Kurdish and Syrian government officials meet after Paris talks canceled
Damascus had said it would not participate in the Paris talks after the Kurds hosted a meeting last week involving Syria's Druze and Alawite minority communities, which have been subjected to sectarian violence in recent months.
The event called for a decentralized state — a move repeatedly rejected by Syria's new authorities — and was effectively the first meeting to bring together representatives of several communities opposed to the approach and vision of governance of Syria's new authorities.
Elham Ahmad, a senior official in the Kurdish administration in Syria's northeast, met Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani "on Monday evening upon the request of the Damascus government," a Kurdish official told AFP, requesting anonymity.
A Syrian government source, also requesting anonymity, confirmed to AFP that the Damascus meeting took place, without providing further details.
The Kurds and Damascus have been holding talks on the implementation of a March 10 deal between Mazloum Abdi, head of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), and President Ahmed al-Sharaa on integrating the Kurds' semi-autonomous civil and military institutions into the state.
Implementation has been held up by differences between the two parties.
Monday's talks sought to affirm "the continuation of the negotiating process via intra-Syrian committees under international supervision," the Kurdish official said, adding that the sides agreed "there was no place for a military option."
"Discussions focused on finding an appropriate formula for decentralisation, without specifying a timeframe," the Kurdish official added.
Late last month, Syria, France and the United States said they agreed to convene talks in Paris "as soon as possible" on implementing the March 10 agreement.
Abdi said in a televised interview in July that the Paris meeting was set to discuss the mechanism for integrating his forces, which he said numbered around 100,000 personnel, into the country's defence ministry.
Several rounds of talks have been held but the process has largely stalled, with Kurdish officials criticising a constitutional declaration announced by the new authorities, saying it failed to reflect Syria's diversity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ya Libnan
2 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Whose Side Is Tom Barrack Really On?
File photo of U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack and Syria's interim president Ahmed Al sharaa , aka( Abu Mohammad al Golani , the former leader of al Qaeda linked al Nusra front ) By : Ya Libnan Editorial Board U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Tom Barrack recently stated that 'the Syrian government has pledged to devote all resources to holding accountable the perpetrators of the Sweida atrocities,' adding that Syria will cooperate with the United Nations to investigate the crimes committed there. He further emphasized a commitment to humanitarian aid for southwestern Syria and to protecting 'all components' of Syrian society from forces that seek to tear it apart. But this raises an urgent question: Whose side is Mr. Barrack really on? The whole world knows that Syrian government forces themselves are responsible for the Sweida massacre last July. Eyewitness accounts and credible reports point directly to the regime's involvement — not only in the killings during the attack, but also in the brutal follow-up assault on Suweida's hospital, where patients and medical staff were targeted. It is no secret that Ahmed Sharaa, now posing in a civilian suit, is in fact the same man once known as Abu Mohammad al-Golani, the notorious leader of the the Al Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front. The change of wardrobe has not erased his Islamist extremism or his history of violence. Yet the Syrian regime — now under his influence — continues to present itself to the world as a legitimate authority, while minorities in Syria suffer under its oppression. If Mr. Barrack truly wants the truth, he should skip the photo opportunities in Damascus and visit Sweida itself. He would hear directly from the families of the victims, from the religious and community leaders living under constant threat, and from those who have endured the destruction of their homes, their hospitals, and their future. Only then will he understand the reality: that the so-called Syrian government is not protecting its people — it is preying on them. The United States must stop lending legitimacy to Sharaa's blood-stained regime. Standing with dictators in suits is still standing with dictators — and history will not forgive those who chose comfort in the palace over truth in the streets of Sweida.
