
A Black Studies Curriculum Is (Defiantly) Rolling Out in New York City
They had been studying ancient matriarchal societies, including Iroquois communities that had women leaders. Now, their teachers were about to play the song 'Ladies First' by Queen Latifah and Monie Love. The teachers instructed their students to highlight any lyrics that reminded them of the Iroquois women, who were known as the Haudenosaunee Clan Mothers.
Although they did not know it, the middle schoolers were in the midst of their first lesson of 'Black Studies as the Study of the World,' a curriculum that rolled out in September and is now available to every New York City public school.
Tristan Vanderhorst, 12, took notes and bobbed to the music. 'I had never seen a woman rap like that,' he said afterward.
The curriculum, which spans from pre-K to 12th grade, covers early African civilizations, Black American history and the achievements and contributions of the African diaspora. The curriculum emphasizes what is known as 'culturally relevant' teaching, an approach meant to help students connect their own lives with what they are learning. It has been used by dozens of schools across the city since the last school year, to little fanfare.
But the Trump administration has moved aggressively in its first weeks to ban programs related to diversity and equity across government, including in schools.
Local school districts have traditionally been insulated from interference from the federal government. New York's curriculum — and similar efforts to bring discussions about race and history into schools — could test those lines, and how far the Trump administration might go to enforce its edicts.
Already, many K-12 educators, including the architects of New York City's new Black studies curriculum, appear defiant.
'In New York, we are trying our best to be Trump-proof,' Adrienne Adams, the speaker of the New York City Council, said in a recent interview. 'We are doing everything we can to protect the curriculum.'
In his second week in office, President Trump signed an executive order to withhold funding from schools that teach that the United States is 'fundamentally racist, sexist or otherwise discriminatory.' The order bans what it called 'discriminatory equity ideology,' which 'treats individuals as members of preferred or disfavored groups, rather than as individuals, and minimizes agency, merit and capability in favor of immoral generalizations.'
Whether New York's curriculum — or other Black history efforts — violate those terms is open to interpretation.
That executive order, and others like it, enter an ongoing debate about how schools should handle race and ethnicity. Some states, like California, have embraced ethnic studies education, a discipline born on the left that connects the experiences of people of color throughout history. Others have sought to limit or ban it. Since 2021, more than 44 states have restricted how race is discussed in public schools.
Last week, the Trump administration issued guidance to schools detailing how it might pursue its orders. Officials might examine elementary school with programs that 'shame students of a particular race or ethnicity' or that 'accuse them of being oppressors in a racial hierarchy.' In its guidance, the administration also suggested it would look at schools that it argued 'have sought to veil discriminatory policies with terms like 'social-emotional learning' or 'culturally responsive' teaching.'
Ms. Adams, who helped allocate $27 million to develop the Black studies lessons, has called New York's curriculum a 'model of fearlessness.' The curriculum offers students an 'African-centered perspective that predates slavery' and is optional for schools.
But about 200 have adopted it, and in early February, nearly 2,000 students gathered at the Channel View School for Research in Rockaway, Queens, for a Black studies student fair connected with the curriculum.
Melissa Aviles-Ramos, the city's schools chancellor, said the curriculum was essential in a diverse school district.
'When students connect with the material, they are more engaged, develop critical thinking skills and build a deeper sense of belonging,' she said in a statement. 'I am proud to lead a school system that values inclusion and the powerful truth that our diversity is our strength.'
In the curriculum's pre-K and elementary school lessons, students contemplate their identity through name study and ancestry exercises. In middle school, they are introduced to the concept of agency while studying local Black communities. They also learn about the Black media and the Black Panthers.
In high school, students explore Black liberation, slavery, disenfranchisement, policing and other hot-button political issues like reparations while reading Ta-Nehisi Coates's article 'The Case for Reparations.'
Peta-Gaye McLean, one of the seventh grade social studies teachers who began a lesson with a hip-hop music video, said she appreciates the new material, even though she has been teaching about Black history for years.
'Not only does it legitimize it, it gives the teachers a responsibility,' she said.
Some of her students took personally the lesson comparing the roles of women in pre-colonial America and Africa. Tristan said his takeaways were 'don't take women for granted. Respect them highly.'
