Australia's current childcare funding model risks failing our most precious people
We don't need yet another series of reviews and reports to tell us that when you rely on the blunt-force of the market, you will see profiteering from government subsidies, lack of quality in service delivery dressed up as 'efficiency' to maximise profits, and next to no services in areas where there's little money to be made.
Australia's current funding model, the childcare subsidy (CCS), has facilitated the rapid expansion of for-profit providers, who now operate nearly 75% of all childcare services across the country.
Research shows that for-profit providers typically deliver lower quality care while charging higher fees than not-for-profit services.
Individual providers who are failing in their care for our most precious people should be held to account, but this is a systemic failure, and the broader fix will be a big, complicated job.
Many of those who work in the early childhood education sector will tell you that they struggle to provide quality education to our children and to keep them safe amid sometimes shocking lack of oversight and adherence to existing rules.
In a recent national survey of 2,000 members from the AWU, conducted before charges were laid against a worker in Victoria, one staff member from that state said 'I can't even guarantee the safety of the children and myself'. Of the educators surveyed, 77% said they were operating below minimum staffing requirements at least weekly, and 42% said it was happening daily.
The early childhood educators who I have met have been hard-working, kind, mostly women, who work for low pay to do incredibly important work. Some private centres are exceeding requirements and standards. But most are not, and the system is failing not only children and families, but the staff and organisations who are doing the right thing.
The ABC's Four Corners report in March revealed that one in 10 childcare centres in Australia have never been rated by regulators and pointed out that only 14% of for-profit centres meet national standards.
Those standards are set by the Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA), but it has no power to enforce them across a system which is managed by states and territories.
So how do we fix it?
This question needs to be tackled now, especially if the government is serious about implementing a universal early childhood education and care system, which it should be.
Evidence shows that children do most of their formative development under age five, and that quality early childhood education enables them to reach their full potential. That opportunity must be offered to all children in an equitable society.
Quality, accessible, affordable care also enables women to work. It begins to remove the innate disadvantages for women who begin a lifelong slide into lower wages, less superannuation and higher financial risk almost as soon as they walk out of school or tertiary education.
For those reading along who will now default to the simplistic just stay home with the kids position, get a grip. Single parents don't have a choice. Nor do couples who are struggling with the price of housing. This generation of parents may not have the option of one parent staying at home. Do not blame families for this.
Safe, quality, accessible, affordable care for our children is essential for families, women, children and the economy. But protecting profit for private providers should not be guiding policy.
What we need is better oversight and better regulation. Governments like being presented with solutions, so here are two.
First, as the National children's commissioner, Anne Hollonds, says, 'National cabinet must make 'child safety and wellbeing' a key priority.'
'Currently the word 'children' is entirely missing from the list of priorities for National Cabinet.'
We need a cabinet minister for Children. A minister would prioritise the litany of issues afflicting our kids, from the transformative opportunity to implement a universal early childhood education system, to youth safety and mental health, to the impact of social media and so on.
Secondly, we need an Early Childhood Commission to set a national approach to regulatory standards, so that everyone is meeting them, including the for-profit providers.
Earlier this year I joined The Parenthood, Goodstart Early Learning, Early Childhood Australia and Royal Far West calling for a national commission to set a national standard and weed out unscrupulous operators. It would also oversee the rolling out of a universal early childhood education system, a policy shift that could be as transformative as the introduction of Medicare for families, children and the nation.
Labor has the numbers and the mandate to leave this legacy.
Never waste a crisis.
Zoe Daniel is a three-time ABC foreign correspondent and former independent member for Goldstein
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘The whole back of my HiLux was covered in rats': what to do about Sydney's growing vermin problem?
