Google finds workaround for lobbying that omits big bosses
The move helped keep Google off the top of the lobbying charts even as it maintained a robust network of advocates pushing its interests in the capital, during federal challenges to its dominance in search and advertising and the beginnings of artificial intelligence regulation.
The findings, which were confirmed by a
Bloomberg
analysis of lobbying records, show that the effect of the accounting change was to lower the amount that Google reported spending to influence the federal government, likely by millions of dollars.
The reorganization 'has allowed the company to shield a significant portion of its lobbying expenditures from public view,' the Tech Transparency Project said in its report.
A Google spokesperson, José Castañeda, disputed the report and said the company has followed all relevant disclosure laws.
'These are inaccurate claims about a technical change that simply brought us in line with how many other companies report their lobbying activities,' he said. 'Our lobbying expenditures began decreasing in 2018, after we restructured our government affairs team and cut spending on consultants.'
Internal reshuffle
Starting in 2019, Google began cutting ties with some of its external lobbying firms, a move it acknowledged publicly as part of an overhaul of its Washington operations.
But the shuffling of external lobbying firms doesn't explain the whole of the decline in Google's reported lobbying expenses, which fell from more than $22 million in 2018 to $8.9 million in the Covid-disrupted year of 2020, and have subsequently remained well below pre-pandemic levels.
There's been another, quieter change: in early 2020, Google moved its in-house lobbyists into a new subsidiary, called Google
Client Services
LLC. It's that unit which now files spending disclosures for Google's lobbying activities.
The reorganization meant that the parent companies Google and Alphabet no longer directly employed any lobbyists – defined under federal disclosure law as people spending at least 20% of their time on influencing
Congress
or the executive branch.
Companies that file lobbying disclosure reports are supposed to also account for the time that other senior executives — those who don't meet the 20% threshold – devote to lobbying, according to legal experts and the compliance guide for the Lobbying Disclosure Act published by Congressional leaders. That generally involves prorating their annual compensation to account for the days they spend influencing the government.
But since Google moved lobbyists into the Google Client Services subsidiary, the parent company no longer meets the threshold for filing disclosures under the Lobbying Disclosure Act, according to the TTP analysis. That means Google no longer reports the lobbying expenses of high-ranking managers who aren't part of the Client Services unit — like Chief Executive Officer
Sundar Pichai
and chief legal officer Kent Walker — to the public, as it once did.
As a result, in 2020 Google dropped out of the top 20 in corporate lobbying expenses for the first time in nearly a decade, the TTP analysis found.
While Google's reported annual spending has since edged back up again, it hasn't come close to the No.1 slot in the company lobbying rankings that it used to occupy. For the past five years, that position has alternated between two other tech giants: Meta Platforms Inc. and Amazon.com Inc.
Antitrust challenge
There's been plenty going on in Washington over the period that was crucial for Google's business. For one thing, the company — like many peers — is betting heavily on AI, a field where decisions in the US capital will shape the commercial landscape.
Google has also been under assault from antitrust authorities over its dominance in search and digital advertising. The company has maintained in those lawsuits that its success is down to consumer choice and superior innovation, rather than a result of its power to shape laws and regulations. Publicity around its lobbying spending has the potential to undercut such arguments and alienate regulators.
When executives are as highly paid as many in Silicon Valley, the prorated amounts can add up to millions — even for just a few days' worth of lobbying. Google reported total compensation for Pichai of more than $225 million in 2022, thanks to grants of stock. His total compensation was $10.7 million in 2024. Walker's total compensation was more than $30 million last year, the company reported.
Some say the new structure Google is employing flouts the spirit of the federal disclosure law – if not the letter itself.
'This is just too cute by half,' said William Luneburg, a professor emeritus at the
University of Pittsburgh School of Law
, and the co-editor of the manual for lobbying compliance published by the American Bar Association.
'On the face of it, it's wrong,' he said. 'They have to report all of their expenses, which would include the time of officers and directors and other employees that spend their time engaging in lobbying activity.'
'We always comply with disclosure laws and any suggestion of improper reporting is false,' said Castañeda, the Google spokesperson.
