logo
Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Forbes29-04-2025

Disembarking operations from the ship Geo Barents on December 11, 2022 in Salerno, Italy. (Photo by ... More)
Figures from a new report show that more people were prosecuted around Europe in 2024 for rendering assistance to irregular migrants than in previous years. Such 'criminalization' is becoming more common, as the EU's leadership and individual member states try to crack down on irregular migration.
In the final episode of Seinfeld, the gang are hauled in front of a small town judge for failing to help someone that was visibly in distress, violating as they did the town's 'Good Samaritan' law. In a case of life not so much imitating art as inverting it, ever more people are being prosecuted for exactly the opposite: helping someone in need. It's a relatively novel crime known as migrant 'facilitation.'
The specific charges that relate to helping irregular migrants differ between individual member states, though many states' laws derive from the EU's 2002 'Facilitation Directive.' Activities that could be considered 'facilitation' under individual member state and EU law include rescuing or aiding people in distress at sea, driving them across a border or providing them with food, clothing or shelter. Increasingly, humanitarian aid is also being targeted, with five people currently facing charges of facilitation in Poland for distributing aid.
Sometimes 'facilitation' can mean the very act of crossing a border oneself. That is to say, asylum seekers and other irregular migrants are themselves prosecuted for taking part in their own journey, whether that be some kind of active participation (say being compelled to steer a boat or distribute food and water to companions), or merely 'facilitating' one's own crossing of a border – which is to say crossing it.
Such prosecutions are becoming increasingly common around Europe and the United Kingdom, as political pressure mounts on governments to reduce the amount of people arriving in Europe, outside of normal channels, in order to seek shelter. These policymakers are often unable to pull more direct policy levers, such as just closing borders or summarily deporting people, given EU and international legal law (though these levers are often pulled informally). Instead, wealthy nations are turning to a raft of other measures intended to deter people from attempting to reach Europe, as well as disrupting the operations of those people trying to help them.
'Across Europe, member states have targeted individuals and NGOs providing non-profit humanitarian assistance - such as food, shelter, medical care, or legal advice - with criminal investigations and prosecutions,' reads a recent policy statement from Amnesty International.
The latest report from Brussels-based charity the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), looking into the prevalence of such 'criminalizations' around Europe, shows they are indeed increasing. In 2024, at least 142 people faced judicial proceedings for helping or rescuing irregular migrants in some form. This number – very likely to be an undercount- is up from the 117 people recorded as criminalized in 2023, and the 89 people between January 2021 and March 2022.
'This is the fourth year in a row that we document increasing levels of criminalization of both migrants and people who help them,' said PICUM advocacy officer Silvia Cara. 'And what we're able to monitor is just the tip of the iceberg.'
An Italian police officer stands by the Iuventa rescue ship run on August 4, 2017. Italian ... More authorities impounded the Iueventa on suspicion of facilitating illegal immigration, police said. The crew were acquitted in 2024. (Photo credit BELLINA FRANCESCO/AFP via Getty Images)
The lion's share of criminalizations were for helping people in distress at sea. This is unsurprising given the focus in recent years on the search-and-rescue NGOs working in the Mediterranean. In recent years – and in particular since the period of high irregular migration across various parts of the Mediterranean beginning in 2015 – a loose group of charity rescue organizations has emerged, known informally as the 'civil fleet,' to fill the gap left when EU state rescue patrols ended.
In the years since, the various rescue boats of the civil fleet – operating within international maritime law – have brought tens of thousands of asylum seekers to European shores, much to the chagrin of leaders such as Italy's Giorgia Meloni, who was elected on a largely anti-migration platform. Italy and Greece tend to receive the majority of irregular arrivals and both governments have pursued various tactics to disrupt the operation of NGOs and other groups working to support people seeking shelter, as well as prosecuting individual migrants. In Greece, migrants prosecuted under 'facilitation' laws in fact make up the second largest prison population in the entire country, with thousands locked up or awaiting trial.
The United Kingdom – though not included in this PICUM report – is another clear example of the criminalization strategy. In recent years hundreds of people – including dozens of minors – have been prosecuted under new or augmented laws for 'facilitating' their own or others' journeys. People prosecuted under such laws face heavy sentences and are all but guaranteed deportation if convicted.
The PICUM report also highlights some emergent avenues for criminalization. For instance, 17 people were charged in 2024 for taking part in protests or demonstrations in support of irregular migrants, without apparently having any direct contact with them. NGOs working on irregular migration have long feared being accused of 'facilitation' for providing information on, for instance, the European asylum system. These 17 prosecutions add weight to the idea that merely supporting someone's right to seek asylum could be considered a crime.
The PICUM report shows the impact the trend towards criminalization is having on European civil society and individual migrants, accompanied as it is by other measures such as non-administrative sanctions and disruption targeting solidarity organizations. NGOs and civil society groups have long decried such practices, not least as they often constrain groups trying to rescue people in distress, plausibly leading to a higher death toll along some of Europe's most dangerous migration routes.
'The criminalization of solidarity with migrants is deeply tied with the criminalization of migration itself,' said PICUM's Silvia Carta. 'These are (…) migration policies that make border crossing unsafe and create a hostile environment against those who are considered to have entered in an irregular manner.'
Despite civil society resistance, the EU plans to increase the use of criminalization as a tool for reducing migration. The EU's 'Facilitation Directive,' mentioned previously, will soon be getting an update. The new directive, proposed by the European Commission in 2023, will likely provide a framework for individual member states to further prosecute people who directly assist, or simply interact in some way with, irregular migrants. As well as humanitarian workers, and migrants themselves, anyone who engages in a financial transaction with people on their journey (think taxi drivers, shopkeepers, hotel owners) could be targeted.
Amid this legislative push for an updated facilitation directive, and absent any easing of concerns over irregular migration in Europe, it appears likely that next year's report will show even more people prosecuted for this novel offense.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Miller Explicitly Ordered ICE Raid Home Depots
Stephen Miller Explicitly Ordered ICE Raid Home Depots

