Volunteer thanks royal family for ‘believing' in Ukraine after receiving honour
Mrs Beaton-Hawryluk, who lives in South Queensferry, near Edinburgh, said: 'It's very special because the last three years with the Ukrainian community has been quite a challenge.
'And to be recognised is the best thing ever because it's for the Ukrainian community.'
Asked about the current situation, she went on: 'I would say in amongst the community, the people that are already here, it's very like it was in those first days.
'They're very unsettled because of the visa extension and it's only for 18 months.
'There's a few arriving now because things are so dangerous in Ukraine and things aren't getting any better.'
Mrs Beaton-Hawryluk, who said her outfit was a 'nod to Ukraine', added that Anne was 'really interested' in her work.
She went on: 'I just wanted to say thank you to the royal family for believing in Ukraine and supporting us.'
Mrs Beaton-Hawryluk took time off from work when the fighting broke out and she became holova (chairwoman) of Edinburgh's Association of Ukrainians in Great Britain (AUGB) nine days after Russian President Vladimur Putin's invasion.
She later told her boss at the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh that she would not be going back, and has dedicated her life to helping with the humanitarian efforts in Edinburgh.
Mrs Beaton-Hawryluk, whose father was Ukrainian, works to ensure that displaced Ukrainian children are able to continue speaking their mother tongue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
41 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Trump and Putin cannot decide on land swaps, say Ukraine and EU
Ukraine and its backers in Europe insist that the United States and Russia cannot decide on land swaps behind their backs at a summit this week, but the Europeans concede that Moscow is unlikely to give up control of Ukrainian land it holds. Ahead of the summit in Alaska on Friday, US President Donald Trump suggested that a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories', but the Europeans see no sign that Russia will offer anything to swap. Europeans and Ukrainians, so far, are not invited to the summit. European Union foreign ministers are meeting on Monday following talks on Ukraine among US and European security advisers over the weekend. They are wary that President Vladimir Putin will try to claim a political victory by portraying Ukraine as inflexible. Concerns have mounted in Europe and Ukraine that Kyiv may be pressed to give up land or accept other curbs on its sovereignty. Ukraine and its European allies reject the notion that Mr Putin should lay claim to any territory even before agreeing to a ceasefire. 'As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: all temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine', EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said ahead of the ministerial meeting. 'A sustainable peace also means that aggression cannot be rewarded,' Ms Kallas said. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said 'it must be obvious to Poland and our European partners – and I hope to all of Nato – that state borders cannot be changed by force'. Any land swaps or peace terms 'must be agreed upon with Ukraine's participation,' he said, according to Polish news agency PAP. On Sunday, Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany would not accept that territorial issues be discussed or decided by Russia and the United States 'over the heads' of Europeans or Ukrainians. In 2022, Russia illegally annexed the Donetsk and Luhansk regions in Ukraine's east, and Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in the south, even though it does not fully control them. It also occupies the Crimean Peninsula, which it seized in 2014. On the 620-mile front line, Russia's bigger army has made slow but costly progress with its summer offensive. The relentless pounding of urban areas has killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to UN estimates. 'In the end, the issue of the fact that the Russians are controlling at this moment, factually, a part of Ukraine has to be on the table' in any peace talks after the Alaska summit, Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said on CBS on Sunday. Giving up any territory, especially without a ceasefire agreement first, would be almost impossible for Mr Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky to sell at home after thousands of troops have died defending their land. Ultimately, Putin is seen as being not so much interested in land itself, but rather in a more 'Russia-friendly' Ukraine with a malleable government that would be unlikely to try to join Nato, just as pro-Russian regions in Georgia stymied that country's hopes of becoming a member. Mr Zelensky insists that a halt to fighting on the front line should be the starting point for negotiations, and the Europeans back him. They say that any future land swaps should be for Ukraine to decide and not be a precondition for a ceasefire.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump snubs Zelensky from Putin meeting in brutal 'nothing happened' slam