L'Orient-Le Jour
3 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
US, Jordan offer Syria support in upholding Sweida cease-fire
AMMAN — Syrian and Jordanian foreign ministers and a U.S. envoy agreed on Tuesday to form a working group to help Damascus uphold a cease-fire in Sweida province, rocked by recent sectarian clashes. In a joint statement issued after a meeting in Amman, Jordan and the United States said they "agreed to respond to the Syrian government's request to establish a trilateral working group [Syrian–Jordanian–American] to support the Syrian government's efforts to consolidate the cease-fire" in Sweida and "resolve the crisis" there. They also agreed to hold another meeting in the coming weeks. The Syrian foreign ministry said its top diplomat Asaad al-Shaibani met with Jordan's Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi and US envoy for Syria Tom Barrack to discuss "ways of strengthening cooperation and coordination between the three sides" in order to serve Syria's stability, "sovereignty and regional security." Damascus said the sides had agreed to form a working group "to support the Syrian government's efforts to consolidate the cease-fire in Sweida province, and work to find a comprehensive solution to the crisis." The meeting on Tuesday was a continuation of discussions held between the officials in Amman on July 19 about deadly clashes in the Druze-majority Syrian province of Sweida, where a week of sectarian violence killed 1,400 people before a cease-fire put an end to the bloodshed. Syria's minority communities have expressed concerns for their safety since December, when an Islamist-led offensive toppled longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad, who had presented himself as a protector of minorities. While the new Syrian authorities have repeatedly stated their intent to protect all of the country's ethnic and religious groups, the killing of more than 1,700 mostly Alawite civilians along the coast in March and the violence in Sweida have raised doubts about their ability to manage sectarian tensions. Barrack, in a post on X, described the talks on Tuesday as "productive", adding that the Syrian government had "pledged to utilize all resources to hold perpetrators of the Sweida atrocities accountable," using an alternative transliteration of the province's name. "Syria will fully cooperate with the U.N. to investigate these crimes, including the horrific violence at Sweida National Hospital," he added. Jordan's King Abdullah II separately met with Shaibani and Barrack, expressing his "support for Syria's efforts to preserve its security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity," a royal statement said. It noted "the importance of Washington's role in supporting the reconstruction process in Syria in a manner that preserves the rights of all Syrians." The king also said Jordan was ready "to share its expertise in all fields to help develop and strengthen the capabilities of Syrian institutions" and "noted the need to step up Jordanian-Syrian cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and preventing arms and drug smuggling," the statement added. According to the Syrian statement, the foreign ministers' meeting welcomed Damascus's efforts to "restore basic services, hold perpetrators of violations to account, and prepare the conditions for the return of displaced people to their homes."
Ya Libnan
5 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Iraqi Oil Ministry: We are studying the possibility of exporting oil through the Lebanese port of Tripoli.
The Iraqi Ministry of Oil announced that it is studying the possibility of exporting oil through the Lebanese port of Tripoli, noting that it will consider REVAMPING the oil export pipeline between Iraq and Syria. The ministry added that it will form a joint committee to assess the pipeline's condition. The announcement came during a visit by the Syrian Energy Minister to Baghdad to discuss cooperation in the oil, gas, and energy sectors. Iraq sent a high-level delegation to Damascus in April to assess the feasibility of renewing its oil pipeline with Syria, a step Baghdad is counting on to diversify its export outlets amid an expansion in its production capacity. the so called Kirkuk–Baniyas pipeline is a currently defunct crude oil pipeline built by the Iraq Petroleum Company from the Kirkuk oil field in Iraq to the Syrian port of Baniyas. The pipeline went into operation in April 1952 and was formally opened in November of that year Between 1982 and 2000 the pipeline was shut down by Iraq, due to Syrian support to Iran during the Iran–Iraq War. During the 2003 invasion of Iraq , the pipeline was damaged by U.S. air-strikes and remained out of operation since then. Iraq primarily exports its oil through its southern Basra terminals , which account for the majority of its exports and state revenue. Additionally, oil exports from the Kurdistan region are being delivered to the Iraqi State Oil Marketing Organization (SOMO) for export, following an agreement between Baghdad and the Kurdistan Regional Government.