TTP said it examined lobbying disclosures of several other companies that filed reports via a similar subsidiary model, but didn't find any that had used the structure to remove executive lobbying from their disclosures.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Delhi University Students To Get AI, Cybersecurity Training Under Google Cloud Collaboration
The University of Delhi (DU) has entered into a multi-year collaboration with Google Cloud to equip students with cutting-edge skills in artificial intelligence (AI), cloud computing, cybersecurity, data analytics, and digital literacy. The initiative will provide industry-recognised certifications, hackathons, mentorship opportunities, startup incubation support, and specialised Google workshops for education. Registrar Dr Vikas Gupta said the partnership is aligned with the objectives of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and is designed to boost students' career prospects. "Technology adoption is growing rapidly. DU has already launched several courses in line with NEP 2020, and this collaboration with Google Cloud will add immense value by offering students future-ready skills," he said. Dean of Colleges, Professor Balram Pani, added, "Delhi University is the number one university in the country. This collaboration will benefit both DU and Google." Google Cloud Managing Director (India) Shashi Sreedharan highlighted the significance of the partnership: "Technology is a powerful equaliser. It is vital that India's next-generation talent is equipped with practical, future-ready skills. Our collaboration with DU marks a major step in shaping an AI-enabled academic ecosystem in India." Professor Sanjeev Singh noted that the programme would include hands-on labs, assessments, and certifications in industry-leading courses. Students will also gain exposure through campus hackathons and webinars.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, cofounder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using AI themselves."Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes," said Katz-Mayfield, who is also a CEO of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. "Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'"Executives refer to the promise of AI with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss' discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using AI to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own with most technological advances, younger people have taken to AI more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers -- inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs -- also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more to nudge high-level managers, CEOs who have fully embraced AI are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's AI assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative AI tools like Mayer Brown, a law firm in Chicago, chair Jon Van Gorp has shared with the partners how he uses a generative AI tool built for legal professionals to help draft contracts and distill the most salient points from his own writing. At a fashion startup called Daydream, Friday lunches are devoted to employees' sharing how they're using generative AI tools; the chief technology officer has shared her Gemini prompts from the chief technology officer, Sandeep Chouksey, 41, is well aware of AI and has been playing around with ChatGPT since it came out nearly three years ago. But he found that watching the engineers on his team helped him understand the technology better. He figured his peers needed to get their eyes on it, too, and suggested inviting employees who were working closely with AI to the leadership work of senior executives "doesn't lend itself to actually experimenting with the technology," Chouksey said. "I knew that the other leaders needed to see what I was seeing -- all the bottom-up work that was happening."Chuck Whitten is witnessing how company executives are gradually wrapping their heads around the AI phenomenon. He is the global head of digital practices at Bain & Co., a management consulting firm where his job is to advise CEOs about technology. They understand the importance of integrating AI into their companies, he said, but don't yet have a feel for the technology was in their shoes not too long ago. In 2021, he left Bain after 22 years to become co-chief operating officer at Dell Technologies. He was in that job when ChatGPT rolled out. He describes it as a "lightning bolt" moment. Part of the reason he returned to Bain was realizing that senior leaders needed assistance entering the "golden age of artificial intelligence," he said."I think the majority that I see are just experimenting with the basics, sort of trying Copilot or ChatGPT for the occasional email, draft or quick fact check," Whitten said. "This is not a tool you can delegate down the hall to the chief information officer. They need to be hands-on in both where the technology is going and how they can apply it today."According to a survey of 456 CEOs by Gartner, a research and advisory firm, released in May, 77% of the executives thought AI is transformative for business, but fewer than half thought their technology officers were up to the task of navigating the current digital CEO is trying to "figure out whether they're set up for the future or not and how the world looks on the other side of this technology transformation," said Tom Pickett, CEO of Headspace, a wellness app. "They're facing this constant change, which just leads to stress and everyday anxiety."Pickett, 56, has dealt with his own anxiety by using AI chatbots as much as possible. He joined the company last August and said chatbots had helped him get up to speed in his role. He uses ChatGPT or Gemini to do research and receive advice about business moves, such as potential partnerships with other companies. He said it helped him "learn 10 times as much or test 10 times as many ideas in a very lightweight way."In the past, he said, "I would have had to ask the resident expert or somebody who worked with that company to really give me a debrief," Pickett said. "And instead, in five minutes, I'm