logo
Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Migration: More People Prosecuted For Helping Migrants In 2024

Forbes29-04-2025
Disembarking operations from the ship Geo Barents on December 11, 2022 in Salerno, Italy. (Photo by ... More)
Figures from a new report show that more people were prosecuted around Europe in 2024 for rendering assistance to irregular migrants than in previous years. Such 'criminalization' is becoming more common, as the EU's leadership and individual member states try to crack down on irregular migration.
In the final episode of Seinfeld, the gang are hauled in front of a small town judge for failing to help someone that was visibly in distress, violating as they did the town's 'Good Samaritan' law. In a case of life not so much imitating art as inverting it, ever more people are being prosecuted for exactly the opposite: helping someone in need. It's a relatively novel crime known as migrant 'facilitation.'
The specific charges that relate to helping irregular migrants differ between individual member states, though many states' laws derive from the EU's 2002 'Facilitation Directive.' Activities that could be considered 'facilitation' under individual member state and EU law include rescuing or aiding people in distress at sea, driving them across a border or providing them with food, clothing or shelter. Increasingly, humanitarian aid is also being targeted, with five people currently facing charges of facilitation in Poland for distributing aid.
Sometimes 'facilitation' can mean the very act of crossing a border oneself. That is to say, asylum seekers and other irregular migrants are themselves prosecuted for taking part in their own journey, whether that be some kind of active participation (say being compelled to steer a boat or distribute food and water to companions), or merely 'facilitating' one's own crossing of a border – which is to say crossing it.
Such prosecutions are becoming increasingly common around Europe and the United Kingdom, as political pressure mounts on governments to reduce the amount of people arriving in Europe, outside of normal channels, in order to seek shelter. These policymakers are often unable to pull more direct policy levers, such as just closing borders or summarily deporting people, given EU and international legal law (though these levers are often pulled informally). Instead, wealthy nations are turning to a raft of other measures intended to deter people from attempting to reach Europe, as well as disrupting the operations of those people trying to help them.
'Across Europe, member states have targeted individuals and NGOs providing non-profit humanitarian assistance - such as food, shelter, medical care, or legal advice - with criminal investigations and prosecutions,' reads a recent policy statement from Amnesty International.
The latest report from Brussels-based charity the Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), looking into the prevalence of such 'criminalizations' around Europe, shows they are indeed increasing. In 2024, at least 142 people faced judicial proceedings for helping or rescuing irregular migrants in some form. This number – very likely to be an undercount- is up from the 117 people recorded as criminalized in 2023, and the 89 people between January 2021 and March 2022.
'This is the fourth year in a row that we document increasing levels of criminalization of both migrants and people who help them,' said PICUM advocacy officer Silvia Cara. 'And what we're able to monitor is just the tip of the iceberg.'
An Italian police officer stands by the Iuventa rescue ship run on August 4, 2017. Italian ... More authorities impounded the Iueventa on suspicion of facilitating illegal immigration, police said. The crew were acquitted in 2024. (Photo credit BELLINA FRANCESCO/AFP via Getty Images)
The lion's share of criminalizations were for helping people in distress at sea. This is unsurprising given the focus in recent years on the search-and-rescue NGOs working in the Mediterranean. In recent years – and in particular since the period of high irregular migration across various parts of the Mediterranean beginning in 2015 – a loose group of charity rescue organizations has emerged, known informally as the 'civil fleet,' to fill the gap left when EU state rescue patrols ended.
In the years since, the various rescue boats of the civil fleet – operating within international maritime law – have brought tens of thousands of asylum seekers to European shores, much to the chagrin of leaders such as Italy's Giorgia Meloni, who was elected on a largely anti-migration platform. Italy and Greece tend to receive the majority of irregular arrivals and both governments have pursued various tactics to disrupt the operation of NGOs and other groups working to support people seeking shelter, as well as prosecuting individual migrants. In Greece, migrants prosecuted under 'facilitation' laws in fact make up the second largest prison population in the entire country, with thousands locked up or awaiting trial.
The United Kingdom – though not included in this PICUM report – is another clear example of the criminalization strategy. In recent years hundreds of people – including dozens of minors – have been prosecuted under new or augmented laws for 'facilitating' their own or others' journeys. People prosecuted under such laws face heavy sentences and are all but guaranteed deportation if convicted.
The PICUM report also highlights some emergent avenues for criminalization. For instance, 17 people were charged in 2024 for taking part in protests or demonstrations in support of irregular migrants, without apparently having any direct contact with them. NGOs working on irregular migration have long feared being accused of 'facilitation' for providing information on, for instance, the European asylum system. These 17 prosecutions add weight to the idea that merely supporting someone's right to seek asylum could be considered a crime.
The PICUM report shows the impact the trend towards criminalization is having on European civil society and individual migrants, accompanied as it is by other measures such as non-administrative sanctions and disruption targeting solidarity organizations. NGOs and civil society groups have long decried such practices, not least as they often constrain groups trying to rescue people in distress, plausibly leading to a higher death toll along some of Europe's most dangerous migration routes.
'The criminalization of solidarity with migrants is deeply tied with the criminalization of migration itself,' said PICUM's Silvia Carta. 'These are (…) migration policies that make border crossing unsafe and create a hostile environment against those who are considered to have entered in an irregular manner.'
Despite civil society resistance, the EU plans to increase the use of criminalization as a tool for reducing migration. The EU's 'Facilitation Directive,' mentioned previously, will soon be getting an update. The new directive, proposed by the European Commission in 2023, will likely provide a framework for individual member states to further prosecute people who directly assist, or simply interact in some way with, irregular migrants. As well as humanitarian workers, and migrants themselves, anyone who engages in a financial transaction with people on their journey (think taxi drivers, shopkeepers, hotel owners) could be targeted.
Amid this legislative push for an updated facilitation directive, and absent any easing of concerns over irregular migration in Europe, it appears likely that next year's report will show even more people prosecuted for this novel offense.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FTC sues reseller for faking accounts to grab Taylor Swift Eras tickets
FTC sues reseller for faking accounts to grab Taylor Swift Eras tickets

