logo
Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Forbes29-04-2025

Disembarking operations from the ship Geo Barents on December 11, 2022 in Salerno, Italy. (Photo by ... More)
Figures from a new report show that more people were prosecuted around Europe in 2024 for rendering assistance to irregular migrants than in previous years. Such 'criminalization' is becoming more common, as the EU's leadership and individual member states try to crack down on irregular migration.
In the final episode of Seinfeld, the gang are hauled in front of a small town judge for failing to help someone that was visibly in distress, violating as they did the town's 'Good Samaritan' law. In a case of life not so much imitating art as inverting it, ever more people are being prosecuted for exactly the opposite: helping someone in need. It's a relatively novel crime known as migrant 'facilitation.'
The specific charges that relate to helping irregular migrants differ between individual member states, though many states' laws derive from the EU's 2002 'Facilitation Directive.' Activities that could be considered 'facilitation' under individual member state and EU law include rescuing or aiding people in distress at sea, driving them across a border or providing them with food, clothing or shelter. Increasingly, humanitarian aid is also being targeted, with five people currently facing charges of facilitation in Poland for distributing aid.
Sometimes 'facilitation' can mean the very act of crossing a border oneself. That is to say, asylum seekers and other irregular migrants are themselves prosecuted for taking part in their own journey, whether that be some kind of active participation (say being compelled to steer a boat or distribute food and water to companions), or merely 'facilitating' one's own crossing of a border – which is to say crossing it.
Such prosecutions are becoming increasingly common around Europe and the United Kingdom, as political pressure mounts on governments to reduce the amount of people arriving in Europe, outside of normal channels, in order to seek shelter. These policymakers are often unable to pull more direct policy levers, such as just closing borders or summarily deporting people, given EU and international legal law (though these levers are often pulled informally). Instead, wealthy nations are turning to a raft of other measures intended to deter people from attempting to reach Europe, as well as disrupting the operations of those people trying to help them.
'Across Europe, member states have targeted individuals and NGOs providing non-profit humanitarian assistance - such as food, shelter, medical care, or legal advice - with criminal investigations and prosecutions,' reads a recent policy statement from Amnesty International.
The latest report from Brussels-based charity the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), looking into the prevalence of such 'criminalizations' around Europe, shows they are indeed increasing. In 2024, at least 142 people faced judicial proceedings for helping or rescuing irregular migrants in some form. This number – very likely to be an undercount- is up from the 117 people recorded as criminalized in 2023, and the 89 people between January 2021 and March 2022.
'This is the fourth year in a row that we document increasing levels of criminalization of both migrants and people who help them,' said PICUM advocacy officer Silvia Cara. 'And what we're able to monitor is just the tip of the iceberg.'
An Italian police officer stands by the Iuventa rescue ship run on August 4, 2017. Italian ... More authorities impounded the Iueventa on suspicion of facilitating illegal immigration, police said. The crew were acquitted in 2024. (Photo credit BELLINA FRANCESCO/AFP via Getty Images)
The lion's share of criminalizations were for helping people in distress at sea. This is unsurprising given the focus in recent years on the search-and-rescue NGOs working in the Mediterranean. In recent years – and in particular since the period of high irregular migration across various parts of the Mediterranean beginning in 2015 – a loose group of charity rescue organizations has emerged, known informally as the 'civil fleet,' to fill the gap left when EU state rescue patrols ended.
In the years since, the various rescue boats of the civil fleet – operating within international maritime law – have brought tens of thousands of asylum seekers to European shores, much to the chagrin of leaders such as Italy's Giorgia Meloni, who was elected on a largely anti-migration platform. Italy and Greece tend to receive the majority of irregular arrivals and both governments have pursued various tactics to disrupt the operation of NGOs and other groups working to support people seeking shelter, as well as prosecuting individual migrants. In Greece, migrants prosecuted under 'facilitation' laws in fact make up the second largest prison population in the entire country, with thousands locked up or awaiting trial.
The United Kingdom – though not included in this PICUM report – is another clear example of the criminalization strategy. In recent years hundreds of people – including dozens of minors – have been prosecuted under new or augmented laws for 'facilitating' their own or others' journeys. People prosecuted under such laws face heavy sentences and are all but guaranteed deportation if convicted.
The PICUM report also highlights some emergent avenues for criminalization. For instance, 17 people were charged in 2024 for taking part in protests or demonstrations in support of irregular migrants, without apparently having any direct contact with them. NGOs working on irregular migration have long feared being accused of 'facilitation' for providing information on, for instance, the European asylum system. These 17 prosecutions add weight to the idea that merely supporting someone's right to seek asylum could be considered a crime.
The PICUM report shows the impact the trend towards criminalization is having on European civil society and individual migrants, accompanied as it is by other measures such as non-administrative sanctions and disruption targeting solidarity organizations. NGOs and civil society groups have long decried such practices, not least as they often constrain groups trying to rescue people in distress, plausibly leading to a higher death toll along some of Europe's most dangerous migration routes.
'The criminalization of solidarity with migrants is deeply tied with the criminalization of migration itself,' said PICUM's Silvia Carta. 'These are (…) migration policies that make border crossing unsafe and create a hostile environment against those who are considered to have entered in an irregular manner.'
Despite civil society resistance, the EU plans to increase the use of criminalization as a tool for reducing migration. The EU's 'Facilitation Directive,' mentioned previously, will soon be getting an update. The new directive, proposed by the European Commission in 2023, will likely provide a framework for individual member states to further prosecute people who directly assist, or simply interact in some way with, irregular migrants. As well as humanitarian workers, and migrants themselves, anyone who engages in a financial transaction with people on their journey (think taxi drivers, shopkeepers, hotel owners) could be targeted.
Amid this legislative push for an updated facilitation directive, and absent any easing of concerns over irregular migration in Europe, it appears likely that next year's report will show even more people prosecuted for this novel offense.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Schiraldi out at Department of Juvenile Services, Gov. Wes Moore says
Schiraldi out at Department of Juvenile Services, Gov. Wes Moore says