His classmate, Amelia Sierra, 12, said the class taught 'all these good things about women and the ladies — how helpful they were and how important they were,' she said. 'So I think that shows me how important I am.'
That is part of the goal. Some education experts say that making connections to students' own lives and culture helps them master the material. One study found that students who take ethnic studies classes are more likely to graduate and go to college.
'The ability to really dig into problems that kids care about is one of the things that I think sets culturally relevant pedagogy apart,' Gloria Ladson-Billings, an education scholar who coined that term in the mid-1990s, said in an interview.
Not all educators agree with that approach. Ian Rowe, the founder of Vertex Partnership Academies, a charter school in the Bronx that embraces the classics, urges students to 'reject victimhood.' He said his school would never adopt the 'Black Studies as the Study of the World' curriculum.
His students, who are predominantly Black and Latino, are still exposed to Black history, Mr. Rowe said. But, he added, 'We're going at it from the human condition, a universality. So we don't want our kids to only see themselves through the prism of race only or gender only.'
Conservative and liberal educators may have more in common than they realize when it comes to teaching about Black history, said Frederick M. Hess, the director of education policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute, a right-leaning think tank.
In both right- and left-leaning parts of the country, new standards and lessons related to African American history often emphasize teaching about the strengths of the Black community. He said that heated political rhetoric prevents both sides from appreciating some of their shared values.
'Instead of trying to find common ground on antiracism or inclusive history or ways in which we can broaden the canon,' he said, partisans 'have instead found it more politically beneficial to plant an extremist flag.'
Alesha Smith, an English Language Arts teacher at Eagle Academy in Harlem, an all-boys school that is using the New York City curriculum, said she loved teaching about empowerment in difficult lessons about slavery, for example.
'The strengths of this curriculum are in identifying the strengths of the individuals and the flaws in the system,' she said.
Nevertheless, conservatives who have taken issue with ethnic studies might make similar criticisms of New York's curriculum, which was informed by some of the issues the Trump orders condemn, like 'equity.' It also does not discuss many Black conservatives.
Still, in some lessons, race never comes up. Professor Sonya Douglass, who oversaw the development of the curriculum as the director of the Black Education Research Center at Teachers College, Columbia University, said the intention was to have students think more about 'concepts like identity and empowerment, self-knowledge, culture.'
In December, Ms. Smith led a lesson on how enslaved people subverted the institution of slavery. An illustration at the front of the room showed a rose climbing out of concrete, a reminder of the class's previous discussion of Tupac Shakur's poem that reflects on the same imagery.
Students chose from several writing prompts, including one asking how they had overcome adversity in their own lives and another about the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
TriNahum Jones, 18, described how Dr. King used his platform as a minister to inspire legions of supporters. And Muhamed Toure, 17, wrote his essay about being stopped and frisked while walking home from the gym.
'It kind of just showed me racism hasn't gone away,' he said. 'It has just evolved and changed throughout time.'
After they put their pencils down, the class talked about Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad. They also spoke about quieter acts of rebellion, like learning how to read and write.