USA Today

time30 minutes ago

  • USA Today

FTC sues reseller for faking accounts to grab Taylor Swift Eras tickets

Federal regulators are suing a ticket broker they say used fake accounts to snag Eras Tour tickets and sell them at a markup. Hot on the heels of Taylor Swift's "The Life of a Showgirl" announcement, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint in Maryland federal court on Aug. 18. The paperwork accused ticket reseller Key Investment Group of using thousands of fake or purchased Ticketmaster accounts to snag tickets to events and resell them at higher rates. The FTC said for one of the Eras concerts, the Baltimore-based company deployed 49 different accounts to seize 273 tickets, evading the six-ticket purchase limit. Key Investment Group operates resale sites such as Ticketmaster faced intense criticism after its botched 2022 sale of tickets to Swift's much-hyped Eras Tour, when billions of fans, bots and resellers overwhelmed the site. The company was forced to cancel a planned general public sale. Taylor Swift speaks out after Ticketmaster cancels her tour's general ticket sale: 'It pisses me off' "There are a multitude of reasons why people had such a hard time trying to get tickets and I'm trying to figure out how this situation can be improved moving forward," Swift posted to her Instagram story. "I'm not going to make excuses for anyone because we asked them, multiple times, if they could handle this kind of demand and we were assured they could. It's truly amazing that 2.4 million people got tickets, but it really pisses me off that a lot of them feel like they went through several bear attacks to get them." FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement that the lawsuit against Key Investment Group puts ticket sellers on notice that the agency will target those who "circumvent ticketing platforms' limits on ticket sales." The action is part of a broader crackdown President Donald Trump announced in March aimed at curbing exploitative reselling practices that raise costs for fans. Taylor Swift 'New Heights' highlights: Eras Tour inspired new album, no extra tracks, more Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to block the investigation, saying its purchases did not involve automated software or bots and did not violate the Better Online Ticket Sales (BOTS) Act. The company said in its lawsuit that the FTC has made it clear "they intend to use the BOTS Act to shut down the entire secondary-ticket market." On Monday, the FTC accused Key Investment Group and three of its executives of violating the BOTS Act as well as the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. Meanwhile, Ticketmaster and its parent, Live Nation Entertainment, are fighting a separate U.S. antitrust lawsuit alleging the company monopolized markets across the live concert industry. Contributing: Reuters. Don't miss any Taylor Swift news; sign up for the free, weekly newsletter This Swift Beat. Follow Taylor Swift reporter Bryan West on Instagram, TikTok and X as @BryanWestTV.