Nathaly Haeren has seen patios in Sydney collapse because brown rats have tunnelled under and created sinkholes. She's been electrocuted in the roof of a house after they chewed through air conditioning wiring. She's even visited a hairdresser where they'd gnawed a circle through double brick. More recently, Haeren has started seeing rats standing in the street in the middle of the day, 'oblivious' and unbothered – like they just don't care. 'It's the destruction they cause that blows my mind, that scares me, because I'm competing against them,' the owner of Pesty Girls pest management says. 'Rats need to keep gnawing to keep their teeth down. Their strength is like iron. And they can flatten to the size of your thumb – they've got hinged ribs … I need to be 10 steps ahead.' Haeren says rats have become a problem 'all across Sydney'. And her requests have spiked to record levels since the pandemic. Anecdotally, numbers are high. A string of viral videos showing rat incursions into typically human spaces in recent months has instilled terror into the hearts of some Sydneysiders. In December, rodents made headlines when 'giant rats' were filmed 'brazenly' scurrying around the Westfield food court in Parramatta. A month later, at least half a dozen rats were filmed running wild in the kitchen of a late-night kebab shop on Oxford Street, deterring some from the business. But nobody really knows how many rats live in Sydney. There's no rat census and given that a rat's pregnancy lasts just three weeks and can produce a litter of more than a dozen pups, any population count is at risk of becoming quickly outdated. Haeren attributes their visible spread across the city to construction pushing them above ground and changing bin cycles allowing residential waste to sit for longer periods. New research suggests invasive rats are becoming increasingly resistant to poisons, posing challenges for councils and pest controllers. The study's author, Edith Cowan University PhD candidate Alicia Gorbould, says the finding should be a warning sign. 'Australia has been using these poisons for more than 50 years in an unchecked way, with few restrictions,' she says. 'Many countries are putting restrictions on regular pesticides, but if we continue as we are, we can also feed into that cycle of resistance. 'We need a more coordinated approach to rodent management, and that's not happening.' In 2019, the city of Sydney reported an increase in the vermin population that the council said had been encouraged by 'unprecedented' levels of construction. Sydney's first outbreak of leptospirosis, which is spread through rodent urine and killed seven dogs, was linked to the 2019 explosion in the rat population. The disease can also be fatal in humans. Rats have been associated with dozens of human diseases and parasites around the world, including indirectly spreading Lyme disease, plagues and typhus through fleas. Over the past 10 centuries, rat-borne diseases may have taken more lives than all of the wars ever fought. Since the 2019 outbreak, leptospirosis has popped up in urban areas around Sydney, the Australian Small Animal Veterinarians president, Julia Crawford, says. She and the founder of Southern Cross Vet, Sam Kovac, argue more research and surveillance are needed in order to prevent further outbreaks of the disease and deaths of beloved dogs. The harm rats can pose goes beyond our family pets. A city of Sydney spokesperson says the greatest health and safety risks posed by rats are disease transmission, food contamination via their droppings, urine and hair, and structural damage. The spokesperson says recent sightings and complaints also suggest rodents are a 'key concern' for residents in social housing estates, who shared communal bin rooms. The council spends about $240,000 a year on pest control. Alongside rat baits, it operates a 'risk-based rodent control program' on streets and at parks, manned by more than 100 staff and contractors with the assistance of 40 electronic multi-catch units in locations where rodent activity is high. The baits are rotated on a quarterly basis to prevent rats becoming resistant to their active ingredients. During severe infestations, licensed pest control contractors also carry out targeted burrow baiting. Across the state, councils and private operators are responding to concerns about increased rat populations with a mixture of methods. Shaun Bankowski has operated his pest control business, MOA Contract Shooting, throughout New South Wales since 2015. He says he has never been in higher demand to deal with rat outbreaks – from shopping centres to food manufacturing sites, chicken farms and warehouses. 'We've had sites where we've shot over 650 rats in four hours,' he says. 'The whole back of my HiLux was covered in rats – 15cm deep.' Most services use the integrated pest management method, which first eliminates the reasons why rats are drawn to the site, like clutter and food sources, then lays down traps and baits. But Bankowski says that's no longer sufficient. 'Say you've got 100 rats – 80% of them will die from the poison and the traps, but then you'll have that 20% that are immune,' he says. 'They breed up and then you've got a colony that's immune to poisons. 'I come in, get rid of as much as you can with a shoot and then drop poison on them. That usually knocks them out.' If it sounds grisly, he says, the rats die as humanely as possible. 'I can hit a 50c piece at about 120 metres,' he says. 'We always make sure that we got a clean shot, in the head or in the chest.' Urban rat numbers around the world are increasing due to climate change, urbanisation and growing human populations, forcing cities to grapple with whether to continue to fight the war on rats or concede defeat. In New York, the city's first 'rat tsar' was hired by the mayor in 2023, following a competitive application process that called for 'bloodthirsty' applicants who possessed 'killer instincts'. Not all cities have approached the issue with such murderous intent. In Paris, where there are estimated to be more rodents than people, the city authorities have transitioned from battling rats to investigating ways to peacefully coexist with them. 