can remove the cancerous tissue. 'Our lungs are actually really remarkable. You can more or less remove one whole lung, and for the average person, they wouldn't notice,' says Professor Brian Oliver, a leading respiratory researcher at the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research in Sydney. But that cuts both ways. Cancer can take over large parts of the lung without the patient even noticing. It is only once the tumour grows into an airway that a bloody cough can develop. By this stage, it may be too late. Survival rates halve at each stage the cancer is detected after the first. Hence, the screening program. A 2021 meta-analysis of nine screening pilots covering thousands of people found a 16 per cent reduction in lung-cancer mortality. 'We're all imperfect people, doing imperfect things.' Amy* But the idea long struggled to get traction among policy-makers, says Brooke. 'We just don't blame other diseases like we do with lung cancer,' he says. 'When we started to talk about the prioritisation of lung cancer screening, others said that ovarian cancer was more worthy.' The change came when advocates started taking a leaf from campaigns run by HIV-AIDS organisations in the '80s. 'A highly stigmatised community that had been pilloried for no reason,' says Brooke. 'We used that template.' Loading As with all screening programs, overdiagnosis remains a real risk. East Asian countries have heavily promoted lung cancer screening over the past few decades. In response, many non-smokers – particularly women – presented for screening. The result: a dramatic increase in lung surgeries, far above the actual rate of cancer detected. Screening often catches slow-growing cancers that probably aren't life-threatening; about 9 per cent of cancers spotted in one pivotal trial are considered 'overdiagnosed'. This problem is exacerbated if you screen a low-risk population – such as non-smoking women. 'Even before a diagnosis of lung cancer was made, the clinicians in those countries are just going ahead with [surgery]. And then not even finding any cancer,' says Professor Katy Bell, an expert in overdiagnosis based at the University of Sydney. 'There is definitely potential for harm.' Australia's program was designed with this in mind. That's why it targets only smokers. The economics of lung cancer screening are also tricky; early estimates suggested it simply wasn't cost-effective. People who smoke are at higher risk of a range of diseases, not just lung cancer. Does catching cancer really change their life-expectancy? It's not clear from the data we have. But health economists estimate for every $60,000 spent on the program, one Australian will enjoy an extra year of disease-free life – just within the cost-threshold the government is typically willing to pay. Amy*, 27, is a smoker who 'comes from a family of smokers', some of whom have developed lung cancer. 'It's a growing, lingering fear in the back of my head,' she says. Loading She's delighted about the introduction of a screening program. 'I can understand where the stigma comes from. On the surface level, it is our choice to smoke,' she says. 'It's something I'm very aware of and working towards – I've tried quitting multiple times. But we're all imperfect people, doing imperfect things.'
The Age
a day ago
- The Age
The ‘unworthy' cancer with a terrible survival rate and the program seeking to change it
Lung cancer is particularly lethal because it is silent, with almost no symptoms until the disease has progressed. Forty-two per cent of diagnoses are for final-stage cancer, when it is almost too late for treatment. The screening program will use low-dose CT scanners to check all heavy smokers aged 50 to 70. By catching cancer at an earlier stage, when it can be more effectively treated, it is expected the program will save 12,000 lives over the next decade. Smoking is the major risk factor for lung cancer, responsible for 90 per cent of male and 65 per cent of female cases. When the tobacco leaf is dried, two nitrosamine molecules are produced. When the tobacco is ignited, the nitrosamines enter the lungs, where they can mutate DNA, turning healthy cells cancerous. Loading Lung cancer itself is relatively survivable if caught early, as surgeons can remove the cancerous tissue. 'Our lungs are actually really remarkable. You can more or less remove one whole lung, and for the average person, they wouldn't notice,' says Professor Brian Oliver, a leading respiratory researcher at the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research in Sydney. But that cuts both ways. Cancer can take over large parts of the lung without the patient even noticing. It is only once the tumour grows into an airway that a bloody cough can develop. By this stage, it may be too late. Survival rates halve at each stage the cancer is detected after the first. Hence, the screening program. A 2021 meta-analysis of nine screening pilots covering thousands of people found a 16 per cent reduction in lung-cancer mortality. 'We're all imperfect people, doing imperfect things.' Amy* But the idea long struggled to get traction among policy-makers, says Brooke. 'We just don't blame other diseases like we do with lung cancer,' he says. 'When we started to talk about the prioritisation of lung cancer screening, others said that ovarian cancer was more worthy.' The change came when advocates started taking a leaf from campaigns run by HIV-AIDS organisations in the '80s. 'A highly stigmatised community that had been pilloried for no reason,' says Brooke. 