Trump will ignore crime reduction data for the political value of a show of force
Trump will ignore crime reduction data for the political value of a show of force

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump will ignore crime reduction data for the political value of a show of force

'They fought back against law enforcement last night, and they're not going to be fighting back long,' Donald Trump said of young people on a 'rampage through city streets' at his press conference this morning. 'See, they fight back until you knock the hell out of them, because it's the only language they understand.' Lay this comment against a series of executive orders about law enforcement and civil rights that the president has issued over the last seven months, and one consequence of the federalization of police in Washington DC becomes evident: Trump will ignore measured effectiveness in reducing crime for the political value of a show of force. 'There is no public safety emergency warranting the deployment of the national guard on DC streets or the federalization of the city's police force,' said Ryan Downer, legal director of the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, a Washington DC-based civil rights group that has litigated police brutality cases. Noting a sharp decrease in violent crime – reaching a 30-year low this year – Downer said that federalizing control of the district 'is an invitation for abuse. When you try to solve a problem of criminal behavior with overpolicing and harsher penalties … you see increases in police violence and police harassment. It's a call at the highest levels for police lawlessness.' Related: Trump spreads false narratives about DC crime – just as he did with LA Downer said his group would be vigilantly looking for stories to share about police abuses over the term of federal control of the district's police. But accountability under these conditions is complicated. Police officers almost anywhere else in the US are constrained both by state and federal law. If a local cop in New York or Los Angeles brutalizes someone in the course of an arrest, they can be arrested by either state or local police, and accountable to a state court and a prosecutor elected by local voters. Uniquely in the US, a serious felony in Washington DC is prosecuted not by the elected attorney general for the district, but by a federal prosecutor appointed by the president – Jeanne Pirro, TV judge turned US attorney for the District of Columbia. And a crime prosecuted in that federal court can be pardoned by the president, as we saw with the convictions of rioters from the January 6 insurrection. 'This is ultimately a problem of DC not having statehood,' said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington DC. The city council passes laws covering the district and the mayor controls the police force, but the president can declare an emergency that gives him control for 30 days, she said. 'He is acting under a pretextual emergency and extending the sort of blatant abuse of power over DC in a way that he could not do in any other jurisdiction as of right now.' Local organizations said they view Trump's declaration as yet another reason to call for statehood. 'Statehood is the only path to real accountability and local control. Without it, the current administration will continue to treat us as powerless and deploy power over us,' said Clinique Chapman, CEO of the DC Justice Lab. 'This latest overreach mirrors nationwide efforts to disempower Black-led cities, elected officials and prosecutors, while leaving federal agencies, unaccountable to our residents, in control of our justice system.' Violent crime is higher in Washington DC than the national average. But it is not among the most violent large cities in the United States today, and the number of incidents have been falling in Washington DC for about two years. Trump cited figures during the press conference from 2023, while ignoring precipitous drops in most categories of violent crime since. Violent crime overall was at a 30-year low on the day Trump took office this January. Decrying local leaders who 'demonize' and 'handcuff' aggressive police, Trump issued an executive order in April, Strengthening And Unleashing America's Law Enforcement To Pursue Criminals And Protect Innocent Citizens, calling for the federal government to withdraw its support for consent decrees and other federal oversight on civil rights and police brutality and for city to 'unleash high-impact local police forces'. Then he went on to test out the experiment in California. Over the objections of California governor Gavin Newsom, Trump called in nearly 5,000 national guard troops and to guard federal property in Los Angeles, a move facing a three-day hearing today for Newsom's federal court challenge. But Trump has also called in the national guard in Washington DC in the past. Troops were present during protests against police brutality in the summer of 2020. US park police dispersed hundreds of demonstrators in Lafayette Park in front of the White House during the protests using chemical irritants, rubber bullets, smoke bombs, flash grenades and a baton charge. Related: 'Red meat to throw to his base': DC residents on Trump's police takeover The federal government settled an ACLU lawsuit over the dispersal of peaceful protesters at Lafayette Park in 2022, agreeing to policy changes that restrict park police from arbitrarily withdrawing demonstration permits, allowing protesters to leave safely and to identify themselves clearly, and modifying Secret Service policy to make clear that uses of force and dispersals are not normally justified by the unlawful conduct of some individuals in a crowd. At the press conference on Monday, Trump seemed to ignore that completely and talked about the conduct of protesters writ large as justification for police violence. 'They're standing and they're screaming at them an inch away from their face, and then they start spitting in their face,' Trump said. 'And I said: 'You tell them you spit and we hit,' and they can hit real hard … People are spitting in their face, and they're not allowed to do anything, but now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.' The downward trend in violence in Washington is consistent with what's being reported in other large cities across the country, according to statistical tracking by the Council on Criminal Justice. But that may not matter if the president is ignoring data in favor of ideology and bluster. 'He made some pretty bold statements that I think should concern everyone in the country at that press conference,' Hopkins said. 'DC is being done now, but he is looking at other cities, right? He just can move more swiftly with DC.'