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Schiraldi out at Department of Juvenile Services, Gov. Wes Moore says

A new acting secretary will take over Maryland's Department of Juvenile Services, replacing the embattled Vincent Schiraldi, Gov. Wes Moore said in a news release late Monday. Betsy Fox Tolentino will assume the post beginning Wednesday, according to the release from the governor's office. Schiraldi had served as secretary of the department since 2023. 'We knew when we took office that the Department of Juveniles Services was one of the most troubled in all of State government. We need to continue to move fast and diligently in order to turn it around,' Moore said in a statement Monday. Tolentino comes to the government from the nonprofit The Roca Impact Institute, where she worked as the managing director of juvenile and young adult justice initiatives. She previously served the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services' Deputy Secretary of Community Operations, the statement said. 'I am thankful for Secretary Schiraldi's service to Maryland while leading an organization that shapes the lives of our young people who need support. I wish him well in his next endeavors,' said Senate President Bill Ferguson in the release from the governor's office. Schiraldi, chosen by Moore to helm an understaffed and financially mismanaged agency as firearm possession and car theft charges among Maryland youth increased, was heralded by many juvenile justice advocates as an expert in his field and an exciting pick to head the department responsible for tamping down youth crime. But his rehabilitative philosophy rattled Republican lawmakers, law enforcement, state prosecutors and members of the public who believe the state's juvenile justice system lacks oversight and accountability for children who commit crimes. Before coming to Maryland, Schiraldi founded the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco and the Washington-based Justice Policy Institute, which focuses on reducing the use of incarceration in the U.S. He then served as director of the Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services in Washington, D.C., for five years before taking a post in New York City. 'Vinny Schiraldi brought decades of experience and innovative thinking to the task of running the Maryland Department of Juvenile Services,' Moore said in the statement. Schiraldi contended that he inherited a department riddled with problems when he was appointed secretary by Moore at the beginning of his term. According to Schiraldi, programs and services for kids in need atrophied under the previous administration after the agency returned nearly $10 million of its annual budget for the better part of a decade. When lawmakers expressed dismay that reform wasn't happening quickly enough, Schiraldi pleaded for patience. 'This is an oil tanker, not a speed boat,' Schiraldi said of the Department of Juvenile Services. Maryland's senate Republicans applauded the shake-up Monday, saying Schiraldi's outsting was 'long overdue.' 'He presided over widespread failures: violent juveniles released with no real supervision, repeated contract mismanagement, dangerous missteps in ankle monitoring, and frontline staff left to fend for themselves,' said Senate Minority Leader Steve Hershey in a statement. 'But just as damaging was his refusal to work with anyone. Law enforcement, state's attorneys, local leaders, legislators all lost confidence in his leadership.' Have a news tip? Contact Racquel Bazos at rbazos@ 443-813-0770 or on X as @rzbworks.