'I come out of class more impressed with the resilience of my race,' TriNahum said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
19 minutes ago
- NBC News
Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin urges fellow Democrats to 'go nuclear' in redistricting fight
BENTON HARBOR, Mich. — Sen. Elissa Slotkin, a rising Democratic star from Michigan, told NBC News that Democrats should 'go nuclear' to counter Republicans' push in Texas and other red states to redraw the congressional maps in their favor. The first-term senator, who was tapped to deliver the Democratic rebuttal to President Donald Trump's joint address to Congress this year, said Democrats have to fight fire with fire. 'I'm going to urge and encourage blue states like a California or Chicago or Illinois to do the same thing. I don't want to do that. I want the country to have a completely nonpartisan drawing of the lines based on the census. But if they're going to do that and go nuclear, so am I,' she said in an exclusive interview after her first and only town hall of the congressional August recess on Monday night. Slotkin argued that Democrats should go on the 'offensive' against Trump and congressional Republicans' agenda more broadly. If Republicans want her vote on a spending bill to avert a government shutdown at the end of September, for example, Slotkin said they will need to roll back health care cuts signed into law as part of Trump's megabill last month. 'If my vote is wanted, right, then we got to negotiate. And then the thing I'm going to negotiate for is returning some of that health care to the people I represent,' she told NBC News, noting that she voted against a Republican spending bill in March as well. The top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer of New York, faced intense backlash from the base after he allowed a key procedural vote on that bill to move forward. Slotkin said Democrats are ready for a new generation of leadership, noting that at 49 years old, she's 'like a spring chicken in the Senate.' She referred to older leaders, at one point, as 'warmed over leftovers' and said younger voters relate to members who get 'technology and the changing economy' and don't 'use a flip phone.' Slotkin brought up the issue during the town hall as well. 'Let's be honest, even here tonight, right? It is a very hard thing to bring our young people into the conversation, because they're disillusioned, they feel left out, they feel like these people don't represent me,' she told the crowd, which was overwhelmingly composed of White seniors and older voters, although it was held at a Boys and Girls Club in predominantly-Black Benton Harbor. The club, which is located in Republican Rep. Bill Huizenga's district, has lobbied her to protect its federal funding, Slotkin said. One Democrat who appears to have a grasp on the demographic the rest of the party seems to be struggling with, Slotkin said, is Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee for mayor in New York City. Slotkin said she disagrees with Mamdani on many issues, but that his upset victory over former Gov. Andrew Cuomo was 'like a blinking red light.' 'It's hard to miss the message of that election, which I think was very similar, frankly, to the election we had in November. Cost of living is still the biggest issue for people that I talk to,' she said. 'It's not maybe the internet's biggest issue, Twitter's biggest issue. It is the issue that 80% of my constituents will talk to me about in the street.' Slotkin said it's not about progressive versus moderate. Like Mamdani, Trump defeated Kamala Harris in 2024 after making lowering costs central to his campaign. 'He was going to put more money into your pocket and his yard signs, his digital ads, his TV ads, they were all centered around that,' she said. 'For Democrats, it was hard to know exactly what our priorities were.' 'We had a lot of issues we cared deeply about, but sometimes, when you care about everything, no one knows what your priorities are,' she continued. 'So my strong belief is that our priority has to be the economy.' The Democratic Party is divided on a central question right now, Slotkin said: 'Is Donald Trump an existential threat to democracy in his second term, or is Donald Trump's second term bad, but, like his first term, survivable if we just wait it out? And I just want you to know, from your senator, as someone who sits in that room on your behalf, I am in camp number one, he is an existential threat to democracy.' Asked about Gaza, Slotkin, a former CIA analyst who is pro-Israel, said she would have voted in favor of blocking certain offensive weapons sales to Israel last week. She missed the votes, brought by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., which failed but attracted the support of more than half of Senate Democrats. 'It's a very dangerous thing if we have support for our relationships abroad be completely partisan,' Slotkin said, adding that she 'was glad' that Trump sent his Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff to Gaza. 'I think that's an important step to, like, see what's on the ground and just bring this thing, all hostages out, end the humanitarian blockade. Like, get it done.'


CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump says Vance is "most likely" his heir apparent
President Trump said Tuesday he sees Vice President JD Vance as an early favorite to serve as his successor. A reporter asked Mr. Trump whether he sees Vance as the "heir apparent to MAGA." The president responded that Vance is "most likely" the leading contender. "It's too early, obviously, to talk about it. But certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point," the president said during an unrelated executive order-signing ceremony. Mr. Trump also mentioned Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and suggested he's "somebody that maybe would get together with JD in some form." And he said the Republican Party has some other "incredible people." The president has singled out Rubio and Vance in the past, but has mostly avoided choosing a favorite. He praised both men in a May interview with NBC News' "Meet the Press" and said he didn't "want to get involved" in picking a leader, though he noted that the vice president would typically "have an advantage." Vance and Rubio are both seen as possible contenders for the 2028 GOP presidential nomination. The two were once vehement Trump critics — with Rubio running against Mr. Trump in the 2016 GOP primaries — but they have repositioned themselves as allies and defenders of the president since then. At least publicly, both men have been coy about their political ambitions. Late last month, Rubio downplayed the possibility of a presidential run in an interview on Fox News' "My View with Lara Trump," which is hosted by the president's daughter-in-law. Rubio said he thinks Vance "would be a great nominee if he decides he wants to do that," adding that he'd be satisfied if secretary of state ended up being "the apex of my career." Meanwhile, Vance told Fox News' "Fox and Friends" in April he isn't focused on 2028, adding: "When we get to that point, I'll talk to the president. We'll figure out what we want to do." Mr. Trump has also repeatedly toyed with the possibility of running for a third term — even though the Constitution forbids presidents from serving for more than two terms. Earlier Tuesday, he told CNBC's "Squawk Box" he "probably" won't run for another term.