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stephen Miller Explicitly Ordered ICE Raid Home Depots

Stephen Miller explicitly ordered ICE to target Home Depot parking lots to arrest undocumented day laborers, a report alleges. The White House deputy chief of staff gave the order in late May, gloating in a meeting that he could leave ICE's D.C. headquarters and arrest 30 people outside the nearest Home Depot, sources told the Wall Street Journal. Miller, 39, is also said to have reminded top immigration officials they are not just targeting the 'worst of the worst' criminals, but anybody who is in the country illegally—even if that is their only alleged wrongdoing. 'Just go out there and arrest illegal aliens,' he said, according to the Journal. ICE officials appear to have heeded the White House's call. The Journal reported that ICE conducted an immigration sweep at a Home Depot on Friday in a predominantly Latino neighborhood of Los Angeles. The raid was among those that spurred widespread anti-ICE demonstrations and occasional riots in the city, which escalated after President Donald Trump activated the National Guard and deployed Marines against the wishes of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom. Day laborers are known to use Home Depot parking lots to find work at locations across the country, often waving down contractors or homeowners as they exit the home improvement store. Home Depot has acknowledged the practice, but does not explicitly allow it. Some stores feature signage to make clear that soliciting work is illegal in their parking lots. MAGA influencers have seized on this practice by migrants and are now encouraging ICE to continue targeting Home Depot parking lots. 'I'd like to report the front entrance of @HomeDepot at 5 am,' said Laura Loomer on Wednesday, responding to a promotion for the Department of Homeland Security's tip line to report undocumented immigrants. 'Location: Every Home Depot in the U.S.' Recent Home Depot raids have occurred at a minimum of seven locations in California, according to the Journal, The Guardian, and NBC Los Angeles. This appears to have workers skiddish about finding work in their go-to spot. Martha Arévalo, the executive director of the Central American Resource Center of Los Angeles, told the Journal that Home Depot parking lots in Southern California, once filled with hundreds of willing workers, have dwindled down to a 'handful.' Home Depot spokeswoman Beth Marlowe told the Daily Beast that the Atlanta-based corporation is not working in conjunction with ICE and that it does not receive any advance notice of raids at or near its locations. 'We tell associates to report [raids] immediately and not to engage with the activity for their safety,' she said. 'If associates feel uncomfortable after witnessing ICE activity, we offer them the option to go home for the rest of the day, with pay.' ICE did not respond to emails from the Daily Beast. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told the Beast in a statement, 'If you are present in the United States illegally, you will be deported. This is the promise President Trump made to the American people, and the administration is committed to keeping it.' Miller has reportedly orchestrated the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. In the same meeting he reportedly ordered ICE to target Home Depot locations, he also allegedly threatened to terminate officials if their arrest numbers did not rise significantly. Miller told ICE it needed an arrest total at or near 3,000 migrants per day. A plan, dubbed 'Operation At Large,' was implemented shortly after. It saw thousands of federal law enforcement officers and special forces, who don't typically assist with immigration, being activated to help ICE round up migrants accused of being in the country illegally. This supercharging of arrests resulted in several notable mishaps. That included ICE briefly detaining a U.S. Marshal in Arizona by mistake last week.