The Dangerous Truth About the ‘Nonlethal' Weapons Used Against LA Protesters
The Dangerous Truth About the ‘Nonlethal' Weapons Used Against LA Protesters

WIRED

timean hour ago

  • WIRED

The Dangerous Truth About the ‘Nonlethal' Weapons Used Against LA Protesters

Jun 9, 2025 6:42 PM While they can cause serious injuries, 'nonlethal' weapons are regularly used in the United States to disperse public demonstrations, including at the recent ICE protests in Los Angeles. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers stand guard and point nonlethal projectile weapons toward protesters on June 7, 2025 in Los Angeles. Photograph:In a stormy weekend for US domestic politics, police and the National Guard arrested at least 56 people demonstrating in Los Angeles, California. On Friday, June 6, several groups took to the streets to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids, which have grown in intensity and number over the past few months. According to CBS News, ICE recorded more than 2,000 arrests per day during Tuesday and Wednesday of the first week of June alone, a considerable increase when compared to the average of 660 that occurred in the first 100 days of Donald Trump's second administration. The use of the National Guard to address a local situation like the protests in Los Angeles raised alarms from California governor Gavin Newsom, who accused the Trump administration of 'creating a crisis.' Meanwhile, other civil society groups condemned the state response against protesters. 'President Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles in response to protests against recent ICE raids is deeply alarming,' Amnesty International wrote. 'Armed troops have no place in our neighborhoods. This is not about protecting communities, but about suppressing dissent and instilling fear.' During the scenes, protesters came face-to-face with National Guard and Los Angeles Sheriff's Office police officers. Both bodies were equipped with 'nonlethal' weapons to disperse the protests. Among these devices are believed to be the PGL-65 (or P540) or the 37mm or 40mm Sage Deuce Projectile Launcher, 'less lethal' ammunition launchers that law enforcement agencies have in their repertoire. Weapons such as those mentioned can launch tear gas grenades with a maximum range of nearly 500 feet. They can also fire kinetic impact grenades (rubber ammunition), 'less lethal' fragmentation grenades (rubber balls that scatter when the munition explodes), stun grenades (explosions that cause loud noises and lights to disorient), and paint marker grenades (to mark demonstrators). According to media outlets such as CNN, police in Los Angeles have used stun guns and tear gas to disperse protesters. Weapons Banned Abroad Canada prohibits the use of these 'nonlethal weapons' for demonstration control. Canada's Firearms Regulations (SOR/2020-96 and SOR/98-462) include the PGL-65, Sage Deuce, and other equivalent models within the category of banned weapons. The statute restricts the use of 'Any firearm with a (bore bore) diameter of 20 mm or more' (except those designed exclusively to neutralize explosive devices) under the 'regulations establishing certain firearms and other weapons, components and parts of weapons, accessories, cartridge magazines, ammunition and projectiles as prohibited or restricted.' Although Canada is among the few countries that explicitly prohibit the PGL-65, civil society organizations discourage its use and warn about the potential dangers of this launcher. The Los Angeles police force also uses another 'less lethal' projectile launcher against protesters. WIRED was able to verify that this weapon matches the Defense Technology 40mm Single-Shot Launcher (model 1325 or similar), which in this case is painted green to distinguish its 'anti-riot' application. A video from the Australian site 9News shows how one of these police officers shot an Australian journalist with what was reportedly a rubber bullet. This weapon appears in other images that media and citizens have documented during the protests. Riot police in Los Angeles fire a 40mm LMT weapon from Defense Technology, which is banned by the Geneva conventions, the 'recommendations' for the application of kinetic projectiles (such as the Model 1325) discourage police from aiming at protesters' faces, as they could result in 'skull fractures and brain damage, eye damage (including permanent blindness) and even death.' The use of kinetic projectiles from an elevated area, such as at a protest, can increase the risk of protesters being shot in the head. Targeting the torso can cause damage to vital organs and result in body penetration, especially when fired at close range. The caliber and velocity of the projectile, as well as the material from which they are made, will also influence the seriousness of the injury. In addition, the Geneva conventions specify the circumstances of possible illegal uses of these weapons and lay down the rules: Kinetic projectiles should not be fired in automatic mode. Firing multiple projectiles at the same time does not comply with the principles of necessity and proportionality. The impact of projectiles should be tested and authorized to ensure that they are accurate enough for a safe area without using excessive energy that could cause injury. Kinetic ammunition weapons should not be used to target the face, face or neck. 'Less Lethal' The vast majority of countries keep confidential the specific name of the models they use to deter protests. Some governments, for example, register purchases under generic designations, such as '40 mm launchers,' without citing the make or model, making accountability and verification of the illegal use of these devices difficult. For example, in Mexico, the Secretariat of National Defense launched tender LA-007000999-E818-2022 in November 2022 for the purchase of 70,000 long- and short-range 40-mm caliber gas projectiles, along with smoke ammunition and liquid marking, according to El Universal. The specifications do not show brands or models of the launcher or manufacturers. Only countries, such as Canada, include the makes and models of their 'nonlethal' weapons. Similar records do not exist in Mexico or Latin America. The application of weapons such as the Penn Arms GL-1 or similar, as well as the Defense Technology 1325, is seen in social protests, often documented by Amnesty International, which accuses them of abusive use against peaceful civilians. And, while touted as 'less lethal,' they can cause serious injuries and human rights violations. In addition, the organization, in its 2023 report 'My Eye Exploded,' demands that the use of 40-mm gas or impact projectiles against peaceful civilians be suspended. According to an assessment by Chile's National Human Rights Institute, police actions during the protests that began in October 2019 resulted in more than 440 eye injuries, with more than 30 cases of eye loss or eye rupture. This story was originally published on WIRED en Español and has been translated from Spanish.