like, 'Oh, OK, I get this.'" (He said he had also consulted people in his company, but now "the conversations are more productive.")Sarah Franklin, CEO of Lattice, a human resources software platform, said it can be difficult to get executives to use new tools, and in internal meetings she regularly asks, "Did you test that message with ChatGPT?"Franklin, who previously was chief marketing officer at Salesforce , has been using generative AI tools since they came on the market. But the technology is moving quickly, and everyone is trying to figure it out on the go."Nobody has 10 years of agentic AI experience right now. They at best have six months. So nobody is fully prepared," Franklin, 49, said. "What we have right now in the world is a lot of optimism combined with a lot of FOMO."Fear of missing out can be the mother of innovation, it January, Greg Schwartz , CEO of StockX, was scrolling the social platform X when he saw several users posting projects that they had made with various AI coding apps. He downloaded the hadn't written a line of code in years. But using the apps got his mind a corporate retreat in March, he decided to push 10 senior leaders to play around with these tools, too. He gave everyone in the room, including the heads of supply chain, marketing and customer service, 30 minutes to build a website with the tool Replit and make a marketing video with the app Creatify."I'm just a tinkerer by trait," Schwartz, 44, said. "I thought that was going to be more engaging and more impactful than me standing in front of the room."There was a "little bit of shock" when he presented the exercise, he said. But he tried to remind people it was a fun activity. They weren't being discomfort is normal, said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of the newsletter One Useful Thing and the book "Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI.""AI is weird and off-putting," Mollick said. "There's a lot of psychological resistance to using the systems even for people who know they should be doing it."Many organizations, he added, have a "real failure of imagination and vision" when it comes to the power of these systems."The main issue is that leaders have to take a leading role," Mollick said. "They all say AI is the future, use AI to do stuff. And then they don't make any decisions or choices."About half of companies do not have road maps for integrating AI, according to a Bain survey. Whitten at Bain said that about only 20% of companies were scaling their AI bets and that most didn't have benchmarks for how workers should use Mammoth Brands, Katz-Mayfield said that he and his team had discussed providing incentives to employees who use AI but that they hadn't needed to. The energy around experimenting is working for the company. In the last meeting it had five demos on the docket but didn't get to all of them because senior leaders were "asking so many questions and wanting to see different things.""If the leadership team is excited and engaged in that stuff," Katz-Mayfield said, "that's probably more than half the battle."
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
CEOs want their companies to adopt AI. But do they get it themselves?
ETtech In March, Andy Katz-Mayfield, cofounder of the razor brand Harry's, started inviting junior employees to monthly meetings usually reserved for his most senior leaders. The purpose was for lower-level workers to show off how they were using generative artificial intelligence to improve the supply chain, finance and marketing. But Katz-Mayfield had another purpose, too: getting the top executives comfortable with using AI themselves. "Building familiarity with these tools opens people's eyes," said Katz-Mayfield, who is also a CEO of Harry's parent company, Mammoth Brands. "Through demos and stuff, people are like: 'Oh, that's cool. I didn't think about that, but I now realize why this is important for my team.'" Executives refer to the promise of AI with grandiose comparisons: the dawn of the internet, the Industrial Revolution, Carl Friedrich Gauss' discovery of number theory. But while boards and top executives may mandate using AI to make their businesses more efficient and competitive, many of those leaders haven't fully integrated it into their own workdays. As with most technological advances, younger people have taken to AI more quickly than their elders. And the work that people do earlier in their careers -- inserting data into spreadsheets, creating decks, coming up with designs -- also lends itself to playing around with the technology. Top executives, on the other hand, are often several steps removed from the mechanics. Once they're in the C-suite, days are filled with meetings. Less doing, more approving. So to nudge high-level managers, CEOs who have fully embraced AI are trying new tactics. Some have told senior leaders to use Gemini, Google's AI assistant, before defaulting to Google search. Some are carving out time at corporate retreats to play around with generative AI tools like Creatify. At Mayer Brown, a law firm in Chicago, chair Jon Van Gorp has shared with the partners how he uses a generative AI tool built for legal professionals to help draft contracts and distill the most salient points from his own writing. At a fashion startup called Daydream, Friday lunches are devoted to employees' sharing how they're using generative AI tools; the chief technology officer has shared her Gemini prompts from the week. Mammoth's chief technology officer, Sandeep Chouksey, 41, is well aware of AI and has been playing around with ChatGPT since it came out nearly three years ago. But he found that watching the engineers on his team helped him understand the technology better. He figured his peers needed to get their eyes on it, too, and suggested inviting employees who were working closely with AI to the leadership meetings. The work of senior executives "doesn't lend itself to actually experimenting with the technology," Chouksey said. "I knew that the other leaders needed to see what I was seeing -- all the bottom-up work that was happening." Did you test that with ChatGPT? Chuck Whitten is witnessing how company