Pentagon investigator admits to faking dozens of Top Secret security clearance background checks
Pentagon investigator admits to faking dozens of Top Secret security clearance background checks

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Pentagon investigator admits to faking dozens of Top Secret security clearance background checks

A federal contractor tasked with performing background checks on Department of Defense employees seeking high-level security clearances copped to submitting reams of bogus reports when she claimed to have thoroughly vetted candidates who, in fact, had not been properly checked out. Of 39 allegedly fraudulent investigations Nousheen Qureshi carried out over the course of more than a year for the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency, at least a half-dozen included fabricated 'interviews' with people who later said they had never even heard from her at all, according to a plea agreement obtained first by The Independent. 'The results of the background investigations conducted by [Qureshi] were used to determine whether to grant security clearances to individuals at various levels, including and up to Top Secret/Sensitive Compartmented Information ('TS/SCI') access,' states the plea agreement, which was unsealed Tuesday in Santa Ana, California federal court. 'To conduct the investigations, [Qureshi] herself had TS/SCI clearance.' Qureshi, a Mission Viejo resident, worked at the time for CACI International, a $7.7 billion Virginia-based conglomerate that bills itself as being 'ever vigilant in helping our customers meet their greatest challenges in national security.' Each of the 299 background investigations she turned in between July 2020 and August 2021 had to be re-worked by the agency, costing taxpayers nearly $250,000 extra, according to the plea agreement. Qureshi was subsequently hired by two other companies to run background checks for the Department of Homeland Security, doing more than 600 of them until her past finally came to light and she was removed from all DHS projects, the plea agreement says. She was charged by information on June 2, and the case has not been made public until now. Tucker Atkins, Qureshi's court-appointed lawyer, did not respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. Since the September 11 terrorist attacks there has been a tremendous increase in the number of security clearances issued by the federal government, according to attorney Dan Meyer, a former U.S. Navy officer who is now a national security partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Tully Rinckey, PLLC. As the system has become more and more overloaded, investigators have seen their workloads double, triple, or even quadruple to as many as 40 cases a week, Meyer told The Independent. Along with this, the incentive to cut corners has also increased, said Meyer. 'And once they start falsifying documents, there's a greater incentive to falsify documents because you've got to hide it once you've done it,' he said. Further, Meyer pointed out, the Trump administration has publicly undercut the importance of rigorous security clearances, where he said sends a message out to the rank-and-file, 'who start to think, 'Hey, maybe this isn't so important.'' A sham background report such as those generated by Qureshi can lead to extremely serious counterintelligence issues, according to Seamus Hughes, a senior researcher at the National Counterterrorism Innovation, Technology, and Education Center, a partnership between the University of Nebraska at Omaha and DHS. 'Intelligence officials are trusted with some of the nation's most important secrets. Fabricating background interviews and gaming the process has the potential to put those secrets at serious risk,' Hughes told The Independent. 'There's been an increasing number of criminal cases recently against government employees with high-level security clearances leaking classified information. A thorough security clearance review is paramount to preventing such disclosures.' The Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency is responsible for ensuring U.S. government job candidates, as well as those already on the payroll, can be trusted with, among other things, classified information. As 'America's gatekeeper,' the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency conducts over two million background checks each year on people applying for both civilian and military roles, and reinvestigates current employees' security clearances at regular intervals. Qureshi began working at CACI in June 2018, and was assigned to the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency security clearance investigations, according to her plea agreement. 'In that capacity, [Qureshi] conducted background investigations for the Department of Defense,' the plea agreement says. 'The investigations included applicants for DoD employment, DoD employee background reinvestigations, and investigations for security clearances of defense contractors' employees.' Qureshi was responsible for interviewing friends, acquaintances, and associates of those under investigation, and writing reports on her findings, according to the plea filing. It says the clearances in question went all the way up to the TS/SCI level, which allows individuals with a demonstrated 'need to know' to access highly classified materials. To ensure security clearance investigations are being done properly, the agency's Quality Management Oversight Group randomly selects reports to review and re-contacts the individuals interviewed with written questionnaires about the process, the plea explains. In June 2021, amid a routine probe into one of Qureshi's reports, the agency heard from 'J.F.,' a person she had spoken to as part of background investigation into a Top Secret security clearance candidate identified in the plea filing as 'M.C.' 'J.F.'s response to DCSA stated that he provided information to [Qureshi] about M.C.'s drug use,' the plea states. '[Qureshi's] report of J.F.'s interview did not contain this derogatory information.' It also says that Qureshi 'willfully falsely reported that she had interviewed M.C.'s landlord, S.R., and that S.R. stated that M.C. had lived at a Lancaster, California residence alone.' However, the plea filing goes on, Qureshi 'well knew' that she had not interviewed S.R., and S.R. 'had not stated M.C. lived alone.' 'In a subsequent interview with S.R., DCIS Special Agents learned that M.C. lived at the Lancaster residence with four roommates and that two rooms at the residence were used as vacation rentals,' the plea continues, adding that Qureshi's 'false statements were material to the decisions' that followed by DCSA as to granting M.C. a security clearance. The plea agreement, which does not specify if M.C.'s clearance was ultimately approved or not, says CACI then pulled a sample of Qureshi's other background investigations, to recheck her work. Of the cases CACI reviewed, it came to find out that 'six individuals claimed they had not been interviewed' at all by Qureshi, who, the plea maintains, 'submitted six separate reports stating that she had interviewed those individuals and provided factual narratives of their conversations.' As a result, the plea says CACI fired Qureshi in August 2021. Once she was gone, the Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency 'reworked the 299 background investigations' Qureshi had conducted over the prior year, for which she had spoken to 1,025 sources, according to the plea. In all, it says special agents discovered no fewer than 39 false reports, and pegs the cost of redoing them at $240,306.04. Two months later, Qureshi hired on as an investigator at a pair of other federal contractors, Omniplex World Services Corporation and ADC Ltd., the plea filing states. It says the two companies had contracts with DHS to perform background checks on prospective employees applying for jobs at the agency. Between late October 2021 and February 2024, when the DHS Office of Inspector General connected the dots and had Qureshi removed from all assignments connected to the agency, she conducted 608 background investigations on applicants to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, according to the plea. Messages seeking comment sent on Wednesday to CACI, Omniplex and ADC went unanswered. In 2020, another CACI employee conducting security clearance investigations for DCSA pleaded guilty to fabricating nearly 70 reports in 11 months. Two years later, a Defense Counterintelligence Security Agency staffer pleaded guilty to falsifying reports as part of security clearance investigations. In 2024, another agency investigator pleaded guilty to near-identical charges, admitting to having made up more than 40 security clearance interviews that never actually took place. Qureshi pleaded guilty to one count of making false statements, a charge that carries up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. In Qureshi's case, however, prosecutors are recommending she be sentenced to probation and home detention. Qureshi is due to appear in court on June 16.