Donald Trump is set for a face-to-face meeting with Vladimir Putin on Friday, but appears to have sidelined Volodymyr Zelensky from this week's discussions Donald Trump has said Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to his meeting with Vladimir Putin after accusing the Ukrainian leader of doing 'nothing' in the past three years. The decision ahead of Friday's summit in Alaska has fuelled concerns in Kyiv and across Europe that a peace plan could be negotiated without its direct involvement. It came as it emerged that Ukraine could agree to stop fighting and cede territory already held by Russia as part of a European-backed plan for peace. Speaking about why Zelensky was not invited, Trump said during a White House briefing: "He wasn't a part of it. I would say he could go, but he's gone to a lot of meetings. You know, he's been there for three and a half years. Nothing happened.' The US President said the Alaska summit with Putin would be a first step in assessing whether an agreement to end the war was possible. "We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin, and at the end of that meeting, probably in the first two minutes, I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be [made] because that's what I do. I make deals,' he told reporters at the White House today. Trump insisted that any settlement would not be decided solely by him. 'I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal. I think a deal should be made for both,' he said, adding he would know within "two minutes" if it was possible. 'How will you know that?' a reporter asked. 'Because that's what I do. I make deals,' Trump said. The president later added that a meeting between Putin and Zelensky would be necessary. 'Ultimately, I'm going to put the two of them in a room. I'll be there, or I won't be there, and I think it'll get solved,' Trump said. The president said that 'there could be many definitions' of a good deal, but he also seemed to lower expectations ahead of Friday's summit. 'I expect to have a meeting with Putin that I think it'll be good, but it might be bad,' Trump said. Despite the President's plans, the Prime Minister's official spokesman warned yesterday that Putin should never be trusted "as far as you can throw him". They added: "We will obviously support President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations. But it is exactly why we've been leading this work on the coalition of the willing, because any ceasefire, as I say, cannot just be an opportunity for President Putin to go away, re-arm, restrengthen, and then go again. "So we're not going to leave it to trust. We're going to ensure that we're prepared such that we achieve a ceasefire. "The coalition of willing and the security guarantees are in place... that learns the lessons of the past, where we clearly have not had those meaningful security guarantees in place, which did allow President Putin to re-arm and go again." Quizzed on whether Zelenskyy should be attending Friday's meeting, the PM's spokesman said: "The UK will never waver in our support for Ukraine. Ukraine's future must be one of freedom, security and self-determination. It will choose its own path and we will stand with it until peace is just and sovereignty is secure. Any peace must be built with Ukraine." They added: "It's up to the United States to set out details of the talks President Trump is leading later in the week. More broadly, the path to peace cannot be decided without Ukraine." The US leader's approach has rattled Ukraine and its European allies, who fear a bilateral arrangement could leave Kyiv sidelined and under pressure to accept territorial concessions. But today, details of a European-backed plan emerged showing Ukraine could agree to halt fighting and cede territory already under Russian control. Zelensky has told European leaders they must reject any settlement that demands surrendering Ukrainian-held territory, although he has indicated that land already occupied by Russia could be part of negotiations. This would effectively freeze the frontline in its current position and hand Moscow de facto control of areas in Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson and Crimea. 'The plan can only be related to the current positions held by the militaries,' a Western official said, describing a flurry of weekend diplomacy between Kyiv and its allies ahead of Friday's talks. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk warned of the stakes, saying: 'I have many fears and a lot of hope.' He added that US officials had promised to consult European capitals before the Trump–Putin face-to-face meeting. One of the central European concerns is a purported peace plan, backed by Moscow, which calls for freezing the battle lines in south-eastern Ukraine if Kyiv agrees to withdraw from parts of Donetsk and Luhansk still under its control. European leaders have backed Kyiv's position that any concessions should be limited to territory already occupied by Russian forces. Their strategy is to present a united diplomatic front, described by one Western official as a single 'Ukraine plus Europe' red line, in an attempt to persuade Trump not to push for deeper Ukrainian compromises. 'Europeans now understand their role as supportive of Ukraine in terms of the diplomatic negotiations,' the official said. 'It's a boost for morale, it's also strengthening the diplomatic positions of Ukraine so that it doesn't feel alone.' Tusk was emphatic about rejecting changes to borders imposed by military force. 'For Poland and our partners, it is clear that state borders cannot be changed by force,' he said at a press conference. 