'We used that template.' Loading As with all screening programs, overdiagnosis remains a real risk. East Asian countries have heavily promoted lung cancer screening over the past few decades. In response, many non-smokers – particularly women – presented for screening. The result: a dramatic increase in lung surgeries, far above the actual rate of cancer detected. Screening often catches slow-growing cancers that probably aren't life-threatening; about 9 per cent of cancers spotted in one pivotal trial are considered 'overdiagnosed'. This problem is exacerbated if you screen a low-risk population – such as non-smoking women. 'Even before a diagnosis of lung cancer was made, the clinicians in those countries are just going ahead with [surgery]. And then not even finding any cancer,' says Professor Katy Bell, an expert in overdiagnosis based at the University of Sydney. 'There is definitely potential for harm.' Australia's program was designed with this in mind. That's why it targets only smokers. The economics of lung cancer screening are also tricky; early estimates suggested it simply wasn't cost-effective. People who smoke are at higher risk of a range of diseases, not just lung cancer. Does catching cancer really change their life-expectancy? It's not clear from the data we have. But health economists estimate for every $60,000 spent on the program, one Australian will enjoy an extra year of disease-free life – just within the cost-threshold the government is typically willing to pay. Amy*, 27, is a smoker who 'comes from a family of smokers', some of whom have developed lung cancer. 'It's a growing, lingering fear in the back of my head,' she says. Loading She's delighted about the introduction of a screening program. 'I can understand where the stigma comes from. On the surface level, it is our choice to smoke,' she says. 'It's something I'm very aware of and working towards – I've tried quitting multiple times. But we're all imperfect people, doing imperfect things.'
ABC News
12-08-2025
- ABC News
Over 31 cases of polio in Papua New Guinea after outbreak declared in May, WHO says
More than 31 cases of polio have been detected in Papua New Guinea since the disease re-emerged earlier this year. The World Health Organisation (WHO) confirmed the numbers on Monday, as PNG launched a national immunisation campaign in Port Moresby. An outbreak was declared in May after two children were confirmed to have the virus. Polio, also known as poliomyelitis, is a highly infectious disease that primarily affects children under the age of five. It can also affect older age groups. Most people who have it have no symptoms, but it can lead to irreversible paralysis in about one in 200 infections, or 1 per cent of cases. The virus is spread by person-to-person contact or the ingestion of contaminated virus from faeces. Because the virus multiplies in the gut of infected people, who then shed it in their stool for several weeks, it can spread through a community, particularly in areas with poor sanitation. The WHO said over 31 detections of the virus had been confirmed in Papua New Guinea through environmental and community surveillance since May. While no cases of paralysis had been reported, the risk of further transmission remained high due to low immunisation rates and poor access to children who lived in remote areas. The WHO said the vaccine campaign would focus on the mainland provinces, of which 17 had been identified as high-risk areas. Here, both the oral polio vaccine and the polio vaccine jab were due to be administered. The New Guinea Islands provinces had been deemed lower-risk, and one round of the polio vaccine injection was planned. "This moment represents more than just a public health initiative — it is a bold step forward in our shared mission to secure the health and future of Papua New Guinea's youngest generation," WHO PNG representative Dr Masahiro Zakoji said. A baby receives polio vaccine in PNG. ( Supplied: WHO Papua New Guinea ) Last year, UNICEF highlighted Papua New Guinea's low childhood immunisation coverage. It found that only about 50 per cent of children born each year received "essential life-saving vaccines", which included the oral polio vaccine. That left about 120,000 children unvaccinated each year, the agency said. It said to prevent outbreaks and reach herd immunity against polio, vaccine coverage should be at least 95 per cent. The agency said that while the global prevalence of the disease had plummeted by more than 99 per cent in the past 35 years, millions of children were still affected because they missed out on the vaccine. Most of these children (85 per cent) were living in "fragile settings", UNICEF said. These included countries and communities where there was conflict, natural disasters and humanitarian crises. In 2000, Papua New Guinea was declared polio-free, but 18 years later, an outbreak of vaccine-derived polio type 1 was declared. It resulted in 26 cases across nine provinces in 2018. The WHO said the 2018 Papua New Guinea outbreak was brought under control through further rounds of vaccination, community engagement and better surveillance of the disease. Meanwhile, the current outbreak is related to vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2. In May, Papua New Guinea's health department said the strain was a "rare form of the virus that can emerge in under-immunised communities but is well understood and can be effectively controlled through vaccination". RNZ