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign sues over Musk election payments
Wisconsin Democracy Campaign sues over Musk election payments

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign sues over Musk election payments

Tesla CEO Elon Musk listens as President Donald Trump speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign is suing billionaire Elon Musk over allegations that he violated multiple state laws, including the election bribery statute, when he offered voters a potential $1 million award for signing a petition as part of his effort to sway the result of Wisconsin's April Supreme Court election. Represented by Wisconsin's Law Forward, Democracy Defenders Fund and New York-based law firm Hecker Fink, the lawsuit accuses the world's richest man of implementing 'a brazen scheme to bribe Wisconsin citizens to vote.' Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, played a major role in this spring's election becoming the most expensive judicial campaign in American history. Musk's involvement in the race, which came as he was leading President Donald Trump's cost-cutting initiatives and firing thousands of federal employees through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), was widely seen as causing a backlash and helping Dane County Judge Susan Crawford defeat Musk-backed Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel. Musk and his PAC spent more than $20 million on the race. Prior to the election, America PAC offered voters $100 if they signed a petition 'in opposition to activist judges,' and another $100 if they referred another voter to sign the petition. Later, at a pre-election rally in Green Bay, Musk handed out two $1 million checks to voters, which had been advertised as awards 'in appreciation for you taking the time to vote.' The lawsuit, filed in Dane County court, notes it is against the law to offer anyone more than $1 to induce them to go to the polls, vote or vote for a particular candidate. 'By offering and paying Wisconsin citizens amounts far greater than $1 to vote, Defendants violated Wisconsin's election bribery law,' the lawsuit states. 'Defendants' payments and offers of payment to Wisconsin voters, made with the clear intent to aid one candidate and induce Wisconsinites to vote, threatened the integrity of the election and damaged public confidence in the electoral system.' Jeff Mandell, Law Forward's general counsel, said the lawsuit was meant to prevent efforts like Musk's from becoming a regular occurrence. 'We are fighting for free and fair elections,' Mandell said. 'We believe our democracy demands better than schemes like the one detailed in our complaint. So, we are working to hold Musk accountable and stop this from becoming the new normal.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store