Gupta lawyers fail to appear for Trafigura fraud case hearing
Gupta lawyers fail to appear for Trafigura fraud case hearing

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Gupta lawyers fail to appear for Trafigura fraud case hearing

By Eric Onstad LONDON (Reuters) -Lawyers representing Indian businessman Prateek Gupta said they failed to appear for a hearing on Monday because of funding difficulties in a long-running fraud case brought by commodity trader Trafigura about nickel cargoes, a London court heard. Geneva-based Trafigura, a major industrial metals and oil trader, filed a lawsuit against Gupta in February 2023, alleging it had been the victim of a $600-million fraud involving nickel cargoes masterminded by Gupta and in which he and his companies participated. Gupta has said in his defence that Trafigura staff devised the scheme at the centre of the case to substitute low-value materials such as scrap for high-grade nickel. Trafigura and its employees have denied any knowledge of fraud. Gupta's lawyers Preston Turnbull informed Trafigura and the court on Friday that due to a lack of funding they would not be attending Monday's hearing regarding the use of documents in a separate arbitration case. "That is an excuse which has been routinely trotted out by the Gupta defendants throughout these proceedings when it had suited them to do so, and it is without any merit," Trafigura lawyer Edward Ho told Monday's hearing. Preston Turnbull did not respond to a request for comment. In March 2024, lawyers for Gupta told a court he had run out of funds to pay legal fees, and in June last year Gupta changed lawyers to Preston Turnbull from Mishcon De Reya. "The court has previously found, and I agree, that there are sources of funding available to the Gupta defendants," Ho added. "Alleged funding issues have been a recurring theme... to justify their failure to meet court deadlines and to comply with court orders." Judges have granted a succession of delays over many months to Gupta to meet deadlines for disclosure of documents relevant to the case, which is due to go to trial in November. Judge Robin Knowles on Monday granted Trafigura's request to use nine documents disclosed by Gupta in the current fraud case in a separate arbitration case due to be heard next month. The arbitration case involves Trafigura and Hong-Kong based Axiom Ltd because Trafigura sold one of the cargoes provided by Gupta to Axiom, which was found not to contain nickel, the court heard. (Additional reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Jan Harvey) Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store