'Russia's war with Ukraine must not bring benefits to the aggressor.' Over the weekend, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz issued statements echoing Tusk's stance, pledging firm opposition to any peace arrangement that would involve surrendering land to Moscow. Trump's meeting with Putin is expected to focus on identifying what he described as 'parameters' for a potential settlement before he engages with Zelensky and European leaders. However, critics argue that the sequencing of the talks - meeting Russia first, then Ukraine - risks giving the Kremlin an advantage in shaping the narrative and terms of any deal. The war, now well into its third year, has cost tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. While both sides remain entrenched, the possibility of a freeze in fighting and a territorial compromise has gained weight among some diplomats seeking to end the conflict. Yet for many in Kyiv, the danger lies in any perception that Western resolve is weakening. European capitals fear that without a firm, united stance, Putin could exploit divisions to secure a peace deal that rewards his invasion. The Alaska summit will be Trump and Putin's first in-person meeting since the US President returned to the White House in January. Both leaders are expected to make public statements after the talks, though no joint press conference is planned.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh Book Festival round-up: Olesya Khromeychuk & Jen Stout: Remembering Victoria Amelina + more
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A BOOK Festival isn't always about the people who attend, sometimes it's about the people who are absent. The absence of Ukrainian writer, poet and activist Victoria Amelina, who died in July 2023 in a Russian missile strike, was keenly felt on Monday at Remembering Victoria Amelina when Scottish journalist and writer Jen Stout and UK-based Ukrainian historian Olesya Khromeychuk joined forces to talk about Amelina's final book. Olesya Khromeychuk and Jen Stout joined forcels to pay tribute to Ukrainian activist Victoria Amelina | Contributed Looking at Women, Looking at War was about 60% finished when she was killed and her editors, who included her partner, decided to publish it in its incomplete state, a collection of fragments of diary, memoir and testimony, because, as Khromeychuk says: 'That's what war does to life.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Amelina had been a novelist but retrained to become a war crimes investigator, committed to hearing the stories of ordinary people and gathering them as material for future war crimes litigation. Khromeychuk described the book, which won the prestigious Orwell Prize in June, as 'the sort of book that turns a reader into a witness'. Stout read a particularly poignant paragraph in which Amelina describes visiting Nuremberg with her son and hearing him say to his cousin: 'This room is important, we'll try Russians here one day'. Amelina mentions the word 'impunity' in the context of Russia's conduct both post-second world war and in contemporary Ukraine. That chimes with a comment made on Sunday evening by barrister and specialist in international law Philippe Sands, who described impunity as 'the word of our times'. His latest book, 38 Londres Street, documents the extraordinary events around the arrest and attempted extradition of Chile's former dictator Augusto Pinochet from the UK in 1998, the first time that a former political leader was arrested in another country for crimes committed in his own country while he was president. He said there are 'parallels of impunity between Pinochet and [some] current presidents around the world who are very careful where they travel to… This is a moment which is very alive right now.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the time, Sands acted on behalf of Human Rights Watch in the battle to extradite Pinochet, but said that 10 years of dogged research for the book revealed far more about the situation than he had guessed at. By tracking down and interviewing figures like Pinochet's chief negotiator, and the woman who was his interpreter while he was in the UK, he was able to confirm that a deal was struck between Chile and Tony Blair's government whereby Pinochet – after some schooling on how to mimic the symptoms of dementia – was returned to Chile on medical grounds in 2000. Make sure you keep up to date with Arts and Culture news from across Scotland by signing up to our free newsletter here. The book also reveals Pinochet's friendship with former Nazi SS Officer Walter Rauff, the man responsible for the invention of the mobile gas chamber which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Not only was he granted political asylum in Chile, where he lived from 1958 until his death in 1984, he is also now understood to have played a role in the 'disappearance' of many hundreds of political opponents of the Pinochet regime. Just when one was starting to feel that a little bit of light relief might be welcome, David Baddiel arrived at the Book Festival to talk about his memoir, My Family. At the heart of the book is the extraordinary story of his mother Sarah's long-running and not-very-secret affair with a golf memorabilia salesman, which his father resolutely refused to acknowledge. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad David Baddiel | Contributed At his mother's funeral, Baddiel explained, many people told him she was wonderful, but for him delving into the complexities of her life was an act of 'reclaiming' the real person.