Leaders of ‘orgasmic meditation' women's wellness company OneTaste convicted in forced labor trial
Leaders of ‘orgasmic meditation' women's wellness company OneTaste convicted in forced labor trial

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Leaders of ‘orgasmic meditation' women's wellness company OneTaste convicted in forced labor trial

NEW YORK (AP) — The leaders of a sex-focused women's wellness company that promoted 'orgasmic meditation' have been convicted of federal forced labor charges. A Brooklyn jury on Monday found Nicole Daedone, founder of OneTaste Inc., and Rachel Cherwitz, the California-based company's former sales director, guilty of forced labor conspiracy after deliberating for less than two days following a roughly monthlong trial. Daedone's defense team had cast her as a 'ceiling-shattering feminist entrepreneur' who created a unique business around women's sexuality and empowerment. But prosecutors argued the two women ran a yearslong scheme that groomed adherents — many of them victims of sexual trauma — to do their bidding. They said Daedone and Cherwitz used economic, sexual and psychological abuse, intimidation and indoctrination to force OneTaste members into sexual acts they found uncomfortable or repulsive, such as having sex with prospective investors or clients. The two told followers the questionable acts were necessary in order to obtain 'freedom' and 'enlightenment' and demonstrate their commitment to the organization's principles. Prosecutors said OneTaste leaders also didn't pay promised earnings to the members-turned-workers and even forced some of them to take out new credit cards to continue taking the company's courses. OneTaste started in San Francisco around 2005 as a sort of self-help commune that viewed female orgasms as key to sexual and psychological wellness and interpersonal connection. A centerpiece was 'orgasmic meditation,' carried out by men manually stimulating women in a group setting. The company quickly opened outposts from Los Angeles to London following glowing media coverage in the 2010s. At the time, OneTaste was portrayed as a cutting-edge enterprise that prioritized women's sexual pleasure. But Daedone sold her stake in 2017 — a year before OneTaste's marketing and labor practices came under scrutiny. The company's current owners, who have rebranded it the Institute of OM Foundation, have said its work has been misconstrued and the charges against its former executives were unjustified.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store