Boston Globe
20 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Russia says it will stop abiding by missile treaty
The US Defense Department did not immediately comment on the Foreign Ministry's statement Monday. The 1987 pact, also known as the INF Treaty, banned ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers (311 to 3,418 miles). As a result, more than 2,600 Soviet and US missiles were eliminated, in what was seen as a Cold War breakthrough. In 2019, during President Trump's first term, the United States pulled out of the agreement. The Trump administration argued that Russia had long been violating the treaty with the deployment of 9M729 cruise missiles, also known as SSC-8 missiles. Russia denied any knowledge of the violations. Advertisement Accusations of Russian violations date to 2014, when the Obama administration raised them. Moscow's announcement Monday came three days after Trump ordered the repositioning of two US nuclear submarines in response to a nuclear threat made online by Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president who is deputy chair of the country's security council. In a post on social media platform X later Monday, Medvedev highlighted the Foreign Ministry's announcement, which he blamed on what he called the anti-Russia policy of NATO countries, and he warned, 'Expect further steps.' Advertisement The ministry's statement did not mention Moscow's use in November of the Oreshnik intermediate-range ballistic missile against a city in Ukraine. The Oreshnik has a range that violates the INF Treaty. Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed Friday that the Oreshnik had entered service and would be deployed to Belarus, which shares a border with three NATO countries. The missile is capable of carrying nuclear warheads. Last year, the United States announced that Washington would begin 'episodic deployments' of intermediate-range missiles in Germany starting in 2026. Russia vowed countermeasures. The announced collapse of the INF Treaty and tensions with Russia over Ukraine have raised worries in the West of a return to a dangerous Cold War-style arms race, in which extremely fast Russian missiles armed with nuclear weapons could reach European capitals in a matter of minutes, with little warning or ability to mount a defense. Russian news media have bragged that the Oreshnik could reach Ramstein Air Base in Germany in just 15 minutes. Upon withdrawing from the INF Treaty, the United States said that, essentially, Washington had been adhering to the pact's restrictions unilaterally. By then, the Pentagon had grown uncomfortable with the treaty's limits. Adhering to the pact meant the United States could not deploy any midrange missiles in Asia, which would be a crucial part of any effort to defend Taiwan, the self-governing island that China has long claimed as its own. In its statement Monday, Russia's Foreign Ministry said that as the United States and its allies were moving toward the deployment of intermediate-range missiles in Europe and Asia, conditions for what it called its 'unilateral moratorium on the deployment of similar weapons' were no longer in place. Advertisement The statement came as Trump's special envoy for the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, prepared to visit Moscow this week to discuss possibilities for peace with Ukraine. Trump has threatened to apply tariffs on Russia and secondary tariffs on its oil buyers if Putin doesn't agree to a ceasefire by the end of the week. The Kremlin has refrained from issuing threats in response, in contrast to the remarks by Medvedev, who regularly makes bombastic comments online and isn't seen as speaking for Putin. On Monday, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov played down Trump's decision to reposition submarines. 'Russia treats the issue of nuclear nonproliferation with great care, and we believe everyone should be extremely cautious with nuclear rhetoric,' Peskov told reporters. He noted that US submarines were regularly on combat duty. 'We don't believe this is a case of any sort of escalation,' he said. The only major arms control agreement left in place between Moscow and Washington is the New START Treaty, but Putin announced in 2023 that Russia was suspending its participation in that pact. The treaty expires next year. Phil Breedlove, a retired US Air Force general who led US European Command from 2013-16, said he wasn't surprised that Russia had announced the move shortly after Trump threatened to get tough on Moscow over the conflict in Ukraine. 'This is a fairly standard approach Russia takes when they're trying to deter or intimidate the West,' Breedlove said. 'Every time the West considers a change, like giving new weapons to Ukraine, this is what happens.' Advertisement