
Commodity Market Roundup- April's Top Performers and Underperformers
A weaker dollar index and a decline in the long-term bond prices were competing bullish and bearish factors for commodities in April for the second consecutive month. The June dollar index moved 4.44% lower, while the June U.S. 30-year Treasury bond futures fell 0.80% to 116-26 during the fourth month of 2025. Gold was higher, reaching a new record peak, while the other precious and base metals were lower; grains were mixed with gains in corn and soybeans and a loss in CBOT wheat futures. Animal proteins rallied, while the energy sector was mostly lower. Soft commodities were mixed, with gains in cocoa, FCOJ, and Arabica coffee, while sugar and cotton prices moved lower.
The only double-digit percentage gains were in cocoa and FCOJ futures and Bitcoin. Gold reached a new record high in April for the fourth consecutive month. Lumber, crude oil, oil products, and natural gas posted double-digit percentage losses for the month ending on Wednesday, April 30. Stocks and cryptocurrencies were lower in April.
New highs in gold- Volatility in copper
Gold's ascent continued in April as investors and traders moved to the precious metal as a safe asset.
The monthly chart shows gold's rally, which took the price over the $3,500 level to a $3,509.90 high. Gold closed March at just under the $3,320 level, significantly higher than the closing level on March 31, 2025.
Meanwhile, copper experienced wild price volatility in April.
The monthly chart shows that COMEX copper futures fell from the record high of $5.3700 in March to $4.03 per pound in April. Copper held just above its critical technical support level.
As I mentioned in the March Barchart commodity roundup, ' one factor impacting copper prices is the Trump administration's tariff plans. These trade barriers have tightened futures markets, causing metals to move from Europe and other locations to the U.S. ' While COMEX futures reached a record high in March, LME three-month copper forwards did not reach a new all-time peak, which, in hindsight, was a clue that the red metal on the futures exchanged was overdone on the upside. Copper futures plunged to just above the $4 level but finished April down under 10% and above the $4.60 per pound level as the nonferrous metal recovered after a very volatile month. Copper rose to nearly $5 in late April, but the price dropped over 26 cents per pound on the month's final day.
Cocoa leads on the upside- Natural gas plunges
ICE cocoa futures have been a bullish beast since breaking through the 1977 previous record high in early 2024. In April, cocoa futures led the commodities asset class with a 12.66% rally as supply concerns persisted.
The daily July futures chart highlights cocoa's rally from below $8,000 to nearly $8,900 per ton. West African growing conditions continue to plague supplies, keeping prices at record levels compared to the pre-2024 levels.
The volatile natural gas futures market posted the most significant decline, falling 21.87% in April.
Since peaking at over $5 per MMBtu on March 10, 2025, NYMEX natural gas futures for June delivery plunged in April as the shoulder season between heating and cooling tempered the demand. Meanwhile, at over $3.30 per MMBtu, nearby natural gas prices remain far higher than those at the end of April 2024, which were below the $2 level.
Source: EIA
The chart shows that, at 1.934 trillion cubic feet for the week ending on April 18, 2025, natural gas inventories across the United States were 19.8% below the same level in mid-April 2024 and 2.2% under the five-year average. Increased demand for LNG has supported natural gas prices. While they fell in April, the energy commodity remained far higher than at the same time in 2024.
Energy falls- Agricultural commodities were mostly steady
Crude oil plunged with the nearby NYMEX WTI futures dropping 17.96% and the ICE Brent futures posting a 17.47% decline. Gasoline and heating oil futures fell 11.52% and 11.39%, respectively. The outperformance in the oil products pushed gasoline and distillate refining spreads higher.
Ethanol prices moved 2.4% higher in April as the 2025 driving season is on the horizon and U.S. gasoline is a blend with biofuel. Meanwhile, Rotterdam coal's price fell 8.62% in April.
Grain prices were mixed, with a 1.58% gain in soybeans and a 2.64% increase in corn futures prices. Soft red winter wheat futures fell 3.59 during April as the 2025 planting season began with few supply concerns.
Animal proteins posted across-the-board gains, with lean hogs for June delivery leading the way on the upside with a 3.15% gain. August feeder cattle futures rallied 1.91%, while the June feeder cattle were 2.33% higher. The meats rallied as the peak demand season begins in late May, as barbecues come out of storage for the summer grilling season.