'No one should aim to exterminate Paris's rats and they're useful in maintaining the sewers,' the deputy mayor Anne-Claire Boux said in the lead-up to the 2024 Paris Olympics. 'The point is that they should stay in the sewers.' Research published in Urban Ecology in 2022 found rat management may be a 'wicked problem for which there is no overarching solution'. Rather than engaging in a 'war on rats', it said the focus should instead be on 'improving the overall health of the community, instead of on eliminating rats'. The study found in all major rat interventions, populations had either remained at consistent levels, or reduced dramatically and then bounced back. It also noted that they didn't just spread illnesses, but something more existential. The presence of rats, the report said, added 'anxiety and fear into the tapestry of issues that people face daily'. The black rat (Rattus rattus) and the brown or Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) arrived in Australia with the First Fleet in the late 1700s and their numbers quickly exploded, taking to Australia's shores so naturally that some settlers thought they'd always been here. But while the invasive species would spread disease, damage buildings and agriculture, pillage bird nests and disrupt the environment, more than 60 native species of rat had already lived in Australia for up to 4m years, causing little to no harm at all. The most common native species in cities is the bush rat, a shy rodent that was the unintended victim of a campaign to exterminate black rats during a plague epidemic in the early 1900s that killed about 500 people in Australia, mostly in Sydney. Peter Banks, a conservation biology professor at the University of Sydney, says native rats could now be Australia's secret weapon against invasive species. He's among academics that have been running programs to reintroduce bush rats to areas around the Sydney harbour they once inhabited, to block reinvasion by black rats. Bush rats may look similar to invasive species but they don't cause disease. They don't smell. They live largely separate lives to humans, hidden in burrows during the day and opting for a diet of seeds, fruit and nectar instead of our trash. 'Once we removed [black rats], the bush rats would fill the area, and really dramatically reduce the black rat population,' Banks says. 'They're quite symmetrical competitors – but the black rat really doesn't like a fight. They occupy the empty spaces in the natural world and if there's something there to give them a hard time, they don't thrive. 'They're really used to living off us, so by restoring the bush, we can make it unfriendly for [invasive] rats.' However, he says, 'there's an argument to be had that the urban environment is their natural environment. We think about them as pests, and they can be pests for us, but we don't go trying to wipe out other species in their natural habitats.' For now, at least, the rats are home too – and they're here to stay.
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: The 2,000 schools where more than HALF of pupils don't speak English as their first language... so is YOUR child's one of them?
English is no longer the first language for the majority of pupils at more than 2,000 schools, MailOnline can today reveal. No children at two primary schools – one in Tower Hamlets and another in Kirklees, West Yorkshire – have English as their mother tongue. Our statistics, obtained exclusively under Freedom of Information (FOI) laws, show nine in ten pupils don't speak only English at home at 107 schools. The full results of our audit, covering all 22,000 state schools, can be viewed in our search tool below. Bengali is the mother tongue of 92 per cent of the pupils at Kobi Nazrul, the primary school in Tower Hamlets where none of the kids solely speak English at home. The others speak a slew of other languages, including Indonesian and Urdu. At Pentland Infant in Dewsbury – the Kirklees school – the overwhelming majority of the children speak either Gujarati (36 per cent) or Panjabi (45 per cent). When broken down by languages, our FOI revealed Tottenhall Infant School, Enfield had the highest rate of Albanian speakers at 18 per cent. Sheffield's Netherthorpe Primary School topped the league table for Arabic (54 per cent), meanwhile Burnley Brow Community School in Oldham had the highest share of Bengali speakers (93 per cent). In terms of Chinese, St Cecilia's CofE Primary School in Wokingham, Berkshire, had the highest rate (28 per cent). Polish speakers were most heavily concentrated at St Cuthbert's Catholic Primary School in Windermere (43 per cent), while Urdu was most common at St Michael's CofE Primary School in Bolton (58 per cent). In total, English is no longer the first language for the majority of children at 2,039 schools. This includes deaf schools, where pupils' first language is BSL. Nationwide, English isn't the first language of 1.8 million pupils, or one in five pupils. Fuelled by immigration having spiralled to all-time highs, this has risen from 1.1 million ten years ago. The soaring numbers have raised concerns among critics that the slew of different languages can be incredibly disruptive in classrooms. Robert Bates, of the Centre for Migration Control, told MailOnline: 'It's a great shame that we have reached this point and it is evidence of successive governments failing to properly address assimilation issues. 'Multi-language classrooms are hugely problematic. They inevitably sap the precious time of teachers who are forced to devote additional attention to those with a weaker grasp of the language at the expense of those who only speak English. 'The resources used will be lowest-common-denominator teaching devices that provide little from the individuals to excel. 'They also foster long term division, with little incentive for those who do not speak English to improve their fluency. 