executives are gradually wrapping their heads around the AI phenomenon. He is the global head of digital practices at Bain & Co., a management consulting firm where his job is to advise CEOs about technology. They understand the importance of integrating AI into their companies, he said, but don't yet have a feel for the technology itself. He was in their shoes not too long ago. In 2021, he left Bain after 22 years to become co-chief operating officer at Dell Technologies. He was in that job when ChatGPT rolled out. He describes it as a "lightning bolt" moment. Part of the reason he returned to Bain was realizing that senior leaders needed assistance entering the "golden age of artificial intelligence," he said. "I think the majority that I see are just experimenting with the basics, sort of trying Copilot or ChatGPT for the occasional email, draft or quick fact check," Whitten said. "This is not a tool you can delegate down the hall to the chief information officer. They need to be hands-on in both where the technology is going and how they can apply it today." According to a survey of 456 CEOs by Gartner, a research and advisory firm, released in May, 77% of the executives thought AI is transformative for business, but fewer than half thought their technology officers were up to the task of navigating the current digital landscape. Every CEO is trying to "figure out whether they're set up for the future or not and how the world looks on the other side of this technology transformation , " said Tom Pickett, CEO of Headspace, a wellness app. "They're facing this constant change, which just leads to stress and everyday anxiety." Pickett, 56, has dealt with his own anxiety by using AI chatbots as much as possible. He joined the company last August and said chatbots had helped him get up to speed in his role. He uses ChatGPT or Gemini to do research and receive advice about business moves, such as potential partnerships with other companies. He said it helped him "learn 10 times as much or test 10 times as many ideas in a very lightweight way." In the past, he said, "I would have had to ask the resident expert or somebody who worked with that company to really give me a debrief," Pickett said. "And instead, in five minutes, I'm like, 'Oh, OK, I get this.'" (He said he had also consulted people in his company, but now "the conversations are more productive.") Sarah Franklin, CEO of Lattice, a human resources software platform, said it can be difficult to get executives to use new tools, and in internal meetings she regularly asks, "Did you test that message with ChatGPT?" Franklin, who previously was chief marketing officer at Salesforce, has been using generative AI tools since they came on the market. But the technology is moving quickly, and everyone is trying to figure it out on the go. "Nobody has 10 years of agentic AI experience right now. They at best have six months. So nobody is fully prepared," Franklin, 49, said. "What we have right now in the world is a lot of optimism combined with a lot of FOMO." Tinkerers in the C-suite Fear of missing out can be the mother of innovation, it seems. In January, Greg Schwartz, CEO of StockX, was scrolling the social platform X when he saw several users posting projects that they had made with various AI coding apps. He downloaded the apps. He hadn't written a line of code in years. But using the apps got his mind racing. During a corporate retreat in March, he decided to push 10 senior leaders to play around with these tools, too. He gave everyone in the room, including the heads of supply chain, marketing and customer service, 30 minutes to build a website with the tool Replit and make a marketing video with the app Creatify. "I'm just a tinkerer by trait," Schwartz, 44, said. "I thought that was going to be more engaging and more impactful than me standing in front of the room." There was a "little bit of shock" when he presented the exercise, he said. But he tried to remind people it was a fun activity. They weren't being graded. Their discomfort is normal, said Ethan Mollick, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and author of the newsletter One Useful Thing and the book "Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI." "AI is weird and off-putting," Mollick said. "There's a lot of psychological resistance to using the systems even for people who know they should be doing it." Many organizations, he added, have a "real failure of imagination and vision" when it comes to the power of these systems. "The main issue is that leaders have to take a leading role," Mollick said. "They all say AI is the future, use AI to do stuff. And then they don't make any decisions or choices." About half of companies do not have road maps for integrating AI, according to a Bain survey. Whitten at Bain said that about only 20% of companies were scaling their AI bets and that most didn't have benchmarks for how workers should use AI. At Mammoth Brands, Katz-Mayfield said that he and his team had discussed providing incentives to employees who use AI but that they hadn't needed to. The energy around experimenting is working for the company. In the last meeting it had five demos on the docket but didn't get to all of them because senior leaders were "asking so many questions and wanting to see different things." "If the leadership team is excited and engaged in that stuff," Katz-Mayfield said, "that's probably more than half the battle." Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. 3 years on, Akasa's next challenge: Staying in the air against IndiGo's dominance Jane Street blow pushes Indian quants to ancient Greek idea to thrive Why are mid-cap stocks fizzling out? It's not just about Trump tariffs. As 50% US tariff looms, 6 key steps that can safeguard Indian economy End of an era: The Maggi Man who rebuilt Nestlé India bows out Stock picks of the week: 5 stocks with consistent score improvement and return potential of more than 25% in 1 year Logistics sector: Be tactical in the face of head & tailwinds; 6 logistics stocks with an upside potential of over 30% These large- and mid-cap stocks can give more than 20% return in 1 year, according to analysts