In other agricultural commodities, cocoa, FCOJ, and Arabica coffee futures posted impressive gains, while sugar and cotton futures were lower. Cotton remains the most inexpensive soft commodity compared to its price action over the past years.
Spotlight on tariffs
President Trump called April 2, 2025, ' Liberation Day ' as he announced the most significant reciprocal and punitive tariffs in history. The trade barriers caused substantial distortions in markets across all asset classes. Stocks dropped, the dollar index plunged, and the long-bond futures fell. Concerns that a global recession would grip economies caused substantial price volatility in markets across all asset classes, and commodities were no exception.
After a period of extreme price variance during the first half of April, markets calmed as the U.S. administration entered negotiations with worldwide trading partners. At the end of April, negotiations continued with no concrete deals on the table. Meanwhile, the most significant issue remains the U.S. trade relationship with China.
Stocks, bonds, and commodities finished April above the month's worst levels, but concerns continue to grip markets.
Factors to watch in May 2025
As I wrote at the end of March, ' Trends are a trader or investor's best friend in markets across all asset classes, and commodities are no exception.' The potential for extreme price variance persists as the raw materials sector moves into May. Agricultural commodities will follow the weather patterns for directional clues. Meats will move into the 2025 peak grilling season at the end of May, and as the temperatures increase, the demand for cooling could support natural gas. Gasoline demand will increase during the 2025 driving season during late spring and summer.
The other issues that could influence commodity prices in May are:
The wars in Ukraine and the Middle East and relations between the U.S. and countries worldwide could cause bouts of volatility.
U.S. policies under the Trump administration could continue to cause market turmoil. Tariffs are trade barriers that impact global raw material prices, creating distortions that lead to sudden price moves. The administration's negotiations and relations with China could cause sudden price variance.
As of the end of March, the Chinese economy remains critical as China is the demand side of the equation for many commodity markets.
Volatility in commodities creates trading opportunities. As I wrote in early April, 'Approach markets with a risk-reward plan and stick to the program. Accepting small losses in the quest for oversized gains is always acceptable. Therefore, stick to loss levels when markets move contrary to expectations, but adjust risk-reward dynamics to protect capital and gains when markets move in the desired direction.'
Expect continued volatility in the commodities asset class in May and beyond, and you will not be surprised or disappointed. Keep a close eye on grains, gasoline, and meats as they enter their peak demand seasons. The driving season runs through spring and summer, as does the grilling season. Meanwhile, gold remains a bullish beast, but even the most aggressive bull markets rarely move in straight lines. The higher the gold price rises, the greater the odds of a correction.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
an hour ago
- Toronto Sun
JONAH GOLDBERG: Trump shows that loyalty is all that matters to him
President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. Photo by Evan Vucci / AP Photo Last week, the Court of International Trade delivered a blow to Donald Trump's global trade war. It found that the worldwide tariffs Trump unveiled on 'Liberation Day' as well his earlier tariffs pretextually aimed at stopping fentanyl coming in from Mexico and Canada (as if) were beyond his authority. The three-judge panel was surely right about the Liberation Day tariffs and probably right about the fentanyl tariffs, but there's a better case that, while bad policy, the fentanyl tariffs were not unlawful. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Please forgive a lengthy excerpt of Trump's response on Truth Social, but it speaks volumes: 'How is it possible for (the CIT judges) to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America? Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be? I was new to Washington, and it was suggested that I use The Federalist Society as a recommending source on Judges. I did so, openly and freely, but then realized that they were under the thumb of a real 'sleazebag' named Leonard Leo, a bad person who, in his own way, probably hates America, and obviously has his own separate ambitions. … In any event, Leo left The Federalist Society to do his own 'thing.' I am so disappointed in The Federalist Society because of the bad advice they gave me on numerous Judicial Nominations. This is something that cannot be forgotten!' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Let's begin with the fact that Trump cannot conceive of a good explanation for an inconvenient court ruling other than Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's irrelevant that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the 1977 law the administration invoked to impose the relevant tariffs, does not even mention the word 'tariff' or that Congress never envisioned the IEEPA as a tool for launching a trade war with every nation in the world, the 'Penguin Islands' included. Also disregard the fact that the decision was unanimous and only one of the three judges was appointed by Trump (the other two were Reagan and Obama appointees). (The decision has been paused by an appeals court.) Trump is the foremost practitioner of what I call Critical Trump Theory — anything bad for Trump is unfair, illegitimate and proof that sinister forces are rigging the system against him. No wonder then that Trump thinks Leonard Leo, formerly a guiding light at the Federalist Society, the premier conservative legal organization, is a 'sleazebag' and 'bad person.' Note: Leo is neither of those things. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. But Trump's broadsides at Leo and the Federalist Society are portentous. Because Congress is AWOL, refusing to take the lead on trade (and many other things) as the Constitution envisions, it's fallen to the courts to restrain Trump's multifront efforts to exceed his authority. That's why the White House is cynically denouncing 'unelected' and 'rogue' judges on an almost daily basis and why Trump's political henchman, Stephen Miller, is incessantly ranting about a 'judicial coup.' The supreme, and sometimes seemingly sole, qualification for appointments to the Trump administration has been servile loyalty to Trump. But that ethos is not reserved for the executive branch. Law firms, elite universities and media outlets are being forced to kneel before the president. Why should judges be any different? This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Trump has a history of suggesting 'my judges' — i.e., his appointees — should be loyal to him. That's why he recently nominated Emil Bove, his former personal criminal lawyer turned political enforcer at the Department of Justice, for a federal judgeship. The significance of Trump's attack on the Federalist Society and Leo, for conservatives, cannot be exaggerated. The legal movement spearheaded by the Federalist Society has been the most successful domestic conservative project of the last century. Scholarly, civic-minded and principled, the Federalist Society spent decades developing ideas and arguments for re-centering the Constitution in American law. But now Trump has issued a fatwa that it, too, must bend the knee and its principles to the needs of one man. The law be damned, ruling against Trump is ingratitude in his mind. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Speaking of ingratitude, the irony is that the Federalist Society deserves a lot of credit — or blame — for Trump being elected in the first place. In 2016, the death of Antonin Scalia left a vacancy on the Supreme Court. Many conservatives did not trust Trump to replace him. To reassure them, Trump agreed to pick from a list of potential replacements crafted by the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society. That decision arguably convinced many reluctant conservatives to vote for him. In the decade since, the Heritage Foundation has dutifully reinvented itself in Trump's image. The Federalist Society stayed loyal to its principles, and that's why the Federalist Society is in Trump's crosshairs. Jonah Goldberg is editor-in-chief of The Dispatch and the host of The Remnant podcast RECOMMENDED VIDEO Sports Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls Columnists World


Winnipeg Free Press
6 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup, concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the tournament. The United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize pool. The Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. But there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear slow. At the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans, either. Wary travelers, visa woes Trump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this year. The U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Association President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months — already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues. 'They (the task force) recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible,' Freeman said. 'But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas. 'We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president,' said Rubio. But the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World Cup. The proclamation included an exemption for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' It did not mention fans. Fan fears There are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup matches. Danny Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, 'We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to (Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem.' That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning. Navarro put the onus on FIFA. 'They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?' Navarro said. 'There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about.' If you build it, will they come? It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup is. Ticket sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45. FIFA created an incentive program that says fans who buy two or more tickets to the Club World Cup 'may' be guaranteed the right to purchase one ticket to the World Cup next summer. Navarro said economic uncertainty and fears of inflation may make fans hesitant to spend their money on the Club World Cup — when the more desirable World Cup is looming. In some host cities, there's little sign the Club World Cup is happening. A light rail station in Seattle had a lone sign advertising the event. The Seattle Sounders are among the teams playing in the tournament. Hans Hobson, executive director of the Tennessee State Soccer Association, suggested part of the problem is that, unlike the national teams that play in the World Cup, some of the club teams playing in Nashville are just not known to U.S. fans. 'It's not leagues that they watch. If it was the Premier League or the Bundesliga or something like that, then they'd go, 'Oh, I know players there. Let's go check it out,' Hobson said. There were tickets available to LAFC's match against Esperance Sportive de Tunisie in Nashville on June 20 for $24.45. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has traveled to several host cities to gin up enthusiasm. He has promised 'the world will be welcomed.' But some say the United States isn't exactly rolling out the red carpet for visitors in the current climate. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. 'I could see trepidation for anyone looking to travel to the U.S. at this current political climate,' said Canadian national team coach Jesse Marsch. 'So it's a sad thing, I think, that we have to talk about visiting the U.S. in this way but I think everybody has to make decisions that are best for them and that fit best with what's going on in their life and their lifestyle.' ___ AP Sports Writer Teresa Walker contributed to this report ___ AP soccer:


Globe and Mail
7 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
1 Top Cryptocurrency to Buy Before It Soars 6,220%, According to Cathie Wood
Ether (CRYPTO: ETH), the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum blockchain, lost more than 30% of its value over the past 12 months. Its first spot-price ETFs were approved last July, but those funds didn't attract as much attention as Bitcoin 's (CRYPTO: BTC) earlier ETFs. Instead, Ether seemed to be held back by concerns about competition from newer and faster blockchains, its slowing network activity, and the Trump Administration's unpredictable tariffs. Nevertheless, some investors remain fiercely bullish on Ether's future. One of those bulls is ARK Invest's Cathie Wood, who believes Ether's price could reach $166,000 by 2032. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » That would represent a gain of nearly 6,220% and boost its market cap to more than $20 trillion. Bitcoin, which Wood is also bullish on, currently has a market cap of $2 trillion. Could Ether skyrocket to those levels, or should investors maintain more realistic expectations? The differences between Ether and Bitcoin Ethereum originally ran on a proof-of-work (PoW) mechanism like Bitcoin. This meant it needed to be mined by GPUs or other chips. But in 2022, Ethereum transitioned to the proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, which was roughly 99% more power efficient than the PoW mechanism. So instead of being mined, Ether is now staked (or locked up for rewards) on the Ethereum blockchain. Ethereum's transformation into a PoS blockchain also enabled it to support smart contracts, which are used to develop decentralized apps (dApps), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other crypto assets. Bitcoin's PoW blockchain doesn't support smart contracts. Therefore, Ether's value is often linked to Ethereum's popularity as a development platform. Bitcoin is still valued by its scarcity and limited supply -- since 19.6 million of its maximum supply of 21 million tokens have already been mined. Ether doesn't have a fixed maximum supply, but its overall supply declines when its network activity rises. That's because a portion of every transaction fee in Ether is burned. But when Ethereum's network activity slows down, its supply rises as more Ether tokens are created than burned. So while Bitcoin is always deflationary, Ether can be both inflationary and deflationary. But to remain a popular platform for developers and investors, it needs to keep providing fast transaction times with low fees. That's becoming increasingly difficult as faster and cheaper PoS blockchains like Solana and Cardano challenge Ethereum. Solana processes transactions much faster than Ethereum, while Cardano usually offers lower fees. Ethereum's catalysts and challenges Ether's next big upgrade -- The Verge -- aims to upgrade its security features and lower its hardware requirements so it can run on smaller devices like smartphones, wearables, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices. It also aims to reduce its off-chain Layer 2 (L2) fees with a series of upgrades for its network to clear more space for fresh data. Those upgrades could help it indirectly reduce its congestion issues by absorbing some of its core Layer 1 (L1) network traffic. Assuming those upgrades bring in more developers and investors, its network activity will increase, reduce its supply, and stabilize Ether's price. Another potential catalyst would be the approval of new spot-price ETFs with staking features. The first batch of Ether's spot-price ETFs only held Ether in cold storage and didn't pass on any of its interest-like staking rewards. The next batch could pass on those rewards (about 3% to 5% annually) and make them more appealing. However, Ether could still be held back by competition from other PoS blockchains, a lack of approvals for new ETFs with staking rewards, or the messy macro environment that is curbing the market's appetite for cryptocurrencies and other speculative investments. Should you believe Cathie Wood's bullish outlook? Wood believes Ether's value will rise as Ethereum becomes a foundational layer of a new digital financial ecosystem that challenges traditional banks with decentralized finance (DeFi) apps, NFTs, and tokenized versions of real-world assets. She also expects Ether's staking yield to become more appealing than the yields of U.S. Treasuries as interest rates decline, and for the approvals of new staking ETFs to bring in even more institutional investors. Just as with Bitcoin, Wood expects the growing institutional adoption of Ether over the next few years to drive its price a lot higher. That thesis sounds reasonable, but claiming it could reach a $20 trillion market cap within the next seven years -- compared to gold's current market cap of $3.4 trillion -- seems too bullish. So while it might be smart to accumulate Ether as it rolls out new networking upgrades, attracts more developers, burns more tokens, and gains more attention with new ETFs, we should take Cathie Wood's forecasts with a grain of salt. It will probably stabilize and rise higher, but its long-term value isn't that easy to gauge. Should you invest $1,000 in Ethereum right now? Before you buy stock in Ethereum, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Ethereum wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025