logo
Ozempic And Wegovy: The Pros And Cons, Explained

Ozempic And Wegovy: The Pros And Cons, Explained

Scoop06-07-2025
Earlier this week semaglutide drugs Ozempic and Wegovy were made available for prescription in New Zealand.
Semaglutide originally arrived on the market in the US in 2017 as a diabetes medication, but has quickly been tied to extreme weight loss.
Wegovy can be prescribed to people over the age of 12, but many of the 65 percent of New Zealanders who are overweight or obese will have trouble affording it, with an estimated price of $500 a month.
The drugs have transformed our ability to manage obesity and type 2 diabetes, and have shown potential for a wide range of conditions such as Alzheimer's, addiction and depression.
But there are clouds to go along with the silver linings - such as potential vision loss.
"This condition, it occurs when there's insufficient blood flow to the nerves connecting the eye to the brain, and this leads to damage," US-based health reporter for New Scientist, Grace Wade, told RNZ's Sunday Morning. The specific condition was non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
"That can cause this sudden and permanent vision loss, usually in just one eye. Now, I should be clear this isn't total vision loss, at least usually - it's more like cloudiness, stuff like that."
People using semaglutides to treat diabetes were 4.3 times more likely to develop this condition, and those using it for weight loss 7.6 times, as people using other types of diabetes medications, a 2024 study found (Wade wrote about it in New Scientist here).
The drugs work by suppressing appetite, which typically leads to weight loss as people consume fewer calories. But the weight lost was not always beneficial, Wade said.
"It leads the body to break down fat, muscle and actually even bone for nutrients, and that's why… some research has found that upwards of 40 percent of the weight loss seen with these medications is due to loss of muscle mass… that makes it really important that people prioritise exercise when taking these drugs because if you don't use your muscle, you're more likely to lose it."
Getting into the exercise habit was also important since one day, most people on Ozempic or Wegovy will stop taking it - putting themselves at risk of putting the weight back on if they were not regularly moving.
Then there is 'Ozempic face'.
"I don't think this is a clinical term yet, but it's something that's popped up a lot in social media," Wade said.
"People who are taking these medications start developing... a sunken or hollowed out appearance, which can exacerbate fine lines and wrinkles, make their skin look a little more saggy.
"It isn't clear exactly how common this is… but it probably has to do with just weight loss, right? If you're losing weight, as much as some people would want to target their weight loss to certain areas of their body, we can't really do that. So, you know, any sort of overall weight loss is also gonna cause a loss of fat in your face."
There were also side effects for some, including constantly needing to go to the toilet, feeling bloated, belching, constipation, heartburn, fever, upset stomach - the list, collected here by the Mayo Clinic, goes on.
And nearly half of people who try it make it through a three-month course, one study found.
Wade also mentioned a lot of people taking semaglutide for diabetes or Alzheimer's prevention might be older and "frail", so not able to lose weight.
"Drug developers are actually working to develop new drugs that have similar effects as these weight loss medications, but without the weight loss."
The good news
One unexpected benefit of semaglutide was its apparent effect on not just calorie consumption, but use of addictive substances, such as alcohol and nicotine.
"We aren't exactly sure why that is, but it appears to be with how these medications affect brain activity.
"So these drugs curb cravings for alcohol similar to how they curb cravings for food, right? And that probably has to do with their impact on brain regions involved in reward processing and craving…
"A study of more than half-a-million people with a history of opioid use disorders showed that those who took Ozempic or similar [medications] had significantly lower rates of opioid overdose than those who didn't.
"Other studies have shown similar effects in people with cannabis use disorder, cigarette smokers and alcoholism."
Scientists did not expect this effect, calling it an "unintended consequence".
The drugs have also shown promise in reducing heart attacks and strokes, improving fertility, treating pain, improving mental health, lower the risk of kidney failure and slowing cognitive decline.
"I've never encountered a group of drugs like this," Wade said. "That's what makes these drugs so remarkable, because most medications can only treat one or two conditions, right?"
She said it was likely that weight loss was playing a role - as it frequently does in health - but "it doesn't seem to be the only [reason]".
But there is still a lot of research to be done, she said, before we all start taking it.
"Let's unravel how they can treat all of these conditions before we jump the gun and start suggesting we, you know, maybe put it in everyone's water or something."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision
Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision

Otago Daily Times

time2 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Leary slams govt over needle exchange decision