'It is time for a sink or swim approach in which state funding for translation costs are stripped across the board, encouraging adult migrants and parents alike to devote greater attention to improving this pretty basic skill.' Schools have had to pivot their limited resources to provide for the needs of pupils who struggle with English. Strain has been placed on their tight budgets due to providing translated versions of resources, adding subtitling and voiceovers, as well funding in-class interpreters. Teachers have previously said schools were under mounting pressure from mass immigration and called on ministers to fund them properly to cope with the array of different languages that pupils speak. MailOnline's analysis showed the authority that had the highest rate of first language speakers other than English was Newham (66.4 per cent). Brent (63.7 per cent) and Harrow (63.6 per cent) rounded out the top three. On the other hand, our FOI found 97 per cent of children spoke English as their first language in Northumberland. Redcar and Cleveland (96.7 per cent) and Cornwall (96.1 per cent) came second and third, respectively. Experts warn that kids who aren't taught English before they get to school are less likely to do well. Ian Mansfield, head of education at Policy Exchange, said: 'These statistics demonstrate the very real pressure that mass immigration places on public services.' However, some studies suggest that pupils who speak English as a second language can outperform native speakers and their presence has no impact on the learning of other pupils. Despite the language barrier, Kobi Nazrul was regarded as 'friendly and welcoming' in a glowing report from Ofsted in its most recent inspection Depending on how close they are to English, both phonetically and grammatically, some languages can be very difficult to switch from. Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said: 'English is the glue that brings and holds us together as a country and helps new arrivals to blend in.' Mr Mehmet, who said he was the only non-English speaker at his east London school growing up in the 1960s, added: 'If teachers have to focus their attention on children who struggle to speak English because the language spoken at home is different, the time devoted to other pupils is bound to diminish.' Jim McConalogue, CEO at the think-tank Civitas said: 'You are effectively seeing the proportion of school-age pupils in England speaking English as an additional language continuing to steadily increase over time. 'Measures to ensure English language acquisition must therefore be prioritised. 'There are some short-term challenges that the DoE need to address for students who speak English as an additional language, as a lack of emphasis on English language provision can have a detrimental impact on both these students themselves and their classmates. 'Many policymakers talk about diversity and inclusion, but relatively little is being done to support English language acquisition. 'This omission creates deeper problems not only for the individual children but society at large, around a common citizenship, a shared language and identity, belonging and social cohesion.' Some politicians believe the high number of immigrants now entering the UK need to be integrated into society by the government properly. Shadow education minister Neil O'Brien said: 'These figures underline just how serious the challenge of integration has become in some parts of the country. 'Integration shouldn't be an afterthought, it must be a priority. 'The government has totally failed to stop the boats and numbers coming illegally are massively up. 'They abandoned our plans to raise income requirements on the family route. And as well as having no plan on immigration they have no plan on integration.' Some campaigners argue the Government needs to have more involvement in schools that have especially high numbers of foreign language speakers. Chris McGovern, of the Campaign for Real Education, said: 'The Government should publish the data regarding the language of pupils in each school and ensure that non-native speakers do not outnumber native speakers of English. 'This will benefit all pupils and allow our society to become more integrated, harmonious and at peace with itself.' The FOI data, from the Department of Education, reflects the state-of-play in January 2024. In it, schools have some flexibility about how they code pupils' language. DoE bosses define the first language as 'where the pupil has been exposed to a language other than English during early development and continues to be exposed to this language in the home or in the community'. A Government spokesperson said: 'This government is determined to break down barriers to opportunity so every child, including pupils who speak a language other than English, can achieve and thrive. 'Schools are best placed to understand the needs of their pupils with English as an additional language and are responsible for determining what support to put in place. 'Additional funding is provided to schools to support pupils who need help learning how to speak, read and write English. 'More widely, to better integrate migrants into their new communities this government will introduce a new English language requirement across a broader range of immigration routes.' MailOnline's investigation comes after Keir Starmer last month warned that mass immigration risks making Britain an 'island of strangers'. Scrambling to blunt the threat of Reform, the Prime Minister vowed to give Brits what they had 'asked for time and time again'. He unveiled a package to 'take back control of our borders'. The skills threshold will be hiked and rules on fluency in English toughened under the Government's plan to bring down annual inflows by around 100,000.
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
Primary schools
New primary school to open by September next year The school in Harlow will be relocated and expanded to cater for double the number of pupils.