A Dunedin-based opposition MP has slammed the government for cutting funding for a world-leading needle exchange service for intravenous drug users. The Otago Daily Times has learned the Disc Trust, which has administered the needle-exchange programme since 1988, has lost its contract. The funding available for the service in the South Island has dropped in the latest round from $1.4 million to $1m. Labour MP for Taieri Ingrid Leary said the cut to the budget for these vital services was "another short-sighted approach by the current government". "This decision fails to recognise the significant value for money that needle exchange services provide. "Preventing diseases such as HIV and hepatitis C not only saves lives and improves quality of life, it also generates substantial long-term savings for taxpayers by averting the much more expensive costs associated with treating these conditions ... once again, it appears the South Island is not being prioritised." Ms Leary said the effectiveness of these services was largely built upon the long-standing and deep relationships providers had cultivated with their communities over many decades. "It will be exceptionally difficult for new providers to achieve the same level of reach and engagement without the benefit of these established relationships." The decision risked undermining the trust and accessibility fundamental to the success of needle-exchange programmes. Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) has said the funding was based on a new population model, but Ms Leary challenged that approach. "Funding these types of services purely on a population health basis is not necessarily the most logical approach, especially when specific communities within the broader population have demonstrably much higher needs." The decision-making process should have prioritised these specific needs rather than a broad population metric when formulating its approach, she said. "A needs-based assessment would likely have resulted in a different scoring matrix for the request for proposals [RFPs]. "I have raised a number of questions with the minister regarding this issue. There are widespread concerns across the motu that needle-exchange services are being centralised in an attempt to cut costs, and I am particularly worried about the adverse flow-on effects this will have on communities that are considered outposts of the primary provider. "The decisions regarding needle-exchange services in Dunedin are deeply problematic, reflecting a concerning trend in health funding and community engagement."

If it ain't broke ...
If it ain't broke ...

Otago Daily Times

time3 hours ago

  • Otago Daily Times

If it ain't broke ...

Decisions about health services which have an impact on vulnerable people must always consider much more than the immediate bottom line. Any changes need to cover whether some of the marginalised served might lose confidence and be unwilling to engage with a new service, and what the long-term cost of that might be to the people personally, and to the public purse. With that in mind, it is hard not to be worried about news the longstanding free needle-exchange service for intravenous drug users in Dunedin, provided through the Dunedin Intravenous Organisation (DIVO) is one of the DISC Trust services which has lost its contract. The trust also included the Southland Harm Reduction Programme, the Timaru Needle Exchange Trust and Nelson Injecting Community Health Enterprise, part of a network that had built a trusted programme which had run for decades. But now Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora (HNZ) has chosen Christchurch-based health service provider He Waka Tapu to deliver the service. That organisation provides a variety of services including personalised health consultations, community health initiatives, mental health crisis intervention, addiction support services, reintegration programmes, family violence prevention and educational offerings to promote holistic wellbeing. It has, however, drawn criticism from some in the existing programme because of its lack of experience in providing a service led by peers. Getting the confidence of intravenous drug users, likely to be fearful of any authority because they know they are breaking the law, is not easy. Workers in the current programme say it can sometimes take years, particularly when it comes to persuading drug users to use health services. (The Dunedin group also runs a free general practice clinic for its clients, and its future is unclear.) While HNZ says the request for proposal (RFP) for regional needle-exchange and harm-reduction services clearly outlined the requirements including that people with lived and living experience had significant roles in the design, delivery and leadership of the programme, questions are being asked about how central lived experience will be to service delivery. We note the brief overview of the RFP on the Government Electronic Tenders Service website makes no specific reference to the need for contenders to provide a peer-based service. Peer-run services in this area are considered internationally best practice. Public health academic Prof Michael Baker says the HIV response in New Zealand was among the most effective in the world and it would be a "grave step backwards" if any new provider moved away from a peer service. It is hard to judge what, if any, consideration was given to the effect of a change on clients of the existing service and whether this might lead to less engagement and more disease. Fears have already been raised the change could lead to more HIV or hepatitis cases. On the face of it, the decision looks like a cost-cutting exercise, with the funding for the South Island services reduced from the previous $1.4 million to $1m. HNZ has said the funding was based on a new population model. This seems a blunt tool to apply to such a programme. That suggests that the number of people who might need such a service would be uniform throughout the country. Is there evidence of that or that existing services were getting more money than they needed? Taieri member of Parliament, Labour's Ingrid Leary, is right to question the population approach rather than a needs-based one. As she says, funding these types of services purely on a population health basis is not necessarily the most logical, especially when specific communities within the broader population have demonstrably much higher needs. The existing service is to wind up in September, but little is known about how the new service will operate. It is difficult for members of a marginalised group such as intravenous drug users to speak up about their needs. That can make it too easy, and possibly even cynically convenient, for decisions to be made about them rather than with them. If this move is expected to be as good as or better for them than the existing service, they and we need to know how.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store